Marcus Carey

Wow! The unhinged bots are out in force today.

@bratanyli @NickJFuentes Bot

@marcuscarey @NickJFuentes The world would be so much better if retards like you were being cut off from internet

The GOP told us that a $17 billion border wall was too expensive and that Mass Deportations were too unpopular. But $200 billion for a regime change war in Iran that has 27% approval is absolutely necessary because Israel said so. ISRAEL FIRST MEANS AMERICA LAST.

@NotableID @NickJFuentes Bot

@marcuscarey @NickJFuentes Are you slow? They’ve already spent 22 billions in 2 weeks in this war

I am going to restate an opinion that's based on no facts other than recognizing certain patterns in the conduct of Donald Trump. I believe that his goal will be to use Easter as a historic point of demarcation at which time we will either declare that we have achieved our objectives in Iran, or that we are turning over the remainder of what needs to be done to Israel and other Middle East countries to reassert the Abraham accords as a guiding principle for unity and prosperity in the region, and, to use their power and influence to bring Iran into the fold by allowing the rational people in that nation, a chance at self determination. I could be wrong, but I see that as a possible target date.

Based upon what he said on Tucker show, you should have the right to cross examine him. If he doesn't grant you that right, I hope that a congressional committee subpoenas him to come testify, and allows you to write the cross examination questions, and follow ups. If Tucker's show had adhered to the rules of evidence and procedure as in court, a place where the pursuit of truth is structured in order to supply Justice, it would've never been admissible. First, Kent would not qualify as an expert entitled offer his opinions. He admitted that he was denied access to the intelligence briefings and meetings with the president which resulted in the president's decision to engage in military action. That's akin to an expert saying he didn't have access to the medical records, or the files, or the evidence that supports his opinion. He would be dismissed from the witness stand immediately by a judge. Tucker, in his new fashion, is no longer asking probing questions. He meets with his guests in advance, they work out the performance, and then Tucker uses leading questions when his job is similar to that of an attorney, asking questions on direct. Tucker tells the witness what he wants them to say, in the form of a question, and then secures their agreement which he worked out in advance. And lastly, there would likely be no need for expert opinion in a courtroom setting in this case to begin with. Kent supplied nothing that demonstrates the need for an expert. His opinions do not supply technical or special expertise without which an ordinary juror, or member of the public in this case, could find the truth on their own. Expert testimony is only admissible if it is necessary to establish a standard care, standard of behavior, standards that are accepted in the area into which the opinion delves. In this case the area of inquiry is governance, where in the USA every citizen is presumed to be qualified. There was no foundation laid that Kent has any qualifications to do any of those things, and had no factual basis for offering them. But, since there's no one but the public to act as judge in this instance, I believe that you ought to be given the right to cross examination. And I have no doubt, that you would expose this agenda driven witness as holy untrustworthy and therefore his testimony should be stricken and ignored by we the people.

Joe Kent, before you appeared on your buddy Qatarlson’s Iranian regime propaganda cast I asked publicly for you to come on my radio show for a one hour interview.  You publicly replied “Sure, let’s go.”  My producer reached out to you to follow up. You didn’t and haven’t replied.  So many questions. The offer stands, Joe.

@Maga4liberty @EricaRN4USA Yes, as should every Christian.

🙏BE HONEST : SHOULD KAROLINE LEAVITT AND PAM BONDI CONTINUE WEARING THE CROSS IN PUBLIC???

@GenFlynn @Cobratate Did AI write this for you? Your comments usually contain far more fact based opinions, and far fewer sweet sounding hollowness.

@Cobratate There has been a complete loss of common sense when it comes to decision making because common sense only comes from the common man and it is the common man who never benefits nor seems to be heard from during any of these BS times. And it is always the common man who suffers.

Worst Case Scenario

Trump is controlling that over which he has control. He's not losing anything there. Now, if your British nose wants to stick itself into American politics, you need credibility. However, you were forced to accept that freedom leads to the development of an empire that eclipses what Britain is today but only after we defeated you repeatedly in the 17 and 1800s. You shifted toward a more democratic form of government which you've now abandoned in favor of one that has more spy cameras than any place on earth, censors people for expressing their opinions, and has bent over for radical Islam and is taking it up behind while the people in your country are losing their national identity. All of this, not to mention that your royal family has been peppered with pedophiles, embroiled in controversy, the males in that family seem to have impulse control problems, and despite the fact that we are responsible for your national security, and prevented you guys from being overrun by Nazis, when we ask you to participate in policing a 20 mile wide waterway through which the vast majority of natural gas, oil and other commodities pass each day, you decline. If it wasn't for us, everything you have would be gone. So until you can regain credibility as a nation, don't stick your snarky nose into our business and comment on it. We welcome your right to say whatever you want, but we reject any claim of impact that your chicken little 'fraidy cat demeanor supplies as the tray upon which your ignorant comments are delivered. Pussified arrogance is SO unappealing.

Trump is losing control of this war.

When commentators in search of approval, fame and riches find that their ideas are not winning the shallowness of their character is exposed. And an exposed character can either be humbling or it can be so raw it triggers intense pain. Then they scream and push harder exposing even deeper flaws in character. This eventually becomes destructive, as they spiral through rejection, being labeled crazy and ultimately being totally ignored, the worst for them. @TuckerCarlson @megynkelly @RealCandaceO @RepThomasMassie

@marklevinshow Cant wait to watch you cross examine Kent.

You’re good

@SteakforPodcast Except that chief negotiator Witkoff says Iran told them other wise. cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump…

🚨 NEW: Joe Kent claims that Iran was not close to enriching enough uranium to develop a nuclear weapon because “they told us they didn’t.” Seems legit

@HeathMayo @KyWhitney @RandPaul Voice text corrections. "Potty" attitude was "haughty" and "pot drink" ....I don't know, I'm sure it meant "haughty" look that says...

Gotta say.. I respect the hell out of @RandPaul for this interrogation of Mullin at that hearing. A Senator holding a member of his own party accountable. Refreshing. Imagine how competent our government would be if we routinely held it to this standard.

In the end we all have to choose who to believe. So you can either believe Trump, Rubio, Hegseth, and the director of the CIA, or you can believe the guy who just booked himself on Candace and Tucker. Your call…

CNN: “MAGA GOP view of Trump, approve is 100%. If you are a member of MAGA in the GOP, you approve of Donald John Trump. 0% say that they disapprove… he’s the 1972 Miami Dolphins.”

@1776Diva @EricaRN4USA @SenRandPaul That's not breaking news, that's all he's ever wanted to do.

Someone please tell him NOT to waste his time and/or donor money!! @SenRandPaul

And yet, after this many years, you still haven't come up with a workable plan to fix it. You'd rather design a little flashing, lapel pin, and profit off of its sales than make it start moving backwards. If you're so smart, and you've got such a great plan for balancing the budget, creating surplus, reducing the national debt with those surpluses, increasing the GDP, so that our debt to GDP ratio improved, legislating to reduce interest rates on the debt, and fixing the economy, then you really need to just shut up about telling people all the problems that are out there. Come up with a meaningful workable plan that will pass through Congress and the Senate and be signed by the president and then you've got something to offer. Otherwise you're just a backbencher grandstander complainer. Once again, I'm I'm trying to give you advance warning, to save a future for yourself, step down now.

The debt passed $39 trillion today. Paying a trillion dollars of interest annually on this debt causes hardship for tax-payers and robs us of resources that could otherwise be used for infrastructure or national defense. And ultimately, this debt will enslave our grandchildren.

@politvidchannel Bot

BREAKING: Epstein victim says she has tapes of Donald Trump doing things that will force him to resign from the presidency.

I'm not so sure that you wouldn't find that in reality there is actually an increase the likelihood of Republicans voting for a majority in the midterms. For the vast number of Maga voters out there polling shows that they are more aligned with Trump now than ever before. Tucker is conducting an improper examination of witnesses and portraying what they have to say as meaningful and truthful. Joe Kent's examination by Tucker fell apart. He has zero proof. He has opinions which are not based upon facts known to him. He had been excluded from these security meetings primarily because he was under investigation for leaking classified information. I'm a lawyer, you're a lawyer, he has been totally impeached in his testimony. And Tucker's persistent use of leading questions might be good for attention getting, but you and I both know that's not the way you get to the truth. You cross examine people by using leading questions to test their accuracy, their truthfulness, their bias, and their lack of a foundation for the opinions they give if they're even qualified to give opinions in the first place. I know this isn't a court of law, but you would have to agree counselor the system established in the courts of law are far better at achieving fairness and arriving at the truth, than politically motivated interviews on a podcast. Joe Kent has built in bias, and if you haven't yet, check out Glenn Beck's program today where he discusses this. Kent has built-in animosity due to the fact that he was under investigation and remains under investigation for leaking classified information. He was cut off from access to the pre-launch data and therefore doesn't have a proper foundation for his opinions to begin with. And I may have missed it, but where was the emphasis on Iran's confession to our negotiators prior to the launch of the military action, that they had 11 nuclear weapons ready to go, and our intelligence confirmed that they have sufficient missile capacity to launch missiles 1000 or more miles away. This brings many US bases and many of our allies into the target zone. And when they were offered all the uranium they would ever need in order to create civilian nuclear energy, they rejected that proposal and stated unequivocally that they will never abandoned their pursuit to obtain functional nuclear weapons. And quite frankly, no one has ever explained how a country who's sitting on such vast energy resources believes that developing nuclear energy is a national project of urgency. I call bullshit on anybody who says that Iran was not in the process of developing nuclear weapons, and the missiles to deliver them with. We could go into a lot more about how this battle and it's affect on China's access to energy is a strong move on the economic chessboard, or we could talk more about how Iran is the chief exporter of terrorism, worldwide and needed to be stopped, and we could have any kind of discussion you want about whether or not that section of the Shiite Muslims, who believe in the 12th Imam theory of jihadism are a political movement and not a religion, following in the footsteps of their prophet Mohammad who after failing to persuade enough people to his way of thinking that he reacted by turning his mission into political warfare himself. But Tucker's interview with Joe Kent, in my view, at least, was weak at best, biased, most certainly, and designed only to further disrupt the Trump America first agenda. I think a reasonable investigation by your show should be into why Tucker is so butt hurt that he's doing all of this.

You wanna rip the GOP apart right to its core and prevent a single America First voter from participating in the midterms? Indict Joe Kent and Tucker Carlson. See how that works out.