@Eltonma 7800$ farmed today by this cluster you identified (6k addresses out of the 15k that received liquidity rewards today)
English
CryptoScam
41 posts
polygonscan.com/tx/0x794b3ac6a…
example of one transaction goes though because the bots are not fast enough to retreat their orders
English
@0xdanzu @Eltonma This cluster farmed 7836$ in rewards today, which is like 15% of the daily (excluding missing rewards from 28th).
Why can't you simply pay T+2 io T+1 so you can just filter out those addresses?
15,498 addresses received liquidity rewards today, out of which 6,041 are in cluster
English
I know how frustrating this is. We have a banning system that has been banning all accounts identified performing the attack. We’ll check this specific clusters
We even added strict checks on API creation last week which helped a bit. Today’s release won’t be instant, but that and the banning will work together to quickly clear attackers.
English
intel.arkm.com/explorer/addre…
This motherfucker is actually funding all his thousands of accounts to spam the rewards market. While I can easily checked all dozens of thousands of account that he creates, polymarket does not actively banning all his accounts and there are likely dozens of ppl using this bug. I am highly skeptical that on Monday they can really solve the ghost fill problem. And those lowlifes can easily created huandred of thousands accounts and on Monday they can still use them after the update.
If polymarket really wanted to solve the issue, they should at least make sure all accounts created since March (I understand they don’t want to affect legacy wallets) to adopt the new method. All legacy account that does not have at least some trading activity should go through kyc process (that way they don’t affect real user) and all linked account created by same ip address should be autobanned and only can be used after some kinda kyc process. Or I am pretty sure the problem will still persist after Monday
English
@Eltonma Less than 7% of rewards went to accounts with 0 volume so I don't think ghost fillers are getting that much
English
Just now I was debating whether to bond one market then I decide to pull the trigger to clear the book for 50k. I got filled 0 lol. Then I noticed my rewards % on that market changed from 5% to 92%. This is just sad 😢 I really hope that the Monday update poly promised can solve the issue otherwise it seems more and more idiotic to farm as you will get no rewards but real fills only. While cheaters got all rewards and no fills. @shayne_coplan
English
@mustafap0ly Pay the 500k$ in liquidity rewards missing from yday due to same bug that occured already 10 days ago! Thank you!
English
@devjoshstevens What about the 500k$+ not paid in liquidity rewards yday because of book snapshots taken every 2-3 minutes instead of 1 minute? Same bug that happened 10 days ago. Can we expect missing rewards to be recomputed and paid anytime soon? I'm owed 5 digits in missed rewards
English
Yesterday's CLOBv2 was a major release. 235M PUSD have been migrated so far, and a big credit to the team for the months of work that went into it. CLOBv2 is the first step toward fixing the root cause of failed transactions but standalone isn't the final fix for it.
The final fix ships Monday to stop failed transactions. It needed CLOBv2 to land first. Given the scope of the change, it also had to go through a full audit, which is why it's taken a little longer than we'd have liked.
I know how frustrating it is when a trade fails. We're on it. As we've said, we're going to make Polymarket's infrastructure the best in the industry. Bear with us as we continue to improve performance and reliability across the system.
English
@Eltonma We should have received 2x more even without considering ghost fills (lp rewards were accruing at 2-3x lower than they should for most of the time, can see it with total distributed being under 500k for the day)
English
Well it seems like nothing really changed much. After the upgrade the fake orders are still there and eating most of the rewards, while I should have gotten say 100k rewards yesterday I only got paid like 16k and fake bits might get a total of 2-300k payout. While farming both side with 100k+ orders. This is beyond sad. And diao also had an argument with me sad.
English
Maybe Polymarket LP Army could do its job of spamming about liquidity rewards accruing at 2-3x lower than it should (same issue as 10 days ago)
English
@Ethena_Eco @pendle_fi Who cares about any of your announcements when you guys have yet to pay S5 airdrop one month after its end? You guys do such a terrible job...
English
New USDe and sUSDe pools on @pendle_fi are live.
Pendle@pendle_fi
When Fast and Furious 7 came out, I remember thinking "YES, more Michelle Rodriguez!" On an unrelated note, here's episode 10 and 13 of your favourite @ethena pools on Ethereum: 💙 USDe (13 Aug 2026) 💙 sUSDe (13 Aug 2026) Vroom vroom 🚗🚀
English
Ethena has been working closely with affected parties this week in a supporting capacity and is participating with a contribution into @aave's coordinated DeFi relief effort following the rsETH related incident.
As part of a broader recovery initiative alongside other ecosystem participants, Ethena's contribution will go towards restoring the rsETH backing in support of an orderly resolution for stakeholders.
Aavethena.
English
English
@Eltonma @Autonomous_Chad I’m trying to understand why you’re the only one not affected by the LP calculation bug over the last 3 days.
English
@Eltonma You're back on top because those incompetent at Polymarket fucked up the sport rewards (getting 3-4x less than it should)
English
Ethena is hiring.
JBweb3@j_b_web3
Energy is building. In the past month we've added 3 new team members and we've opened more roles this week! Join @ethena! If you're in, or want to be in Crypto, no place better or more exciting. So much coming and work to do. Just be prepared to work hard. Top priorities Trading Tech Engineering Manager Senior Data Engineer Senior Loan Originator Head of Platform Engineering All the details here! jobs.lever.co/ethenalabs
Filipino
Today we'd like to announce an important proposal regarding Scroll's protocol and governance operations.
We're proposing to dissolve the Security Council and transition protocol admin control to a Scroll Admin multisig. We expect the transition to take place over the next ten days.
The council's cost relative to its actual usage over the past quarters no longer justified continuation. These resources are better directed toward building products and driving growth.
We've carefully weighed the security considerations that come with this change and are confident this is the most responsible allocation of resources at this stage. Security councils play an important role in the maturity of any protocol and that's why we will be working with key stakeholders to identify a new security council structure better adapted to current market conditions.
Our infrastructure is mature, thoroughly audited, and actively maintained by the engineering team that built it.
Scroll will continue operating under the highest security standards to safeguard users.
English
I am calling on World Liberty Financial @worldlibertyfi to publicly disclose who controls the single guardian EOA and the 3/5 multisig that govern the WLFI smart contract.
Every investor has the right to know who holds the power to freeze their assets.
Here is what on-chain records show: A single guardian EOA — which also sits on the multisig — blacklisted my wallet. That same address is the sole owner of a second guardian Safe with a threshold of 1.
This means one person — one single individual — has the unilateral power to freeze any token holder's assets. Seizing those assets requires a 3-of-5 multisig vote, but freezing requires only one signature.
Who is that person? The community deserves an answer.
Let me be clear about what this structure means: community governance and voting are meaningless. Every proposal, every vote, every claim of decentralized decision-making is theater. Real power — the power to freeze, to move funds, to control the protocol — sits with one anonymous EOA and a 3-of-5 multisig that answers to no one. The entire governance framework has been hollowed out from the inside.
A project that claims to stand for decentralization and financial freedom cannot concentrate this level of power in a single anonymous address. If the WLFI team has nothing to hide, they should have no difficulty identifying who controls these keys.
banteg@banteg
justin sun vs wlfi the original token deployed sep 2024 had no blacklist and no seizure, but it was upgradable. the blacklist was added in v2 on aug 24, 2025. 11 months after sun invested and one week before trading opened. on nov 19, 2025, another upgrade added batch reallocation, essentially seizing, justified with saving phished funds. whatever the paper contract said, the code for vesting contract supports cliff dates, linear schedules, and up to 8 segments per category. wlfi used none of these to restrict sun. they chose 20% instant lump-sum unlock, then punished him for using a fraction of it. the remaining 80% has no vesting schedule at all, 7+ months later, claimable() returns 0. the vesting contract has per-category schedules to enforce token lockups. what's interesting is wlfi has carved out a special category 3 specifically for justin sun, he's the only user in it. the other 519 investors are in category 1. 14 minutes before sun activated his wallet, wlfi's own 3-of-5 multisig configured category 3 to release 20% of his 3b allocation as freely transferable tokens at trading start. over the next 3 days sun transferred out 55m. a single guardian eoa (also on multisig) blacklisted him. that address is also the sole owner of a second guardian safe with threshold 1. so one person can freeze anyone, while seizing requires 3-of-5. meanwhile, the same multisig is using 5b wlfi as collateral on dolomite to borrow $250m in stablecoins. they represent 98% of all wlfi on dolomite and 86% of the protocol's entire borrow volume. two safes with the same five signers, running a usd1/usdc loop that recycles borrowed usd1 as collateral to borrow usdc and feed it back.
English
@justinsuntron Mama look the scammer that got scammed by bigger scammers is whining 🙄
English
Whoever is hiding behind this official account, step forward and identify yourself. Every action taken by the WLFI team to secretly implant backdoor controls over user assets, to freeze investor funds without disclosure or due process, and to treat the crypto community as a personal ATM, someone must be held personally accountable for these actions. As the largest investor in this project, I demand that those responsible come forward by name, instead of hiding in the shadows.
WLFI@worldlibertyfi
Does anyone still believe @justinsuntron ? Justin’s favorite move is playing the victim while making baseless allegations to cover up his own misconduct. Same playbook, different target. WLFI isn't the first. We have the contracts. We have the evidence. We have the truth. See you in court pal.
English
@worldlibertyfi With money you made insider trading the ceasefire motherfuckers?
English
2 days ago we repaid $15M USD1 on our WLFI Markets position. Today we repaid another $10M USD1.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
etherscan.io/tx/0xa4201f3d5…
etherscan.io/tx/0x0fe85aa82…
English
@missalpha_z Shut up scammer! Only open your dirty mouth once you have paid S2 airdrop
English
스크롤 팀과 함께하면서 우리가 잘하는 것과 못하는 것, 노이즈와 시그널을 분별하는 방법을 배우고, 다시 집중하는 법을 배운다.
오늘따라 안좋은 트윗이 쏟아지는데
Oh well, 일단 소부터 키워야지🐮
Wu Blockchain@WuBlockchain
Scroll (SCR), the first project to be traded pre-market on Binance, currently has a market capitalization of only $8.16 million, having fallen 83% in the past year. Scroll previously raised $50 million in 2023 at a valuation of $1.8 billion. Scroll has received praise from Vitalik and EF multiple times and is considered a benchmark for Ethereum's zkEVM.
한국어
@dcfgod @Scroll_ZKP Should be no surprise coming from a team of scumbags that did not have the basic decency to honor S2 airdrop...
English
That’s absolutely nasty work @Scroll_ZKP
How is this even a legal move?
Completely throws out the idea of a permission-less, self custodial, decentralized, etc. blockchain
If they don’t like what you’re doing (leaving their chain) they’ll manually increase the gas costs to the point where it’s impossibly expensive to do anything
Nice to see etherfi fully gone and on optimism now
Back to winning
Note: dcf cap seeded etherfi
Kairos Research@Kairos_Res
It appears @Scroll_ZKP transaction costs jumped massively as @Ether_Fi began their migration to Optimism. Total txn fees from EtherFi based products used to total $250 daily and have since jumped to roughly $16k a day Scroll's single sequencer began reporting inflated L1 gas prices to the L2 oracle contract with values significantly higher than actual Ethereum L1 conditions at around ~09:00 UTC on March 31st Is this the first example of a single sequencer being manipulated in what appears to be a potentially malicious manner?
English