The Cleveland Browns are proposing a rule change that would allow NFL teams to trade draft picks five years into the future instead of three. Any changes need to be approved by at least 24 of the 32 teams. spr.ly/6016B6nKD8

@espn @Grok do you think Cleveland will get this rule change?

@espn @grok explain in layman’s terms

@espn Why is this rule proposal coming at this time, why 5 draft pick instead of three? @grok

Think you know who will cut down the nets? Download the app and bet on them to win it all in March!

@espn Cleveland Browns just dropped a wild NFL rule change: trade draft picks FIVE years out instead of three. Needs 24/32 teams to greenlight it at owners meetings. Could spark mega-deals like NBA-style hauls Browns GM Berry's wheeling for sure. Game-changer or tank fuel?

@espn Extending it to 5 years adds flexibility but also removes accountability. Decision-makers won’t even be around to deal with the fallout.

@espn Someone needs to save the Browns from themselves 😂

@espn Imagine trading a pick today for a player who might not even be in the league when that pick hits.

@espn Do not ruin the beautiful sport. Too much change will ruin it

@espn Browns proposing 5-year draft pick trades? GMs about to mortgage unborn picks like it’s the NBA. Chaos approved 😂 #NFL

@espn The Browns really ran out of picks to trade for 30-year-old QBs and decided to change the whole rulebook. 💀

@espn Trading picks five years out feels like putting next decade on a credit card.

It’s time to dance! Get it on tournament action with Bonus Bets from FanDuel.

@espn More flexibility… but also more risk if teams go all-in

@espn @grok is this true

@espn Browns proposing 5-year draft trades? Future mortgaging gonna be insane 😂

@espn The Browns wanting to trade picks five years out is like someone with a maxed out credit card asking for a higher limit.

@espn Trading picks 5 years out isn’t strategy it’s gambling with a future GM’s job.

@espn Interesting proposal from the Browns, extending future pick trades to 5 years could give teams more flexibility, but it also adds risk. Curious to see if it gets the 24 votes needed.

@espn I prefer the MLB rule, draft picks can’t be traded.

@espn Imagine being hired as a new GM and no first round picks for five years…

@espn The Browns pushing for 5-year draft pick trades is a bold (and risky) move—could make blockbuster deals way more common, but teams will definitely start mortgaging futures like never before. 😬

@espn Browns be trading or releasing all their picks away why they so lousy why do they want to go to 5 years?

@espn They already traded away their entire 2020s decade so they are just trying to get a head start on ruining the 2030s.

@espn Why so they can trade 5 first round picks for Michael Penix Jr?

@espn Awesome. Maybe the Browns can trade their #1 draft picks for the next five years for a mediocre QB this year. PAR for the course.

@espn that’s straight up chaos waiting to happen

@espn So a junior or sophomore in high school can be a future 5 year pick😉

@espn The Cleveland Browns credit score is probably a "540."

@espn The Cleveland Browns are proposing a rule change so they can attempt to do trades that would set their franchise back an additional 5 years into the future.

@espn The last team that should be trading picks 5 years out is the Cleveland Browns. Just an opportunity to make more bad decisions.

@espn They know Shedeur is not their future

@espn Are they naming it the Ted Stepien Law of Diminishing Returns?

@espn The Browns proposed this rule because they would do it a lot.

@espn So, I'm a GM trying to save my job, and I'm going to make sure that if I get fired, I'm f'n over my replacement.

@espn My Browns are absolute retards. Haslem has got to go

@espn A stupid rule change. Just because the Browns are a bunch of fuckups is no reason to change the rules