TripleD67

339 posts

TripleD67

TripleD67

@TripleDMore

Inscrit le Mart 2026
22 Abonnements8 Abonnés
TripleD67
TripleD67@TripleDMore·
@jmp4260 @Dan_Townley Dan your arguing with room temperature IQ blokes who aren't listening to the breakdowns because they are in a fury induced stupor having to see a woman on the TV
English
0
0
1
5
Dan Townley
Dan Townley@Dan_Townley·
Football needs more people like Emma Hayes. Her punditry / analysis has been brilliant every game and has been really refreshing to watch.
English
65
10
170
6.8K
TripleD67
TripleD67@TripleDMore·
@SurfCity_Mayor @hxxntrr Also 80% would be worth 200mil lmao, the guy writing this thread must have used AI because you'd realise how stupid you sound as you typed it out
English
0
0
0
260
Mayor Chad Schraeder 🇺🇸✝️🇷🇸
Dumbest take today, thanks. The reason people partner with those guys is because they have the knowledge and connections to grow brands. People come up with brilliant product ideas all the time, but most don’t ever make it to market because they don’t have the connections to make them work.
English
8
0
256
17.1K
hunter
hunter@hxxntrr·
Scrub Daddy gave up 20% of their company on Shark Tank for $200,000 That 20% is now worth over $50,000,000 The founder handed eight figures to a billionaire on national television because nobody told him he could get $200K from Chase at 0% interest with zero equity in 15 minutes Every season of Shark Tank is a masterclass in how to destroy generational wealth on camera Bombas gave up 17.5% for $200K. The company did $100M+ in revenue. That 17.5% became worth north of $50M. For $200K. That they could have put on business cards Zipz Wine gave up 10% for $400K. Meanwhile the Ring doorbell guy walked into the same room, Kevin O'Leary tried to take his equity, and he said no. Turned the Sharks down on national television. Kept 100% of his company. Then sold Ring to Amazon for over $1 billion. He's the only founder in Shark Tank history who understood what his equity was actually worth The rest of them walked into a room full of billionaires and traded permanent ownership of their life's work for an amount of money that Chase, Amex, and Capital One hand out every single day to anyone with a 700 score and an LLC The math is so violent it's almost funny $200K from a Shark: you lose 20% of every dollar your company ever makes. Forever. If the company hits $10M in revenue the Shark's cut is $2M a year. If it hits $100M that's $20M a year. Flowing out of your pocket into a billionaire's pocket because you needed $200K in 2012 $200K from 0% business cards: you owe $200K. You pay it back in 12 to 15 months. Interest: $0. Equity given up: 0%. You keep 100% of your company forever. The bank gets their $200K back and never sees another dollar from your business One path costs you $200K. The other path costs you $50M+ The exact stack to replace any Shark Tank deal: Chase Ink Business Unlimited: $30K to $50K at 0% for 12 months Chase Ink Business Cash: $25K to $45K at 0% for 12 months Amex Blue Business Plus: $25K to $50K at 0% for 12 months Capital One Spark Cash: $20K to $40K at 0% for 15 months US Bank Triple Cash: $20K to $35K at 0% for 15 months Bank of America Business Advantage: $20K to $40K at 0% for 15 months Conservative total on a 720 score: $140K to $260K That covers every single Shark Tank deal in the first 8 seasons. Not most of them. All of them. The average Shark Tank investment was $250K for 25% equity. You can match the dollar amount on credit cards and keep the 25% "But Sharks bring connections, mentorship, distribution" Mark Cuban invested in 85+ Shark Tank companies. Ask yourself how many of those founders have his personal cell phone. The answer is almost none of them. They got a 10-minute segment, a handshake, and a wire transfer. The "mentorship" is a production assistant emailing quarterly. The "connections" are an intro to someone on the Shark's team who manages 40 other portfolio companies. You're not getting mentored. You're getting managed The distribution they offer (Lori's QVC placement, Daymond's retail network, Mark's digital channels) can be replaced by spending the $200K on paid ads, Amazon PPC, and TikTok Shop. You'll reach more customers through a $200K ad budget than through a 3-minute QVC segment that airs at 2am on a Tuesday The real reason founders go on Shark Tank: They don't know that 0% business credit exists. That's it. That's the entire reason They think capital comes from either: (a) a bank loan at 10% with collateral, or (b) an investor who takes equity. Nobody ever showed them option (c): unsecured business credit cards at 0% interest, no collateral, no equity, approved in 12 minutes online The $200K they begged for on national television while getting insulted by Kevin O'Leary was sitting at Chase the entire time. They just didn't know to look And the Sharks know this. Every Shark on that panel has business credit cards. Every one of them uses 0% promotional capital in their own businesses. Cuban didn't build his wealth by giving equity to other billionaires. He used leverage. He used bank capital. He used other people's money at the lowest possible cost. Then he sits on a TV set and offers entrepreneurs the most expensive capital on earth (equity) and acts like he's doing them a favor "I'll give you $200K for 25% of your company" is the most predatory sentence in business. At a 24% annual interest rate, $200K costs you $48K a year and you stop paying when the debt is cleared. At 25% equity on a $10M company, $200K costs you $2.5M a year and you never stop paying An interest rate has an end date. Equity has no end date. You pay the Shark forever The companies that should have used 0% cards instead of Sharks: Any product company: use the $200K to buy initial inventory, run ads, and build sales velocity on Amazon or DTC. Pay the cards back from revenue in 6 to 10 months Any service company: use the $200K on hiring and client acquisition. Service companies cash flow almost immediately. Pay the cards back from the first 3 months of client revenue Any tech company pre-revenue: this is the one case where equity capital makes sense because there's no revenue to service the debt. But even here, $200K in 0% cards buys 12 to 15 months of runway without giving up a single share Scrub Daddy could have put $200K on 4 business cards, bought inventory, landed the same retail placements (retailers don't care who your investor is, they care about your sell-through rate), and kept 100% of a company now worth half a billion dollars Instead Aaron Krause shook Lori Greiner's hand on national television and gave her fifty million dollars for the price of a small house Every founder who watches Shark Tank sees a dream. Every funding consultant who watches Shark Tank sees a crime scene lmfaooo dm me "funding" and i'll show you how you can qualify for up to 250k in 0% APR funding (if you have a 700+)
English
231
41
826
636.9K
TripleD67
TripleD67@TripleDMore·
@Everton_Dad @itvfootball She is quite insightful to be fair, I guess most of it goes over your little head in your fury enraged stupor having to watch a woman on the tele
English
0
0
5
923
Old Glwadys
Old Glwadys@Everton_Dad·
That Emma Hayes on itv is an absolute whopper. Saying stuff that any football fan with the most basic knowledge knows and @itvfootball making out she is some tactical guru. They wonder why people don’t take women’s football serious. Just let them focus on women’s football 🫠
English
35
15
344
111.7K
PEPE - “THE GOAT”
PEPE - “THE GOAT”@AdamHODL·
Surely betting Starmer to resign on Monday is free money?.
PEPE - “THE GOAT” tweet mediaPEPE - “THE GOAT” tweet media
English
1
0
3
1.2K
TripleD67
TripleD67@TripleDMore·
The duality of twitter @drcharliefraud @alanrog3 Too many politically illiterate people have the ability to shout words into people's lives thanks to social media, every village idiot has a voice, the world would be better off without it
TripleD67 tweet media
English
0
0
0
2
Jan
Jan@janelsooo·
Watching the World Cup and looked up Offsides. Offsides in Soccer is about the dumbest rule I've ever heard in my life.
English
1.2K
73
2.1K
898.5K
TripleD67
TripleD67@TripleDMore·
@Rhigallimore @hetisemma Funny discourse, opening up a tweet and then replying to it shows that someone cares, certainly enough to comment - which begs the question: does Emma have the ability to critically think? It would appear not, as hominems are generally utilised by the inferior intellectual
English
0
0
0
5
Rhi
Rhi@Rhigallimore·
@hetisemma So why are you here then?
English
2
0
2
289
Rhi
Rhi@Rhigallimore·
Controversial, but Father’s Day is about celebrating dads/step dads only, yes I get there are single mums out there (huge respect btw) but you have your own day. Could you imagine the uproar if a single dad posted about himself on Mother’s Day??
English
37
24
705
124K
TripleD67
TripleD67@TripleDMore·
@KatieCurtis They don't notice because they're eating the whole time
English
0
0
12
1.6K
TripleD67
TripleD67@TripleDMore·
@adamrowecomedy He's had a breakout 12 months.and is 19, it's definitely this season's data lol
English
0
0
1
479
Adam Rowe
Adam Rowe@adamrowecomedy·
We are stocking up on players for the future atm… including last season. So surely €20m a year ago, would have been worth it just to have him as an asset? If they were aware of him. And they must have been. Cos there’s no way we are spending this with only 12 months data.
English
21
1
116
26.3K
Adam Rowe
Adam Rowe@adamrowecomedy·
Genuine question… I’d imagine we have scouts who’s job it is to try and find the next major talent before they become “worth” €100m… If this lad is as good as they say and he’s worth that now (according to our recruitment team) how did they miss him a year before?
DaveOCKOP@DaveOCKOP

🚨 Liverpool are expected to return with an improved offer of around €115M for Yan Diomande. It would be incredible business for RB Leipzig who signed him for around €20M last summer. daveockop.com/transfer-news/…

English
145
19
1.3K
482.1K
Politics UK
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK·
🚨 NEW: A Labour source says Keir Starmer feels "betrayed" "He gave everything to Labour, including sacrificing much of his children's teenage years to help make the party electable. He feels deeply betrayed, especially by those he believed were loyal to him"
English
6.3K
1.2K
17.4K
3.7M
Jaredfromsubway.eth
Jaredfromsubway.eth@jaredsmev·
@CarlosFreire0 The hacker cannot easily utilize the previously hacked funds due to legal complications. In contrast, this $1 million will constitute legitimate, legally compliant money for him.
English
24
0
55
17K
Sean Ryan
Sean Ryan@SeanOrionRyan·
@Cobra15915265 @3YearLetterman You mean the part that would be part of the Third Reich if we had not stepped in and is currently having their daughters raped and pillaged by Pakistanis? That part?
English
2
0
28
455
Maga Nadine
Maga Nadine@femalebodybuil6·
$700,000 or a date with Kim Kardashian? 🤔😅.
Maga Nadine tweet media
English
11K
224
4K
665K
Bella 💙
Bella 💙@itsCozyBella·
as a grown man , why are you watching the World Cup
English
167
2
55
5.6K
NUFC Kobe
NUFC Kobe@nufcKobe·
Hi @AskPaddyPower, I really need some clarity now. It’s my first few weeks betting with you and mctominey clearly has a shot on target? I understand there can be technical faults so please sort this out x.com/yelwocluap/sta…
English
87
7
265
503.5K
Cate
Cate@Catherinelc94·
I saw a tiktok the other day, about a grumpy old man shouting at a young guy for taking his daughters to the women’s toilet. If you’re a dad with a daughter or a mum with a son and they need the toilet, use the women’s. This shouldn’t even be a conversation.
jezz@JezziiB

Ok so here’s how it works Dads with daughters: Women’s restroom. Moms with daughters: Women’s restroom. Dads with sons: Men’s restrooms. Mothers with sons: Women’s restroom. Hope that helps.

English
8
3
31
4K