Me retweeté

Need proof that the Supreme Court’s honor system is a joke? Enter Samuel Alito.
Four former officials confirmed that Justice Alito’s son, Philip, has worked as a lawyer inside Trump’s Treasury Department since early last year.
His role was kept off the public record: no résumé, no LinkedIn, no mention on Treasury’s own website, and outdated bar listings.
While he was there, the Treasury was a named defendant in a case argued before the Supreme Court over Trump’s emergency tariffs. The department never disclosed the connection in court, and Justice Alito did not recuse himself. He sat on the case.
Treasury’s defense is that the son never touched the tariff matter, so no recusal was needed.
That misses the law entirely.
Federal law requires recusal whenever a justice’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
The test is not whether anyone can prove influence. It is whether a reasonable person would have doubts. A justice ruling on cases involving the department that signs his son’s paychecks fails that test on its face.
This is the textbook definition of a conflict of interest, and Congress must act.
I support withholding funding from the Court until the justices adopt a binding ethics code with real recusal review.
forbes.com/sites/alisondu…
English



















