CanPay

You know what’s dark? Your dishonesty. You don’t care about permissionless at all. For example, you retweeted the below… it’s about a centralized issuer issuing a centralized asset. Why did you do it? Because it’s on “your” chain. If you truly cared about permissionless all that much (aka “dark times”), you’d say the only asset that should exist on ETH is…. ETH or similar assets. No RWAs. Definitely no RWAs that have centralized control. But again, you’re not really honest. You talk from a position. You try to push for your bags. And that’s ok btw, but “dark times”. lol, give me a break.

Austin Campbell delivers a brutal reality check on the "Trilemma of Compliance." He argues that you cannot have permissionlessness, smart contracts, and real-world assets simultaneously without a federal judge eventually "rugging" the system. "In the US legal system, asset commingling has a simple standard: freeze everything and figure it out later." "If you think the blockchain makes crime legal, you haven't met a federal judge."

Canton is not a blockchain, and it's NOT a semantic difference. This materially limits their ability to protect transacting parties, which is the entire reason the blockchain technology exists.

Due to the currently high network transaction fees, after completing refunds for all Onchain Pending transactions, we have decided to restructure our operational model. Going forward, CanPay will be restricted to specific users only and will no longer be open to the general public. All public Campaign activities will be stopped immediately. The minimum transaction amount and address verification fees will be further increased. This is a difficult decision, but long-term sustainability is more important. If you are able to obtain an invitation code for CanPay, you will be able to continue using CanPay services as well as enjoy future membership benefits. Thank you for your understanding and support.