Olly

My piece in the Guardian on Macron's failures and what it says about liberalism more generally. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…

Remember: for years the UK had negative borrowing costs. We could’ve build infrastructure, resilience, capacity. Instead, we chose austerity. Now we’re paying the price in so many ways.

Would you believe me if I told you that business is going very well indeed for a lobbying firm that helped get Labour elected and is staffed by former party officials and advisers opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-…

Hassan and others on the French left have been repeatedly hauled in front of the counter terror police. I wrote about some of the uses of the terrorism apologia laws her: jacobin.com/2025/02/france…

I get that this is an unpopular view but: We need more journalists & fewer pundits. We need more original reporting & fewer hot takes riffing off the news. We don't have this because reporting takes work and is difficult & pontificating on YouTube is lazy & easy.

The proposed Yadan law would also criminalise calling for an end to a state, citing criticism of Israel in the justification. Caroline Yadan, who is proposing the new law, is the MP for the 8th constituency for 🇫🇷 residents overseas, which includes 🇮🇱 + 🇵🇸

Franco-Palestian MEP has been taken into custody for "terrorism apologia" following a tweet about a member of the Japanese Red Army Faction. This comes as 🇫🇷 is debating the Yadan Law, which would criminalise referring to "acts of terrorism" as "legitimate resistance".

🔴 Info StreetPress - Néofascistes, identitaires, hooligan... On dresse le profil des militants d'extrême droite présents avec Quentin Deranque le jour de la rixe mortelle à Lyon👇 streetpress.com/sujet/17749486…

Dans le groupe de Quentin, le jour de sa mort, on trouve Grégory Violland. Deux mois plus tôt, cet homme de 21 ans était condamné pour avoir fait un salut nazi devant le panneau de la commune de "Juif" (Saône-et-Loire). Dans sa chambre, les enquêteurs ont retrouvé un emblème SS.

@adoptedcan92 @LukeTryl It wasn't an accusation, I'm just interested. Different polls point to quite different political realities so want to know what the methodology is that produces the difference.

@reality_manager @LukeTryl Dunno,but they were the most accurate in terms of seat predictions in 2024 so they are doing something right

Reform bounce back to 30% in our latest voting intention, 9pts ahead of the Conservatives who are just ahead of Labour. ➡️ REF UK 30% (+3) 🌳 CON 21% (+1) 🌹 LAB 19% (nc) 🌍 GREEN 12% (nc) 🔶 LIB DEM 11% (-3) ❓OTH 4% (nc) 🟡 SNP 2% (-1) N = 2,003 | 28-30/3| Change w 25/03

I am genuinely curious: if the rule is that people who do civilian media work for a party to a conflict can be killed, does this mean Eylon thinks he was a lawful target in 2023/24? Does he like think the Israeli MFA Spokesperson can be lawfully killed by Iran today?

Bolloré's dogs are trying to claim that it isn't racist to compare a black man, Bally Bagayoko, the newly elected mayor of St-Denis, to a monkey or chieftan of a primitive tribe They also claim to fight against racism in all its forms lol. x.com/CNEWS/status/2…

Is this the first recorded use of Yookay?

PAUL HOLDEN STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO INTERVIEW WITH JOSH SIMONS ON BBC NEWSCAST Yesterday, BBC Newscast published a lengthy, forty-minute interview with former Cabinet Minister Josh Simons MP. The interview addressed how Simons, as a director of @LabourTogether, had appointed a firm called APCO Worldwide to investigate me and my colleagues. I was not told by the BBC ahead of the broadcast that the episode was being recorded or aired. I was not approached to respond to the lengthy comments made about me or the small anti-corruption organisation, @ShadowWorldInv1 , that I run with my colleague @andrewfeinstein. Andrew, who is also repeatedly mentioned, was also not approached for comment. I only found out last night, when a friend texted me, that the person who hired a major multinational reputation management firm that produced a despicable and defamatory report on me and my colleagues, and who reported me on the basis of these false and defamatory reports to the UK’s security services, was being given forty minutes to give his version of events on a major podcast published by our national broadcaster. To be clear, the BBC has NEVER - not once - approached me to comment on a story that is, ultimately, about me, my investigations, my family and my colleagues. They did not approach me when the story first broke, and they did not approach me for this episode. If the BBC had done so, I would have raised several issues with the way in which matters related to me were discussed. For example, Simons repeatedly stated in the interview that he instructed APCO to investigate whether my reporting or sourcing derived from a ‘hack’ of the Electoral Commission. The word ‘hack’ is used eight times in the interview. At no time was it acknowledged in this discussion that this allegation – that I might have received hacked materials – is entirely false, and I have repeatedly proven it to be false. Following the broadcast, I contacted the BBC to complain and to raise serious issues with the broadcast. I was contacted by the Newscast editor, Sam Bonham, to say the BBC would update the Newscast episode and further reporting to reflect some of my concerns. This has not yet happened with regards to the podcast, although I note some online reporting finally reflects a very small and limited sampling of my comments. I will wait to see if amendments and updates will follow. If they do not, I will be escalating this matter to OFCOM. In the interim, I have decided to share the full statement I provided to the BBC, which is produced below: I would like to put certain things on the record. First, my reporting on Labour Together and Morgan McSweeney was entirely factually accurate and based on impeccable, legal sourcing. My sourcing has been reviewed by multiple media outlets, who confirmed the authenticity and legal provenance of my sources. Revelations based on my book, The Fraud, has subsequently been covered widely across the mainstream media, including in multiple front-page scoops, in outlets such as The Times, Daily Mail, The Guardian, The National and ITV. The stories I produced in 2023 and 2024, and which prompted Labour Together's investigation into me, were subject to extensive editorial and legal checks. They were, I believe, entirely accurate reporting on matters of profound public interest, which included raising concerns about the character of powerful individuals like Morgan McSweeney. Considering the recent Mandelson affair, I believe I have been entirely vindicated in attempting to alert the public about McSweeney's past, including how McSweeney made use of £700,000 in funding that he unlawfully failed to declare to the Electoral Commission to procure power and influence for himself and Sir Keir Starmer. Second, Josh Simons states that he never intended for APCO Worldwide to investigate me or my journalistic colleagues. However, a copy of the contract between APCO Worldwide and Labour Together, addressed to Simons, has now been published. The contract sets out a scope of work written in plain English. It states that APCO will 'investigate the sourcing, funding, origins of a Sunday Times article as well as upcoming works by authors Paul Holden and Matt Taibbi.' The contract then states that the aim of the APCO investigation will be to 'provide a body of evidence that could be packaged up in the media in order to create narratives that would proactively undermine any future attacks on Labour Together.' The contract then sets out a range of potentially invasive investigative methods that will be used to generate this 'package', including 'financial investigations' and 'human intelligence investigations.' I provide the full text of this contract below. This contract is clear. APCO were hired to investigate me to produce materials that would 'proactively undermine' my factually accurate, public interest reporting. They would use a range of investigative techniques to do so. APCO then did exactly as was suggested in the contract, using these investigative methods to "investigate" me. This investigation has caused me and my family significant anxiety and distress. Third, Josh Simons was provided with a report called Operation Cannon. It is the result of a lengthy investigation into me and my colleagues by APCO Worldwide. I have seen a copy of this report. It makes a series of extremely defamatory and utterly false allegations against me. It identifies my home address and sets out private information about my family. I cannot express how profoundly shocking, outrageous and defamatory this report truly is. Simons may claim he never intended for APCO to investigate me, but on receipt of this despicable report, he then chose to use it. He submitted sections of the report to the National Cyber Security Centre to convince them to investigate me. The Guardian has published the email correspondence in which Simons repeated some of the substance of the allegations in the APCO reports. Fourth, multiple media freedom advocacy organisations, including the NUJ, have strongly criticised the APCO investigation and these related matters. They have all, to my mind correctly, strongly criticised Labour Together and APCO for investigating journalists producing factually accurate reporting in the public interest. Finally, I am still reviewing the Newscast interview. I will be responding in due course and I hope that the BBC will, this time, give me the platform to set out what really happened and why. Text of Contract Between Labour Together and APCO Worldwide, addressed to Josh Simons Dear Mr Simons We are pleased that you have selected APCO Worldwide Limited (“APCO”) to provide the following scope of work (“services”) during Term: APCO will devise a concise strategy to aid Labour Together. APCO will investigate the sourcing, funding and origins of a Sunday Times article about Labour Together, as well as upcoming works by authors Paul Holden and Matt Taibbi – to establish who and what are behind the coordinated attacks on Labour Together. The approach should provide a body of evidence that could be packaged up for use in the media in order to create narratives that would proactively undermine any future attacks on Labour Together. The material can also inform any future legal strategy that Labour Together might wish to pursue against any of these parties. The work will include: • Open Source Investigations (OSINT): Recovery and Preservation of Evidence • Human Intelligence Investigation (HUMINT): Recovery and Preservation of Evidence • Financial Investigation: Forensic Accounting Focus • Digital Forensics Investigation: Recovery and Preservation of Evidence • Stakeholder Outreach • Media Packaging and Dissemination

Starting to look positively insane that every European leader apart from Sanchez supported this war. The costs for Europe will be very, very heavy. A month from now Merz, Macron, von der Leyen, Meloni won’t have time for anything else but explaining themselves

@edwyplenel @sarahbenhaida @Mediapart Edwy, est-ce que vous allez soutenir De Villepin en 2027?

À un an de la présidentielle, Dominique de Villepin s’offre un meeting test à La Sorbonne. Par @sarahbenhaida @Mediapart mediapart.fr/journal/politi…

Andrew Neil was Chairman at the time of this article

Edouard Philippe, soi-disant moderate: