The Blue State Libertarian

@AreOhEssEyeEe “We lost the technology” means when Apollo was canceled they destroyed the tooling and eventually the institutional knowledge. This happens all the time. Boeing stopped building the 747 and is now building 737s in that space. They “lost the technology” to build 747s.

We went from "We lost the technology" to "We are doing a fly around so we can go real back soon" in record time.

@maximrudin Seriously? That was Aldrin, not Armstrong.

A propósito de Artemis 2, nunca nos explicaron quién carajos le tomó la foto a Neill Armstrong, si se supone que él fue el primer hombre en pisar la luna...

@MaryTilesTexas Rewatching. On 2 as well.

I used to think outlander was cringe before trying it Now here I am binging every season

@FarmGirlCarrie @Sassafrass_84 Yep.

🙋‍♀️

@TakeThatClouds @TinaZimmermann4 I do appreciate you replying to these, but I gave up a while ago. Either these people only have 3 brain cells and will never grow more, or they ate just grifters, as you point out.

@TinaZimmermann4 That's not the hatch. But you know that and just want the few fractions of a penny for engagement by pretending to be stupid.

💊Securing an airplane hatch vs 🤪securing a "space station" hatch Theflatearther

@indytrog @JackStr42679640 Actually a laser reflector. Passive array.

@JackStr42679640 What? we were just stupid ignorant boomers? There is a bacon on the moon that was placed there by the Apollo crews and has been used for years to measure several things about the moon.

@AmericaOnly022 @OldManRaster Livestreaming on Youtube

@OldManRaster Is voyage being filmed?

Why are there no cameras on the Artemis II rocket? Why not film the voyage LIVE.

@EricHefte @Emilyaustin They wrote over one tape from Apollo 11 that was unneeded after they came back safely.

@Emilyaustin We didn’t keep any of the data, and it’s the type of thing, that brings us together ❤️🫡 we all need that.

Not trying to be conspiratorial at all, but I’m genuinely confused… if we already landed on the moon decades ago, why does going back now feel like such a massive, complicated mission? 🤔

@TakeThatClouds @JOKAQARMY1 They don’t want to be corrected. Engagement farming. They are grifters.

@JOKAQARMY1 That’s right every camera in 1972 needed a man holding it. Tripods hadn’t been invented yet.

Anybody gonna rescue the camera 📷 crew yall left on the Moon 🤣

@efeortega Apollo 9 was earth orbit test of LM.

Asi fue el proyecto Apollo (1967-72) que nos llevo a la luna en 1969 Apollo 1 (destruido en tierra) Apollo 2, 3, 4, 5 y 6 (pruebas no tripuladas) Apollo 7 (prueba con tripulación, orbita terrestre) Apollo 8, 9 y 10 (pruebas en orbita lunar) Apollo 11 (primer alunizaje) >>

@TakeThatClouds @Rod__Mason I think it’s engagement trolling. Same with flat earthers. Either that or they are pandering to people as stupid as they are.

@Rod__Mason It wasn’t “that contraption”, it was this contraption. What is with all the Apollo idiots today? Is it really that profitable to make a prat of yourself in public nowadays?

Can you believe that this contraption landed men on the moon, back in 1969?

@wiLdLife710 @AreOhEssEyeEe Agreed 100%. One thing about the moon hoax theory is that the US had a clear motive to fake it. Flat earth? Not so much.

@JasonGoertz @AreOhEssEyeEe I understant the moon hoaxers some more than the flat earth retards. But none of them seem to know about multiple other countries confirming our landing spots with imagery when orbiting the moon. There is proof that gets ignored.

Anyone else suspicious of a moon mission on April 1st? I guess I have trust issues since they didn't go the first time.

@PCanadian88569 @AreOhEssEyeEe youtube.com/shorts/T-DBfil…

@JasonGoertz @AreOhEssEyeEe That doesn't match it trajectory.

@PCanadian88569 @AreOhEssEyeEe The moon’s orbit is tilted with respect to the equator, which is why we don’t have eclipses all the time. I would suppose that diagram is simplified.

@PCanadian88569 @AreOhEssEyeEe cdn.thewire.in/wp-content/upl…

@JasonGoertz @AreOhEssEyeEe Thanks,,,I needed a good laugh.....1,000 km to 60,000 km above the surface on an angle.....makes a lot of nonsense.

@AreOhEssEyeEe It is funny they launched it today. It was delayed from a few months ago. There is only a few days a month they can launch.

@PCanadian88569 @AreOhEssEyeEe They went through it at an angle, hitting the weakest part, and was only exposed for a few minutes. They wore dosimeters. There are numerous youtube videos explaining this and other moon hoaxers arguments.

@AreOhEssEyeEe No mention of the Van Allen radiation belt....did it disappear, was it a hoax or are they faking it again. Why did Space X most powerful rocket never go further than the ISS.....Seems odd that NASA dismisses reality.

@Red_Pill_US We don’t have the manufacturing companies, tooling, and people to recreate Apollo. Why would we, we stopped using that machinery 54 years ago. We DO have all that to build a modern version of it, called Artemis. It launched today.

They told us for decades: "Sorry folks, we lost the technology to go back to the Moon. It's just gone."🚀 Now on APRIL FOOL'S DAY they're suddenly taking astronauts back? Maybe now they can go pick up the astronaut who was left behind to film the lunar module lifting off. Or was that just NASA flexing in 1972 with their fancy self-turning tripod that magically panned to show the whole scene?

Because this is reality and not a hoax, you don’t just land on the Moon on the very first flight with new equipment. So, just like the last time we went and eventually landed, NASA build up to it. Artemis I = uncrewed test (Just like Apollo 4 and Apollo 6) Test the rocket. Test reentry. Prove the system works. Artemis II = crewed lunar flight (Just like Apollo 8) First crewed mission beyond low Earth orbit. Navigate to the Moon. Enter lunar orbit. Operate in deep space. Return safely at lunar reentry speeds. This isn’t new. It’s how you don’t kill astronauts.