Lunamorte

@AMasduu @Bitcoin_Teddy And for what reason would the companies just eat the costs?

How about companies eat the tariffs instead if putting the difference on consumers? Walmart doesn't need that 8% on bananas or anything else. This is why increasing wages doesn't do anything either. Because companies just raise the prices of all their products at the same time because "people have more money."

DEAN: “What’s the tariff on bananas?” LUTNICK: “10%.” DEAN: “Walmart already raised banana prices by 8%.” LUTNICK: “Well, if you build in America, there’s no tariff.” DEAN: “You can’t build bananas in America.”

@BadAceMike @Beware_The_Noid @crazypetealive @Bitcoin_Teddy Because they are a commonly purchased food which make it a decent example. It doesn't take more than a single brain cell to realize that this is about more than just bananas. Cost of groceries is going up in general.

@Beware_The_Noid @crazypetealive @Bitcoin_Teddy DUDE look at the fucking video....> SHE IS BITCHING ABOUT BANANAS Hello.............

@EkimMotlah67675 @JamesTate121 The cost of living and quality life tends to be higher in those other countries. You say you looked it up, but it sounds like you did not properly read it.

@JamesTate121 Now look at how much money those people keep after paying all taxes and cost of living expenses vs the US. Ive looked this up in Scandinavian countries and they keep a third of what we do for middle class earners and that includes healthcare costs.

When the price gap is this wide, people start asking why healthcare costs so much more in the U.S.

@99999subatomic @colette5081 @NorthshoreRob59 @Coutorce @TukiFromKL I am not revising history in to fit my narrative in anyway nor am I using any loophole semantics. That is a false accusation. I am referencing historical fact; plain and simple.

@colette5081 @NorthshoreRob59 @TypeLuna @Coutorce @TukiFromKL That’s what they always do. Loophole semantics.

🚨 Do you understand what SCOTUS is about to decide? in 1857, the Supreme Court ruled that Black Americans... even those born free on American soil.. could never be citizens.. it was called the Dred Scott decision.. one of the most shameful rulings in legal history.. it took a Civil War and 360,000 Union deaths to fix it.. in 1868, Congress passed the 14th Amendment.. "all persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens".. no exceptions.. no asterisks.. they wrote it that way on purpose.. so no government could ever again decide who counts as American on this soil.. it has stood for 156 years.. Trump signed an executive order trying to end it.. not a constitutional amendment.. not an act of Congress.. an executive order.. and SCOTUS is about to decide if that's allowed.. here's what nobody's saying out loud.. this isn't about immigration.. if a president can override the 14th Amendment with an executive order.. there is no amendment a president cannot override with an executive order.. one executive order just did what the Confederacy couldn't.

@colette5081 @Coutorce @TukiFromKL I am not wrong, you are. Anyone without diplomatic immunity is considered to be within the jurisdiction of the US while they are in the US. Historical records has shown that the intention of the 14th ammendment extends past the children of former slaves and applies to immigrants.

@TypeLuna @Coutorce @TukiFromKL 3/3 You are arguing that this means that our law provides automatic citizenship yet bypassing other laws that classify them as being here illegally & foreign nationals. The 14th has been misinterpreted for decades but how it was been exploited was NOT the original understanding.

@TalentedTargets @c_h_e_m @Pirat_Nation Then perhaps we need to move onto an investigation then because Visa and Mastercard are effectively essential to modern civilization with the grip they have on payment processing. Under no circumstance should they be allowed to deny services for any legal business.

@c_h_e_m @Pirat_Nation Correct if that was the case there would be an investigation and not a letter

The FTC Chairman sent warning letters to PayPal, Stripe, Visa, and Mastercard. They can no longer deny services to legal businesses, including anime and adult content creators. This follows Trump's order against unfair debanking.

@MortalXpert @1479pro @FurankyFuran @BigOPiper Yuzuha is a key support in anamoly teams. She is one of the best characters in the game because of how much she does for Anamoly teams. She, along with Astra and Lucia, make up the support triad in ZZZ.

@1479pro @FurankyFuran @BigOPiper Damn guess everyone's OP ok let's hear what you said if I said S Anby, Trigger or SEED

4 sure mate

@MortalXpert @N07745023 @Astarze13 @veryepicctoast @BigOPiper

@N07745023 @Astarze13 @veryepicctoast @BigOPiper Not fake you dumb fuck but hey you said you got charts of the revenue that accurate so please pull them up or will you be just like you're other friends and just make bullshit claims

i have almost 8000 pulls on ZZZ

@99999subatomic @NorthshoreRob59 @Coutorce @TukiFromKL I am not using any loophole. I am referencing historical fact. Historical congressional records from 1866 show Jacob Howard clarifying that the clause excludes only those with diplomatic immunity, supporting the notion of deliberate expansiveness beyond former slaves.

@TypeLuna @NorthshoreRob59 @Coutorce @TukiFromKL These emantic loopholes you’re using only work under democratic control. Try again.

@colette5081 @Coutorce @TukiFromKL Historical congressional records from 1866 show Sen. Jacob Howard clarifying that the clause excludes only those with diplomatic immunity but affirms citizenship for "every other class of persons," supporting the notion of deliberate expansiveness beyond former slaves.

@colette5081 @Coutorce @TukiFromKL When I say immigrants, I mean anyone who does not have something like diplomatic immunity that would put them outside of the jurisdiction of the US. Even illegal immigrants in thw US fall under its jurisdiction; that's why they can be criminally charged.

@NorthshoreRob59 @Coutorce @TukiFromKL It is what they are talking about. Permanent residents like Green card holders cannot serve on juries and cannot vote, but they still fall under US jurisdiction; they condradict your claim. Any immigrant, legal or not, fall under US jurisdiction while in the US.

@TypeLuna @Coutorce @TukiFromKL Falling under jurisdiction for criminal offenses is not what they were talking about. A non-citizen doesn't fall under the jurisdiction in the sense they can't serve on juries, they can't vote, their allegiance was to a king or to another government, not the US.

@colette5081 @Coutorce @TukiFromKL I am not ignoring it. That phrase does not exclude immigrants in anyway. It to exclude the children of foreign diplomats who are under diplomatic immunity while they are in the US. Historical records clarify this.

@TypeLuna @Coutorce @TukiFromKL AND Subject to the jurisdiction thereof Immigrants and anchor babies love ignoring the second part.

@NorthshoreRob59 @Coutorce @TukiFromKL You are wrong. Illegal immigrants can be criminally charge while they are in the US and thus fall under US jurisdiction. To not fall under US jurisdiction means having diplomatic immunity.

@TypeLuna @Coutorce @TukiFromKL ANY person who is not a US citizen doesn't fall under US jurisdiction. If they LEGALLY immigrate here, they're coming with the INTENTION of becoming a citizen, and were allowed in based on that assumption. People who sneak across the border and drop a kid was NEVER the intent.

@NorthshoreRob59 @HeapBigMuckMuck @Coutorce @TukiFromKL No, you are wrong. Legal scholars and the Constitutional Accountability Center explain that in 19th-century legal language, he was using those terms to describe the same group: people with diplomatic immunity who are not legally "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S.

@TypeLuna @HeapBigMuckMuck @Coutorce @TukiFromKL There would have been no reason to write what he did if he didn't mean ANYONE under the jurisdiction of another government. Sorry, but you're wrong. And SCOTUS will clarify that. x.com/NorthshoreRob5…

@HeapBigMuckMuck @NorthshoreRob59 @Coutorce @TukiFromKL Trump is not fixing it; he is trying to break it. I will never be grateful for such an attrocity.

@HeapBigMuckMuck @NorthshoreRob59 @Coutorce @TukiFromKL Historical congressional records from 1866 show Jacob Howard clarifying that the clause excludes only those with foreign diplomatic immunity but affirms citizenship for "every other class of persons," supporting the notion view of deliberate expansiveness beyond former slaves.

@99999subatomic @NorthshoreRob59 @Coutorce @TukiFromKL Historical congressional records from 1866 show Sen. Jacob Howard clarifying that the clause excludes only those with diplomatic immunity but affirms citizenship for "every other class of persons," supporting the notion of deliberate expansiveness beyond former slaves.

@99999subatomic @NorthshoreRob59 @Coutorce @TukiFromKL And at the same time, they intentionally did not exclude immigrants for a reason. The 14th Ammendment was made to counter the Dred Scott ruling and it uses a sweeping statement to intentionally include more than just the children of slaves.