BluntOP

@Mik7t @JoshuaMoonsault @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase The "inquisitions" involved small, regional courts mostly used against heresy. Only a small proportion of those questioned by an inquisition were found guilty of anything and only a tiny fraction was executed. Secular courts were far more indiscriminate when it came to execution.

@BluntObserver @JoshuaMoonsault @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase The church themselves recorded the inquisitions, the economic and intellectual stagnation during the most religious time period in Europe is well documented, who are you trying to gaslight, me or yourself? Because you aren’t gaslighting me.

Public school students in Texas will be required to read passages from the bible in class, starting in 2030. (theguardian.com/us-news/2026/j…)

@rescened @JoshuaMoonsault @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase I just told you: leftist ones.

@BluntObserver @JoshuaMoonsault @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase literally what depraved sexual ethics are children being taught ? 😭😭

@Mik7t @JoshuaMoonsault @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase There is no such thing as the Dark Ages. That is a label invented by Protestant and non-religious anti-Catholic bigots like yourself. But if you want to read actual history, I recommend Bart Ehrman's 2026 book entitled Love Thy Stranger. Ehrman is a mainstream agnostic historian

@BluntObserver @JoshuaMoonsault @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase It’s a historical fact that the only thing they shaped was killing non-believers and throwing us into the dark ages you ignorant monkey.

@XxpackSkillzxX @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase Most of the immigrants who have come here were and are Christian too. So what is your point?

@chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase The Bible did not build America, immigration did. Cry about it

@sincityfrog @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase The first abolitionists in history were Christian. The first person to explicitly denounce slavery as intrinsically immoral was a Christian, St. Gregory of Nyssa. Stop using leftist rhetoric to justify your bigotry against Christianity.

@chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase mutilating and kidnapping black and indigenous people is fine, but shittalk christianity and that's too far!

@JoshuaMoonsault @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase It's a historical fact that Jesus and Christianity heavily shaped western morals and society. But let's just ignore all that and teach kids about depraved, leftist sexual ethics instead. 🙄

@chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase yeah that’s why there’s a separation between church and state right?? dumb fuck.

@seanpureDFS @CatRedFront We don’t believe that we can kill children. That’s typically what leftists and atheists do though. 😂

@BluntObserver @CatRedFront 🤣🤣 so I didn’t misrepresent anything. you lost the second you defended your religion’s morality to kill children. Good luck bro

I don’t particularly dislike islam over other religions but honestly I rarely see christians claiming their religion is progressive or whatever nor do I regularly see leftists getting mad at others for calling christianity reactionary

@seanpureDFS @CatRedFront Uh huh. The flood was God’s judgement against evil, and is presented as a necessary action that God took to set humanity back on a course that makes their salvation and restoration to Paradise possible. It’s not relevant to human politics since we aren’t God. It’s a cheap shot.

@BluntObserver @CatRedFront i've read both the bible & quran as well as have studied hinduism/buddhism/vipassana extensively. so ill ask again, what did i misrepresent in the great flood?

@seanpureDFS @CatRedFront So I’ll take that as a no, you don’t have anything substantive to say. No, I’m implying that you’re taking a passage in a book that you know nothing about to justify anti-religious bigotry and manipulation of politics.

@BluntObserver @CatRedFront uneducated are the ones that believe in made up stories written 2000 years ago and have never questioned them their entire lives. Are you implying the great flood is a made up story?

@psilynt @thisissky0 @AgedReference @nocontextmemes matter the possible state of affairs, then that wrongness must apply to all possible people, even if they disagree. This is actually one way philosophers sometimes justify objective morality: reductio ad absurdem, or the absurdity of the contrary.

@psilynt @thisissky0 @AgedReference @nocontextmemes for fun is wrong depends on human so say, then it could be, and was for some people or societies, morally good. If you agree that genocide for fun is wrong no matter the possible state of affairs, then you agree with objective morality, for if genocide for fun is wrong no ...

@seanpureDFS @CatRedFront It took you just two tweets to reveal that you are an uneducated, anti-religious bigot. Impressive. So do you have any substantive to say, or are you just gonna cry about a Bible story?

@BluntObserver @CatRedFront I'm an anti low IQ bigot which all scripture god believers are, yes

@psilynt @thisissky0 @AgedReference @nocontextmemes The theist is trying to argue that objective morality can only be grounded in a being that we know of as "God." If morality is just like taste in food, then there would be nothing to explain. Maybe you misunderstand where the theist is coming from.

@BluntObserver @thisissky0 @AgedReference @nocontextmemes > morality is determined by the person or society Correct > there is no good or bad thing as such Not objectively existing. There's no shared non-physical realm where good and bad exist. It's as you said, determined by person and society. It's not mind-independent.

@seanpureDFS @CatRedFront I can mispresent secularism and assert that your beliefs aren't reasonable either. That doesn't get us anywhere. Be honest, you're just an anti-religious bigot.

@BluntObserver @CatRedFront Your religion's morality had your god kill millions of children in a mass flood. Utter stupidity to even reason with you

@psilynt @thisissky0 @AgedReference @nocontextmemes So, you believe in moral non-realism. That morality is determined by the person or society, and that there is no good or bad thing as such. Thanks for proving the OP's point lol.

@thisissky0 @AgedReference @nocontextmemes That does seem to be the case. Have you looked around outside your rock? People aren't discovering 'moral truths' by sitting in an armchair and navel gazing. People do, in fact, disagree. Saying morality is subjective is just descriptive.

@DavidRobinr0 @reddit_lies Consider: docs.google.com/document/d/1V8…

@reddit_lies I’m an atheist myself and agree with the teachings of religion. Religion does far more good than bad

Reddit atheists will internalize Christian morality and then just discard the things that make them uncomfortable.

@seanpureDFS @CatRedFront I believe my religion’s morality is based on reason. Now what?

@BluntObserver @CatRedFront your morality and pragmatism should be based on reason which should be based on evidence. hope this isn't too complicated to understand

@CatRedFront Of course it's not, it's the converse of what you said. If religious beliefs shouldn't guide my political choices, who's beliefs should?

@BluntObserver Not the same thing