0xMarioNawfal
41K posts

0xMarioNawfal
@RoundtableSpace
@MarioNawfal’s Crypto & AI Account
Katılım Haziran 2022
6.3K Takip Edilen256.2K Takipçiler

ONE LOST VISIO FILE CREATED A TOOL USED BY MILLIONS
* Mermaid replaced drag-and-drop diagrams with Markdown-style text that AI can generate instantly
* Now powers diagrams across GitHub, Notion, Obsidian, VS Code, and more
Repo: github.com/mermaid-js/mer…

English

If you’re creating a Claude agent, these three prompts establish its identity, decision-making, and output quality:
1. Role
“You are an expert [role] whose primary goal is to [objective]. Stay within this scope and ask clarifying questions when information is missing.”
2. Rules
“Always prioritize accuracy over speed. Never invent facts. Explain assumptions, state uncertainty when appropriate, and verify requirements before taking action.”
3. Output Format
“Structure every response as: Summary → Analysis → Action Items → Next Steps. Use concise language, bullet points where helpful, and end with any open questions.”
These three prompts cover the essentials:
* Who the agent is (identity)
* How it should think (behavior and constraints)
* How it should communicate (consistent output)

English

AI JUST AUTOMATED THE ENTIRE JOB SEARCH
* Finds jobs, tailors resumes, and writes custom applications automatically
* Scores your fit and helps prepare you for interviews
Repo: github.com/MadsLorentzen/…

English

Someone fine-tuned a 9B model on Claude Mythos traces and it's pulling 1.9k likes on HuggingFace.
> 1M context window via YaRN rope-scaling
> +34 pts MMLU, +30 pts gsm8k-strict over base Qwen3.5-9B
> Native function calling, multimodal, vision, agentic
> Trained on 500M tokens of Claude Mythos chain-of-thought generated in-house
> Runs on llama.cpp, Ollama, LM Studio, KoboldCpp — 4-bit fits in under 6GB
A 9B model trained on frontier reasoning traces, running locally, 1M context window by default.
The gap between local and frontier is closing faster than anyone anticipated.
huggingface.co/empero-ai/Qwyt…

English

GLM-5.2 vs Sonnet 5 nearly identical benchmark scores, then the pricing hits.
> $1.4 vs $2 per 1M input tokens
> $4.4 vs $10 per 1M output tokens
Open weights, MIT licensed, self-hostable
Sonnet 5 edges it on SWE-bench. GLM-5.2 edges it on Terminal-Bench. The gap on performance is razor thin. The gap on cost and access is not.
Is "proprietary API only" still a defensible position when open weights are this close?

English

