Eostamar

7.7K posts

Eostamar

Eostamar

@eostamar

Generic bio here.

Nebraska, USA Se unió Aralık 2022
240 Siguiendo163 Seguidores
Eostamar
Eostamar@eostamar·
@TruthFairy131 That… sounds planned. But also I’ve heard horror stories about donors being sued for child support. I am sure it was a fairy tail though.
English
0
0
0
11
Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏
Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏@TruthFairy131·
🔥 NO WHITE DONORS 🔥 I know so many single White woman in their 30’s & 40’s that sadly never found the right person to settle down & have a family with. People work long hours these days & it’s much harder to meet people. As a single White woman, I know & understand the struggle. Women knowing their biological clock is ticking & not wanting to miss the opportunity to be a mother which is one of the most rewarding & natural things in the world, women are turning to sperm donation out of desperation. But the problem is THERE ARE NO WHITE DONORS in Australia. There are months to years waiting lists for White European donors. There are thousands of donors of all other races but WHITE.
Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏 tweet media
English
522
78
550
33.1K
Vinzz
Vinzz@v_i_n_z_d·
@MyLordBebo This is because only men can be compelled to serve in the army. Women have another risky function, that of giving life (and suffering and even risking it for that).
English
46
1
4
4.5K
Eostamar
Eostamar@eostamar·
@XFreeze The only punishment for them is removal from office. Which is rarer than shooting stars
English
0
0
0
1
X Freeze
X Freeze@XFreeze·
Judges in the US operate under a doctrine called Absolute Immunity This means a judge cannot be sued for any damages for a "judicial act" even if their decision was made in error, with blatant bias, or resulted in a tragedy The reality is when a judge grants low bail or OR release to a violent repeat offender who then commits a murder, there is ZERO legal mechanism to hold that judge civilly liable for the loss of life It's wild how the justice system operates. A judge can literally burn the whole country down and not be held accountable
X Freeze tweet media
English
613
1K
3.1K
34.2K
Eostamar
Eostamar@eostamar·
@orntwo @JeffreyLuscombe Repubs aren’t any better. Funny business can do it, brightline, but needs government support
English
0
0
0
50
Eostamar
Eostamar@eostamar·
@JeffreyLuscombe Honestly, most of my family assume it won’t work. Not because they weren’t okay with trying. But past projects taught them it won’t. As a conservative, I’d support getting more people off my roads! I love driving.
English
0
0
0
0
Jostein Hauge
Jostein Hauge@haugejostein·
It's socialism — not capitalism — that creates prosperity. Norway has one of the strongest welfare systems in the world. In Singapore, most people live in housing built by the government. In Luxembourg, social spending as a share of GDP is among the highest in the EU. Most countries that score well on this chart do so because they have socialist policies in place that increase social mobility and reduce economic precariousness.
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil

Capitalism creates prosperity

English
1.3K
513
2.4K
218.3K
Eostamar
Eostamar@eostamar·
@RockChartrand @haugejostein True! They’ve had to scale back on the programs several times because they chained the economy down to much. It takes balls for a politician to do that.
English
0
0
0
17
Rock Chartrand🤑
Rock Chartrand🤑@RockChartrand·
Norway isn’t rich because of welfare. It’s rich because of productive industries, capital accumulation, and markets that generate surplus. The welfare state spends that surplus. Wealth is created first. Then it’s redistributed. So the claim flips cause and effect. Social programs don’t create the wealth they rely on. They depend on it.
English
37
40
858
6.4K
Eostamar
Eostamar@eostamar·
@haugejostein Try again buddy. Your ignorance is outstanding. Once again an ID10 -T that conflates well managed social programs with socialism. Capitalism is what makes Norway possible, their own politicians admit it. You ignore reality at the peril of others lives. Sociopath.
English
0
0
0
4
Eostamar
Eostamar@eostamar·
@ClownWorld I swear some of these are people trolling. Now way do they expect to get $30 an hour equivalent for shit service.
English
0
0
0
4
Ambar
Ambar@Ambar_SIFF_MRA·
Wait what? Do women take kids to war?
Ambar tweet media
English
98
24
188
8.4K
Eostamar retuiteado
Michael
Michael@Michael951413·
Michael tweet media
ZXX
22
725
2.8K
25K
Eostamar
Eostamar@eostamar·
@NoLeftyEsty @mitchellvii @lbiBB42xo I heard an interesting and old idea. Get rid of all welfare programs and keep the open borders. Meaning no social security, no Medicaid, no food stamps, nothing of the sort. That is even less likely to happen.
English
0
0
0
7
Bill Mitchell
Bill Mitchell@mitchellvii·
It's hard to imagine that the Supreme Court would end Trump's tariffs AND institutionalize birthright citizenship forever! I mean, my God, whose side are they on?
Bill Mitchell tweet media
English
1.2K
2.2K
8.1K
85.2K
Eostamar
Eostamar@eostamar·
@jlippincott_ I’d say that about free healthcare or the enlarged welfare programs that together is the single largest cost for the budget.
English
0
0
0
0
Josiah Lippincott
Josiah Lippincott@jlippincott_·
Fixing this pothole is more important than bombing Iran.
Josiah Lippincott tweet media
English
5K
1.8K
20.5K
884.5K
Eostamar
Eostamar@eostamar·
@TheLaurenChen What do you expect of her? She’s feels threatened by the extreme left.
English
0
0
0
5
Eostamar
Eostamar@eostamar·
@NoLeftyEsty @mitchellvii @lbiBB42xo I don’t like it. I think even at the time it was worded poorly. The author would be considered an open borders maniac nowadays. But it was written in a different time, different culture, different views of what’s even possible in the worst term case.
English
1
0
1
9
John smith
John smith@Johnsmithhuhy·
@mgholcombe1976 @mitchellvii @RosieBud521 69% OF VOTERS now say children of illegal immigrants should be granted automatic citizenship—a massive shift from the 45% who felt that way twenty years ago, according to a new Fox News Poll
English
1
0
0
23
Eostamar
Eostamar@eostamar·
@NoLeftyEsty @4xdbfp787t @mitchellvii @lbiBB42xo Reservations are national sovereign not wholly American. Similar to the territories. He could stipulate that immigrants on territories are not granted immediate citizenship unless citizens or those territories or an American parent. But hey. That would piss of the base.
English
1
0
1
13
Eostamar
Eostamar@eostamar·
@NoLeftyEsty @mitchellvii @lbiBB42xo With how it is written it can mean that yes. The vague notion of under its jurisdiction heavily implies it since the Supreme Court first ruled it. Funny how the writer was dead at the time. Still if we want to alter it it will need an act of Congress (amendment or law)
English
1
0
1
26
Stellar Conservative Lady.
ITS HARD TO IMAGINE ANY CITIZEN NOT AWARE OF THEIR CONSTITUTION. The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (Section 1) establishes birthright citizenship, stating that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside". This "Citizenship Clause" guarantees automatic citizenship to almost everyone born on U.S. soil, regardless of parents' citizenship or immigration status. [1, 2, 3, 4]
English
7
0
5
586
shakermaker.eth
shakermaker.eth@Shakermaker003·
@A177AR @D_Myti_Quinn @TRHLofficial Because it’s not actually a thing that moves the needle. Way more important issues to tackle. This is just, “I don’t like people who aren’t white”
English
8
0
1
112
The Redheaded libertarian
The Redheaded libertarian@TRHLofficial·
SCOTUS may rule that birthright citizenship is constitutional, using precedent and a loose interpretation of an earlier ruling, so we may need to approach the issue of one million Chinese communists voting in our elections in the future differently. As it holds, they can’t even be denaturalized. There would definitively and permanently be no solution and creating citizens of those who dilute our values is republic ending. What we can do now, is aggressively and publicly enforce FARA, the Espionage Act, and related statutes against anyone (citizen or not) acting under CCP direction. Prosecute espionage, influence ops, and undisclosed CCP ties. That’s really it though. If it’s ruled constitutional for anyone infiltrate and dismantle our republic, all we can do is try to disincentivize it. How utterly demoralizing.
English
386
676
4.6K
88.9K