Jennifer Strieby 🇺🇸

Melania Trump has spoken out publicly in defense of her husband, delivering an emotional statement that has quickly drawn attention across the political landscape. “What is happening to my husband goes far beyond ordinary criticism. It has become deeply personal and, in many ways, profoundly unfair to a man who has devoted decades of his life to public service. I often ask myself how people can be so relentless. They are attacking a leader who carries immense responsibility every day — someone who works under constant pressure, scrutiny, and expectations that very few people could truly understand. Donald has never asked for sympathy, and he has never blamed others. Instead, he continues to work and lets his actions speak for themselves.” “To me, Donald is more than just a president. He is a determined, disciplined, and resilient man. Rather than magnifying every mistake or adding more pressure through endless headlines and debates, people should recognize the sacrifices and strength it takes to stand at the center of such intense public attention. He does not fight simply for power — he fights because he genuinely believes in the future of this nation.”

🚨 JUST IN: Karoline Leavitt and Erika Kirk just WALKED OUT to an ELECTRIC packed crowd at George Washington University For Charlie! 🇺🇸🇺🇸

@ShaykhSulaiman He was fired you fucking idiot.

🚨 LMFAO! Karoline Leavitt just dropped this hilarious line "You always want to be the most well-read person in the room, and I try to be every day. But Donald Trump always is!" 🤣🔥

Justice Alito brings in a key point… You can’t establish a legal permanent domicile somewhere you are illegally present and subject to removal at any time.

US Solicitor General John Sauer confirms they have found "500 birth tourism companies" in China who’s only purpose is to bring people to America to have babies for citizenship “There are 500 birth tourism companies in the People's Republic of China, whose what business is to bring people here to give birth and return tto that nation” “We're in a new world now — to where 8 billion people are one plane ride away from having child who's a US citizen” Then that baby can then bring their whole family over on visas to get them citizenship… we won’t have a country

🚨 WOW! NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch just EVISCERATED the leftist jury acquitting a cop killer of first-degree m*rder Zohran Mamdani stood right next to her "The failure to convict landed a GUT PUNCH to all members of NYPD!" Mamdani's NYC.

Say a prayer for Tina Peters hopefully she gets some good news today.

@WarlordDilley People pushing this, obviously, don’t know Trump.

The DeSimps are all out in force stumping for Ron Meatball DeSantis to join the administration as the next Attorney General. Ain't no fucking way that weird little autist is getting that job.

@BlueBoxDave Someone figured out how to turn water into wine 😉

I wonder which of the apostles kept the budget, and if he ever said to Jesus, “Teacher, there is a way we couldst save on wine…”

Trump just released a photo of him standing on the construction site of the new White House East wing and ballroom.

This…is…awesome. 🤣🤣🤣

THE SUPREME COURT'S BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP HEARING I've been working on a few exciting projects (for the future), but here's my quick take: This is actually a very simple case but made messy for the justices.  90% of the time the justices spent asking questions/making statements that had absolutely no relevance to the 14th amendment but were result-oriented attempts at justifying birthright citizenship.  There were comments about administration, policy, English common law, etc.  But anyone who can read and comprehend the civil rights act in 1866 that preceded the amendment, the debates surrounding the act, and the subsequent draft and debate around the 14th amendment would know full well that the amendment never -- in any way -- contemplated granting birthright citizenship to foreigners, let alone illegal aliens.  It would have been unimaginable.  In fact, it was not intended to be an immigration amendment.  It was passed by Congress and ratified by the states to enshrine in the Constitution and across all states the treatment of newly freed slaves and their children as citizens after the Civil War, and because certain states refused to acknowledge their citizenship.  Indeed, President Andrew Johnson had vetoed the Civil Rights Act of 1866, his veto was overridden, but that was the impetus for the constitutional amendment.   The language -- "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" -- had a specific meaning and intent.  As explained years ago by me and others, this refers to the political allegiance to the United States and is derived from the 1866 Civil Rights Act, which extended citizenship to the freed slaves and their children. Again, to underscore, it had nothing to do with immigration at all.  Therefore, foreigners who come into the United States illegally cannot confer upon themselves "jurisdiction" for the purposes of granting citizenship to their babies because they were born in our country.

Seriously

@VonFustercluck @The_Sublimatory @bazzdgrogan @greg_price11 Historically, courts have considered jurisdiction as a form of allegiance. We have the SCOTUS to decide.

@JenniferStrby @The_Sublimatory @bazzdgrogan @greg_price11 You're entitled to that opinion, but it's not what the 14th Amendment says. The Court's job is to consider the Amendment as written, not as you'd like it to be written.

It just feels so painfully obvious that the 14th amendment does not mean that a 9-months pregnant woman from Mexico can cross the Rio Grande illegally, give birth, and be allowed to stay because her child is now a natural born citizen.

I’d offer to be the new Andy Rooney, but they’d never let me smoke.

@ginamilan_ Yes. Muted her several months ago.

Is she fucking insane?