iChris

7.1K posts

iChris banner
iChris

iChris

@f1rstdev

deploying the next runner...

utopia Se unió Mart 2022
606 Siguiendo862 Seguidores
Colewherld
Colewherld@Colewherld·
NO WAY CENTED BOUGHT 10% of $7 BRO. YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS UP 😭😭😭😭😭
Colewherld tweet media
English
47
3
128
16.3K
Chromadera🌸
Chromadera🌸@Chromadera·
Lmao ☠️☠️ this is a naive way of looking at things. If you are a noob there are areas ai can't help you. Writing the code is the easiest part. The code executing what you want, the way you want, and a fair evaluation model is entirely different. Ai makes good Devs better. Ai makes non coders on average bad Devs.
RUGWAY@observingweb3

Ai is so easy rn. Anyone can code, if you have a clear understanding of what you want and can type out those words. Claude/ agents will code exactly what you want. At the end of all my prompts , I write - I’m a noob with zero knowledge about coding. Give Step by step instructions

English
2
1
1
275
RUGWAY
RUGWAY@observingweb3·
I’ve actually seen some 2 other persons build that’s never had a red day. And atleast 200k monthly profit. The highest PnL = 2x , average hold time is around 6 seconds. Average PnL % = 20% 40% It’s more of a numbers game than a trying to secure a 2x 3x PnL. + they target alot of wallets. Daily volume run into $300k +
Thomas@tjb1376

@observingweb3 I built a very similar thing and had similar results. Was in over 3k a month in infrastructure costs and lost about 20 sol because I was 50 ish milliseconds too slow

English
4
0
61
6K
RUGWAY
RUGWAY@observingweb3·
@f1rstdev Oh okay , cos this particular guy is brutal. 500k usd PnL in 56 days and the highest PnL is a 4x 😭
English
2
0
1
93
iChris
iChris@f1rstdev·
@observingweb3 im looking for a good algo/strategy for my bot 😂 😂
English
2
0
0
68
RUGWAY
RUGWAY@observingweb3·
@f1rstdev Don’t copy trade. Lol
English
1
0
0
100
RUGWAY
RUGWAY@observingweb3·
@f1rstdev Here 6s8Z55Qtdks3EiwycXApooMDnXrxgJ464HuJFkGSzqAj
Indonesia
2
0
2
130
RUGWAY
RUGWAY@observingweb3·
RUGWAY tweet media
ZXX
2
0
5
508
Eze Miracle
Eze Miracle@nolimitmiracle·
2020 Mercedes-AMG C43 Engine: 3.0L V6 biturbo Hp: 385 Torque: 520 Nm 0–100 km/h in 4.5seconds 🏷️44m naira Car condition : perfect Doorstep Delivery includes Buying , shipping , custom duty No hidden charges
Eze Miracle tweet mediaEze Miracle tweet mediaEze Miracle tweet mediaEze Miracle tweet media
English
19
56
639
32.5K
stanley
stanley@heisajeet·
gm, making 100 sol this week.
stanley tweet media
English
55
4
154
6.3K
iChris
iChris@f1rstdev·
lord's day ❤️
iChris tweet media
English
1
0
7
116
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Terafab Project launches in 7 days
English
14.9K
10.8K
90.2K
87.2M
obafemi goathlisberger
obafemi goathlisberger@goathlisbergerr·
your gf publicizing everything except you. 2+2 my ngga
English
11
281
2.4K
64.3K
iChris retuiteado
SightBringer
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__·
⚡️The thing he is missing is that jobs are not the economy. Jobs are the current distribution mechanism. That is the deepest truth here. People confuse production with distribution because, for most of modern life, the two were fused. Humans worked, got paid, and used that pay to claim a share of output. So it felt natural to assume that if labor income disappears, the economy itself disappears. That only holds if wage labor remains the main way purchasing power is assigned. Once AI and automation get good enough, the binding problem changes. The system no longer revolves around how to produce enough. It revolves around who gets claims on the output. If machines can produce a growing share of goods and services, society can remain physically productive with far less human labor. The hard part becomes political and financial allocation. Who owns the machines. Who receives income. Who gets access to housing, healthcare, energy, food, software, logistics, and social status when labor is no longer the main ticket in. So the endgame is simple. If AI really takes most jobs, one of two things happens. Purchasing power gets redistributed through some new mechanism, or the social order breaks and forces one. There is no stable third path where a tiny owner class captures all production, everyone else loses income, and the system just hums along happily. Mass demand cannot vanish without consequences. Rent cannot be paid at scale by people with no claims on output. Political legitimacy cannot survive a society where the majority is economically unnecessary and materially excluded. That is why the real transition risk is much uglier than the cartoon version. The final state could be technically abundant. The path to it could be savage. Wages compress first. White collar ladders thin first. Junior roles disappear first. Demand weakens before a new distribution system is built. Owners and firms try to keep the gains. Governments react late. Social anger rises before institutional redesign catches up. The danger zone is not the fully automated world. The danger zone is the long interval where labor is losing pricing power faster than society is redesigning how income and status are distributed.
Govind@Govindtwtt

Everyone says “AI will take all the jobs.” If that happens… how does this future actually work? No jobs → no income → no spending. So who buys things? Who pays rent? Who keeps the economy moving? What am I missing here?

English
48
62
328
37K
Rational Aussie
Rational Aussie@rationalaussie·
Energy lockdowns are coming. Get used to the phrase 'all non-essential travel is prohibited'. You'll be seeing that a lot. You won't be able to drive your car without explicit approval. Good luck everyone.
English
546
1.4K
8.6K
283.8K
theo
theo@theonomix·
@clukz @33krypticSol Clukz just trying to gatekeep, everyone needs to do what he does!!!!
English
2
0
20
952
clukz
clukz@clukz·
@33krypticSol Gl but be careful if it was easy to replicate everyone would be doing it
English
12
0
79
4.2K