MetenIsWeten

71.5K posts

MetenIsWeten

MetenIsWeten

@ToKnowOrNot

Wetenschap. Statistieken.

Inscrit le Haziran 2022
1K Abonnements604 Abonnés
Tweet épinglé
MetenIsWeten
MetenIsWeten@ToKnowOrNot·
Angst. Dat is wat wappies drijft. Angst. Maakt dat ze in complottheorieën geloven. uva.nl/shared-content… Angst voor 'boven ons gestelden'. Angst voor autoriteiten. Angst is sterker dan feiten. Angst wordt gevoed door leugens. Angst. Behandelen kan. psycholoog.nl/klachten/angst
MetenIsWeten tweet mediaMetenIsWeten tweet mediaMetenIsWeten tweet media
Nederlands
22
5
25
3.7K
Vala van den Boomen
Vala van den Boomen@ValavdBoomen·
Interessant: dus Maarten heeft mensen 'in zijn omgeving' die 'letterlijk zijn overleden' - in tegenstelling tot de figuurlijke dood die veel mensen zijn gestorven aan het coronabeleid, maar dat terzijde - aan 'antivax' en 'desinformatie' (nieuwe, dodelijke virussen), dus zijn zijn hypotheses en zijn analyses waar. Maar iedereen die het waagt uit te spreken dat er in zijn/haar omgeving opeens veel mensen zijn die plotseling ziek zijn geworden, of zomaar dood zijn gaan en oproepen tot een dialoog over en onderzoek naar de eventuele invloed van de coronavaccins zijn liegende propagandisten, die een gevaar vormen voor de maatschappij. En dat is dan 'verantwoordelijkheid nemen'. We mogen blij zijn dat experts zoals Maarten ons niet alleen objectief informeren, maar in hun vrije tijd ook nog eens belangeloos op de stoel van de rechter gaan zitten, zonder de beklaagden uit te nodigen voor een eerlijk proces. De hoeder van de democratie en altijd pandemisch paraat, die Maarten. Hij doet het voor een ander. Via @Wftproof ⬇️ x.com/Wftproof/statu…
Vala van den Boomen tweet media
Nederlands
28
36
161
3.4K
Reint van Veen
Reint van Veen@reint_veen·
"De Amerikaanse minister van Volksgezondheid Robert F. Kennedy Jr. vertelt waarom hij gestopt is met het griepvaccin: “Ik liet me elk jaar tegen griep vaccineren.” “Ik ben er in 2005 mee gestopt toen ik me ging verdiepen in de bijwerkingen.” “Een van de bijwerkingen die bij veel vaccins werd genoemd, was spasmodische dysfonie, een aandoening die ik aan mijn stem heb.” “Dat blijkt een vaccinatiegerelateerde aandoening te zijn.” “Daarom is mijn stem zo verpest.” “Weet ik zeker dat het door mijn jaarlijkse griepprik kwam? Ik heb geen idee.” “Het is een mogelijke oorzaak die ik niet kan uitsluiten.” “We zouden die gegevens allang moeten hebben, maar die hebben we niet.”"
healthbot@thehealthb0t

RFK Jr. reveals why he stopped getting the flu shot: “I was getting a flu shot every year.” “I stopped in 2005 when I began looking at the side effects.” “One of the injuries that was listed on a lot of them was spasmodic dysphonia, which is an injury I have to my voice.” “That turns out to be a vaccine injury.” “That’s why my voice is so screwed up.” “Do I know that it was caused by my annual flu shot? I have no idea.” “It’s a potential culprit that I cannot rule out.” “We should have that data, but we don't.”

Nederlands
8
51
118
2.8K
christtinel
christtinel@christtinel1·
@reint_veen Niet gevaccineerden blijven maar zagen en klagen. Gevaccineerden gaan verder met hun leven en zijn bijna vergeten dat ze gevaccineerd zijn .
Nederlands
1
0
1
61
Patrice Plet
Patrice Plet@pletman·
@reint_veen Mij valt op dat een bepaald soort (wappen) mensen, nog dommere mensen, gewoon blind volgen. Alles om hun overtuiging (religie) te bevestigen. Verbanden trekken die er niet zijn en dan zeggen dat ze wakker zijn. Ik verbaas me echt steeds over dit fenomeen. factchecknederland.afp.com/doc.afp.com.69…
Nederlands
1
0
1
28
Frank Stassen
Frank Stassen@StassenFrank·
@reint_veen Ok Reint, laat even zien waar @SecKennedy deze bijwerking heeft gevonden als vaccingerelateerde bijwerking. Spoiler: die vind je niet. Omdat die nooit gerapporteerd is. RFK heeft "vocal fold paralysis" gevonden. Alleen is dat totaal iets anders dan zijn spasmodic dysphonia
Nederlands
1
0
1
25
Health Organica
Health Organica@HealthOrganica_·
@P_McCulloughMD Vaccines trigger brain damage because they contain neurotoxic adjuvants. You don’t need ‘science’ to understand them....you just need common sense. Abnormalities in brain regions associated with Social and Emotion Development, what a very strange side effect… -Brian Clark
Health Organica tweet media
English
2
0
1
117
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®@P_McCulloughMD·
Myocarditis is Caused by COVID-19 Vaccination not SARS-CoV-2 Infection Alone and It's Fatal M. Nathaniel Mead, Jessica Rose, William Makis, Kirk Milhoan, Nicolas Hulscher and Peter A. McCullough. Myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination: Epidemiology, outcomes, and new perspectives. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH & INNOVATION. Jan-Mar 2025, VOL. 3, ISSUE 1, pp. 1-43, DOI 10.61577 ijcri.2025.100001 reseaprojournals.com/journals/cardi…
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® tweet media
The Wellness Company@twc_health

‼️MUST LISTEN‼️ Dr. Peter McCullough joins Theo Vonn to discuss the heartbreaking truth that nobody is talking about.... The COVID 💉 is directly linked to myocarditis.  Period.

English
21
535
1.2K
32.2K
healthbot
healthbot@thehealthb0t·
In the 12 months of 2022 1598 athletes suffered a heath attack 1100 of them died
English
94
1.5K
3.3K
53.8K
Thomas Emmett III 🧬 🧠 🛡️ 🌿 🐭 🦝
Database Studies Are Not Safety Studies A recent Ontario study is being promoted as “definitive proof” that COVID vaccines don’t cause sudden cardiac death. The problem: The study is structurally incapable of detecting the documented mechanisms of harm. What they miss? Spike persistence (17+ months in tissues) Amyloid microclots (invisible to D‑dimer) Microvascular ischemia (no troponin rise) DNA contamination (627× above limits, 815‑fold batch variance) Their own data reveals bias Flu vaccine showed 28% lower cardiac death risk healthy vaccinee bias. Same bias applies to their COVID findings. 89.6% of “sudden cardiac death” cases had no diagnostic confirmation. No specialized autopsy. No tissue testing. Population studies using death certificates cannot detect emerging biological mechanisms that require specialized testing. Presenting such studies as “definitive proof” is not science it’s overreach. When does a study’s limitation become fatal to its conclusions? The study is adequate for detecting acute, hospital-confirmed cardiac events. It is NOT adequate for detecting chronic, microvascular, or undiagnosed mechanisms. The study's "within 6 weeks" analysis is biologically incapable of detecting mechanisms with longer latency. Claiming this proves "no long-term risk" is not science. It's deliberately ignoring the documented timeline of these mechanisms. Clare Craig's observation: "SCCS cannot address between-person selection bias because dead people cannot be vaccinated." Using a method that cannot count the dead to prove the living are safe that's not science, that's a statistical trick. The study treats the jabs as binary despite 815-fold variance in DNA contamination between batches - Direct correlation: Higher contamination → more adverse events - DNA up to 627-fold above regulatory limits If Lot A has 815x more DNA contamination than Lot B, and higher contamination correlates with more adverse events, then grouping all lots together as "vaccinated" obscures the true risk The study cannot detect a dose-response relationship because it refuses to acknowledge that dose exists. @DJSpeicher #VaccineSafety #ResearchMethods #PublicHealth
Prof Jeffrey S Morris@jsm2334

🏮 Another population-level study finds no evidence whatsoever of that healthy younger individuals given COVID-19 vaccines had increased risk of "dying suddenly", i.e. with sudden cardiac deaths. Researchers in Toronto just published a study in PLOS Medicine assessing whether risk of sudden cardiac death was increased after COVID-19 vaccination in healthy young people 12-50yrs old. The study was a population-based matched case-control study from a cohort of 14,966,193 residents of Ontario, Canada, focusing on the subset of 6,365,451 who were <50yrs and "healthy", with no medical history of cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, mental illness, dementia, COPD, IBD, chronic liver or kidney disease, autoimmune disease, or alcohol or illicit drug use. Cases included 4,803 individuals from that cohort who "died suddenly" between April 1, 2021 and June 30, 2023, meaning they either died outside the hospital or died in ER or within 24hr of admission with indication of cardiac arrest, sudden death or arrhythmia but no indication of trauma, mental illness or substance use. Controls included 24,030 individuals matched 5:1 to cases in terms of age, sex, geographic area, and neighborhood income quintile, with their index data set to death date of matched case. After matching, all of these variables were well-balanced between cases and controls. The primary analysis was a conditional logistic regression to assess association of case/control status with vaccination status (any vaccine), with covariate-adjustment for confounders including COVID-19 infection, influenza vaccination, number of SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests to estimate COVID healthcare utilization, and history of asthma, hypertension and mood/anxiety disorders. Many sensitivity analyses were done including separate analyses for vaccine types, focusing on the 6wk period after vaccination, focusing only on ER/hospital deaths with cause well-documented, excluding any opioid deaths, focusing on <=40yrs old, plus a secondary self-controlled case series comparing the 6wk after doses 1/2/3 to other time periods to perform an assessment free from any subject-level residual confounders such as healthcare utilization or other factors related to healthy vaccinee effect. In the primary analysis, 77.1% of controls received any COVID-19 vaccine before the index date, while only 67.4% of cases did, which resulted in an adjusted odds ratio of 0.57 (95% CI 0.53-0.61), suggesting a 43% reduced risk of sudden death in the vaccinated group. All secondary analyses found similar results, with vaccinated having lower risk of sudden death than unvaccinated, with some statistically significant and some not. None of the analyses had any indication whatsoever that risk of sudden death was increased after vaccination, either in the short or long term. This validates results from two earlier UK studies using self-controlled case series that found no increased risk of sudden cardiac death within 4wks (Nafilyan et al. 2023 Nature Communications PMID: 36973247) or 12wks (Xu et al. 2024 Vaccine PMID: 38388239) after COVID-19 vaccination. So, in spite of all of the repeated claims on social media and in videos purporting major increased risk in sudden cardiac death after COVID-19 vaccination, the population-level data continue to strongly refute these claims.

English
3
1
2
275
Steve Kirsch
Steve Kirsch@stkirsch·
Textbook case of how institutional science creates the illusion of consensus: by perfecting methods that can never yield an inconvenient answer. In short, it is a gamed study and they don't allow the data to be seen by anyone. Details: alter.systems/p/27c6d318-e74…
Prof Jeffrey S Morris@jsm2334

🏮 Another population-level study finds no evidence whatsoever of that healthy younger individuals given COVID-19 vaccines had increased risk of "dying suddenly", i.e. with sudden cardiac deaths. Researchers in Toronto just published a study in PLOS Medicine assessing whether risk of sudden cardiac death was increased after COVID-19 vaccination in healthy young people 12-50yrs old. The study was a population-based matched case-control study from a cohort of 14,966,193 residents of Ontario, Canada, focusing on the subset of 6,365,451 who were <50yrs and "healthy", with no medical history of cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, mental illness, dementia, COPD, IBD, chronic liver or kidney disease, autoimmune disease, or alcohol or illicit drug use. Cases included 4,803 individuals from that cohort who "died suddenly" between April 1, 2021 and June 30, 2023, meaning they either died outside the hospital or died in ER or within 24hr of admission with indication of cardiac arrest, sudden death or arrhythmia but no indication of trauma, mental illness or substance use. Controls included 24,030 individuals matched 5:1 to cases in terms of age, sex, geographic area, and neighborhood income quintile, with their index data set to death date of matched case. After matching, all of these variables were well-balanced between cases and controls. The primary analysis was a conditional logistic regression to assess association of case/control status with vaccination status (any vaccine), with covariate-adjustment for confounders including COVID-19 infection, influenza vaccination, number of SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests to estimate COVID healthcare utilization, and history of asthma, hypertension and mood/anxiety disorders. Many sensitivity analyses were done including separate analyses for vaccine types, focusing on the 6wk period after vaccination, focusing only on ER/hospital deaths with cause well-documented, excluding any opioid deaths, focusing on <=40yrs old, plus a secondary self-controlled case series comparing the 6wk after doses 1/2/3 to other time periods to perform an assessment free from any subject-level residual confounders such as healthcare utilization or other factors related to healthy vaccinee effect. In the primary analysis, 77.1% of controls received any COVID-19 vaccine before the index date, while only 67.4% of cases did, which resulted in an adjusted odds ratio of 0.57 (95% CI 0.53-0.61), suggesting a 43% reduced risk of sudden death in the vaccinated group. All secondary analyses found similar results, with vaccinated having lower risk of sudden death than unvaccinated, with some statistically significant and some not. None of the analyses had any indication whatsoever that risk of sudden death was increased after vaccination, either in the short or long term. This validates results from two earlier UK studies using self-controlled case series that found no increased risk of sudden cardiac death within 4wks (Nafilyan et al. 2023 Nature Communications PMID: 36973247) or 12wks (Xu et al. 2024 Vaccine PMID: 38388239) after COVID-19 vaccination. So, in spite of all of the repeated claims on social media and in videos purporting major increased risk in sudden cardiac death after COVID-19 vaccination, the population-level data continue to strongly refute these claims.

English
14
44
135
9.5K
MetenIsWeten
MetenIsWeten@ToKnowOrNot·
@hsdvries Ja Sjoerd, alle remmen los: het Hongarije van Orban is corrupt, het meest corrupte land van de EU!
MetenIsWeten tweet media
Nederlands
0
0
0
2
Sjoerd
Sjoerd@hsdvries·
Alle remmen los in Hongarije. Hongaarse premier al jaren de grootste dwarsligger in EU. En terecht. Deze man zou von der Leyen moeten opvolgen. Deze vrouw richt EU ten gronde.
Sjoerd tweet media
Nederlands
124
537
1.7K
12.3K
healthbot
healthbot@thehealthb0t·
Dr. Weinstein explains that our world was injected with the SV40 virus, which leads to cancer, in his conversation with Joe Rogan.
English
12
93
198
6.6K
healthbot
healthbot@thehealthb0t·
42-year-old man took the Moderna shot and died right in front of doctors. DR. MCCULLOUGH: "If this was any other new drug on the market that caused a fatality, it would have been pulled immediately." But not the COVID vaccine.
English
42
962
3.5K
76.8K
healthbot
healthbot@thehealthb0t·
Wake up people I posted this earlier this morning and it was removed
English
18
451
705
10K