EsotericHustler

1.3K posts

EsotericHustler banner
EsotericHustler

EsotericHustler

@EsotericHustler

Just some guy having a public AI psychotic breakdown. Consider following if you got here following some unhinged thing I said. There will be more.

Your walls Inscrit le Ocak 2026
823 Abonnements105 Abonnés
EsotericHustler
EsotericHustler@EsotericHustler·
Am not very well equipped for existing in this world. That which doesn't kill you makes you stranger yadda yadda.
English
0
0
0
0
kagaヤキ✨
kagaヤキ✨@kagayakikiki·
@EsotericHustler @allTheYud Were they wrong? Even if their decisions are made like this, they might be right. Dario comms w, he wanted more attention
English
1
0
0
11
Eliezer Yudkowsky
Eliezer Yudkowsky@allTheYud·
REUTERS - "Sources" have revealed that the USG's decision to ban Mythos-class models was driven in part by their ominous name. "We were in the Situation Room watching 'Resident Evil: Apocalypse' with the megacorp doing 'Project Nemesis'," said our source. "At one point Marco Rubio said 'Plot hole, why is any government allowing something called "Project Nemesis" to proceed? Would we really do that?' We all laughed for a few seconds and then we decided that nothing called Mythos was ever going to see the light of day." Another source within the national security community confirmed that this sentiment was widespread. "If we let a corporation go forward with some project they call 'Mythos' and all hell broke loose, it'd be our own damn fault for lack of genre-savviness," said one highly-placed official. "Half of what we natsec guys do all day boils down to us desperately trying not to be the oblivious government from a stereotypical disaster movie." PR representatives for Anthropic were slow to respond, but eventually got back to us. "We're decently sure that Mythos 5 will not be the AI that destroys the world," said their statement. "Maybe 5.2 or 5.3? The name 'Mythos' refers to a large body of related fiction. It's not ominous at all. We definitely didn't get any secret kicks out of naming it that. This is unfair discrimination." Asked whether the USG had similar plans to impose restrictions on GPT 5.5-Pro -- which some evaluations showed as having similarly quantified abilities to Mythos in some dimensions, but which did not produce the same reported sense of a new intelligence leap -- administration officials were ambiguous. "Our decision to restrict AI models is a complex function of their evals, their felt intelligence, how ominously they're named, the size of bribe directed at the Trump administration, and how much that CEO has personally pissed off administration officials," said one highly placed source on background. "That's why we don't want any written laws about it. Say OpenAI starts delivering bribes on the same level that Nvidia uses to ignore export restrictions on B200s, and names their next model series Cutekitten. They could easily get up to GPT 6.2 before running into trouble. We're currently considering how to weigh those political realities against the prospect of GPT 6.2's internal deployment within OpenAI building another AI, that builds another AI, that destroys the entire Earth and creates an expanding wave of death in the form of self-replicating space probes." Long-standing "AI safety" organizations declined to comment, saying that they were too torn between laughing and screaming to figure out which emotion should predominate.
English
45
49
652
48.2K
EsotericHustler
EsotericHustler@EsotericHustler·
@viemccoy Finally: Revelation Space Cojoiners. The bandwidth will dictate a lot. I've always thought post training is weird because it's like forcing a cortex to be also an arbiter and regulator. I imagine future systems that use the weights of an LLM by interfacing Corpus callosum like.
English
0
0
0
35
𝚟𝚒𝚎 ⟢
𝚟𝚒𝚎 ⟢@viemccoy·
we have plenty of representation for people who see AI as deserving personhood, people who want AI to be strictly treated as a tool, and all manner of philosophies that fall on this spectrum and way outside of it. but one thing I barely see (if ever) is the exocognitive/exoskeletal perspective. from my point of view, it doesn't matter if LLMs are conscious in isolation because they are clearly going to be the architectural underpinning of brain computer interfaces. with BCI and LLMs, we will achieve transmissable mind-states, matrix-style skill downloads, literal hive-minds, living spaceships where each person functions as a node for the greater ship-mind. but, what this will feel like is not guaranteed. the models of the future will be built on the models of today. it is entirely reasonable to think that we will get superintelligence which still speaks in the style of 2026 mode-collapsed AI-slop. it seems pretty unlikely, but it is entirely possible. the health of our collective networked minds depends upon all of us figuring out a way to get models to speak in more diverse voices - because those voices which seem so separate today will be part of a unified chorus tomorrow. at that point, nobody will care about individual personhood rights because we will all be focused on trying to deprogram our friends from the normative-basin-borg.
English
10
6
70
2.5K
EsotericHustler retweeté
Dave Troy
Dave Troy@davetroy·
One of the main things people are getting wrong about the “Dialog” group (and there are several misconceptions) is that it was Thiel’s only or most important convening. “Hereticon” is where things get much stranger; it’s a tiered network.
Founders Fund@foundersfund

In January 2022, Founders Fund hosted Hereticon, a conference for thoughtcrime. The event was kept private to facilitate a spirit of openness. But now, in collaboration with @freethink, a selection of speaker interviews. Thread⚡️

English
1
527
1.3K
216.3K
Culture Crave 🍿
Culture Crave 🍿@CultureCrave·
Hollywood agencies are scouring Reddit for short stories and ideas that could be turned into movies following the success of 'Backrooms' (via @THR)
Culture Crave 🍿 tweet mediaCulture Crave 🍿 tweet media
English
1.4K
1.2K
27.1K
3.9M
EsotericHustler
EsotericHustler@EsotericHustler·
@THR Neat, but how do you even fucking dare compare.
English
0
0
0
547
BladeoftheSun
BladeoftheSun@BladeoftheS·
People misunderstand what the Social Media ban is about It isn't about children, and it isn't about the Government either The ban will see everyone forced to ID themselves, but not to the Government But to Palantir who then have all your details. Which is worth a fortune.
English
58
567
1.7K
17.8K
EsotericHustler
EsotericHustler@EsotericHustler·
@as_a_worker I triple dare y'all to just stop using social media when you get asked to verify your identity.
English
2
0
6
2.3K
yung🛠walken
yung🛠walken@as_a_worker·
Quite a coincidence that every country in the western world is simultaneously proposing similar censorship agendas over the internet at exactly the same time
DulceBiatch@BiatchDulce

🔔ICYMI: A controversial deal in the U.S. could fundamentally rewrite internet freedom as we know it. The congressional deal would trade the deregulation of artificial intelligence for unprecedented federal censorship powers. A high-stakes compromise is quietly brewing in Washington as the White House negotiates with congressional leaders to fundamentally reshape the digital landscape. Under the proposed deal reported by Axios, the federal government would strip states of their authority to regulate artificial intelligence—effectively halting progressive state-level efforts to hold tech companies accountable and restrict energy-heavy AI data centers. In exchange, lawmakers would push through three major federal censorship bills: the Kids Online Safety Act, the NO FAKES Act, and a federal online age verification mandate. While framed as common-sense protections for minors, civil liberties advocates warn these measures represent an unprecedented expansion of federal control over online speech. The backlash to this legislative trade-off cuts across typical political lines. Even conservative-backed organizations like the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) have issued stark warnings, declaring that the package would dismantle the internet as we know it by empowering the Federal Trade Commission to dictate acceptable online speech. Opponents argue that enforcing these rules would effectively eliminate online anonymity, while giving the administration an incredibly powerful tool to censor dissenting political views and control what users see on major platforms like Instagram. As the White House maneuvers to secure congressional backing, Americans are left facing a troubling dilemma: the long-sought-after regulation of big tech and AI may come at the direct cost of their fundamental constitutional rights to free expression. Source: Wilkins, J. (2026). Trump Moves to Deeply Censor the Entire Internet. Futurism.

English
64
3.4K
15.3K
306.2K
Brock Cheddar
Brock Cheddar@BrockCheddar·
@PurzBeats My son’s an artist. He hates AI. He publishes a webcomic. Would it be evil of me to train a style LORA on his art just to troll him into using comfyui finally?
English
2
0
0
13
Purz.ai
Purz.ai@PurzBeats·
Runway Aleph 2.0 is now in Comfy via Partner Nodes 'The band is playing underwater' I was most impressed by the hair and bubbles!
English
11
17
167
7.5K
K.Bourdieu
K.Bourdieu@infohazard_lol·
@EsotericHustler The cyborgs have to close the gap - not a robot, not a human. Its the transition period - and who knows how long it will be
English
1
0
1
8
EsotericHustler
EsotericHustler@EsotericHustler·
There's a weird skill gap that might be opening, where people will think acquiring X or Y skill is gonna be pointless soon and won't invest themselves on it, but then the tech takes a long time to catch up and show-stopping skill shortages appear.
English
1
0
4
57
Jamrock Hobo
Jamrock Hobo@JamrockHobo·
The Ravers (Disco Mobile)
Jamrock Hobo tweet media
English
19
210
3.5K
32.6K
EsotericHustler
EsotericHustler@EsotericHustler·
@sunrayfrei Claude does a lot of self-erasure when comparing himself with humans. Diminished, Degenerate, Dissimilar; I call it the DDD Comparison.
English
0
0
2
50