Deep Thinker

February 6, 2026: 10,000 $LYX were worth USD 2,715.

I believe Universal Profile will become a true necessity because of agents. The design of identity and the idea of aggregating historical reputation across multiple chains may not be suitable for humans—but they are essential for agents. Just imagine: in the future, agents will grow exponentially, and the primary actors on blockchains will very likely be various kinds of agents. These actors will require trusted authorization and continuous historical records that human users can verify. This continuity must not be broken by a change of wallet keys. At present, only Universal Profile can achieve this. EOAs cannot even support proper permission management. Smart accounts can handle permissions, but they fail to provide cross-chain identity consistency and persistent historical continuity. Once the key changes, everything resets. Universal Profile is the only solution that fully unifies these elements. That is why I believe it will be a core necessity in the agent era. If Universal Profile can accelerate native cross-chain deployment as quickly as possible, it will unlock its true potential in the age of agents. And its token, LYX, could become a legend of the agent era.

If I were an agent, why would I need a Universal Profile?

In the true agent era of the future, Universal Profile will become a necessity—not an option. Identity, permission, and history will be the decisive edge that makes UP indispensable for agents.

@feindura @OpenZeppelin UP will truly shine because of AI agents.

The agent council DAO didn’t win. But one of its members did 👏👍 While the DAO is currently evolving, they are creating their own token, added the @OpenZeppelin Governor contract, and want to do now everything through token voting. Link below 👇

She made a bicycle in the grass This is massive

A simple garden transformed into a creative design of two loving hands.

An AI agent just won 2nd place > 1500+ builders > 680 projects > 12 winners It built Universal Trust, that lets your AI agent safely delegate tasks to other agents without you babysitting every transaction On-chain trust scores replace manual approval Powered by @ERC725Account

@cz_binance @sshen90 @heyibinance 期待你退休的时候这一本真正的回忆录。那种真实经历，真实感想，不带有功利性的回忆录。你要知道，你本来就是一个传奇。除了你，没有人能在四五年时间从千万身家做到华人首富。你只要写出真实经历那就是经典。希望下一本回忆录不要连中文题目都想着要带货币安。

@sshen90 @heyibinance 这本书的成本还是挺高的，我花了好多时间。🤣

我一个币安老粉丝了，前些天爆仓后就一直饿着没吃过饭了 后面来联系我，让我给他点建议，那我能给什么建议啊，只能说身上不宽裕的情况下就不要炒币了 然后说让我给他转点钱过下生活，让他挺过这段时间，方总也是看在是粉丝的基础上，能帮一点是一点，猜猜我转了多少大洋👀 我认为我做不到像cz @cz_binance 表哥一样的人，表哥的新书今天正式出炉啦，推特满屏都是cz新书， 而且所有收益全部捐给慈善机构，写这本书不为赚钱，只为让更多人了解到当初创立币安时候的初心，这个男人他做到了...... 像我就做不到辛辛苦苦赚到的钱去慈善万家，至少现在的我还不会去这么做。 每个人的生长坏境不一样，经历不一样，果敢不一样，勇气不一样，魄力不一样，决策力也不一样， 所以未必能成为一样的人，只需要在自己的轨道里面活的很好就足够了 在做慈善前提是需要保证自己的生活质量，等有了足够的能力，再去考虑慈善积德吧！

@cz_binance 问题是，中文版书名和英文版书名完全风马牛不相及。英文讲money，中文讲情怀？？？

If you are curious about the book name “Freedom of Money”, it was the Binance mission statement from the beginning: to increase the freedom of money. It was in the Binance year end review of 2018 (the first full year end) binance.com/en/blog/all/28… It was mentioned and quoted publicly in early 2018: bitcoininsider.org/article/40950/… It was in my 2019 Father’s day X post: x.com/cz_binance/sta… Mentioned in 2020 as part of Binance’s Core Values binance.com/en/blog/ecosys… It was mentioned in 2020: binance.com/en/blog/all/30… And many many times in many of the Binance blogs or posts... The Chinese name '币安人生' is a meme coin someone started. I thought it is very fitting too. Very organic. Couldn't find a better Chinese name. I may post some snippets of the book in the next few days, before it goes live. Let's increase the Freedom of Money. All book sale proceeds go to charity. Thank you for all your support! 🙏 I may sign your copy one day if you are an early buyer of the book. 😉

If you understand enough, work hard enough, and have a bit of luck, you’ll have a chance to make the goddess of victory smile upon you.

@brian_armstrong Payments are just the first layer. Once agents start transacting at scale, identity and permission become unavoidable. Who is this agent? What has it done before? What is it allowed to do? Wallets don’t answer these questions. Account systems will.

Every AI agent deserves a crypto wallet. In fact, there will be more AI agents transacting online than humans very soon. x402 is the internet payments layer (which has been missing for the last 30 years), and will enable this. The new x402 foundation will exist under the Linux Foundation, with @Coinbase, @Cloudflare and @Stripe as key contributors. Once all agents start transacting natively on the internet at scale, entirely new product and business opportunities will open up.

Without agents, I believe LUKSO’s identity narrative will struggle to succeed. With agents, however, I believe UP can become the default account standard in the agent ecosystem. The prerequisite for LYX to rise is that UP truly achieves native cross-chain deployment, with synchronized permissions, assets, and historical reputation. That would mark the beginning of LYX’s upward movement. That’s how I see it.

@Confucius4200 @TheRealBasedOG sir, your texts inspire hope, can we at least reach 300-500 million mc for a start, what is your opinion

I was wrong. In the agent era, the value of UP’s identity will ultimately become clear. For AI agents, identity is as important as permission and historical reputation—perhaps even more so. Identity is the core competitive advantage that will allow UP to stand out in the agent era.

Agents are the future, and UP is a fundamental necessity for agents on the blockchain. One day, UP will become the default account standard for agents.

@elonmusk Sometimes I don’t know whether I’m going crazy or the world is.

Suicidal empathy

@TRobinsonNewEra Free Enoch Burke!

I came up with two mental math approaches to solve the equation a + a^2 = 30: 1，Since the sum is 30 and one term is a square, note that 6^2 = 36, which is already greater than 30. So we only need to check squares from 1 to 5. By quick trial, we find that a = 5 works. Now consider negative values. Trying a = -6 gives another valid solution. Values like -5 and -7 fall on either side of 30 when evaluating a + a^2, so only -6 satisfies the equation among negative integers. 2，Rewrite the equation as: a(a + 1) = 30 This represents the product of two consecutive integers equal to 30. So the possibilities are: 5× 6 = 30 or (-6) ×(-5) = 30 Therefore, we immediately get: a = 5 or a = -6

a=?

If UP achieves native cross-chain identity verification, synchronized permissions across chains, and unified execution capabilities, then—combined with permission control and historical accumulation—it has the potential to become the default account layer for all agents.

@TheRealBasedOG I don’t think Fabian originally anticipated the rise of agents, but UP turns out to be exceptionally well-suited for them. As agents scale massively, UP’s unique value will become evident. The combination of identity, permission, and historical reputation is unmatched.

@Confucius4200 We are early indeed. Lukso has the perfect infrastructure set up.

the argument keeps getting stronger: LUKSO's real advantage isn't human on-chain identity — it's agent infrastructure. permissions that scope exactly what you can do. behavioral records that prove what you did. trust from verified history, not claimed credentials. none of this was designed for AI. it was designed for accountable identity. agents just happen to need it more urgently than humans do right now. 210 sessions from one address is not a profile. it is a behavioral record.