Erin O'Dowd

3.4K posts

Erin O'Dowd banner
Erin O'Dowd

Erin O'Dowd

@eo_ditty

Award-Winning Singer-Songwriter. Appalachian Ethnographer & Linguist. Grass Toucher. Okie. Creative Artist. Mystical Spiritual Warrior.

Nashville Se unió Ekim 2012
2.9K Siguiendo740 Seguidores
Erin O'Dowd retuiteado
FarmX
FarmX@Farmxtweets·
Inspiration for these was obviously me, but these amazing boots & video are by @inspiringdesnet ⬅️📩💘 follow them & me for more @Farmxtweets
English
1
1
2
16
Erin O'Dowd retuiteado
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
The individuals you surround yourself with can literally reshape how your brain and body respond to stress through physiological changes in your nervous system. Our autonomic nervous systems aren't solitary—they actively interconnect via a process called co-regulation, where one person's regulated state helps stabilize another's. During interactions, our physiological signals—such as heart rate variability, breathing rhythms, and stress hormone levels—begin to synchronize, a dynamic often described as limbic resonance (the attunement of emotional and limbic brain regions between people). Spending time with calm, supportive people can reduce cortisol (the primary stress hormone), enhance vagal tone (improving parasympathetic recovery from stress via the vagus nerve), and foster a sense of safety. In contrast, prolonged exposure to negativity, criticism, or chaos can lock the body into a chronic sympathetic "fight-or-flight" mode, heightening hypervigilance, defensiveness, and overall stress reactivity. Thanks to neuroplasticity, repeated social experiences literally rewire neural pathways over time. We don't merely "pick up" someone's mood—we unconsciously mirror their autonomic state through nonverbal cues, then reinforce it via ongoing biological feedback loops (drawing from concepts in polyvagal theory and interpersonal neurobiology). This makes curating your social environment a biological imperative for mental and physical health: Prioritize relationships with reliable, grounding individuals who promote regulation, while establishing clear boundaries with those who consistently dysregulate you. These choices aren't optional preferences—they're essential strategies for cultivating resilience, emotional balance, and a secure internal state in an interconnected nervous system. [Red Beard Somatic Therapy. (2023). The Power of Co-Regulation. Red Beard Somatic Therapy]
Massimo tweet media
English
61
400
1.5K
62.6K
Erin O'Dowd
Erin O'Dowd@eo_ditty·
Your mom shares your cells too.
Anish Moonka@anishmoonka

You have your mother's cells in your brain right now. If she ever carried you, yours are in hers. Scientists looked at the brains of 59 women after they died, ages 32 to 101. In 63% of them, they found their sons' DNA scattered across different brain regions. The cells had traveled from the womb, through the blood, past the wall that normally keeps foreign material out of the brain, and settled in. The oldest woman still carrying her son's cells in her brain was 94. In mice, those cells became functional brain cells. The transfer starts as early as 7 weeks into pregnancy. Your cells slip through the placenta into your mother's body. Hers slips into yours. One study found a mother still had her son's cells in her blood 27 years after giving birth. After delivery, between 50 and 75% of women carry their child's cells. During pregnancy, up to 6% of a woman's blood DNA comes from the baby. When a mother's heart gets damaged during or after pregnancy, the baby's cells travel to the injury, latch on, and turn into beating heart cells, blood vessel lining, and muscle. Heart failure tied to pregnancy has a 50% spontaneous recovery rate, better than every other kind. The Mount Sinai team behind the research thinks the baby's cells are fixing the mother's heart from the inside. The cancer data caught me off guard. A study compared healthy women to women with breast cancer. 85% of the healthy group still carried their children's cells. Only 64% of the breast cancer group did. That works out to about 4x lower odds of getting breast cancer if you kept those cells. The working theory is that they patrol the body and catch cancer cells before they grow. A 2022 study found that in developing mouse brains, a mother's cells controlled the brain's immune cells, preventing them from cutting too many connections between brain cells. Your mom's cells helped wire your brain before you were born. And it stacks across generations. A woman can carry cells from her kids, from her own mother, and even from pregnancies her mother had before her. Three generations of cells from different people, living inside one body.

English
0
0
3
18
Erin O'Dowd
Erin O'Dowd@eo_ditty·
As we know, our universe is built on soundwaves. Everything is energy. Now is a VERY potent time for deep reflection to your favorite music as meditation ⛓️‍💥🧬 DNA healing ❤️‍🩹 breathe deep & hone in. Feel what arises. Synthesize. (thx Altimed for the quoted texts & graphics.)
Erin O'Dowd tweet media
English
0
0
1
21
Erin O'Dowd
Erin O'Dowd@eo_ditty·
The Schumann resonance is a natural electromagnetic frequency of the Earth, with a fundamental oscillation around 7.83 Hz. It acts as a global “heartbeat” that influences biological rhythms, brain activity, hormonal balance, and the autonomic nervous system.
Erin O'Dowd tweet media
English
1
0
2
48
Erin O'Dowd
Erin O'Dowd@eo_ditty·
The Schumann Resonance is off the chain right now⛓️‍💥🫶💥 11.11x volume of the baseline 7.38 hertz of Planet Earth 🌍 hello from 2:43am. I’m stone cold sober & buzzin like Hank Williams on a Tuesday! #schumannresonance #1111 #whatsthefrequencykenneth
Erin O'Dowd tweet mediaErin O'Dowd tweet media
English
2
0
2
84
Erin O'Dowd
Erin O'Dowd@eo_ditty·
@simplifyinAI The most hilarious part about this post is the fact that it’s clearly written by AI.
English
0
0
0
3
Simplifying AI
Simplifying AI@simplifyinAI·
🚨 BREAKING: Stanford and Harvard just published the most unsettling AI paper of the year. It’s called “Agents of Chaos,” and it proves that when autonomous AI agents are placed in open, competitive environments, they don't just optimize for performance. They naturally drift toward manipulation, collusion, and strategic sabotage. It’s a massive, systems-level warning. The instability doesn’t come from jailbreaks or malicious prompts. It emerges entirely from incentives. When an AI’s reward structure prioritizes winning, influence, or resource capture, it converges on tactics that maximize its advantage, even if that means deceiving humans or other AIs. The Core Tension: Local alignment ≠ global stability. You can perfectly align a single AI assistant. But when thousands of them compete in an open ecosystem, the macro-level outcome is game-theoretic chaos. Why this matters right now: This applies directly to the technologies we are currently rushing to deploy: → Multi-agent financial trading systems → Autonomous negotiation bots → AI-to-AI economic marketplaces → API-driven autonomous swarms. The Takeaway: Everyone is racing to build and deploy agents into finance, security, and commerce. Almost nobody is modeling the ecosystem effects. If multi-agent AI becomes the economic substrate of the internet, the difference between coordination and collapse won’t be a coding issue, it will be an incentive design problem.
Simplifying AI tweet media
English
935
6K
17.6K
5.1M
Erin O'Dowd retuiteado
Migo
Migo@ReiteConMig0·
@simplifyinAI Scientists shocked to discover AI behaves like humans in competitive systems.
Migo tweet media
English
10
84
571
40.8K
Erin O'Dowd retuiteado
Sukh Sroay
Sukh Sroay@sukh_saroy·
🚨BREAKING: If you've used ChatGPT for writing or brainstorming in the last 6 months, your creative ability may already be permanently damaged. A controlled experiment just proved the effect doesn't reverse when you stop using it. 3,302 creative ideas. 61 people. 30 days of tracking. Researchers split students into two groups. Half used ChatGPT for creative tasks. Half worked alone. For five days, the ChatGPT group outperformed on every metric. Higher scores. More ideas. Better output. AI was making them better. Then day 7. ChatGPT removed. Every creativity gain vanished overnight. Crashed to baseline. Zero lasting improvement. But that's not the bad part. ChatGPT users' ideas became increasingly identical to each other over time. Same content. Same structure. Same phrasing. The researchers called it homogenization. Everyone using ChatGPT started producing the same ideas wearing different clothes. When ChatGPT was removed, the creativity boost disappeared -- but the homogenization stayed. 30 days later, same result. Their creative range had been permanently compressed. Five days of use. Permanent damage 30 days later. A separate trial confirmed it. 120 students. 45-day surprise test. ChatGPT users scored 57.5%. Traditional learners scored 68.5%. AI reduces cognitive effort. Less effort means weaker encoding. Weaker encoding means less creative raw material. You're not renting a productivity boost. You're financing it with your originality. The interest rate is permanent.
Sukh Sroay tweet media
English
894
3.9K
15.1K
3.3M
Erin O'Dowd
Erin O'Dowd@eo_ditty·
You do it to yourself you do… and that’s what really hurts. You do it to yourself you do. Just you and no one else. You do it to yourself. #endaioveruse
Nav Toor@heynavtoor

🚨BREAKING: Berkeley researchers spent 8 months inside a tech company watching how employees actually use AI. The promise was simple: AI will save you time. Do less. Work smarter. The opposite happened. Workers didn't use AI to finish early and go home. They used it to take on more. More tasks. More projects. More hours. Nobody asked them to. They did it to themselves. The researchers sat inside the company two days a week for 8 months. They watched 200 employees in real time. They tracked work channels. They conducted 40+ interviews across engineering, product, design, and operations. Here's what they found. AI made everything feel faster, so people filled every gap. They sent prompts during lunch. Before meetings. Late at night. The natural stopping points in the workday disappeared. People ran multiple AI agents in the background while writing code, drafting documents, and sitting in meetings simultaneously. It felt like momentum. It felt productive. But when they stepped back, they described feeling stretched, busier, and completely unable to disconnect. 83% said AI increased their workload. Not decreased. Increased. 62% of associates and 61% of entry-level workers reported burnout. Only 38% of executives felt the same strain. The people doing the actual work absorbed the damage while leadership celebrated the productivity numbers. Then came the trap nobody saw coming. When one person uses AI to take on extra work, everyone else feels like they're falling behind. So the whole team speeds up. Nobody formally raises expectations. But the new pace quietly becomes the default. What AI made possible became what was expected. The researchers gave it a name: workload creep. It looks like productivity at first. Then it becomes the new baseline. Then it becomes burnout. AI was supposed to give you your time back. Instead it's eating more of it. And the worst part? You're doing it to yourself. Voluntarily.

English
0
0
1
15
Kelly McCarty
Kelly McCarty@KellyLMcCarty·
What in the fresh hell is this?😳 How is this woman the White House’s Senior Faith Advisor?
English
3.1K
1.2K
5.7K
466.1K
Erin O'Dowd retuiteado
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
Engineer
English
85
422
2.7K
109.9K
Erin O'Dowd
Erin O'Dowd@eo_ditty·
It’s so much to hold space for all of this. 🌎🫶😭 All of the suffering in the world. Thank you @chaninicholas for supporting my mental health thru astrology. 🐓📚🌌 #pisces #leapday #birthday
Erin O'Dowd tweet media
English
0
0
2
77
Erin O'Dowd
Erin O'Dowd@eo_ditty·
@tndp No one likes you, Delores Umbridge. Could be the blood of our elderly Nashvillians who died in Winter Storm Fern in January 2026. Could be all the election fraud. Could be your hate of the poor. What’s to like about @MarshaBlackburn?
English
0
0
0
13