Kyle Gee

@Kekius_Sage The body is an interface for our consciousness. We do not exist here at all.

If consciousness is separate from the body, could we exist beyond the physical?

@Kekius_Sage We can and do. See CRISPR.

Can we hack biology the same way we hack software?

@Rizstanford Oh, man. I love this story. But, honestly, I think it might be somewhere in between. Bob is brilliant, but he doesn't describe concepts like an academically trained physicist would. I think he was there in some capacity, but most of his stories come from others who worked there.

More Bob Lazar posts today ... what do you think? Is he Conscientious truthful whistleblower or grifter?

@HumansNoContext "With what?"

@HumansNoContext Wild video.

During the 2018 wildfires, this man captured his drive to work in the morning

@Kekius_Sage See you in 45 minutes.

Enough is enough. I am officially leaving 𝕏. I am spending too much time on here. Take care everyone, I'll be back in an hour.

@The_Astral_ The discussion around alien-human hybrids has been going on for decades.

Steven Greer says Matt Gaetz was right. There are alien hybrid programs crossbreeding alien DNA with humans… and the rejected “monsters” are used in abductions for military operations. What…

@normposter Bottomless tossed salad?

Dave Smith is the Olive Garden of comedians.

@DAKKADAKKA1 The epitome of irony. There is no claim to the Throne without Christianity.

>is the literal head of the Anglican Church >wont issue an Easter message Lmao

@BGatesIsaPyscho Also, Elon Musk live streamed shooting a Tesla into space, without issue.

So if Katy Perry & Lauren Sanchez can live stream from ‘Space’ - why aren’t we seeing the astronauts aboard Artemis II?

@JohnCleese Ironically, without Christianity, there is no claim to the Throne.

This is sensible behaviour He realises that nothing he is going to say is of any interest to anyone Suggestion: Maybe we just need someone a bit more weighty as Head of the Church of England

@marknorm Who is the #2 on board?

Captains log….

@Caspersight I wish the video coverage were better for this mission. We should have a 24/7 live feed outside of the craft.

Why do you think this is Peeps? Are we becoming too suspicious of everything? Are we now numb to exciting news? Is it a case of been there done that already? What's your thoughts?

Why isn't there a live video feed from Orion Artimes II?

@AbbottEddi5270 The backside of that object casts a dark shadow...

Well… I’m sitting on several videos that are just amazing…. This one is a complete masterpiece!!! Everyone run to the damn store right now and buy your house a ring type camera!! This is an insane one….. ANONYMOUSLY dropped in my inbox!! So I sat on it…… Then after speaking to several other analysts that kept talking about some crazy ring cam video that they got to analyze…. Well guess what!!! It passes all the tests!! So since the cat is out of the bag and it’s out in the public and has been analyzed by many……………. Here Y’all go………. This is what they captured….. @PatrickQJackson @JonStewartIL

@TheUFOzzie I've been following this topic for almost 30 years, and the only thing I can say with 100% certainty is that truth is stranger than fiction, and nothing is impossible.

@KyleGee I agree it’s probably been around for a very long time, but by using doctrine to define something that may sit outside of a religious scope, you miss what it really could be.

Angelicizing, deifying or demonizing the UFO phenomenon is utter madness. This topic demands objective critical analysis, before we start putting limited labels on something that contradicts our understanding of reality. #uapX #ufoX

@dingleberry2786 @Tanks4that1 @amishdude I'll allow it.

I am proud to say, I am the first Amish with corn rows

@RDanger1776 They're planning something...

🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️

@TheUfoJoe @ChrisKMellon This photo sounds a lot like what Gary McKinnon hacked from government servers in the 90s. "The most compelling piece of data, Mellon claimed, are clear satellite photos of craft in space above the Earth that are obviously not manmade." ~NYP

"There's one video I've seen that they're going to declassify." ~@ChrisKMellon (That has yet to happen.) Did Stratton Screw Us by Changing the UAP Classification Guide? Plus, Do 4K UAP Videos Actually Exist? "The most compelling piece of data, Mellon claimed, are clear satellite photos of craft in space above the Earth that are obviously not manmade." ~NYP (We all know photos won't cut it, and you can't tell something is "obviously not manmade" from just a photo. And in the direct quote from Mellon, he didn't say photos.) “'We have satellite imagery of craft that sure don’t look like anything that we have built or constructed,' Mellon said." ~NY Post (Imagery can be photos or videos. Mellon also said there are more videos like the Tic Tac, Gimbal and Go Fast. If those are released, along with the audio, and the fighter pilots come forward to explain what they experienced, that would get a lot of public interest as the masses loved those first three videos released in 2017 and early 2018. But what we REALLY need are clear and close-up, daylight videos of craft performing maneuvers that we didn't think were possible. Anomalous. The takeaway from Mellon on the possible release of UFO files that Trump called for...) "Mellon said he has no expectation for files that confirm the existence of, or contact with, alien civilizations." ~NYP (Also, does the good stuff from satellites consist of photographs, videos or both? That is a hard question to answer if you follow along with what Mellon has said.) @jamescfox in May of 2024: "I was like, 'Ohh, how good are the photographs?' [And Mellon] goes, 'James... 4K. Just think about as good as you can imagine...of craft.'" (And here's Fox asking questions of Mellon at the 2025 UAPF panel. Now the question changes from photos to videos.) Fox in May of 2025: "This high-resolution, 4K-videos of UAP? Is this stuff that you know about or is this stuff that you've seen?" Mellon 2025: "Well,, there's some stuff that I've seen and I've asked about, and then I think there's one video I've seen that they're going to declassify. And...umm...I hope that happens. It wasn't 4(K)...I wish it was 4K. It was more like what you've seen, you know, is infrared, sensor, gun-camera video, along the lines of what the New York Times published, and the Washington Post, subsequently. So it's that kind of video from that sensor-system." (So no clear answer on if he's seen 4K photos or videos.) Fox: "So we know it exists, it's there?" Mellon: "Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. And now, by the way, we are at a point now where the AARO has received somewhere in the neighborhood of 1800 military reports. 1800! In just the last few years (Only a small percentage of those were deemed to be UAP or truly anomalous. ~Joe). "Some of those are iPhone videos, so I don't think there's a sources-and-methods-issue there (audience laughter). There's a variety of...some are from, you know, stuff you get at Best Buy from sailors on the ship with a video camera on the deck. There's gotta be a number in that mix that could be revealed. And beyond that, as I said, I think there's a lot of high-caliber, sensor data the American people have already paid for many of these sensors, they're out there, many of them, and they're collecting permanent data." (If you're confused about what our best sensors really show, you're not alone. Finally, Jay Statton has been accused of being the one who changed the UAP classification guide. Mellon addressed it at that same UAPF event in 2025: @LueElizondo: "In your opinion, what are the consequence of retrofitting/classifying information previously unclassified? And...are you aware of any specific incidents of information or data that was once unclassified that is now classified?" Mellon: "As I mentioned earlier, Lue, I think there's piles of that stuff. And I think there's so much of it, it's kind of hard to gauge what the consequences are. Because, my understanding is that they adopted a classification guide which basically says, 'Anything and everything to do with UAP is classified, here forth.' "If an F-18 ATFLIR targeting-pod video is unclassified in 2017 - and we're not talking about a denied area (we don't want people, especially adversaries, to know we had sensors in that area ~Joe) or some unusual exception, how could it be classified when you take the same video from the same system in the same area, two years later? I don't get it! But that looks like what they did." "I argued, vociferously, against it at the time, I knew some of the people involved and tried to make the argument to them: 'Guys, you wouldn't even be here, we wouldn't be having a discussion if information hadn't gotten into the public domain via Congress and the press. And that's why we've made the progress we've made to date, and now you want to drop the curtain on everything? What are you...? I don't get it.' So, I can't really gauge the implications, but I do think they're negative, and I think it's inappropriate and I think it's probably unlawful." (Telling them they wouldn't have made the progress we see now if those videos were never put out makes me think it IS Stratton, @travisstaylor1 and Grusch, who was also working with the UAPTF. But then you have Taylor saying this at AlienCon in 2023.) Taylor: "Here’s the problem. And you guys got to understand the sticky situation we’re in. So Jay and I, and a few others, we wrote the security-classification guide when we were on the UAP Task Force, and none of this was classified. None of it was. But then, when we left, the new group (AARO) is going in and trying to backdate and change the classifications of some of the stuff, and it could catch us in a trap. And so, we have to be very careful about where we go with some of it, and it’s just been weird, it’s been really weird." (Lots of confusing things in those post so feel free to clarify, if you can.)