Yuukimaru

1.7K posts

Yuukimaru

Yuukimaru

@YuukimaruRP

I facilitate strategy discussions for right-wing dissidents. Connect with other based people: https://t.co/OIBN9lOwxY

Inscrit le Mayıs 2020
102 Abonnements282 Abonnés
Tweet épinglé
Yuukimaru
Yuukimaru@YuukimaruRP·
The single most important mantra DR people need right now is: Stop hoping that by escaping to some place you will attain the kind of life boomers had. Was a historical anomaly. You will find it nowhere. Start hoping to become tough enough to prosper while living in the trenches.
English
7
3
42
8.6K
Yuukimaru
Yuukimaru@YuukimaruRP·
@DiodLeAnarchist Name just 3 dissident right individuals who used to be based on JQ, but later sided with the Jews. I'll wait, but won't hold my breath.
English
0
0
1
6
Diod the Anarchist :) 🌲
Diod the Anarchist :) 🌲@DiodLeAnarchist·
"If you can't beat 'em, join 'em" <--- The inevitable outcome of the so-called "dissident right" regarding jewishness
English
3
0
7
208
Yuukimaru
Yuukimaru@YuukimaruRP·
Actually, a woman's income DOES predict whether she marries. - Negatively, when you normalize by looks and IQ. If a woman is pretty, that makes her more likely to get married, and more likely to have a high income. If a woman is high IQ, that makes her more likely to get married, and more likely to have a high income. When you compare only women who are "pretty+high IQ+high income" to women who are "pretty+high IQ+low income", you will see very clearly that a low income woman is much more likely to get married. Proxy data: x.com/williameijer/s…
William Meijer@williameijer

Gender equality is the most potent contraceptive (r ≈ 0.81)

English
0
2
4
178
Jake Kozloski
Jake Kozloski@jakozloski·
A man's income strongly predicts whether he marries. A woman's does not. And this effect has only gotten stronger over the last century. For men born around 1900, earnings explained about 2.5% of who ever married. For men born in the 1970s, over 20%. With the rise of gender equality, a man's ability to provide has paradoxically become more important, not less.
English
9
11
145
3.5K
Yuukimaru retweeté
William Meijer
William Meijer@williameijer·
Gender equality is the most potent contraceptive (r ≈ 0.81)
William Meijer tweet media
English
144
571
4.2K
141.4K
Yuukimaru
Yuukimaru@YuukimaruRP·
Many people today understand that if a man is exceptionally good looking, women are willing to overlook his faults. A woman who rejected one man for having a salary not significantly higher than hers, and another man for not being "funny"; will be very happy to date an exceptionally good looking man who has all those faults. But understanding this, is just the tip of the iceberg. There is a much harsher fact that the beginner level red-pillers have yet to discover. It's this - When a man is exceptionally good looking, a woman is willing to overlook her own faults for him. This is similar, but much more important and has much darker implications. - A woman will often reject a man not because there is something wrong with him, but because there is something wrong with her. Maybe she still hasn't gotten over her ex. Maybe she is trying to careermaxx and sees dating as too much of a distraction. Maybe she has plans to migrate soon and is hence unwilling to get involved with someone who lives in her current country of residence. But a woman who has faults like these is willing to overlook them for an exceptionally good looking man. The reason this truth is so much darker, is - If an ordinary looking man gets rejected by a woman who will choose a better looking man with the same faults, the ordinary looking man can still work to fix his faults. He can still work to outshine the exceptionally good looking man in other areas. So that when he gets another date, a woman doesn't reject him for the faults she would have overlooked in a better looking man. But if an ordinary looking man gets rejected by a woman for her own faults, then there is nothing he can do about it. If he is not getting the 1st date, because the women he tries to flirt with are "not ready for a relationship", then him trying to improve anything is just pointless. P.S. I am not telling you this to demoralize you, but to make you realize that we do need a society-level fix. Many of you "internal locust of control" guys think you are doing young men a favor by telling what will motivate them to self-improve. But really you are causing all the men who will fail for systemic/statistical reasons to engage in self-blame and self-resentment instead of banding together to fix this wretched society.
English
8
0
4
110
Yuukimaru
Yuukimaru@YuukimaruRP·
The purpose of Hollywood movies is not to earn money. Both the directors of these movies and the shareholders of the corporations funding their production, are adherents of Antonio Gramsci. The motivation behind production of these movies is explained in Gramsci's theory of "cultural hegemony". The purpose they serve is: - To make people less likely to consume an earlier version of the story - To add an extra step for anyone trying to reference the older version, hence making references to older version less common (because having to use many words is tedious) - To desecrate the names of the characters (similar to how they corrupted words "freedom" and "marriage")
English
0
0
3
31
Yuukimaru retweeté
Thaïs d’Escufon
Thaïs d’Escufon@ThaisEscufon·
Europeans and American patriots! Tomorrow, the courts of my country, France, may decide to send me to prison for daring to say on television that “the main danger to women in France is Black African and Arab immigrant men.” Meanwhile, my own attacker, a Tunisian migrant, is still at large. I need your help to generate media pressure and hope to be acquitted. They cannot silence the truth! Thank you for your support 💪🏻🇫🇷
English
5.8K
71.8K
200.9K
6.5M
Yuukimaru retweeté
Cenk Uygur
Cenk Uygur@cenkuygur·
Notice how no one in his administration dares disagree with Donald Trump on anything. Then when Israel wants it, all of a sudden, half his team is in open rebellion. And it's totally kosher to say he's wrong and defy him. Interesting rules.
English
327
1.8K
13.4K
194.9K
Yuukimaru
Yuukimaru@YuukimaruRP·
You are wrong. 70% of Zoomer men in the West will never in their entire life have any decent option whatsoever. We should still be warning them of what will happen when they marry a reformed whore. But just so that they would be better prepared, emotionally and legally. You can advise them all you want, they still won't end up with a functional marriage.
English
1
1
2
169
Adriana Flowers 🌸
Adriana Flowers 🌸@Adriana19Flower·
@uoislame If men were told this, most wouldn’t even come close to a whore. I’m convinced that men that marry whores are not doing it with informed consent. They think they’re consenting to a happy long marriage when really, they are consenting to cheating, sexlessness and lovelessness.
English
2
1
49
741
Yuukimaru retweeté
Yuukimaru
Yuukimaru@YuukimaruRP·
And your solution is to go on an Ellulian rant about how "propaganda is not a neutral instrument but a technique whose internal logic and requirements for efficiency necessarily subordinate the user and escape human direction"; And how "a propagandist is never asked to be involved in what he is saying, for, if it becomes necessary, he may be asked to say the exact opposite with similar conviction." ?
English
0
0
0
38
κρῠπτός
κρῠπτός@_kruptos·
So your solution to propaganda is to want to become the propagandist to tell people the truth. Again, tell me you don’t know how propaganda works without telling me.
Fourthbranch 🌴@The4ourthBranch

@_kruptos @Aris_Utensil I unironically agree with you that I should be in charge of a centralized organization dictating what's truth and what isn't so people aren't inundated with all sorts of fake truths and half truths

English
3
0
6
893
Yuukimaru
Yuukimaru@YuukimaruRP·
@DiodLeAnarchist Among other things, come to a Juni's X space on some Saturday again. Last time we talked about the issues with having no well-defined rules; Next time lets talk about your ideas about how a sustainably tax-free zone would emerge, and how it would expand.
English
1
0
1
104
Yuukimaru retweeté
Yuukimaru
Yuukimaru@YuukimaruRP·
"Men’s desirability peaks at ages 40-50" is highly misleading. Men of all ages prefer a woman who is roughly around 20. Women who are around 20 are choosing mostly men who are in their 20s. The fact that 40 year old women are more likely to want a man who is 40-50 does not mean that men who are 40-50 are the most desirable, not in a way that men care about.
English
40
16
803
49.3K
Yuukimaru
Yuukimaru@YuukimaruRP·
@muckledug @ChrisWillx I did not interview any men around 60. My opinion is based on evolutionary explanations, data from OKCupid, studies by Jan Antfolk, and the fact that I am currently 30 and my taste in women is not any different than when I was 20. I am open to new evidence.
English
7
0
30
5.3K
Davie Park
Davie Park@muckledug·
@YuukimaruRP @ChrisWillx Hmm. I know plenty of men around my age (60ish) who are pretty open about their preferences - and none prefer women 'around 20'.
English
8
0
60
5.9K
Chris Williamson
Chris Williamson@ChrisWillx·
The dating market is brutal. Elizabeth Bruch, a professor of sociology at the University of Michigan analysed data from online dating. Here are some things she discovered… -Men’s desirability peaks at ages 40-50. But women’s desirability starts highest at age 18 and falls throughout their lifespan. -Both men and women pursue partners who are on average about 25% more desirable than themselves. -Women’s prospects dim as they achieve the highest level of education. -Almost no one messages users less desirable than they are. Everyone’s understanding of their place in the hierarchy is very accurate. -Men experience lower reply rates when they write more positively worded messages.
English
504
478
8.2K
2M
Yuukimaru retweeté
Jorge Clúni
Jorge Clúni@CluniJorge·
@YuukimaruRP Sensible enough: know Step 2 (if not also Steps 3,4,5) before initiating Step 1
English
0
1
1
58
Yuukimaru
Yuukimaru@YuukimaruRP·
Mid-looking Women on X (twitter) rarely engage with incels at all. When they do, the conversation usually goes like this: Women: Why are you incels allowing the so called "chads" to deceive and hurt women and get away with it? Why are you allowing "chads" to use us for sex and never commit? Incels: Oh, you dislike it now? Ok then, help us pass the laws to legally enforce monogamy. Then everyone will just be marrying their looksmatch and not sleep around. Women: Woah, cool it off with misogyny! This kind of fascist personality is exactly why you can't get laid!
English
0
0
1
63
Yuukimaru
Yuukimaru@YuukimaruRP·
Every now and then, some public figure compares the terrible things that are happening presently to Hitler and Holocaust. Every time it happens, the liberal Jews get furious that someone dared to compare present events to Hitler and Holocaust. But what else are we supposed to use as the point of comparison? Ever since the liberal Jews got to dictate the curriculum for the public schools, Hitler and Holocaust are the only history lesson that's repeated often enough for the normies to remember. If some public figure compared what's happening today to 410AD's Porta Salaria, none of the normies would know have a clue what he is talking about.
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10

I want to be really clear in my response. I am not going to retract anything, I stand by every single word. Labour are calling for me to apologise. The answer is no. Industrial rape across almost every town and city in Britain. Sexual torture. Murder. Endless rape. I sat there for two weeks, listening to these girls. I heard how one girl was raped by a dog, as Muslim men bet on what the animal would do. Girls drugged and locked in cages, like rats. Another, raped by 700 men over three years. Dozens and dozens of these stories through our inquiry, and we are barely scratching the surface. This was allowed to happen EXACTLY because politicians were cowards, refusing to discuss it. I will not make that same mistake. I said what I said, and I meant it. The Labour Party have blood on their hands, yet they think they can demand an apology from me for highlighting the systemic evil they allowed to infect our entire country? They can piss off. I am angry about it. Furious. When you hear directly from these girls about what they have been through, it changes the way you see politics. Forever. Our report will be out very soon. When that happens, I don’t want any apologies from the Labour Party. I don’t care about that. I want to see those politicians responsible for covering up this atrocity behind bars for what they have done to these girls.

English
0
0
1
67