Billy Bratz

@Sakshi50038 2-5 years? Now! There is an important nuance, AI is only as good as its prompter A shit solution is still shit regardless of how fast it was written. What we’re seeing is an end to the standard of hiring engineers where the bar is “has a pulse”

AI will eat most of the jobs in next 2-5 years: Roles at high risk: - Frontend devs - Backend devs - Full-stack devs - Jr. software engineers - QA testers - Basic data analysts Roles that are safe: - UI/UX and graphic designers - Software/system architects - Entrepreneurs - AI specialists

These are not mechanical human brains capable for learning and reasoning and abstract autonomous thought. Model drift is a problem on simple tasks, accuracy is a problem on simple tasks. Stop listening to people who are trying to change reality to be Ex-Machina this is not that

The truth about AI “AI” as we refer to it broadly speaks of Large Language Models (LLMs) which are trained to mathematically predict and emulate how a human would respond. What this is: A force multiplier for a talented user What this is not: Jarvis, Ultron

@bosshoss101 @Reeseforsure Something similar was likely said at every technological advancement ever. “Don’t use that wheel you’ll become weak and lazy and won’t be able to hunt.” Humans always adapts. Nothing but fear and pure speculation indicate this will be any different

@BasedAiEngineer @Reeseforsure Most will subject themselves to AI and what they believe it’s worth and will be slaves those that live free raise their food and reject AI will be smarter and better off than the other.

AI will be largely rejected by people in the end

@tjsingletonjr @evanbpeters How many people have been sued for creating AI videos from people’s images? Not saying if you go all in it wouldn’t trigger Napster style blowback but that never stopped anyone.

@BasedAiEngineer @evanbpeters If you try to make money using other people’s images (without permission) as the characters, you will be sued

The thing about AI “movies” is, I just don’t care. I’m not impressed. Really. People are like, “wow look what I made with $39!” and its some wild space movie and it just does nothing for me. I’d rather see a $39 movie made by real people with props and sets that looks cheap and silly than a $39 AI movie that looks like a blockbuster.

@sahill_og Sup

X is cool. but it’s 100x better when your timeline is full with people who code and build things. if you’re into tech, AI, startups, product, design, development or programming. say hi and let's connect

@TheMG3D Yeah and no edited images, only real photos uploaded directly from the device used to take them. 🙄

Generative AI needs to be removed from all platforms

@justbyte_ Depends on your use case. ChatGPT is in my opinion the best all around and the best deal for a paid tier. However Claude is the king for writing code. If your primary use is writing code and you can afford it Claude. If you don’t OpenAI

Be honest, which Ai tool is worth using in 2026??

Are you a Developer… or an Engineer? If you’re just a programmer, AI is coming for your job. If you’re an Engineer — and you’re not learning how to use AI as a force multiplier — AI is still coming for your job. Not in 5 years. Not in 5 months. Not in 5 weeks. Now.

AI doesn’t remove engineering constraints. It removes friction. Those are not the same thing. You can now generate 10x the code. But architecture, trade-offs, and long-term maintenance still compound. If your system was fragile before AI, it’s just fragiler faster now. Leverage without discipline is debt.

AI didn’t replace bad engineering. It amplified it. More code. More surface area. More complexity. Same architecture. If your foundation is weak, AI just helps you dig the hole faster. ROI doesn’t come from tokens. It comes from disciplined systems.

Companies went all-in on AI. Now they’re staring at the bill. Tokens ≠ value. Executives are starting to ask the only question that matters: Where’s the ROI? This is where the real AI phase begins. #AI