Stuart Sims

FYI the Bible literally says to cheer at the death of the wicked. Don’t let any of these wizards under the “status” of being a “Christian” shame you for cheering in gladness at the death of the wicked. It actually is a natural response from good people. Fact. Imagine people mourning when a Forrest fire is extinguished. That would be crazy right? Yes it would

With all due respect to the Orch-OR model, attributing purpose or 'feelings like reward' to primordial organic molecules seems to introduce an unnecessary anthropomorphic detour. Pre-genetic evolution can be elegantly explained through non-equilibrium thermodynamics and molecular natural selection. Molecules did not cluster due to psychological drives; they stabilized because certain configurations achieved local persistence, self-sustenance, and structural coherence within the primordial field.  It is not a matter of feeling or reward. It is physics.

God created humans to continue his work of creation, and humans in turn created AI.

The thing AI is missing is a non-verbal unconscious. AGI will require creation and integration of something akin to an artificial Jungian shadow.

It literally takes like 20 minutes of actual research to determine that vaccines are a scam and an instrument of death. If you can't figure it out, don't get mad at us.

What if the universe works less like a solid, physical place and more like an enormous video game, only rendering reality in detail the moment someone looks? This provocative idea comes from Thomas Campbell, a physicist who spent years working with NASA. In his theory, which he calls My Big TOE, short for My Big Theory of Everything, he proposes that reality is fundamentally made of information, and that the physical universe is a kind of virtual reality. Just as a video game does not bother rendering a distant mountain until your character turns to look at it, Campbell suggests the universe may only produce concrete physical detail when an observer requests it. His inspiration comes from the genuine strangeness of quantum mechanics. In real, verified experiments, tiny particles behave like blurry waves of possibility until they are measured, at which point they snap into a definite state. Campbell takes this famous observer effect and runs with it, arguing that consciousness itself plays a central role, and that the world we experience is essentially data being processed, like a simulation. Now the essential honesty. This is Campbell's personal hypothesis, not established or accepted physics. The vast majority of physicists interpret the quantum observer effect very differently, pointing out that observation in quantum mechanics means any physical measurement or interaction, not necessarily a conscious mind. There is currently no experimental proof that reality is a simulation or that it vanishes when unobserved. It is a bold, imaginative idea sitting at the edge of science and philosophy. Still, it taps into a question that has fascinated humanity forever. What is reality actually made of, and does it exist independently of us? Similar simulation ideas have been seriously discussed by thinkers like Elon Musk and philosopher Nick Bostrom, which is partly why the concept keeps capturing imaginations. Whether or not it is true, it is a genuinely mind bending thought to sit with. Do you think reality exists completely on its own, or is there something to the idea that observation shapes the world around us?