EVILpartyOfficial

@GrizzledTexan @darwintojesus The people that told you otherwise lied to you. No one is saying lockdowns are good things with no consequences, but the aim was to reduce how quickly the disease spreads through the population

@GrizzledTexan @darwintojesus Here's the thing eith that phrase. You, and the majority of the public, dont understand the topic well enough to really investigate it. Masks and social distancing DO slow the spread respiratory, droplet spread infections, and DID slow the soread kf covid.

This is a myth. Doing science requires blind faith in 15-30 totally unproven assumptions. Why is it that people who say they love science know basically nothing about it?

@darwintojesus @BasicHeresy I dont think you understand the correlation vs causation thing...

Firstly, correlation doesn't equal causation. Secondly you're assuming that in reality if you hold a true belief you'll get better results, but that's an assumption about reality, not something you can actually test. So you have at least two problems here and you're not even addressing what I actually said.

If you believe that only evidence justifies a belief... That itself "only evidence justifies a belief" is also a belief. But what's the evidence for that? Ultimately beliefs have to based in something besides evidence.

@NoWarChristian Oh I didnt even get to the war crimes, genocides and what amounts to the sex slavery that your god commands the isrealites to engage in...if you want to go there we can though?

@TheHonestEvil Rethinking it, I guess Israel could’ve put the poor in prison like America does, that sounds more loving.

@NoWarChristian Thats what the bible says is okay. They they are property. That they can be inherited. Hell exodus gives you a way to hold a man's wife and children hostage to essentially force him into chattel slavery...

@TheHonestEvil Property, depends on the context. Objects? No.

@NoWarChristian So to be clear, owning, and treating people as property and objects is totally fine?

@TheHonestEvil x.com/nowarchristian…

@NoWarChristian Did you actually think I'd make the claim that the bible explicitly condones chattel slavery without having read the bible?

@NoWarChristian Lev 25:44 - 45 Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property.

@NoWarChristian So to be clear, you dont think that owning and treating as objects and property is wrong? (And yes the bible explicitly allows and condones chattel slavery)

@TheHonestEvil My guy, I don’t consider slavery evil in itself. The transatlantic slave trade? Yes, evil. So, this dog isn’t gonna hunt.

@NoWarChristian Notice how you completely skipped answering the question? Lets make it more explicit, can yiu give me a single explicitly anti-slavery christian group or writing from before the 17th century?

@TheHonestEvil Well, at least you’re honest about your evil

@BrockRiddickIFB The reason we dont use the relativity equations for most human cases is that the newtonian approximation gives the same results in them and are much easier to understand and solve...

@BrockRiddickIFB As I said when you previously made this claim. Outside of relativistic scales the relativity equations simplify to newtons equations. And yes the Cavendish experiment fits relativity perfectly.

So... Given the premise that BOTH the Einsteinian General Relativity Gravitational THEORY (unproven) and the Newtonian Classical Mechanics Gravitational THEORY (unproven) cant be applicable (ONE, at Most): Some questions: 👇 Question 1: [25 Marks] So Newton's THEORY applies for everything BUT "the orbit of the planet Mercury"? Question 2: [25 Marks] So Einstein's THEORY does not apply to the explanation of what Cavendish imagined in his shed? Question 3a: [25 Marks] If you, by some warped logic of imagination, challenge the premise and baselessly ASSERT that BOTH Einstein and Newton were correct, then at WHAT POINT of mass does the Einsteinian General Relativity Gravitational THEORY (unproven) overwrite the Newtonian Classical Mechanics Gravitational THEORY (unproven)? Question 3b: [25 Marks] Assuming that there is a CONTINUOUS (analog) spectrum for the application of both; at what point do BOTH the Newtonian Theory and Einsteinian Theory apply? (or is the Switchover INSTANTANEOUS (discrete) in nature? Hint: But be careful... because your science priests saw Flat Earthers on the horizon, and they are now FORCED to retreat, retract, recede into the Imaginary World of the Hypothetical \ Conceptual \ Abstract Quantum realm... Looking for the Quantum Graviton Particle, Theory (unproven)... 😎👍 [TOTAL: 100]

@oliverburdick Can you name any of those "500 witnesses" mentioned by paul in that creed? Everytime this claim is made i am convinced xtians don't understand what the word evidence means.

The real facts:

@SteveMcRae_ No because "i am unconvinced that a super natural being that can be described as a god exists" Is not a truth claim about anything but my lack of belief... "I believe a god exists" inherently means you think you know a thing about reality.

This is a false analogy. One could easily reframe in the negative and argue by similar means that "Theism is a lack of belief in the non-existence of God"

@AleMartnezR1 Cool, so give me an example of a thing you don't think is designed so we can compare and contrast it with desugned things?

1. If a thing or object has properties of order, purpose, follow regularities, and is subject to physical laws, then it is designed. 2. If it is designed, then it has a designer 3. The universe has order, purpose, follow regularities, and are subject physical laws. .: The universe has a designer

@darwintojesus Science consistently produces useful knowledge that has allowed us to advance our technology far beyond anything the people writing the bible even imagined.

the science works because science works because science works because science works because science works because science works because it works….

@BrockRiddickIFB Sure...thats why relativity equations simplify to newtons equations in non relatavistic scenarios?

You STILL believe in Classical Mechanics (Newton) to explain your Theory of Gravity (unproven). It has been disproven via planetary (unproven) inconsistencies. Science Priests were then FORCED to come up with damage control measures FAST FAST - Thus General Relativity (Einstein) was used as a Theory of Gravity (unproven) to plug the hole of inconsistencies. The IDEA of Gravity in Classical Mechanics and The IDEA of Gravity in General Relativity are completely irreconcilable. And yet, you STILL sit in your basement like a good little keyboard warrior - and regurgitate the disproven concepts of "Mass attracts Mass" as some type of justification of Gravity. ... sympathies

@SteveMcRae_ I know my mind better than you do. I have not seen sufficient evidence to believe that a supernatural being that could be described as a god exists. Lacking this evidence it is more parsimonious to assume that one does not exist than one does.

I guess I am needed again to explain to people that atheism is in fact a belief. I will take on any challengers who think they have the knowledge and skill level to prove me wrong with substantive evidence and logic. Good luck with that! Atheism: The belief there is no God.

@BrockRiddickIFB Proof, in the sense you're using it, only exists in mathematics.

Proof is Evidence Evidence is not Proof. If you dont understand a concept as simple and obvious as this, good luck trying to debunk a flat earther.