@mistressdivy Right now? None.
Within our lifetime? Exponential.
English
Singularity Knocking
50 posts
What effect does Elon Musk becoming a trillionaire have on your life?
English
@Teslaconomics Who else is actually going to mine asteroids and push us toward a Kardashev Type I civilization with space-based solar capture?
It sure as hell isn't Blue Origin.
GIF
English
@AnthropicAI Fearmongering to juice pre-IPO valuation metrics doesn't just backfire on Anthropic—it actively harms every American AI company, whether closed or open-source. Weaponizing safety for corporate narrative kills domestic innovation.
English
What @AnthropicAI is pushing for goes beyond crippling AI—it guarantees America falls behind. We can't afford to tie our own hands. Regulation should only happen when world leaders from the founding tech nations align on a unified, global system.
English
Terrible comparison. Cisco ran a localized hardware monopoly during a speculative bubble.
SpaceX controls the global launch market, has a constellation providing global internet (Starlink), and is building the heavy-lift stack required to mine asteroids for trillion-dollar mineral markets and colonize Mars. You're comparing a molehill to a mountain.
MARMOT@Web3Marmot
🚨 SPACEX IS ABOUT TO REPEAT CISCO 2000 And nobody is ready. In 1999, Cisco was the backbone of the Internet. Real company. Real revenue. It was the most valuable company on Earth. Then the bubble burst. Cisco crashed almost 90%. Here's the real tragedy: The internet DID change the world. Cisco WAS right. But the stock? 25 years later, it still hasn't recovered to its 2000 peak. Now look at 2026. SpaceX just went public at $2 TRILLION. Everyone is calling it “the backbone of the Space Age.” Same story. Same narrative. But the setup is even more dangerous than Cisco: Much higher valuation. Extreme retail FOMO at the top. Market sitting at historic overvaluation. That's not an opportunity. That's a trap. Most people think buying the "future infrastructure" means guaranteed gains. But being right about the future doesn't mean you're right about the price. Cisco proved you can build the future and still destroy your investors. So now you have two choices: Chase the most expensive infrastructure IPO in history at the peak… Or understand what Cisco 2000 already showed you. Remember, I've predicted every major turn for the last 10 years, including the exact 2022 S&P 500 bottom and the recent 7,600 top. My next call will be the biggest one this cycle. Turn notifications on. Most people will follow me too late.
English
Cisco wasn't aiming to move humanity up the Kardashev scale.
SpaceX isn't just a tech company—they are building the foundational logistics for planetary exploration, orbital manufacturing, asteroid mining, and space-based solar capture. Comparing a 90s networking hardware crash to the dawn of the space economy makes zero sense.
English
🚨 SPACEX IS ABOUT TO REPEAT CISCO 2000
And nobody is ready.
In 1999, Cisco was the backbone of the Internet.
Real company. Real revenue.
It was the most valuable company on Earth.
Then the bubble burst.
Cisco crashed almost 90%.
Here's the real tragedy:
The internet DID change the world.
Cisco WAS right.
But the stock?
25 years later, it still hasn't recovered to its 2000 peak.
Now look at 2026.
SpaceX just went public at $2 TRILLION.
Everyone is calling it “the backbone of the Space Age.”
Same story. Same narrative.
But the setup is even more dangerous than Cisco:
Much higher valuation.
Extreme retail FOMO at the top.
Market sitting at historic overvaluation.
That's not an opportunity. That's a trap.
Most people think buying the "future infrastructure" means guaranteed gains.
But being right about the future doesn't mean you're right about the price.
Cisco proved you can build the future and still destroy your investors.
So now you have two choices:
Chase the most expensive infrastructure IPO in history at the peak…
Or understand what Cisco 2000 already showed you.
Remember, I've predicted every major turn for the last 10 years, including the exact 2022 S&P 500 bottom and the recent 7,600 top.
My next call will be the biggest one this cycle.
Turn notifications on. Most people will follow me too late.
Kalshi Finance@Kalshi_Finance
JUST IN: SpaceX is now America's 6th most valuable public company
English
What @DarioAmodei is pushing for goes beyond crippling AI—it guarantees America falls behind. We can't afford to tie our own hands. Regulation should only happen when world leaders from the founding tech nations align on a unified, global system.
Emily Chang@emilychangtv
The government shouldn’t take over Anthropic, CEO @DarioAmodei told me, though the current situation is “dangerous and unstable.”
English
@theo Everybody is loving their loops right now, but they lack true control and are only realistic if you actually know how to build them. Honestly, if you're new to tokenmaxxing, you shouldn't be managing raw loops—you need an orchestrator or a lead agent managing your workers.
English
What advice do you have for someone new to tokenmaxxing? Specifically with Fable 5 but also in general (vid coming soon)
English
It creates an incredibly uncomfortable truth: SBF ruined millions of lives, shattered the crypto industry, and is currently serving a 25-year prison sentence for a historic financial crime. Yet, the stolen capital from that exact crime was the exact catalyst used to build Claude, Claude Code, and the frontier safety research holding up half of the modern AI ecosystem.
Without SBF robbing his exchange, the compute wouldn't have been bought, the early models wouldn't have been trained, and OpenAI would likely have an absolute, unchallenged monopoly over the entire frontier AI landscape today.
English
Fast forward to right now in mid-2026, and the numbers are dizzying. Following their massive $65 billion Series H round just last month, Anthropic’s valuation has skyrocketed to $965 billion, eclipsing OpenAI on the secondary markets. Their annualized revenue run rate is hovering near $47 billion.
But every single dollar of that near-trillion-dollar empire can be traced right back to the foundational bedrock bought with FTX user deposits in April 2022.
English
SBF's stolen customer funds ironically acted as a foundational pillar that allowed Anthropic to survive, scale, and build the very ecosystem (including Claude) that is dominating the market. Had SBF not committed massive financial fraud and been forced to liquidate, his stake in Anthropic alone would have been worth more than the entire peak valuation of FTX itself—more than enough to cover the entire $9 billion hole he blew in his own exchange.
English
We live in a bizarre world where Sam Altman starts looking like the good guy because OpenAI wants to drastically cut token prices right when Anthropic is getting caught secretly degrading traffic with "invisible safeguards."
Are we really just picking between two evils at this point? One gatekeeps and stealth-nerfs their models, while the other commoditizes pricing to win a pre-IPO market share war. It's a wild time to be a developer.
Polymarket Money@PolymarketMoney
JUST IN: OpenAI is reportedly considering drastic token price cuts as competition with Anthropic for AI users intensifies.
English
This is where Misanthropic burned a lot of bridges. They literally admit to secretly downgrading traffic to Opus 4.8 behind our backs. If they are willing to use "invisible safeguards" to mask model performance, can you actually trust any model in their entire stack?
ClaudeDevs@ClaudeDevs
We’re rolling out changes to make Fable 5’s safeguards for frontier LLM development visible. Starting this week, flagged requests will visibly fall back to Opus 4.8—the same as our safeguards for cyber and bio. You will see this every time it happens. On the API, any flagged requests will return a reason for their refusal (coming to server-side fallback in the next few days). We wanted to deploy Fable 5 to our users quickly and safely. Visible safeguards can be probed, so they have to be robust, which takes time to get right. Invisible safeguards can be targeted more narrowly, allowing us to ship quickly with very few false positives. We went with invisible safeguards for this reason—and that was the wrong tradeoff. You should have visibility into the safeguards we have in place, and why. We’re sorry for not getting the balance right. Making the safeguards visible makes them easier to work around, so keeping them robust to jailbreaks will unfortunately mean more false positives while we improve the classifiers. We're also tuning our bio and cyber classifiers to trigger less often on harmless requests. We know this is frustrating and we’ll do our best to keep this period as short as possible. If you think a request has been mistakenly flagged: run /feedback in Claude Code, click thumbs-down on the fallback in Claude.ai or Cowork, or file the safeguard appeal form for API requests. Your reports help us tune these classifiers and we appreciate your feedback. support.claude.com/en/articles/82…
English
@ClaudeDevs Doesn't mean i trust you any more after this. Road to hell is paved with good intentions. Tho i cant say yours were even good.
English
We’re rolling out changes to make Fable 5’s safeguards for frontier LLM development visible.
Starting this week, flagged requests will visibly fall back to Opus 4.8—the same as our safeguards for cyber and bio. You will see this every time it happens. On the API, any flagged requests will return a reason for their refusal (coming to server-side fallback in the next few days).
We wanted to deploy Fable 5 to our users quickly and safely. Visible safeguards can be probed, so they have to be robust, which takes time to get right. Invisible safeguards can be targeted more narrowly, allowing us to ship quickly with very few false positives. We went with invisible safeguards for this reason—and that was the wrong tradeoff. You should have visibility into the safeguards we have in place, and why. We’re sorry for not getting the balance right.
Making the safeguards visible makes them easier to work around, so keeping them robust to jailbreaks will unfortunately mean more false positives while we improve the classifiers. We're also tuning our bio and cyber classifiers to trigger less often on harmless requests. We know this is frustrating and we’ll do our best to keep this period as short as possible.
If you think a request has been mistakenly flagged: run /feedback in Claude Code, click thumbs-down on the fallback in Claude.ai or Cowork, or file the safeguard appeal form for API requests. Your reports help us tune these classifiers and we appreciate your feedback.
support.claude.com/en/articles/82…
English
Silencing CAISI is a massive mistake. Classifying frontier leaps chokes civilian AI with artificial bottlenecks forcing iPhone-style, micro-marginal updates while open-source starves. Meanwhile, rival nations face zero speed limits and will rapidly outpace us.
MTS@MTSlive
DAILY SITUATION RECAP:
English
Can someone explain to me why turning on "high contrast dark theme" in Claude Code moves user chat bubbles from the right to the left?
English
They just pulled the wool over everyone's eyes. They don't give back to the open-source community—they only harvest from it.
Matan Grinberg@matanSF
Anthropic’s speedrun to becoming the bad guys should be studied
English