khajiit

@Amani2oo1 @yagirl its real, hope you picked up some of that sweet sweet tree dolla bitcoin

@yagirl Is this a real screenshot or just a crazy glitch because if it actually hit three dollars someone just got insanely rich on a limit order

wtf is happening

@XBToshi monero is extremely illiquid. its delisted from most exchanges, so it cant handle large trading volume. as a result it behaves more like a microcap. remember in january, the price doubled from just a single hacker trying to use it to move $280 m.

Any FUD spreading about Monero that I'm not aware of? Or is the overall privacy sector no longer to be trusted? monero:native

whats with all the indians peddling zcash? thats how you know its some scammy dogshit zio coin

oversold daily rsi for btc, even lower than feb 5 bottom. nothing conclusive obviously, but mildly reassuring that we may get a bounce from here

@0xDamien i know its so unfair. i mean so what if it can be printed infinitely..

crypto market is a joke lol one of the strongest coins and best holds just casually down -30% in a day

@R89Capital @whenwillitendd0 you dont know what kind of shenanigans was taking place. who bought? maybe funds using investor money so insiders could dump. whole thing can be coordinated

@whenwillitendd0 It went up like 20x

ZEC obviously wasn't infinitely minted you retards lol

@Ellieboo73 @ramzpaul Iran would never use one. No country would. That's the beauty of nukes. States that have them never engage in total war with each other

@ramzpaul You'd love that wouldn't you. Probably celebrate if they used one to kill your fellow countrymen .

Iran has a nuke, doesn't it?

naval pushed the zio coin hard. so did balaji . the jeet-joo alliance is well established. it was all a scam zcash:native

@benthecarman what else do you expect from zio cash

Was the whole zcash hype the last year manufactured so someone could dump the infinite coins they were printing

rip zcash. monero is the undisputed privacy king. the parabolic rise starts now. there is no second best.

@ameensol shouldn’t this have caused sustained heavy sell pressure? opposite of the parabolic run we saw

legitimately nightmare fuel wtf

@mert i have a much better idea. dump it and never look back

since this comes up every few months, a refresher: - first, there *is* a way to prove the bug wasn't exploited, more on this below - the fundamental tradeoff in a strict privacy pool is that if there's a bug, it could be utilized without immediate detection. this is the same for almost all privacy protocols without audit keys and with circuits - it's similar to any other crypto bug, like defi, in that something could be exploited and moved to a different chain. there are bugs lurking all over defi, blockchains, and all software at all times. the difference is that given the privacy, it's obviously harder to detect timely - note that this has always been the case with any of these things (and zcash isn't unique here, the other notable privacy project you're thinking of also has the risk of counterfeit bugs), so nothing is "new" except for the fact that understandably not everyone knows the technical tradeoffs - in zcash, you have guardrails to detect this so the supply would never increase past 21M *but* the ppl in that pool would get shafted unless there's social consensus, which would admittedly be messy - recently, the zcash core teams have been increasingly using advanced tools and hiring external security firms to audit themselves to keep improving security - this is also why it's harder than it sounds to just add privacy to an L1 or L2 (without audit keys) because you want a high concentration of security researchers and cryptographers looking at this at all times. it's also why "dino" projects are interesting because they've survived this long. - now with this new effort, one of these was a hit and the team immediately patched the bug they found - you can be reasonably sure that it wasn't exploited given a number of signals, but you can't definitively prove it unless either: i) the turnstile is triggered ii) the wallets start pointing to a new pool to migrate (there have been 3 such migrations in the past for example) which would then prove this luckily, there has been work on creating a new pool that's provably sound, formally verified, and quantum proof this whole time with @TachyonZcash (which is also how I first got introduced to zcash) so once that migration is done, you will have full certainty

@shadeonmymind @mert hahaha

@mert so you're saying we need to trust until we can verify? sounds dope

its obviously AI generated, I wasnt trying to hide that. im also not going to sit there and write out that long ass post when the AI can spit the facts out just the same. you cant have a fking no kyc mastercard. that entire biz is bullshit, some guy selling prepaid cards using a mexico corp entity. will be shut down instantly once they catch on to it. also fk you for promoting it

@YtgLegacy @MacroCRG complete trash. ztrash

@MacroCRG so basically a unlimited amount of counterfeit zcash:native is possible? thats fking bad bro.

really hope this $zec fud is not as bad as it seems

do not use that crap. heres why: There is no such legal category as a "Non-KYC Mastercard." Every Visa/Mastercard card is issued under a BIN (Bank Identification Number) owned by a licensed bank or e-money institution. That issuer is bound by the card network's own operating rules and by anti-money-laundering law in its jurisdiction — the US Bank Secrecy Act, the EU's AML directives, and in Mexico specifically the Ley Federal para la Prevención e Identificación de Operaciones con Recursos de Procedencia Ilícita plus CNBV regulation of prepaid/electronic-money products. KYC/CDD on the cardholder is mandatory at the issuer level. It cannot be waived by a reseller's preference. So what is Goblin actually doing? The only coherent model — and the one independent crypto-card coverage describes — is that an operator like this is not a bank and not a card issuer. It buys or resells prepaid cards from a BIN sponsor (an offshore fintech) and signs you up as an anonymous sub-user on its own corporate account. The KYC was done once, by the operator, on the master account. To Mastercard, the card belongs to the sponsor; you are an unnamed entry in the operator's internal ledger. The "balance in MXN," the "no name printed on card," the "PIN in an envelope," and "balance check via partner app" are the exact fingerprints of a reloadable Mexican prepaid-card program being resold. Every Visa or Mastercard transaction flows through a BIN assigned to a licensed institution; non-KYC providers like Goblin Card are not banks and not licensed issuers — they operate as a reseller on top of a BIN sponsor's program, usually offshore. The practical consequence: the privacy is an illusion of one layer. You skip showing Goblin your passport. But the BIN sponsor and the upstream bank still hold the master KYC, the transaction stream is fully visible to the network and acquirers, and the operator itself necessarily knows your shipping address and your funding crypto addresses (which are pseudonymous, not anonymous — chain analysis routinely de-anonymizes BTC/ETH/SOL; only the XMR funding path resists it). You are trading verifiable, regulated custody for trust in an anonymous Telegram account. That is a strictly worse privacy posture than it sounds, not a better one. The About page says Mexico "offers specific legal frameworks that allow us to operate a Non-KYC card service while maintaining full compliance" and that the operation is "fully legitimate." This is false on its face. Mexico has no legal regime permitting anonymous, identity-free issuance or loading of payment cards; the opposite is true — Mexican AML law and CNBV rules impose customer identification on electronic-payment and prepaid products. A service whose entire selling point is evading identity verification cannot simultaneously be "in full compliance" with the AML framework of any FATF-aligned country. The phrase "we're transparent… through honesty, not obscurity" appears on a page that names no company, no legal entity, no registration number, no director, and no address. That is obscurity wearing a transparency costume.

@TrafficBrokerX @DFoday24693 he's right. its really fking annoying. youve said absolutely nothing what 'certain things'? how is the real money made? whats the true game? open eyes to what?

@DFoday24693 Sorry I’ve let you down David

The most amazing thing to me is how many people dedicate their life to the Affiliate Industry but truly have no clue how the game is played & how the real money is made Essentially 90% of the industry is blind to why certain people are doing certain things Your boss wants you blind to this, so you’re happy to make your 5% or 10% commission Most affiliates don’t even understand the true game I think the only way to understand is to be burned badly which always opens your eyes 👀

looks like the main character from black myth wukong

@crypto_bitlord7 ones a jpeg, the other a cool shiny thing in your hand

Explain to me how Pokémon cards are flying and NFTs are dead? -It’s a marketing issue NFTs have a global accessibility to liquidity Pokémon cards are isolated locally with friction. NFT market can be 10x bigger. As an industry we need to do better: OpenSea needs buying out