
Common Sense
29.2K posts

Common Sense
@SeeHearThink
We have good and bad but to look for the TRUTH is important. Don't believe everything RESEARCH IT. Sticks & Stone may break my bones but names don't hurt me.


If you gave away $126 billion to subsidize free flights between LA and San Francisco at current demand levels, you could fund roughly 150 to 200 years of travel before the money runs out.



Monroe Township, NJ on March 11 at a council meeting this woman from Monroe didn’t come to play. She stood up and delivered a straight-up verbal masterclass on the council. NO filter, all facts, zero chill. She ATE. If you think local government gets a free pass… watch this. Residents are DONE staying quiet. "No one came to ur door and said, "Run for office! You're NOT LEADERS" Get it girl!🔥🔥



This is Judge Tracey Lloyd-Clarke, she has sentenced an ex-soldier with PTSD, Daffron Williams, to two and a half years in prison for Facebook comments. She also sentenced someone for posting a video on social media to 12 months. But that exact same judge let off a child rapist called Reese Newman because she said the prisons were overcrowded This is British Justice.






Mid-Air Birth Flies Home How Stupid Birthright Citizenship Is To me it seems only logical that if a baby was born on an international flight, that baby would be a citizen of the parent's country of origin, or the country where their passport was issued. Not the country they are flying to! Am I right? 🤔 This whole birthright citizenship BS needs to be terminated, IMO. From the article: The extreme manipulation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause must end now if the republic is to survive. To borrow from comedian Jeff Foxworthy’s famous redneck schtick, if you were born on a flight over U.S. air space, you might be a U.S. citizen. The latest birthplace debate underscores just how insanely stupid sweeping birthright citizenship has become in the modern age. And it’s another example of why the U.S. Supreme Court needs to fix a flawed 130-year-old interpretation of the Constitution. ‘A Child Born on a Plane’ Multiple corporate outlets had some fun reporting on the “stork” story of a passenger who gave birth over the weekend during a flight from Jamaica to New York City. The Caribbean Airlines flight “landed at New York’s John F. Kennedy international airport with one more person than it took off with,” the liberal Guardian guffawed. As the cheeky piece explained, the citizenship status of the newborn remained up in the air because officials had yet to make clear the citizenship status of the parents — “and where the plane was at the exact moment the baby was born.” The child would, of course, automatically be a U.S. citizen if either parent is a U.S. citizen. If not, it depends on precisely where the birth occurred. If the answer is within 12 nautical miles of the U.S. coastline, the newborn just won the U.S. citizenship lottery. “… [A] child born on a plane in the United States or flying over its territory would acquire United States citizenship at birth,” the State Department’s rule states. All of this drives home the point that the expansive view of birthright citizenship is a bastardization of the law — and it needs to end. This Supreme Court has a chance to bring sanity to more than a century of manipulation of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, twisted to appease myriad monied interests. One thing is for certain, the crafters of the Citizenship Clause did not foresee the rise of “birth tourism,” which has, according to FAIR, “exploded into a coordinated global enterprise, with roughly 33,000 tourist-visa births per year and more than 70,000 total foreign births annually.” “The consequences are severe: nearly 1.5 million U.S.-citizen children raised overseas with primary loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party, an explosion of chain migration, and more than $150 billion in annual net costs shifted onto American taxpayers,” the Federation reports. And it’s safe to say the denizens of 1868 did not envision babies born mid-air and the dividing line between citizen and noncitizen. For the real originalists on the court, and the liberal justices selectively claiming that space, the Citizenship Clause is more than location; it’s the intent of the time in which it was written. On that score, birthright citizenship should be blown out of the air. Link to article in comments














