
General Mike Flynn
18.4K posts

General Mike Flynn
@GenFlynn
Faith, family, freedom, Former National Security Advisor to 45th POTUS. 🏄🏻♂️ 🌊 Subscribe to my Substack: https://t.co/TsoI4xdEzu


The XI TRUMP Summit was momentous in ways that no-one is saying. It was the second time TRUMP was given a CEASE AND DESIST Demand, this time backed by an implicit warning of Great Power armed conflict, in a period of just over 2 weeks. Here is the Chinese Foreign Ministry's official translation of the readout which sets out XI's Demand: "President Xi stressed that the Taiwan question is the most important issue in China-U.S. relations. If it is handled properly, the bilateral relationship will enjoy overall stability. Otherwise, the two countries will have clashes and even conflicts, putting the entire relationship in great jeopardy. “Taiwan independence” and cross-Strait peace are as irreconcilable as fire and water. Safeguarding peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait is the biggest common denominator between China and the U.S. The U.S. side must exercise extra caution in handling the Taiwan question." It is the word 'must' which stands out. For the first time that I can remember, certainly since the end of the Cold War, the leader of another country is telling the United States what it 'must' do. The US often talks in this way to other countries. It does not expect to be talked to in that way. The Chinese President has however just done precisely that. Moreover, as the photo attached to the Chinese readout makes clear, this was said by the Chinese President to the US President not in a private conversation, where they were the only ones present with translators, but during the full plenary meeting with the entire US delegation present. The word 'must' is backed by a clear threat of armed conflict. How else to interpret words like 'clashes and conflicts', which might put the entire relationship in 'great jeopardy'? XI also made clear that for China Taiwan is the paramount issue, overriding all others. Questions of trade, technology, rare earths, Iran, the Strait of Hormuz etc. are secondary. No doubt it was precisely for this reason that China, so as not to dilute the message, declined to enter into substantive discussions on these secondary issues. In other words China cannot be bribed or bullied or bought or frightened into changing its stance on Taiwan. It may be that the words in the Chinese language original are softer. It is the Chinese Foreign Ministry however that translated them in this way. I do not believe that Foreign Ministry's translators do not understand the force and weight these words in English carry. The Chinese, as they always do, were careful afterwards to soften the pill, hosting TRUMP in a banquet in the Great Hall of the People, and giving him tours of the Temple of Heaven and of Zhongnanhai. That however does not soften the impact of the words. On the contrary, it makes the warning starker still. The fact the Chinese gave TRUMP nothing on any other matter - Boeings, trade, rare earths, Iran, the Strait of Hormuz etc - underlines the point. This is the second time a Great Power leader has given the US President a warning of this kind in the space of just over 2 weeks. The previous such warnings were given by PUTIN on 29th April when he warned TRUMP over the phone not to attack Iran again, and gave TRUMP a further warning of the overwhelming retaliatory action Russia would take against Central Kiev if the Victory Day Parade in Moscow on 9th May were attacked. The fact TRUMP is now repeatedly getting warnings like this from Great Power leaders shows that China and Russia consider him a reckless leader barely under control who cannot be trusted. Certainly the Chinese, after seeing how he has acted in the last few months against Venezuela, Cuba and Iran, and perhaps against Russia in connection with the Valdai attack, don't trust him on Taiwan. Thus the decision to give him the warning. It also shows the change which has taken place in the global balance of power. Other Great Powers now feel able to make peremptory demands to the US dictating how it should behave over issues like Taiwan. Previously it was the US alone which did that. @RnaudBertrand @AlastairCrooke @AXChristoforou @thecyrusjanssen @Glenn_Diesen @TheGrayzoneNews @unjoe @MearsheimerJ @Consortiumnews @barnes_law @RealPepeEscobar @JamesWebb_16 @DanielLDavis1 youtube.com/watch?v=RsMRz7…

This is the longform version of the master plan to remake America’s government, a plan I’ve outlined in pieces across various threads. The protests and foreign-policy interventions are all moving toward the same end: a transformed American system of governance designed to prevent another Trump from ever taking power again. In effect, the United States has become its own democratic-transition project. We are living through a color revolution. Read more below.

Thank you Governor Polis. I made mistakes, and for those I am sorry. Five years ago I misled the Secretary of State when allowing a person to gain access to county voting equipment. That was wrong. I have learned and grown during my time in prison and going forward I will make sure that my actions always follow the law, and I will avoid the mistakes of the past. I strongly condemned it when people not connected to me threatened to storm the prison I am in. I myself have faced threats, so, I also want to be clear that I condemn any and all bullying, threats and acts of violence against voters, county clerks, election workers, and other public officials, and concerned citizens like myself. Upon release, I plan to do my best through legal means to support election integrity and based on my own personal experiences to elevate the cause of prison reform to help ensure the detention system is more fair and equitable for people of all ages. My experiences have given me a perspective that plan to share with others to improve Colorado’s corrections system. I am grateful for a second chance and an earlier release, and I look forward to doing good in the world.



There is a systematic effort to cut @DNIGabbard off at the knees. That is clear. The whistleblower said what he said. There was also clear semantics in play, for instance, the use of the word “raid” by some was too strong and not what actually happened (but documents were removed nonetheless). The bottom line, with all the BS we now know the CIA has done in the past 70 plus years, to include their involvement in the assassination of a president, it’s about time for our @POTUS to consider very serious reforms of the CIA. We can no longer afford to play this guessing game any longer. Americans simply don’t trust the organization at all. Reforms are past being necessary, they are now mandatory. And while the president is at it, there also needs to be a check on the shadow agency that exists and runs parallel to the one that sits in Langley. Thank you for all your excellent analysis and reporting.

🧵I feel like triggering Pentagon bureaucrats and partisan ideologues masquerading as neutral actors today. Everyone gives @PeteHegseth a hard time for his “mass purge” of a whopping 2% of senior officers. They screech, asking why?! On what grounds?! They shouldn’t panic, but they do. No. This is what will make them panic in the halls of government. Just like they did in 1940. A system that can be stood up at this exact moment to delineate between who stays and who goes. Who rises and who falls.👇













I just sent a letter to @CIADirector asking him to personally review CIA whistleblower Jim Erdman’s written testimony from yesterday’s hearing. The CIA is on formal notice: there must be no retaliation against him for complying with a Senate subpoena. hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/upl…





