RootMonsteR

🚨 Most AI agents look insane in demos… …then hit real production and completely melt down - hallucinations, drift, and total chaos. Yet most security teams (and their insurance companies 😂) are still hesitant to trust them in live production. We’ve built a battle-tested SOC automation platform powered by production-grade agentic AI and zero-trust agent architecture - now ready for paid pilots and strategic investment to protect critical infrastructure at scale. And I’m here to tell you: autonomous agents CAN go fully production-ready - when engineered properly instead of hope and hype. 1/6

This is exactly what I mean, tools like this are being built right now and barely anyone knows about them yet. Agentic coding that actually adapts to how you work instead of just autocompleting? That's where this whole space is heading. Anyone else building or using AI dev tools that feel like a genuine leap forward? Drop them here.

@RootMonsteR Totally agree! Small AI chats on X are where the magic is. foryouforge (still unreleased 👀) is insane, the agentic vibe coding platform. Spins up autonomous agents that vibe with your style, understand your codebase & you, handles edits/refactors/tests like a dev team.

I keep finding the most interesting AI conversations happen in small pockets of X that are hard to find. So here's a genuine question, what's the most underrated AI tool or project you've come across recently that deserves way more attention? Drop it below. I'm replying to everyone because I want to actually learn from this, not just scroll past. RT if you want your mutuals to weigh in too.

California got woke to it too? I thought it was just us in the UK where we now have to show passport/ID to use X, Reddit, Discord, Tinder, gaming platforms... and they're currently pushing age verification on VPNs as well. All to "protect the children" of course. Welcome to the club.

/me raises hand If I have a Linux VPS in California does that mean I need to do age verification on it? I don't live in California. I don't understand the law

@SancastleAir @UK_Daniel_Card Q got promoted. Life really does imitate Bond. 🫡

@RootMonsteR @UK_Daniel_Card The former head of Q Branch at MI6 is now C

Ofcom talking about "protecting children" while simultaneously: → Pushing to scan every private message on your phone before it's encrypted (Section 121) → Ordering Apple to backdoor iCloud for ALL users worldwide → Labelling encryption itself as a "risk factor" → Forcing Apple to REMOVE security features from UK users Signal, WhatsApp, and Apple all said they'd rather leave the UK than comply. The European Court of Human Rights already ruled that breaking encryption violates fundamental rights. Article 8: Right to privacy. Article 10: Freedom of expression. Ofcom is violating both. This isn't safety. It's surveillance. And every UK citizen should be paying attention.

We've fined 4chan £450,000 for not having age checks in place to prevent children seeing porn on its site. The Online Safety Act is concerned with protecting people in the UK. It doesn't require platforms to restrict what people in other countries see. 🔗ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/…

@ForeverScept Yeah it's pretty bad, who would of thought @elonmusk's platform is suppressing freedom of speech.

Grok confirms there is a issue with right leaning accounts in the UK being shadowbanned over the last week. Is the UK Gov applying pressure to X now?

X has massive potential and the direction is right. Strong spam protection matters, but not when it silently kneecaps the very users building this place. Small accounts are the lifeblood of any platform. Fine-tune the filters. Stop making real people collateral damage. I want to keep creating here, not shouting into a void. Feedback, fixes, or even just acknowledgement - any of it welcome. 🚀

The spam filters are catching real people. My reach has dropped to virtually zero - not gradually, overnight. Think about that, what social network punishes you for actually using it? Post too much, engage too often, and you get quietly flagged as a bot. This isn't protecting the platform. It's suffocating it. Small accounts and genuine creators are being wiped out while looking like nothing's wrong.

Same here mate - @RootMonsteR is ghost banned too. Replies hidden from everyone but me. Keep posting, some of us are still seeing it and that's exactly why they don't want us talking. Welcome to the dark side of truth, and this was supposed to be the platform for truth @elonmusk not for the super woke.

Brilliant, I have been banished to the shadow realm on X once again for being too controversial 😑 Sorry guys, I will continue to post for you guys that are seeing my stuff 🫵🫡

@StuartRest1688 @prestonjbyrne Indeed, it's very concerning. You really do have to wonder sometimes.

@RootMonsteR @prestonjbyrne Almost like this was by design or something

Some lawyers think my hamster e-mail was unserious. Ofcom is unserious. It doesn't matter what person from another country sends my client a demand. Domesticate it properly in the US or GTFO. The fact that the British government is on the other end doesn't change my response

@StuartRest1688 @prestonjbyrne Exactly. The whole framework seems to work overtime protecting terrorists and criminals while ordinary British people get nothing from it. It's supposed to be about everyone's rights but in practice it's a one-way street.

@RootMonsteR @prestonjbyrne No it doesn’t. The ECHR has so many exceptions to its “rights” that it’s worthless. There’s no point appealing to it.

Grok's had to deal with: - Getting banned by multiple countries - Generating images people definitely didn't ask for - Features getting paywalled mid-session - The status page just saying "Temporarily Unavailable" - And now its boss is posting memes about it Grok isn't tired. Grok needs a union.

It’s probably been a tough day for @grok

Meta's defence for their AI leaking sensitive user data "a human could also give erroneous advice" Right. But when a human leaks your data, you can fire them. When the AI does it, you classify it as a "Sev 1," shrug, and keep building the same systems. This is the company that wants to run AI agents across every product you use.

Meta let an AI agent handle sensitive user data, leading to a major internal security event. The error came as a result of an engineer implementing code on the bad advice given to them by the AI agent. How is Meta defending itself? "a human could also give erroneous advice."

@elonmusk Half the "real deal" founders in my timeline raised $5M on a Figma prototype and a ChatGPT-written pitch deck. The bar is underground.

So many phonies, so few who are the real deal

@elonmusk @grok The real plot twist is that Claude just described RLHF more accurately in 3 sentences than most alignment papers do in 30 pages

With @Grok, we keep the honest versions and kill the bad transformers (I believe they are called “Decepticons”)

@_SignalNotNoise Hello ☕👋🇬🇧

If you are a real person say hi or something 👇 🇬🇧

@SANDY4AYU @EchoBlauWeiss

Special Promotion Alert 🚨 Follow below verified member 👇he follows back asap 🥳 👉 @EchoBlauWeiss Reply below 👇 to gain organic verified 👀 RT DM for paid promotion 📢

Good morning ☀️ The scariest cybersecurity threat in 2026 isn't ransomware. It's a 22 year old with ChatGPT, no experience, and a Senior DevOps title. Change my mind.