Tweet épinglé
Really?
66.1K posts
Really?
@AFactCheck2U
We are the news! Fact-checking and sharing information.
Inscrit le Aralık 2024
1.2K Abonnements1.3K Abonnés
Really? retweeté
🚨 TRUTH NUKE ON BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP: “There are more than 500 firms in China that facilitate people coming from the CCP to give birth here….what that could mean is 1 million new voters by 2030. Imagine that. Communist Party VOTERS.”
EXISTENTIAL.
English
Really? retweeté
🚨 The Chinese Communist party estimates that they are sending up to 100,000 people per year to engage in birth tourism and create new U.S. citizens, according to Eric Eggers.
"That's potentially up to 𝗢𝗡𝗘 𝗠𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗢𝗡 people that could be voting in this country by 2030 or earlier," he said ‼️
The birthright citizenship case before the Supreme Court today matters.
@SatAmericaFNC ⬇️
English
Really? retweeté
Raise your hand if you think the Supreme Court should BAN Birthright Citizenship! ✋
English
Really? retweeté
Really? retweeté
In the next decade, over 1M Chinese communists will be able to vote in American elections.
You heard me.
Thanks to birth tourism, Chinese billionaires are paying surrogates to birth their children on U.S. soil so the babies are American citizens.
The children are taken back to China after birth, raised as communists, then when they’re 18, they’re allowed to vote in U.S. elections.
THAT is why birthright citizenship must end.
1M votes swings any election.
Soon the Chinese communists will “legally” control our elections.
Unless we end birthright citizenship.
English
Really? retweeté
How is this even a serious conversation?
The idea that ANYONE can fly from ANYWHERE into America, have a baby, then fly back with citizenship is unserious.
And yet, that’s exactly what is happening.
Birthright citizenship should be rejected by SCOTUS immediately.
English
Really? retweeté
BEYOND PARODY: Gavin Newsom Spends $20 Million on Consulting Firm in Effort to Find Ways to Cut Waste
READ: thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/beyond…
English
Really? retweeté
🚨🚨🚨
This ActBlue investigation is among the biggest bombshell campaign finance corruption and actual foreign election interference stories in American politics.
And it was all so publicly obvious, with many urging the media to look into this, but until recently, the media refused to cover it.
A must read from (surprisingly!) @nytimes @ShaneGoldmacher @reidepstein
“This presents a substantial risk for ActBlue,” the law firm, Covington & Burling, wrote in one of two memos expressing legal concerns. One memo raised the specter of a criminal investigation if prosecutors believed that ActBlue had tried to conceal facts about its efforts to prevent foreign contributions.
Federal election law prohibits foreign citizens or people who are not permanent residents from donating directly to federal candidates or political action committees. Lying to or obstructing Congress is a crime.
The memos instigated a meltdown at the highest levels of ActBlue, one of the Democratic Party’s most vital financial organs….
It can be alleged that ActBlue accepted and/or facilitated the acceptance of foreign-national contributions into American elections,” one memo states. “In addition, because ActBlue’s staff was aware that its system was not as robust as necessary, it could be alleged that these violations were ‘knowing and willful,’ a standard that both increases the penalties the F.E.C. might seek and gives the Justice Department jurisdiction for a potential criminal investigation.”
🚨🚨🚨🚨
nytimes.com/2026/04/02/us/…
English
Really? retweeté
🚨 WOW: ACTING ATTORNEY TODD BLANCHE WARNS: FRAUD CRACKDOWN is HERE 👀💣🚨
$50 MILLION SCHEME BUSTED — ARRESTS ALREADY HAPPENING🔥
Says even STATE LEADERS could be involved — “THEY’RE LETTING IT HAPPEN” 😳
English
Really? retweeté
The New York Times just confirmed what we've long suspected: ActBlue knowingly let in fraudulent foreign donations to help Democrats win.
Yet another example of the left's embrace of fraud.
Everyone involved must face the full weight of the law.
English
Really? retweeté
Oh look - ActBlue was finally exposed for what the “conspiracy theorists” have been saying for years:
Democrats are laundering foreign money.
Tom Cotton@TomCottonAR
The New York Times just confirmed what we've long suspected: ActBlue knowingly let in fraudulent foreign donations to help Democrats win. Yet another example of the left's embrace of fraud. Everyone involved must face the full weight of the law.
English
Really? retweeté
🚨 BOOM! ActBlue just got BUSTED, implicated in LYING to Congress about vetting FOREIGN DONATIONS.
Rep. Chip Roy says it could be TENS OF MILLIONS in illegal foreign cash — and they may have committed straight-up PERJURY.
English
Really? retweeté
Praise God!
One of my favorite clients of all 33+ years of law practice in service to advancing liberty!!
LifeNews.com@LifeNewsHQ
BREAKING: Final Charge Dismissed Against David Daleiden for Exposing Planned Parenthood Aborted Baby Part Sales lifenews.com/2026/04/02/fin…
English
Really? retweeté
Why isn’t this OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE ⁉️ @TheJusticeDept
Ian Speir@IanSpeir
Colorado is now requiring lawyers in the State, as a condition of logging into its court e-filing system, to promise not to cooperate with federal authorities in enforcing federal immigration law. Please understand: - I do not practice immigration law. - I do not practice criminal law. - Nothing about my civil practice has anything to do with this. And yet because I cannot log into the State's official e-filing system without saluting The Resistance, I now cannot represent my clients, file lawsuits, access cases, file documents in existing cases, etc. If I click "Decline," it kicks me out of the system. I must click "Accept" to access the system and continue representing my civil clients -- again, in cases that have absolutely nothing to do with immigration law or policy. I've read SB 25-276 (the law referred to below). It does not regulate me as a private attorney or any of the clients I represent in civil matters. This is outrageous draconian overreach. I have ethical obligations to my clients to represent them competently. My existing cases have running deadlines that I must attend to. Judges issue orders in my cases that I must follow. If I don't click "Accept" in order to access the State's e-filing system, I will harm my clients, torpedo my practice, and probably commit malpractice. So, I have no choice. I'm clicking "Accept" under protest.
English
Really? retweeté
Staffer for the now #2 most powerful official at DOJ:
Stanley Woodward, a Democrat who sued Trump and whose wife also sued Trump.
And people wonder why the DOJ is such a mess.
Trump wanted him fired.
Why is he still there? Why is Ashleigh Bondoc still employed at DOJ?
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer
EXCLUSIVE: Pro-illegal alien and pro-DEI lawyer Ashleigh Bondoc was recently hired to work at the DOJ under @AGPamBondi as a Special Assistant to Stanley Woodward, the Senior Counselor to President Trump at the White House, and the new Trump nominee for associate Attorney General. According to Ashleigh Bondoc’s LinkedIn profile, she worked as a Public Interest Intern for the American Bar Association Commission on Immigration. During this time, Ashleigh worked to help illegal aliens by doing the following legal jobs in her position: — Provided legal assistance to detainees in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities across the nation through a phone hotline service, communicating in both English and Spanish — Prepared portfolios containing legal assistance information for ICE detainees to assist in resolving their immigration cases, ranging from asylum claims to vacating criminal charges — Evaluated detainee concerns to draft formal complaints forwarded to ICE In early April, President Trump nominated Woodward to be associate attorney general. Woodward is the person who hired Ashleigh Bondoc. How does the Trump administration expect to carry out mass deportations when they are hiring illegal alien advocates to work at the DOJ and the Executive Office of the President? See receipts below 👇🏻
English
Really? retweeté
Really? retweeté
This is what they’ve been up to all along.
They did everything but strike the match.
English
Really? retweeté
Law Professor Jonathan Turley: It’s ‘Insane’ That We Continue to Embrace Birthright Citizenship (VIDEO)
READ: thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/law-pr…
English
Really? retweeté
The Details You Haven't Heard About This Swalwell And Dem Scandal Will Blow Your Mind: Clip of Kevin McCarthy explaining why Eric Swalwell's involvement with Chinese spy Fang Fang is far worse than you can imagine! youtu.be/M1TN_YTrDcQ via @YouTube
YouTube
Tony Seruga@TonySeruga
🚨 Swalwell, the 'Working Parent' Millionaire: Delays Taxes, Raids Retirement, Blows $244K in Campaign Cash on Child Care While Pocketing $444K a Year and Ordering Uber Eats Like It's Going Out of Style California governor candidate Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell’s finances show that he delayed paying his federal taxes, and spends the most on child care in the House with campaign funds. Swalwell and his wife, Brittany, made an average income of more than $444,000 from 2021 to 2024, which included cash-raising moves such as drawing down retirement accounts, delaying federal tax payments, and spending on child care with campaign funds, according to tax returns and campaign finance filings, the Sacramento Bee reported. The Swalwells’ income puts them in the top 5% of households in Washington, D.C., where the couple owns a $1.2 million home, in addition to the congressman renting a room in Livermore, Calif., owned by another family. The couple withdrew nearly $145,000 from their retirement accounts from 2020 to 2022. In 2023, Swalwell zeroed out withholdings on his congressional salary, and only withheld $2,580 in 2022, effectively delaying payment of his federal taxes, which incurred penalties. Swalwell’s congressional salary increased from $161,648 in 2021 to $184,229 in 2024, and he supplemented it with self-employment described in the returns as “Administrative Office Work” from 2022 to 2024, earning up to $32,000. In other disclosures, Swalwell says the additional income came from an LLC linked to Spycraft Entertainment, “a global production company run by former senior intelligence officers from the U.S. and U.K.” Swalwell’s wife, who has a background in the hospitality industry, earned salaries of around $200,000 to $250,000 during that time, with different employers: Evolution Hospitality in 2021, the Swalwell Remedy Group from 2022 to 2024, and Rockbridge Capital from 2023 to 2024. The congressman also used campaign funds to pay for child care for his three children at a rate far higher than any other representative, including nearly $60,000 in 2022. Swalwell used campaign funds to pay for more than $244,000 in child care expenses from 2019 to 2025, which is the highest total in the House, and more than three times the amount spent by the next highest lawmaker. Federal election rules permit using campaign funds to pay for child care. It is unclear why Swalwell made the cash-raising moves, as disclosures show that he has owed between $50,000 and $100,000 on student loans for more than a decade. Swalwell’s most recent paperwork shows the family holds between $15,000 and $50,000 in credit card liabilities apiece for Chase and American Express, and the loan for the D.C. home is listed between $1 million and $5 million. Swalwell’s campaign spokesperson, Micah Beasley, told the news outlet that the congressman’s tax returns differentiated him from Tom Steyer, a billionaire rival who, along with former Rep. Katie Porter, has polled evenly with Swalwell in the crowded gubernatorial primary. The three Democrats tied at 10% in a California Democratic Party poll released last week, behind Republicans Steve Hilton and Chad Bianco. “Unlike others in this race, Congressman Eric Swalwell is not a billionaire,” Beasley said. “He is a working parent raising three young children with his wife while serving in public office. Like millions of Californians, they balance mortgage payments, student loans, child care, and everyday expenses.” Beasley added that Swalwell’s tax returns “mirror those of a typical middle-class Californian, in stark contrast to the candidates who have used offshore tax strategies, benefited from investments structured to minimize taxes, and have a documented history of incomplete financial disclosures — all while campaigning on making others ‘pay their fair share.’” Swalwell drew from his official House spending account to reimburse himself for an average of $1,625 in monthly lodging expenses since January 2023, which many Congress members have done since House rules expanded to allow the expenditures. Since Jan. 1, 2020, Swalwell’s congressional campaign committee has spent nearly $25,000 on Uber Eats, which is more than any other Congress member. He was second only to House Majority Leader Steve Scalise in overall Uber spending during that period, paying more than $105. 👉 Boost the algorithm, fight the throttling, and get more 👀: bookmark, share, reply, repost, like, and follow @TonySeruga
English
Really? retweeté
ActBlue, the Democrats’ campaign cash machine, has faced many recent criminal allegations.
• Illegal "Smurfing"
• Turning a "blind eye" to illegal foreign donations
• Nonprofit fraud
Now it's time to add "lying to Congress."
Could we finally see a criminal investigation? 🧵
English