data

90.3K posts

data

data

@data02

Folk der ikke kan lide Brøndby-snak, ironi, sakasme, sort homor og politisk ukorrekthed bør putte mig på ignore (-:

Se unió Haziran 2009
3.4K Siguiendo2.4K Seguidores
data
data@data02·
@Uniondamholt @4dorthe Lav lige en oversigt over hvad de har betalt kontra os andre i samme periode
Dansk
0
0
3
170
data retuiteado
Kristian Ploug
Kristian Ploug@kristianploug·
Og det er endda uden at medregne en potentiel skat på boligsalg. 👀
Kristian Ploug tweet media
Dansk
6
9
72
1.9K
JCB_VSTGN
JCB_VSTGN@JACOB_VSTGN_BIF·
@CopenhagenDroid @DHytte @data02 Jeg kan seriøst ikke se det store talent og har aldrig kunne rigtig kunne det, kan godt være han har været i Ajax men det har så mange. Han ligner en spiller der højst har niveau til at være på rotation i Randers.
Dansk
1
0
0
43
data
data@data02·
@EricLDaugh So full of europeans that he hates so much
English
0
0
0
26
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump posts footage of New York City in 1929 Trump is reminiscing about an America that isn't flooded with 3rd world savages and destroyed by modern leftist policies 🇺🇸 FULL MAGA!
English
3K
5.8K
30.3K
943.9K
data
data@data02·
@mickitiki Indeed he does her things done. Ruining the US economy, driving up inflation, ruining job creation, driving up gas prices, turning former allies into non-allies,even threatening to invade them, making closer ties with dictators, starting another senseless war in the middle east
English
0
0
0
60
Micki way
Micki way@mickitiki·
Exactly 💥🔥🇺🇸👊
Micki way tweet media
English
14.9K
8.7K
58.9K
950.2K
data retuiteado
Michael McFaul
Michael McFaul@McFaul·
Trump won't share the burden with NATO allies of providing economic and military aid to Ukraine in its fight against Russia -- a genuine threat to NATO -- but Trump begs NATO allies to share the burden of his war against Iran. Amazing.
English
155
1K
4.6K
57.2K
data retuiteado
Amy Siskind 🏳️‍🌈
Trump has now lifted sanctions on: * Russia * Iran * Belarus Three of the most villainous autocracies. But we hate all our former allies 🤷🏻‍♀️
English
423
4.7K
18.3K
188.1K
data retuiteado
Henrik Zeberg
Henrik Zeberg@HenrikZeberg·
Fuldstændig enig! @JuulMona @troelslundp At angribe @AlexVanopslagh og @LiberalAlliance .... sikrer blot et rødt flertal. Tænk! Er det bedre at vinde ét mandat fra LA - hvis det medfører, at I mister regeringsmuligheden sammen med LA? Lad nu ikke en intern kamp om statsministerposten før valget ødelægge mulighederne for en reel blå regering. I ser jo heller ikke SF, Radikale og Enhedslisten angribe Mette Frederiksen.... og der er ellers rigeligt, de kunne tage fat på.
Tom™️@TomTomKrus

Kære @troelslundp og @JuulMona . I har kun Jer selv at takke for det ikke bliver et borgerligt flertal. Først @venstredk og nu @KonservativeDK med @metteabildgaard i spidsen. Jeg tror simpelthen ikke at de ønsker et borgerligt flertal, men kun har fokus på at sikre deres egen røv på Christiansborg. Den kampagne de har gang i er helt gakkelak.

Dansk
0
4
46
16.1K
data retuiteado
Jostein Hauge
Jostein Hauge@haugejostein·
This is wild. People in *every single one* of the top US allies now think it's better to depend on China than the US. The global balance of power is clearly tilting away from the US and toward China.
Jostein Hauge tweet media
English
720
3.2K
8.2K
635.2K
Eric Trump
Eric Trump@EricTrump·
🤣🤣 One of the great responses to a reporter in history! JAPANESE REPORTER: Why didn't you tell Japan before the Iran war? PRESIDENT TRUMP: "Why didn't you tell ME about PEARL HARBOR?!" "You believe in surprise much more-so than US!"
English
11.9K
8.3K
50.2K
3.7M
Spencer Hakimian
Spencer Hakimian@SpencerHakimian·
🚨BREAKING: PETE HEGSETH DEMANDS EUROPE SAY THANK YOU TO TRUMP
English
1K
146
572
107.1K
data
data@data02·
@NoahKamara99 @heidiponyrider @WarMonitor3 Well we might have done it despite that - if Trump hadnt mocked, threatened, trying to split us, put tariffs on us, generelly treating us as enemies while praising Putin
English
0
0
0
20
WarMonitor🇺🇦🇬🇧
Denmark had seriously prepared for a possible US attack on Greenland earlier this year, troops that were sent under the guise of exercise were equipped with explosives and prepared to blow key runways and bridges-DR Wow...
English
360
622
10.6K
551.5K
data
data@data02·
@TorstenGejl Hvorfor ikke producere til andre lande også? Under acceptable forhold naturligvis
Dansk
0
0
0
71
Torsten Gejl
Torsten Gejl@TorstenGejl·
Hvorfor skal Danmark være svineproduktions fabrik for hele verden? Alternativet forslår at vi kun producerer de grise, vi selv kan spise. Og at de får lov til at se solens lys. #dkpol nyheder.tv2.dk/live/politik/2…
Dansk
47
12
97
23.6K
data
data@data02·
@heidiponyrider @WarMonitor3 Well, at least the Europeans will be trained intensively by the Ukraineans indtur coming years. But thats not the reason we are not helping the US in the meaningless endeavor by the way .
English
1
0
0
26
Heidi
Heidi@heidiponyrider·
@data02 @WarMonitor3 Yeah. And they're right. A $40 drone can take out a million dollar ship. The only ones with real done warfare experience are the Ukrainians, Russians, Israelis, Iran and Iranian proxies. America is new to drone warfare. Imagine where the Europeans are in the line up.
English
3
0
0
81
Heidi
Heidi@heidiponyrider·
@data02 @WarMonitor3 Denmark can't even fight a drone war. They don't care about Greenland. Why do you think no one is sending ships when they use the Strait? The TDS is posturing. The truth? Everyone is afraid they'll lose one of their few seaworthy ships to a random drone.
English
2
0
5
203
data
data@data02·
@heidiponyrider @WarMonitor3 Well Trump forced us to focus on him, by threatening us. So unnessesary to do to a loyal ally
English
3
0
23
249
Heidi
Heidi@heidiponyrider·
@WarMonitor3 Runways and bridges where? What's there to bomb? The Danes didn't build any roads. Denmark is foolish. They're expending a lot of useless energy in Trump TDS instead of focusing on the real problems: China and Russia. They're doing an Iran move: attacking an ally.
English
16
0
105
4.3K
data
data@data02·
@PHippien @PkayOksy Og derfor skulle spørsmålet nok være mere præcist formuleret, når det kan tolkes forskelligt. Jeg tolker det helt klart på denne måde -hver enkel bliver rigere, hvilket øger den absolutte ulighed, og over tid den relative ulighed også
Dansk
0
0
0
15
Charlie Guillam
Charlie Guillam@PHippien·
@data02 @PkayOksy Det er der ingen, der siger, at I gør, så det forstår jeg ikke, hvorfor du skriver. Men formuleringen på spørgsmålet åbner nu stadig for skismaet, at 99% kan blive fattigere samtidig med, at kagen bliver større. Det er jo en ret almindelig Piketty-pointe.
Dansk
1
0
0
13