Debidoodoo

7.3K posts

Debidoodoo

Debidoodoo

@debidoodoos

Derby Inscrit le Aralık 2010
738 Abonnements437 Abonnés
Donna Louise
Donna Louise@DonnaLouise1212·
"My dead grandad & dad voted labour, so I've got to vote labour" "They'd be turning in their grave's if I voted anyone else, even though we've had labour for 40 years and our community, services, & rape gangs are totally fcked up"... What goes on in peoples heads?
Donna Louise tweet media
English
69
125
679
5.2K
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
@NC1stinFreedom @TRobinsonNewEra Nope! Most people rely on MSM for their "news". In my small town people still go for covid jabs, etc - they are so brainwashed. I doubt many of them have any idea about the grooming gang report & the horrific abuse those poor girls suffered. They'll be the death of this country.
English
1
0
1
14
Appetite4Liberty
Appetite4Liberty@NC1stinFreedom·
For YEARS, the MSM media has used the name 'Tommy Robinson' just like any other weaponized label; racist, Nazi, Islamophobe etc. It has effectively silenced any discussion on the underlying issues. Legit question for those in the UK: Outside of X, are regular non-engaged citizens starting to see through this at all?
English
1
0
3
627
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra·
The BBC finally interviewed Rupert Lowe. Did they ask him about the rape gang inquiry? Of course not, they moaned about me to him. He put them in their place live on air.
English
265
4.4K
27.6K
284.2K
Debidoodoo retweeté
AwakenedOutlaw⚒️
AwakenedOutlaw⚒️@AwakenedOutlaw·
I just checked in on the BBC's website, and yup. Still not a damn word about the Rape Gang Inquiry Report. You know, the biggest scandal in the country/world... the one that they're completely ignoring. Weird, right?
AwakenedOutlaw⚒️ tweet media
English
32
388
913
5.8K
Debidoodoo retweeté
Dr. Maalouf ‏
Dr. Maalouf ‏@realMaalouf·
Not a single woman or child. Only military-age men. That’s because they are not refugees. They are soldiers, and this is a religious war of conquest. Europe needs to wake up.
English
1.6K
18K
54.7K
486.9K
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
IMPORTANT COMMENT ⬇️
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo@RafHM

I'm tired of constantly having to say this: In every British election more people vote for LEFT wing parties than for right The right succeeded b4 because it was united & the left was split Makerfield again shows the left are more willing to vote tactically to block Reform than the right is willing to vote tactically to block Labour Green and Lib Dem voters showed no party loyalty, lending their vote to Labour. This was not reflected on the right. This is a disaster The right must get its act together and either unite or learn to vote tactically Does our fractured right really hate each other so much that we are willing to allow the Left to form the next government? I'm afraid we don't have time for this. Because there is another uncomfortable truth I keep repeating: Right wing voters are dying at TWICE THE RATE of left wing voters And they are not being replenished amongst the young. We have the most radically left wing youth in history (3/4 of youth are on the political left). We do not have time for the drama of right wing divisions. Britain's demographic time bomb means we only have one or two general elections left to save the country (and reverse the left's domination over youth education etc.,) To win a majority government the winning party must secure at least 31%/32% of the national vote. There must be sufficient unity or tactical voting on the right to enable that to happen. The Left won't be *as* united in a General Election as they were in Makerfield. Nevertheless, we are going to see them engage in tactical voting as NEVER BEFORE. This is the time to put emotion and everything else aside and face the cold hard mathematical reality.

Français
0
0
0
1
Debidoodoo retweeté
Wrexham Unite 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿
THEY REMOVED HENRY’S FLAG Our personal flag tribute to Henry Nowak has been ripped down and taken away from the Tesco roundabout in Wrexham. Our Flag Man made this one deeply personal, placing it proudly on one of the main roundabouts where the red dragons of Wales flew around our brother Henry. We felt compelled to honour him. Because without justice there is no peace. But now the flag is gone. Removed by those who clearly don’t want reminders of what happened to this innocent 18-year-old boy. A young man stabbed by a sword, murdered, then failed by the police as he lay dying, and now even his memorial flag in our town is erased? This is a disgrace. This is disrespect to Henry, and every single person who wants real justice. We will not forget. We will not stay silent. Share this everywhere. Make sure Wrexham, and the whole country, know they can take the flag down, but they can’t bury the truth. Our brother. Our son. #justiceforhenry
English
29
637
1.8K
22.5K
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
So Keir Starmer thinks the grooming gang scandal has been "overblown "! How dare he disrespect the thousands of young girls who have suffered at the hands of these degenerates! Hateful, Hateful man. 🤬🤬🤬
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra

ARE YOU ANGRY ENOUGH YET? SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE!!!! So @BretBaier speaks to @patrickbetdavid on the @PBDsPodcast and tells him that he actually asked British Prime Minister @Keir_Starmer about the 'Rape Gangs' which was brought to his attention by @elonmusk. All Keir Starmer could do was downplay the issue of generations of British girls being raped, pimped and prostituted by Muslim Pakistani gangs, telling Bret the issue has been 'overblown'. We will NEVER get justice for the children of the UK as long as we have politicians like Keir Starmer in positions of power. #TheRapeOfBritain #TheRapeGangInquiry

English
0
0
0
21
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
This is worth a read. ⬇️
Millie Marconi@MillieMarconnni

A Japanese immunologist spent 20 years proving that the chemicals trees release into the air walk into your bloodstream, hunt down your stress hormones, and arm your immune system in ways no therapist or pharmaceutical has ever matched, and most of the data has been sitting in Japanese medical journals for two decades waiting to be translated. His name is Qing Li. He is a clinical professor at Nippon Medical School in Tokyo and the president of the Japanese Society of Forest Medicine. The Japanese government has been funding his research since 2004, and the body of work he has produced is the reason forest bathing is now an officially prescribed clinical therapy in Japan and Korea. The story actually starts in 1982, when the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries coined the term shinrin-yoku to describe the practice of slow, mindful walking in a forest. They did it for a practical reason. Japan was urbanizing fast, stress-related illness was climbing, and the country had thousands of square kilometers of forest sitting unused. The idea was to give people a reason to walk into the trees... They had no idea what was actually happening to the human body during those walks until Qing Li ran the first proper experiment in 2005. He took twelve healthy adult men on a three-day, two-night trip to a forest park. They walked for a few hours each day. Nothing strenuous. No prescribed routes or breathing exercises. They simply walked slowly through the trees, breathing the air, looking at the forest. Li drew blood and urine samples before the trip, on the second day, on the third day, on day seven after returning home, and again on day thirty. The numbers that came back from the lab were not what anyone expected. The activity of a specific type of immune cell called the natural killer cell, which is the cell your body uses to hunt down cancer cells and virus-infected cells before they can spread, had jumped by roughly 50 percent during the forest trip. The actual number of natural killer cells circulating in the bloodstream had increased significantly. Three different anti-cancer proteins that those cells produce, called perforin, granzymes, and granulysin, had all risen sharply. And the effect did not disappear when the men went home. The immune boost was still measurable on day seven and was still partially present on day thirty. Two hours a day in a forest had upgraded the immune system for a full month. Li ran the same experiment with women a year later and found nearly identical results. Then he ran it with a control group who took a three-day trip through an urban area with the same amount of walking, the same hotel quality, and the same diet. The urban group showed no measurable change in natural killer cell activity at all. The forest was doing the work, not the vacation. The mechanism turned out to be a class of airborne molecules called phytoncides. Trees produce these compounds to defend themselves against insects, bacteria, and fungi. Pine, cedar, oak, and cypress trees release them in particularly large amounts, especially in warmer weather and after rainfall. When you walk through a forest, you are inhaling those molecules into your lungs and absorbing them through your skin, and once inside your body they appear to directly stimulate the production and activity of the very immune cells Li was measuring in his lab. Roughly 50 percent of the health benefit of a forest walk, according to Li's data, comes from the chemistry of the air itself. The other half comes from what the forest is doing to your nervous system. This is where it stops being only about the immune system and starts being about stress. A separate Japanese research team measured cortisol, the body's main stress hormone, in 84 participants across 35 different forest sites. They drew samples before and after a 30-minute walk in each forest and compared them to control walks in matched urban environments. The cortisol levels of the people who walked in the forest were lower than the cortisol levels of the people who walked in the city by a significant margin. Their heart rates were lower. Their blood pressure was lower. The activity of their parasympathetic nervous system, which is the part responsible for rest and recovery, had gone up. The activity of their sympathetic nervous system, which is the part that drives fight or flight, had gone down. Then a researcher at the University of Michigan named MaryCarol Hunter ran the cleanest version of this experiment ever done. She recruited participants from a city and told them to take a nature pill three times a week for eight weeks. They were free to choose the time, the place, and the duration of the nature experience, as long as it was outside, in daylight, and free of phones, conversations, and aerobic exercise. They sent her saliva samples before and after each session so she could measure cortisol changes accurately and rule out the normal daily drop in stress hormones that happens to everyone. The result was that participants experienced a 21.3 percent drop in cortisol per hour spent in nature, with the biggest payoff happening between minutes 20 and 30 of the walk. After that, the cortisol kept dropping, but more slowly. The threshold dose for measurable stress relief was just 20 minutes outside in something that looked and felt like nature. What none of this means is that nature is a substitute for therapy or for medication when someone genuinely needs them. Therapy treats different things than a walk does, and Li himself has been careful in interviews to call forest bathing a complementary intervention rather than a replacement for clinical care. But what the research has settled is that the human body has a physiological response to being among trees that operates on the same biological systems modern medicine is trying to reach with drugs and clinical protocols, and that response is fast, measurable, and free. The strangest part of Li's work is the implication he keeps repeating in interviews. The average person now spends more than 90 percent of their life indoors. Their cortisol stays elevated. Their natural killer cells stay sluggish. Their parasympathetic nervous system rarely gets a chance to take over. The system that was tuned by millions of years of life under a canopy of trees is being asked to run permanently inside a box made of drywall and screens. Your body has not forgotten what it is supposed to do in a forest. It is waiting for you to walk into one.

English
0
0
0
1
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
@ReilandJeffrey @JENpatriotic @LaurenVella82 Because this report has not been published or discussed on the msm. Not BBC, ITV, Sky TV, or most newspapers. Most people are entirely ignorant about this. And indeed about most things! Not everyone is on X, sadly. Normies still call us conspiracy theorists. 😕
English
1
0
3
61
Jeffrey Reiland II
Jeffrey Reiland II@ReilandJeffrey·
@JENpatriotic @LaurenVella82 Jen, I seriously don’t understand why the UK isn’t on fire right now. And why y’all aren’t dragging Muslims out of their holes and hanging them from the nearest lamp post.
English
7
5
93
1.9K
Jen💀🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧
When your police take a young girl who was raped by pakistani immigrants and return her not to her parents, but to the pakistani immigrants and tell them to 'have fun with her,' your entire system has to burn.
English
182
2.4K
16.1K
126.7K
Debidoodoo retweeté
𐌁𐌉Ᏽ 𐌕𐌉𐌌𐌉
Remember when they sold us the slogan, “Go paperless, save trees, save the planet”? Now we've gone digital, and it's consuming enormous amounts of water, destroying ecosystems, harming bees, and contributing to environmental damage on a scale paper never did.
English
46
2K
9.5K
59.6K
Debidoodoo retweeté
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
The EU Acted. Hungary Acted. The US Acted. Britain Signed Hotel Contracts Until 2039. Yesterday the European Parliament voted 418 to 218 to pass the strictest returns legislation in EU history. The lead negotiator described it as the final missing piece of Europe's migration system. After almost twenty years of standstill, he said, Europe finally has effective return measures. The vote followed the Chișinău Declaration of 15 May, signed by all 46 Council of Europe member states, pushing back against the European Court of Human Rights' increasingly expansive interpretation of migration law. Europe's governments, operating inside the ECHR framework, have decided they have had enough of judicial overreach. They are acting anyway. Britain's removal rate for illegal arrivals stands at 4%. The EU's removal rate, the number so catastrophically low it triggered yesterday's emergency legislation, stands at 20%. Britain is removing at one fifth the rate of a system the EU itself just declared broken beyond tolerance. While announcing it wants to stop the boats, the Home Office has signed accommodation contracts for asylum seekers running until 2039. A government that intends to remove people does not contract for 15 years of housing them. The standard explanation is the ECHR. Ministers have cited it for years as the primary obstacle to removal, the external constraint that ties Britain's hands regardless of political will. It is worth examining that claim against the Court's own published data. Of more than 430,000 applications processed by the ECHR in the past decade, fewer than 2% concerned immigration. Of those, over 92% were dismissed. Fewer than 450 cases, one in every thousand applications to the Court, resulted in a finding of human rights violation on immigration grounds. The obstacle is not in Strasbourg. It is in Chancery Lane. The domestic immigration tribunal system, staffed in part by judges whose documented backgrounds lie in open-borders advocacy, produces rulings that no democratically elected parliament ever intended and that the ECHR itself would not require. And the institutional machinery surrounding it ensures that challenging any of this carries consequences. A new Islamophobia definition, opposed by the government's own former anti-extremism adviser and by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, is being embedded across every school, hospital, broadcaster and public body in the country. Two-tier policing, documented in Hampshire's own Race Action Plan and in the College of Policing's guidance, conditions officers to treat a racism accusation as the primary fact requiring response. The framework does not just permit the embedding of mass migration. It is designed to make objecting to it a disciplinary matter. The EU has now demonstrated, within the ECHR framework, that effective returns legislation is achievable. Hungary has demonstrated that a 4% removal rate is a political choice, not a legal inevitability. The United States has demonstrated that border crossings can be reduced from 1.6 million to under 240,000 within months of a government deciding to act. Every external constraint Britain's government cites as the reason it cannot act has now been dismantled by other governments operating under comparable or identical legal obligations. Mass immigration is not an act of nature managed by people smugglers. It is a policy choice sustained by successive governments across thirty years, maintained by an institutional framework that classifies concern about it as extremism, and defended by a legal excuse that the EU just voted 418 to 218 to stop hiding behind. The smugglers did not build this system. The government did. Yesterday, 418 members of the European Parliament decided they had had enough of pretending otherwise. Britain's government has not. "Mass immigration is not an act of nature managed by people smugglers. It is a policy choice sustained by successive governments across thirty years"
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
64
736
1.4K
18.8K
Debidoodoo retweeté
Christian
Christian@InTheTrenchesUK·
MOTHER ENGLAND IS BLEEDING She has been betrayed. Not by enemies at the gates, but by the permanent government within. And they are mortgaging her future. Four people. Four names you never voted for. Four people who control more power than the Prime Minister, more power than Parliament, more power than you. And they are borrowing billions from your children to pay for it. DAME ANTONIA ROMEO - The Bully She controls 500,000 civil servants. Her own staff called her "unreasonable, degrading, demeaning." She repaid £31,000 in dodgy expenses. Investigated for bullying in New York. Multiple women came forward. Starmer promoted her anyway. She decides what ministers see. She decides what policies live or die. She runs the machine that outlasts every government. SIR JAMES BOWLER - The Debt-Maker He controls the Treasury. The borrowing. The "no" to tax cuts and the "yes" to debt your grandchildren will pay. He admitted Britain is "dependent on the kindness of strangers" to borrow. He commits billions that future governments cannot undo. Four Chancellors have come and gone. He remains. He has never faced a voter. GARETH DAVIES - The Gatekeeper Fresh into Home Office, now controlling who enters, who stays, who is removed. The borders are his. The policing is his. The small boats keep coming. He keeps his job. Who appointed him? Why now? What commitments has he made that will bind the next government? VIJAY RANGARAJAN - The Sovereignty-Giver He negotiated the Chagos handover. British territory given to Mauritius. The cost? £35 billion. A 99-year commitment that binds your grandchildren. £101-165 million every year until 2124. Long after Starmer is dust. Long after the next government is forgotten. The payments continue. The unelected man who gave away British territory now runs British elections. He investigates Reform UK repeatedly. Finds nothing. Questions about Brendan Cox associations. Questions about loyalty. THEY WERE ALL APPOINTED WITHIN THE LAST TWO YEARS. Romeo - February 2026. Bowler - entrenched since 2022, borrowing for decades. Davies - April 2026. Rangarajan - March 2024, committing billions for a century. Fresh appointments. Fresh power. Fresh debt. They will outlast Starmer. They will outlast the next government. The permanent government commits. The elected politicians pay. Your children inherit the bill. WHO DO THEY REALLY SERVE? Not you. You never voted for them. You cannot remove them. Yet they control the money, the borders, the elections, and the civil service. They borrow billions your grandchildren will repay. They give away territory your grandchildren will never reclaim. They make commitments that bind for 99 years. They hide behind "operational independence." They hide behind "expert advice." They hide in plain sight while mortgaging your future. MOTHER ENGLAND IS BLEEDING. Her sovereignty sold for £35 billion. Her borders open. Her elections overseen by the sovereignty-giver. Her Treasury run by the debt-maker. Her civil service run by bullies. Her future mortgaged by people she never elected. This is not democracy. This is intergenerational theft by bureaucratic dictatorship. WHO HAS THE RECEIPTS? I am compiling the complete dossier. If you have evidence, documents, verifiable facts about these four, submit them. Facts only. Sources required. The next government must remove them. All four. On day one. Cancel the Chagos commitment. Fire the debt-makers. Clean house. No more operational independence. No more expert advice. No more permanent government. No more borrowing from our children's future. Mother England will not bleed forever. The British people will not be ruled by those they never elected. And we will not pay for their 99-year mistakes. Submit what you have. I will verify. I will publish. I will not stop. Your move.
Christian tweet media
English
206
2.6K
4.4K
68.9K
Debidoodoo retweeté
Alan
Alan@A1an_M·
This story is a good example of quite a number of things. 1. It's a good example of the poor quality of BBC "science journalism". 2. It's a good example of how big corporations and their interests have captured mainstream media. 3. It's a good example of why we really need independent social media (and why governments and large corporates, which have essentially merged together (into a form of corporatism as Mussolini define it) don't like social media and want it censored). Let's look at what the story says. The headline says "Cervical cancer deaths fall to zero in young women given vaccine". Specifically, they say "Between 2020 and 2024, no cervical cancer deaths were recorded in women aged 20 to 24 - the first time that had happened over a five-year period." But routine vaccination of 13 year olds only started in 2018. So the earliest children vaccinated in 2018 would only have been 19 in 2024 at the end of their study period. And we know that even prior to vaccination starting, the number of deaths in 20 to 24 year olds was always close to zero (see graph). So the claim is misleading. Not factually incorrect, but giving a false impression. It's disinformation, in fact. Making us think the vaccine has caused a dramatic improvement, when it has not. If we look at that graph, we can see that the trend is for deaths in all age groups to fall over time, a long time before vaccination started. So the decline in deaths is clearly due to something else (routine cervical screening and earlier treatment being the prime candidate). The BBC journalist who wrote this story has clearly put zero critical thinking into it. The company responsible for the HPV vaccine might as well have just written it verbatim and given it to the BBC to publish. Maybe they did? Let's project ourselves into the future, where all social media users have to provide government ID to access social media, and governments can track who is posting what, and identify and single out "troublemakers", critics and whistle-blowers for their social media posts. Do you think they will stop at censoring and banning people breaking the law, or do you think they will tackle people who are merely criticising flaws in the narrative using data and evidence? Well, we don't need to be Mystic Meg to imagine the future. We can just look back to 2020-1 and see what happened then. Exactly what I described. Government disinformation units tackling what they called "misinformation" and "disinformation" which turned out to be inconvenient truths about lockdowns, vaccines, masks, social distancing, government statistics. So without social media, big corporations and governments can get away with pushing their propaganda through unquestioning mainstream media journalists. That's why we need independent social media. As for the HPV vaccine: it might turn out to be a life-saver. But given that the first cohort of teenagers who received the vaccine in 2018 are now only 31, and the median age at diagnosis with cervical cancer is 45, we are not going to know for sure from empirical data for another decade or more. There are also potential confounders here. In parallel with the introduction of the HPV vaccine for teenagers, cervical cancer screening processes have been changed. Screening is starting at a later age, and is now focusing on detecting HPV rather than directly looking for cancer, and increasing the intervals between screenings. These changes alone may well result in the appearance of less cancer in younger age groups, but risk a big spike in cancers being detected at a later age. The authorities are tilting the table in favour of the vaccine pushers in the short term, but possibly at the expense of women in the longer term. And the other thing we will likely never know is whether the total effect on health from the HPV vaccination is a net positive. Little point in saving 20 cervical cancer deaths per 100,000 people if the vaccine itself is directly causing more than 20 deaths and chronic illnesses per 100,000 people from adverse effects. Why won't we ever know this? Because long-term comparisons of death and illness from all causes between vaccinated people and those receiving a saline placebo is almost never done. Studies always look narrowly at the target disease alone with a very brief and temporary consideration of adverse effects. This ⬆️ is the kind of in-depth analysis our national broadcaster should be doing, in the public interest. Not just parroting vaccine manufacturer talking points. But when you point this out, you get accused of being a conspiracy theorist, and the BBC sets the spook-y Marianna Spring on you. 🙄🕵️‍♀️
Alan tweet media
BBC News (UK)@BBCNews

Cervical cancer deaths fall to zero in young women given vaccine bbc.in/4ovjOLq

English
44
219
579
29.5K
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
@RickOpland @9mmsmg Some people got 3 years jail time for a tweet. A boy recently got arrested and charged for throwing a rubbish bin which hit nobody. All of them in response to horrific incidents involving "people of another culture". What can we do?
English
0
0
0
32
Rick Opland
Rick Opland@RickOpland·
@9mmsmg The tolerance of the British people is unbelievable. The fact that hundreds of fathers didn’t get revenge and take out as many as possible is something I can’t comprehend.
English
10
0
29
548
9mmSMG
9mmSMG@9mmsmg·
Whats happened in the UK is so repulsive that I don't even like thinking about it. What these Pakistanis have done can't be undone, but it can never happen again. Our government needs to make the UK feel the pressure from this. Honestly if they weren't a nuclear country I'd say the United States should completely take them over. This horror needs fixing. Everyone involved in the government and media needs to face justice. They all need to go back.
English
99
135
2.2K
27K
Debidoodoo retweeté
Paul Weston
Paul Weston@PWestoff·
Imagine the 24/7 Whore Media coverage if a report dropped this week on Far-Right, white, Christian rape-gangs targetting 250k+ Muslim girls in Britain. We know the coverage would be fanatically insane. Yet the other way around? SILENCE! Why so? @BBCNews @SkyNews @dailytelegraph
Paul Weston tweet media
English
33
163
440
6.7K
Debidoodoo retweeté
Dean Smith
Dean Smith@DeanSmi47962704·
Dean Smith tweet media
ZXX
8
117
145
2.7K
Debidoodoo
Debidoodoo@debidoodoos·
A long, but worthwhile read, with sources.
Christian@InTheTrenchesUK

"Save this post. Every fact in it is sourced to the BBC, Guardian, Telegraph, Sky and Met data. The only thing they never did was put it all in one place. So I did." The Sadiq Khan Story: How a Bus Driver's Son Became the Most Dangerous Man Ever to Hold Office in London. This is not a hit piece. This is a record. Every line is publicly sourced. Every fact has been printed by the BBC, the Guardian, the Telegraph, the Standard, Sky News, LBC, or the Met Police's own data. The only thing missing from the official record is anyone with the spine to put it all in one place. So here it is. The full picture. Start to finish. Decide for yourselves. 1968. The Arrival. Amanullah and Sehrun Khan arrive in England from Pakistan. He drives a London bus for 25 years. She sews clothes at home. They raise eight children in a council flat in Tooting. By any honest measure, this is a story Britain should be proud of. The country opened its door, an immigrant family worked hard, and their son rose. The problem is not where he came from. The problem is what he chose to do with what Britain gave him. The Lawyer Years. Whose Side Was He On? Before politics, Sadiq Khan was a human rights lawyer. And the human rights he chose to fight for tell you everything. 2001. Khan personally represents the Nation of Islam in the High Court and successfully overturns the UK's 15 year ban on Louis Farrakhan, one of the most notorious antisemites alive on the planet. A man who calls Jews "termites." Khan got him the legal right to walk back into Britain. Source: Wikipedia, Guardian, Standard. 2001 to 2006. Khan's law firm consults on the defence of Zacarias Moussaoui, the only person ever convicted in a US court of direct involvement in the 9/11 attacks. Source: Full Fact, Guardian. 2005 to 2006. Khan personally visits Babar Ahmad, a terror suspect, in Woodhill Prison. Ahmad's own father was an extremist Khan would later share a platform with in Parliament itself in 2012. Source: Evening Standard. Post 7/7. Khan signs an open letter blaming the London bombings, the murder of 52 innocent Britons on their way to work, on British government policy. Not on the bombers. On us. Source: Middle East Forum, ConservativeHome. 2004 to 2013. Khan shares a platform NINE times with Suliman Gani, a Tooting imam who has called women "subservient" to men, condemned gay people, and called for the establishment of an Islamic state. Source: BBC, Guardian, Evening Standard. That is not a defence lawyer doing his job. That is a pattern. That is a worldview. The Mayoralty. The Wrecking Ball. Since taking office in May 2016, here is what London has actually looked like under Sadiq Khan. Not opinion. Numbers. Knife crime, up 72%. From 9,100 offences in the year to June 2016 to 15,639 in the year to June 2025. The 2024/25 figure of 16,147 is the highest of any year of his mayoralty. Source: Daily Mail, Evening Standard, Met Police data. Khan was officially rebuked by the Office for Statistics Regulation for falsely claiming knife crime was falling. The state's own statistics watchdog had to publicly correct the Mayor of London. Source: Evening Standard. Robbery up 59%. Residential burglary up 37%. Source: GLA Conservatives, Met Police data. A record 30 teenage homicides in 2021. Thirty children, in one city, in one year. Source: Evening Standard. Two tier policing, on the record. A damning think tank report called for Khan to be stripped of policing control, finding officers "failing to arrest those committing criminal damage or shouting 'jihad' at pro Palestinian rallies." His reduction of stop and search has had, in the report's own words, "a catastrophic impact on the fight against crime." Source: LBC. This is the man lecturing you about safety. ULEZ. The Greatest Highway Robbery in British History. The Ultra Low Emission Zone was sold as a clean air policy. The data says otherwise. £500 million plus extracted from London drivers since the 2023 expansion alone. Source: Daily Mail FOI data. 2.4 million penalties issued. One every 15 seconds. Source: Daily Mail FOI data. £9 million of public money spent on a propaganda blitz to sell Londoners a policy they did not want. Source: Daily Mail, City Hall Conservatives. Independent impact assessment: ULEZ expansion had a "negligible effect on air quality." Source: Sky News. Sky News investigation: Khan's office accused of an "alarmingly cosy relationship" with scientific advisors, conspiring to silence research that contradicted his agenda. Source: Sky News. He bankrupted small businesses. He taxed pensioners off the road. He told you it was for the children's lungs. The science says it did nothing. The receipts say it raised half a billion pounds. You do the maths. TfL. Effectively Bankrupt. £11 to £12 billion in debt. Paying £400 million a year just in debt interest. Bailed out by central government seven times. Described in the House of Commons as "effectively bankrupt." Source: BBC, Telegraph, Guardian. This is the same man who increased the GLA council tax precept by 71% since 2016, from around £276 to over £510 for the average Band D household. Source: Full Fact, Evening Standard, BBC. You pay more. The trains break down more. The buses are more dangerous. The Met is stretched thinner. Where did the money go? The Cultural War on London Itself. In June 2020, days after the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, USA, Khan set up the Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm. A £250,000 taxpayer funded panel to review which British statues, street names and memorials should remain standing. Source: Daily Mail, Express, Telegraph. The commission's first scandal was its own commissioner. Toyin Agbetu was forced to resign after antisemitic and inflammatory social media posts were exposed. The man Khan picked to judge which British heroes deserved to stand had a record so toxic he had to be quietly dropped. Source: Telegraph, CUFI. This is the man deciding which parts of British history are allowed to remain visible in the British capital. The Grooming Gang Cover Up. London Edition. In February 2026, the Express revealed that Sadiq Khan was not only denying the existence of grooming gangs in London but actively dismissing first hand evidence from whistleblowers as "malicious" and "politically motivated." In May 2026, a survivor of grooming, a woman who was repeatedly trafficked directly into the capital, publicly accused Khan of "living under a rock" and wilfully turning a blind eye to a grooming gang epidemic in his city. Source: Express, May 2026. This is not a historical scandal he inherited. This is happening now. To children. In his city. And he is doing the same thing every authority did in Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Oldham and Bradford for twenty years. He is calling the people who tell the truth liars, and he is calling the victims politically inconvenient. History will hang this around his neck. And it should. The Met, Hobbled. The Palantir Block. May 2026. Khan personally blocks a £50 million contract between the Metropolitan Police and Palantir, an AI firm that had helped the force investigate corrupt officers including Wayne Couzens and David Carrick. Source: BBC, Guardian, GB News. Palantir's UK boss publicly accused Khan of "putting politics above public safety." A senior figure stated that the Mayor was "making the Metropolitan Police fight criminals with their hands tied behind their backs." Source: BBC, GB News. The same man who has presided over record knife crime, record phone theft and the collapse of stop and search just stripped the Met of the very tool that catches their own corrupt officers. Ask yourself why. And Now, the Flag. This is the part most Londoners have not yet fully clocked. Pay attention. New Year's Eve 2025 into 2026. Sadiq Khan turns the London Eye into the flag of the European Union. During Britain's own New Year fireworks. In the capital of the United Kingdom. The Union Jack? Reduced to a guest appearance. Source: Telegraph, GB News. GB News commentator Tom Harwood named it for what it was: "A foreign flag before our own." In response, Khan publicly "joked about declaring independence for London" and openly briefed about Britain rejoining the EU. Source: GB News, Evening Standard. He has used the phrase "take back control", the slogan of the Brexit campaign he despises, to demand more devolved power for himself in City Hall. Source: london.gov.uk official record. Read this carefully and read it twice. The Mayor of London has flown a foreign flag over the river Thames on New Year's Eve, publicly mused about declaring his city independent from the United Kingdom, and is now reportedly about to be elevated to a peerage and dragged into Starmer's cabinet after the 2026 local elections. Source: Wikipedia, March 2026 reporting. This is not a politician. This is a project. London is the prize. And the prize is being prepared for someone other than the British people. The Pattern. Now Look At It Whole. Step back. Look at the line. A lawyer who freed Farrakhan, defended terror cases, visited terror suspects in prison, signed letters blaming 7/7 on Britain, and shared platforms nine times with a radical imam. A mayor who oversaw a 72% rise in knife crime, was officially rebuked for lying about it, and presided over a record 30 teenage murders in a single year. A tax collector who extracted half a billion pounds from drivers under a scheme his own assessors said does nothing for air quality. A debtor who broke TfL and made you pay for it through a 71% precept hike. A culture warrior who pointed a commission at British statues and put an antisemite on it. A denialist who calls grooming gang victims liars in 2026, the same year Britain finally began saying their names. A saboteur of policing who blocked the AI contract that catches dirty cops. A flag flier who lit the London Eye in the colours of a foreign union and floated independence for his own city. This is not incompetence. Incompetence does not move in one direction for 25 years. This is a worldview, executed with patience, protected by the press, and rewarded with a knighthood and, if Starmer gets his way, a seat in the Lords. Final Word. London is the greatest city in the world. It was that long before Sadiq Khan walked into City Hall. It will be that long after he is dragged out of it. He inherited a capital that was the envy of Europe. He will leave behind a city more violent, more taxed, more divided, more hostile to its own history and more detached from the country that built it than at any point in living memory. There is one question that matters now. It is the question every Londoner, every Englishman, every Briton needs to put to themselves before the next ballot is cast. Whose city is this? Because it is not theirs. It never was. And it never will be. 🇬🇧

English
0
0
0
1
Debidoodoo retweeté
Bernie
Bernie@Artemisfornow·
🚨 Listen very carefully to what Tony Blair and Larry Ellison of Oracle are telling you. Everything about you will be centralised as data, run by AI, from your genome to your behaviour. You will be watched & monitored constantly. The Panopticon is being built without consent. And when it’s built they won’t need to bother asking you anything anymore. Why do you really think they need those data centres 🚨
English
405
3.4K
5.6K
114.1K
Debidoodoo retweeté
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
When You Can't Beat Reform, Change The Rules. Labour Just Did. There is a line in a democracy that, once crossed, changes everything. When those in power begin adjusting the rules of the game to determine its outcome, the game is no longer democracy. It is managed succession. That line was crossed again on Tuesday night. Two days before the Makerfield by-election, Labour rushed a change to the mayoral voting system through the House of Lords. Regional mayors will now be elected using the supplementary vote system rather than first past the post. The change applies immediately. It will govern whoever replaces Andy Burnham as Mayor of Greater Manchester if he wins on Thursday and stands down. The government's defence is that it is simply restoring the system used before Boris Johnson changed it in 2021. That argument requires the public to believe that a change Labour could have introduced at any point in two years of government became urgent on Tuesday evening, forty eight hours before the vote that triggers the election it is designed to affect. Lord Hayward, a Conservative peer and experienced pollster, was precise in the Lords. There is no other justification for the haste, he said, other than that it solves the Labour Party's problems and prevents Reform winning a mayoralty. Not clumsy. Not rushed. Designed. The mechanics explain why. Under first past the post, Reform could win the Greater Manchester mayoralty on a plurality of votes in a fragmented field, precisely as it won all eight council wards in May's local elections with around fifty percent of the vote. Under the supplementary vote system, voters express a first and second preference. Lib Dem and Green voters, given a second preference, will direct those votes to Labour overwhelmingly. The change does not affect Thursday's by-election. It affects the mayoral contest that follows it, constructing an anti-Reform coalition from the second preferences of smaller parties that Reform itself cannot access. Lord Jackson identified the wider implication. This is potentially a strategy for a progressive alliance being rolled out ahead of a general election, he said, with the aim of locking out the Conservatives and Reform from power. Burnham's allies have already confirmed he would scrap first past the post nationally in favour of proportional representation. The supplementary vote is the local pilot for a national project. Pool second preferences, lock out the right, govern indefinitely on a minority of first preference votes. This is not the first time. Earlier this year Labour delayed local elections after the Electoral Commission stated explicitly that the justification was not legitimate, that extending mandates damages public confidence and creates a conflict of interest by allowing those in power to decide how long they may remain there without consent. The Commission's objection was noted and ignored. Reform demolished Labour anyway. Now the same instinct has been applied to a different mechanism. Not cancellation this time. Electoral system change, deployed with surgical precision forty eight hours before the vote that triggers the election it is designed to affect. Governments confident in their mandate do not need to change the rules two days before the ballot. They face the electorate and take their chances. The timing of Tuesday night's Lords motion is not a coincidence. It is a confession. The voters of Makerfield vote on Thursday. The question of who governs Greater Manchester after that, and under what rules, was settled in the Lords on Tuesday. Nobody voted for that. "Burnham's allies have already confirmed he would scrap first past the post nationally in favour of proportional representation."
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
314
2.3K
4K
118K
Debidoodoo retweeté
British Patriot UK 🇬🇧
🚨Sadiq Khan read the reports of young girls being drugged, threatened & gang-raped in London hotels by Muslim grooming gangs - then repeatedly denied they even existed. His cover-up enabled years of horror. When will he finally face accountability? 🇬🇧
British Patriot UK 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
602
2.9K
7.1K
76.3K