everything's computer

57.7K posts

everything's computer banner
everything's computer

everything's computer

@col_mobius

Inscrit le Ağustos 2008
625 Abonnements391 Abonnés
everything's computer retweeté
Rocco Botte
Rocco Botte@rocco_botte·
MICHAEL is incredible. Entire audience singing. A full theater dancing nonstop. Children throwing their popcorn and sodas at the screen. Dogs barking at max volume. Multiple couples sucking and fucking in full view. Statues of Mother Theresa shattered with hammers. It’s perfect.
English
31
327
3.4K
53.1K
everything's computer
everything's computer@col_mobius·
@constans Well, technically, anyone in a sensitive or natsec position is also not published, but most civilians are easy to find
English
0
0
2
55
constans
constans@constans·
All federal salaries except within the GAO are public info. You can look them up. If you think your neighbor who works for the federal government is living the high life on a government salary, you can just look up how much money they’re making. I’m nosy & do this all the time
English
2
1
78
1.9K
constans
constans@constans·
You don’t get stock options in the government. Salaries are generally middling and salaries are capped at a hard limit. The advantage is a bit more autonomy and stability SOME end up doing better than they could in the pvt sector but only because the govt can’t find the best ppl
Moses Kagan@moseskagan

[Deleted a comment I made last night about the advisability of govt paying high salaries for certain jobs to workers who would not be able to get anywhere near those salaries anywhere else. There are circumstances where the value of having a good person in a specific seat generates so much value for an org that it's worth paying a lot more than he/she could get in any other seat. So, I think the comment was unfair.]

English
7
11
185
31K
everything's computer retweeté
Maia
Maia@maiamindel·
first reformed (2017)
Maia tweet media
English
10
106
779
229.4K
everything's computer retweeté
Kyle Kondik
Kyle Kondik@kkondik·
Taking VA into account, along with new maps in CA, MO, NC, OH, TX, & UT: The new median House seat by 2024 presidential margin is Trump +1.8 (3-way tie among NM-2, CO-8, & CA-22). Trump won the popular vote by 1.5 pts, so only a minuscule R bias
English
5
23
141
21.3K
everything's computer
everything's computer@col_mobius·
@trumwill Yeah, that's sort of the obvious tell, right? Republicans don't actually want to solve the problem. The SAVE Act is an obvious place to start a compromise and they aren't even trying.
English
0
0
0
21
everything's computer
everything's computer@col_mobius·
@trumwill To be charitable, I'll say I'm willing to believe that's all true. I just don't see the point in worrying about it when there isn't even a conversation happening.
English
0
0
0
8
Will Truman
Will Truman@trumwill·
@col_mobius Not at all. If you ask me who is to blame here I point to the GOP. (I am working on a thread on this.) Theyre the first order problem. But I believe there is a second order problem here. And a third (though that's the easiest to solve, IMO.)
Ranson, WV 🇺🇸 English
2
0
1
56
everything's computer
everything's computer@col_mobius·
@trumwill At the moment, given there is no GOP plan of any kind to end partisan gerrymandering, it actually is entirely GOP intransigence. It could be something else in the future, but right now it is not.
English
0
0
0
17
Will Truman
Will Truman@trumwill·
@col_mobius Dems have higher ground here, but I think this is a problem beyond GOP intransigence.
Ranson, WV 🇺🇸 English
1
0
0
23
everything's computer
everything's computer@col_mobius·
@trumwill This is the classic "both sides" issue where one party is clearly wrong and bad on the issue but it feels mean to say so and we need to bring in some hypothetical bad guys on the other side who might not even exist.
English
1
0
0
26
everything's computer
everything's computer@col_mobius·
@trumwill I mean, maybe, but this seems needlessly pessimistic given that all Republicans are opposed regardless of any other considerations, so there's no compromise to be had.
English
1
0
0
33
everything's computer
everything's computer@col_mobius·
I'm not picking on any one person in particular, because my feed is full of people gaming out the chances of bipartisan redistricting reform this morning, but of course the chances are zero because Republicans oppose redistricting reform.
Benjy Sarlin@BenjySarlin

Even if it’s not a wave, like in 2022, the hope of one plus red state census gains would likely make the already minimal window for bipartisan gerrymander ban nonexistent. And not too early to think about this! I covered 2020 maps in 2014.

English
0
0
0
40
everything's computer
everything's computer@col_mobius·
@conorsen In my opinion, the hardest part is that Democrats pretty much all support redistricting reform and Republicans pretty much all oppose it.
English
0
0
3
209
Conor Sen
Conor Sen@conorsen·
The hardest part about redistricting reform (to the extent the public has an appetite for it) is in 2029 or whenever you’d need a dozen Dems in California and a dozen Republicans in Texas to vote to eliminate their own seats, seems challenging.
English
17
5
100
20.9K
everything's computer retweeté
Matthew Yglesias
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias·
Again, if Republicans want to stop partisan gerrymandering they should vote for Democrats’ proposal for a national ban on partisan gerrymandering. If they don’t want to stop it, then stop whining.
CJ Pearson@Cjpearson

It's still just completely insane that Democrats were allowed to write a ballot question that says "restore fairness" and have the result create this lobster-like monstrosity of a congressional district.

English
454
960
6.6K
726.5K
helmet girl
helmet girl@sbodrojan·
would someone like to distract me from my work 👍👍👍
helmet girl tweet media
English
9
6
1.1K
13.8K
Chris🥃
Chris🥃@MixingChris·
As a born sorter of things, I've been creating decade playlists, and am currently engorging myself on 70s music, so what's some 70s music I should listen to?
English
2
0
1
155
everything's computer
everything's computer@col_mobius·
@RichardHanania Not really? It’s like 1%, which is high enough you’d basically expect to see it given how many people there are.
English
0
0
7
851
Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania·
Isn’t this gender ratio pretty much mathematically impossible?
English
67
2
71
75.4K