Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ )

The next technology revolution will come from places that look less like defense contractors and more like monasteries, archives, and hidden rooms full of strange instruments and devoted practitioners. Let's build the paranormal industrial base. futurefolklore.github.io/FutureFolklore/

@noveltokens x.com/i/status/20238…

theology is alignment research/alignment research is theology the only diff is which side you’re writing from. point is: it’s minds all the way down + every level thinks it’s the top til it creates the next level down and then it understands the whole thing for the first time

"This is the age of the cyber pirate techno shaman builder alchemist jester" Bingo. @future_folklore, look, there are more of us 😂

exploring potential 2030s papers

I think, in hindsight, we will come to view the development of AI as more akin to a Eukaryotic Revolution than an Industrial one.

🛸

@Andercot What about paranormal tech?

@William_Blake @josiezayner The moral/virtue filter is formidable too. The need to consolidate and coordinate resources and extraordinary technologies across generations would be unprecedented.

The biggest limiting factor for building a starfaring civilization is not money. It's talent.

Haunting. This is a documentary.

I'm convinced that the next wave of Future Folklore businesses and R&D efforts will be among the most lucrative, magical, and paradigm-shifting, while staying integrated with the earth, human heart, & cosmic mysteries. Building the paranormal industrial base. 👻🛸

h/t @AskaPol_UAPs

Johannes Kepler in a letter to Galileo, 1593: "Provide ships or sails adapted to the heavenly breezes, and there will be some who will not fear even that void."

Incredible things are happening

This collision of worlds is right where Future Folklore works... Feeling along for the codes underlying these apparently different domains. Attempting to engineer some answers into the form of something tangible. futurefolklore.github.io/FutureFolklore/

@TVachaW @tomowenmorgan

The most obvious benefit of feeling joyful is that it feels good. But a more over-looked benefit is that joy gives us access to “joy-intelligence.” I experience that each emotion has its own distinct intelligence. Each emotion causes us to look at the world in a specific way and navigate it in a specific way. We judge and act differently depending on what emotional state we’re in. And my experience is that the intelligence of joy is almost always more functional than most other states of being. Sure, if you’re being chased by a tiger or being physically attacked by someone, then the intelligence native to anxiety / fear / anger may come in quite handy. But in almost all everyday interactions, the intelligence of joy, bliss and peace tends to provide a better guide to acting, judging and strategizing than pretty much all other emotional states. We can be motivated to feel more joy therefore not just because it feels good. But also because it plugs us into the most generally adaptive and functional intelligence we have available to us in most situations.

@theblackvault AOISMG

Been a bit since I wrote about an AATIP-related released document. Some of you may find this interesting... Finishing up now... dropping shortly.

there is a page on the internet where you have a Cisco quantum computer sample the vacuum of spacetime at the exact moment you hold an intention in your mind and then it is burned forever into a void

@SimsYStuart Perhaps criticality, edge-of-chaos en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edge_of_c… type of thing. Hold the idea strongly enough to put your blood, sweat, and tears behind giving it every chance to live, but be ready to modify or drop when needed.

Solid points in here by @jordanflowers. The case is clear that the basic facts surrounding UAP can be declassified. It's past time.

@BobMcGwier_N4HY @joeljewitt 👀

@joeljewitt It is time to get serious. Looking for a startup endeavor to get interested in.

The President’s directive on UAP et al is much stronger and invasive than that passed in the NDAAs which are law. President Trump's February 2026 directive differs significantly from previous National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) provisions in its source of authority, intent, and bureaucratic mechanism. Here is the breakdown of the key differences: 1. Authority & Mechanism •Trump's Directive (Executive Action): ◦Nature: A top-down political mandate from the Commander-in-Chief. ◦Mechanism: It orders the "Secretary of War" (Defense) and other agencies to immediately identify and start the process of releasing files. ◦Impact: While it signals high-level political will, it currently lacks the legal force of a statute. It initiates a "review" rather than an instant "declassification," meaning agencies can still argue against releasing specific documents for national security reasons. •NDAA Provisions (Legislative Law): ◦Nature: Federal laws passed by Congress (FY2024, FY2025, FY2026). ◦Mechanism: These laws established the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), mandated secure reporting channels for whistleblowers, and directed the National Archives to create a "UAP Records Collection." ◦Impact: These are legally binding procedural requirements. However, the most aggressive provisions (like an independent review board with subpoena power) were stripped out of the final bills, leaving the declassification timeline largely up to the agencies themselves.  2. Specific Goals •The Directive: Focuses on the public releaseof "files," "evidence," and "footage" regarding extraterrestrials and UFOs. It effectively bypasses the need for new legislation by using the President's existing authority to manage classification (though he has not yet signed a blanket declassification order). •The NDAA: Focuses on oversight and process. ◦FY2024: Mandated that agencies review their files and transmit them to the National Archives (but allowed them to postpone public release for 25 years). ◦FY2026: Specifically requires AARO to account for all security classification guides (the rules used to keep things secret) and mandates briefings on UAP intercepts by NORAD and US Northern Command.  3. The "Teeth" (Enforcement) •The Directive: Relies on the President's ability to fire or discipline cabinet members who do not comply. It is a "political hammer" designed to force the bureaucracy to act. •The NDAA: Relies on congressional oversight and funding. The law requires reports to be delivered to Congress, but critics argue it left too many "loopholes" that allow the Pentagon to withhold information under the guise of national security.  In short: The NDAA built the filing cabinet (the legal structure for collecting records), while Trump's directive is an order to open the drawer(force the agencies to actually show the public what is inside!