Basic Heresy

3.6K posts

Basic Heresy banner
Basic Heresy

Basic Heresy

@BasicHeresy

Truth is Heresy. NeoCon-Libertarian. Protestant-Atheist. Moral-Imperialist. Techno-Maximalist. Views are my own.

Katılım Aralık 2025
14 Takip Edilen106 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Basic Heresy
Basic Heresy@BasicHeresy·
The staggering amount of strawman arguments, misunderstandings of evolution and absurd implications of his own arguments are sending me… I will now systematically dismantle @aigkenham’s entire post (while steel manning and acknowledging truths/pseudo truths). This will be a long thread. Follow closely 👇
Ken Ham@aigkenham

Did dinosaurs once swim across what’s now the Atlantic Ocean to colonize Africa? Well, according to a new study, they must have completed this “once-in-a-million year event,” because, well, the dinosaur fossils are found in North America and then they show up in Morocco (North Africa), so . . . of course they swam hundreds of miles and somehow survived! (It’s just typical evolutionary storytelling!) According to evolutionary interpretations, 66 million years ago the continent of Africa was “a lone island continent,” like Australia is today, separated from what’s now North America by hundreds of miles of open water. But evolutionists have a problem. The remains of a member of the duck-billed dinosaur family that evolved in North America were recently found in northern Africa—prompting questions as to how they got there. So how did they get there? Researchers say, “A herd of pony-sized duck-billed dinosaurs must have either floated or swam across.” If that sounds impossible to you, you’re not alone—one of the researchers noted that it’s “extremely improbable.” “‘It’s extremely improbable that dinosaurs could cross water to get to Africa,’ he said. ‘But improbable isn’t the same as impossible. And given enough time, improbable things become probable.’ “Buy a lottery ticket every day, and if you wait long enough, you’ll win. These ocean crossings might be once-in-a-million-year events but the Cretaceous lasted nearly 100 million years. “‘A lot of strange things will happen in that time,’ he suggested, ‘including dinosaurs crossing seas.’” In other words, it doesn’t matter how improbable something is, because time is the evolutionary hero. Just give it enough time and, sure, it must have happened! (Keep in mind that no one observed dinosaurs swimming across the ocean. This is an interpretation based on their assumptions regarding evolution and the ages of certain rock layers, along with assumptions regarding when and how the continents broke apart.) Man’s word: With time, nothing is impossible. God’s Word: “For nothing will be impossible with God” (Luke 1:37). This is why evolutionists get so angry when anyone questions millions of years! Without eons and eons of time—an incomprehensible amount of time, really—none of their ideas will work. They must have millions and millions of years. The popular science article reporting on this new research notes that much smaller reptiles have been observed surviving long trips at sea. The researchers compared the anomaly of the crossing to the unusual journeys of some modern-day animals, such as a group of at least 15 iguanas swept off the shores of Guadeloupe in the Caribbean by a hurricane and washed up around 200 miles away on the island of Anguilla a month later in 2015, or a tortoise from the island of Aldabra that once drifted ashore in Tanzania, 700 kilometers away. We believe that, after the global flood, many animals and plants, including reptiles like tortoises, were stuck on massive floating log mats made of vegetation ripped up during the flood and that’s how they were dispersed to other places. Larger animals likely colonized new places via land bridges or “island hopping.” Lower ocean levels due to the post-flood ice age would make this easier than it would be today. Over the years, we’ve had evolutionists make fun of this idea—and yet ocean rafting has now been observed in some of the very species we suggested traveled this way, and evolutionists are forced to believe that a herd of 500-pound dinosaurs made the trek floating or swimming! Those duck-billed dinosaurs found buried in North America and North Africa were all buried during the global flood. They don’t represent populations separated by millions of years on continents slowly drifting apart. They were catastrophically buried, and the single pre-flood continent broke apart into today's seven continents where they were rapidly and violently ripped apart and moved into different configurations during the global flood just 4,350 years ago. As I’ve said over and over, it’s the same evidence, just two different interpretations because of very different starting points: God’s Word and man’s word.

English
1
0
0
150
Basic Heresy
Basic Heresy@BasicHeresy·
You’re being so difficult and it’s telling because you want a particular answer out of me and I won’t give it you lol. We were discussing about the LOGICAL argument where I gave a false premise (all four legged animals are dogs). The LOGIC of that argument is arbitrary. The logic ITSELF is not objective (mind independent). Even though it’s internally consistent. But logic can MODEL reality. I gave you so many examples (paper on fire example). We know that the argument “if you set fire to a paper it will burn” REPRESENTS objective reality because we can TEST IT. Based on test results we can know which logical paths are more reliable MODELS for navigating the real world. Your claim that “morality is objectively true” should be testable yes. You can make any logical argument you like. But unless the rubber meets the road it’s all in your head or it’s a social construct. I mean honestly don’t even know what your understanding of morality even is. You dance around it and are too scared to put forward an I mean how many times does this need to be explained to you? And you STILL have not put forward ANY evidence that morality is objective. You are either completely unable to prove objective morality is a thing and are stalling OR you just don’t get it.
English
1
0
0
15
Darwin to Jesus
Darwin to Jesus@darwintojesus·
@BasicHeresy Arguments aren’t true or false? Okay so my argument that morality is real is neither true or false… wow that’s brilliant bro. Why are you here debating?
English
1
0
0
16
Darwin to Jesus
Darwin to Jesus@darwintojesus·
There's this question atheists love to ask, "Why am I morally obligated to obey God?" The point of a question like this is for the atheist to position themselves as the person that gets to choose if they want to be obligated to God or not, it's the same reason they pretend like they want evidence for God (so they can be the arbiter of what counts as evidence and they just reject everything). Here's my question: what would give someone the right to give you real obligations? Any reasonable answer you give, I guarantee God will qualify for. If you say nothing, then you're both wrong and asking a loaded question that you reject the premise to and you now need to demonstrate why it's not possible for someone to give you a real obligation. Either way atheists will totally fail at this.
English
59
6
77
4.3K
Basic Heresy
Basic Heresy@BasicHeresy·
I didn’t say the argument was true or false did I? In fact I said it’s internally coherent regardless of the truth of the premise. You determine if a logic is sound if it is adhering to the ARBITRARY “laws” we set. (If X then Y). It’s like calling foul during a football game. So anyway this is fun discussing logic. So morality in your view is like logic? How’s your model for how morality works?
English
2
0
0
17
Basic Heresy
Basic Heresy@BasicHeresy·
@IMPERATORAUS This is not a person (yes yes don’t worry it’s a HUMAN zygote). Any questions?
Basic Heresy tweet media
English
3
0
0
38
IMPERATOR
IMPERATOR@IMPERATORAUS·
@BasicHeresy In your opinion, what makes them not classified as "people"?
English
1
0
10
69
Basic Heresy
Basic Heresy@BasicHeresy·
The only reason we say that’s “illogical” is by convention. Logic is a game. You just played the game wrong like you can play chess wrong. I can say all four legged animals are dogs, all cats have four legs, therefore all cats are dogs. That’s internally logically consistent (within a certain framework of logic, in this case modus ponens) there is actually different types of logic with different t language games. Of course your premise “all four legged animals are dogs” can be shown to be objectively false. Presuppositions don’t have to represent objective truth for certain games of logic to be consistent. There is nothing controversial about what I’ve said. So now let me ask again, in which real does your “objective morality” fall into?
English
2
0
0
9
Basic Heresy
Basic Heresy@BasicHeresy·
@MikhailaFuller The food pyramid is and always will be based. Post data, let it be scrutinized, or it’s snake oil. I don’t make the rules!
English
0
0
0
14
Basic Heresy
Basic Heresy@BasicHeresy·
@Renatta So you observe the sabbath on Saturday and stone to death anyone who doesn’t? No? Then your post is completely debunked.
English
1
0
1
71
Renatta Oxendine
Renatta Oxendine@Renatta·
Sin is sin. If it was a sin 2,000 years ago, it is still a sin today. The world may change, but God never does.
English
27
53
914
6.1K
Basic Heresy
Basic Heresy@BasicHeresy·
Test it. See its predictive value. See the example of the paper on fire I presented to you. Logic is just a mental tool. And it’s not always based on truth. You can accept or not accept it. Reality will resolve the robustness of your logic. But yes logic itself is not objectively real.
English
2
0
0
28
Basic Heresy
Basic Heresy@BasicHeresy·
To all the communist/socialists raging against AI centers: Do you realize, AI doing work while you sit on your veranda slurping bubble tea is LITERALLY the final utopia Karl Marx dreamt of?
English
0
0
0
14
Pedro Domingos
Pedro Domingos@pmddomingos·
Your brain doesn't know what gradient descent is, and learns better than any neural network.
English
102
46
593
36.9K
Basic Heresy
Basic Heresy@BasicHeresy·
Young Earth Creationism has been utterly and completely defeated. Seriously, most Christians don’t even hold to that view anymore. Instead of going down kicking and screaming, maybe it’s time young earth creationists move on and continue their apologetics from firmer grounds (like old earth intelligent design).
English
0
0
0
12
Toysoul
Toysoul@Jeremygreen1337·
@BasicHeresy @creation247 the fact that you say "Now what" tells me you have a vendetta towards something which tells me you're not as happy as you could be if you let that go.
English
1
0
0
15
Joshua J Albert
Joshua J Albert@JoshuaJAlbert·
@patriarchysguy @BasicHeresy @darwintojesus I think his point is to point out the differences between quantitative and qualitative information, and demonstrating that even qualitative information doesn't necessarily imply intelligence.
English
1
0
2
21
Darwin to Jesus
Darwin to Jesus@darwintojesus·
If we find information in a radio signal from space, we treat it as evidence of a mind. But when we find vastly more complex information inside a cell, we’re told intelligence can’t even be considered. Why?
English
79
258
2K
75.4K
Basic Heresy
Basic Heresy@BasicHeresy·
@darwintojesus I already explained but I’ll keep it simple for you. No. Laws of logic do not exist in the realm of objective reality. It’s a modeling tool. Also they are not “laws” in any objective sense. Those laws can be completely made up (like in computer programs or chess).
English
1
0
0
24
Darwin to Jesus
Darwin to Jesus@darwintojesus·
@BasicHeresy Cool so that took about 3 days, now back to my original point. Do laws of logic exist if you can’t point to them in any physical way?
English
1
0
1
33