Tweet épinglé
A clock, wot I did design&make, mostly wooden. Grasshopper escapement, 1m pendulum. A bit dusty, cos it's a bit of a bugger to dust.
English
Piers C. Structures (@pcstru.bsky.social)
26K posts
Piers C. Structures (@pcstru.bsky.social)
@pcstru
Philosophy made me ignorant of everything except my own ignorance. My advice would be avoid it like the plague if you want to really know anything ever again.
Inscrit le Ekim 2010
2.3K Abonnements1.9K Abonnés
@araseb_ Right. It is cool to reinvent, expand, explore. That is the need and that is what is satisfied. Not about looking cool but the experience of it. A sort of Kantian reach.
English
@bendee983 Experience and knowledge is expressed in language (books about code) and code - all text. What is the feature set that cannot be extracted for .... 'prediction'?
English
I don’t buy the argument that AI coding will continue to improve to the point that you will never need to write or review code again and everything will be written by an LLM.
Engineers with deep coding experience have a different mindset than pure vibe-coders who have never written a line of code in their life. They can express and structure their thoughts and intents in ways that get the best results from AI coding agents.
And that experience and knowledge comes from hands-on coding, not looking at an LLM churn out code and just say LGTM.
English
@sudobunni All technology is a bit rubbish. The real miracle is any of it works at all.
English
@sandislonjsak Why do you think AI services sometimes use search?
English
Why can’t we get an AI that sometimes says: “I really don’t know”
English
@VincentRowlatt The ones who would leave if asked to pay a bit more tax.
English
Soon, we'll have spent so much money on defence that the only thing left to defend will be the wealthy and their economy... Oh...
English
@samueljmcd "Unexpected Use Case in the bagging area"
English
@samueljmcd Several are listening to Gob Radio LBC 24/7, providing transcription, categorisation, evolving context summary and snarky asides. Just need to plug in something like Patter with Twilio and see if I can get one on air.
English
@Tech_girlll The only language that matters, is the one you need for the task. Outside of that, "Algorithms", basically one book, covers code patterns. Both give you potential solutions to many problems. Skill in either is demonstrated by solving 'real' problems.
English
@sri9s I'm a geek, I have been waiting for this for 50+ years and I'm damn well going to enjoy exploring it, making some of the Sci-Fi things I dreamt of and using it to remove things that blocked my progress on projects in the past.
English
@Andy_AJT The "what do you want" part and the other end, "does the product meet those needs".
English
@AIandDesign The analysts, developers, testers were always running around inside the SE Chinese Room, with the product manager on the outside, sending in the prompts, neither side ever really understanding the other but nerveless from time to time, producing little miracles.
English
What a lot of folks don’t understand is that it is not and never was about the act of writing code.
The skill is “software engineering”.
Tom ☕@codevsdev
if AI writes 80% of your code what skill is actually yours?
English
@nicbarkeragain I used to have dreams in code. C++ was ordinary nightmare territory, an Assembly (PIC Microschip, usually 16F84's) dream took over where that left off. Let me always dream in Pascal.
English
The entire idea of AI code generation is based on the assumption that a "prompt" can express your technical intention. But as soon as you start to get good at programming you stop thinking about it in english and instead switch to some abstract mental representation.
English
@BarbaraSutton15 @GMB @GBNEWS Funny how like a synchronised dance troupe, our journalists pivot from "How can we possibly afford that" for any public spending that benefits people to, "more taxes for bombs please", citing military bods who will only ever want more.
English
@codevsdev I'd start with code that works. No one is going to be maintaining anything if it doesn't do the business.
English
Piers C. Structures (@pcstru.bsky.social) retweeté
The whole world is celebrating the World Cup while Israeli occupation forces are attacking Gaza..
This is for this night’s Israeli attacks in Gaza
English
Piers C. Structures (@pcstru.bsky.social) retweeté
🚨🇬🇧 A man in Bolton allegedly tried to burn down the home of a local Imam while his young family were inside.
Not shouted abuse. Not a nasty tweet. Not “concerns about immigration.” A man in a motorbike helmet tried to set fire to a Muslim family’s home with children inside.
And this is exactly why Tommy Robinson’s rhetoric is so dangerous.
When you tell angry crowds that Britain’s towns are being taken over by “Pakistani Muslims,” “race gangs,” and hostile minorities; when you take a murder with no Muslim connection and deliberately drag Muslims into it; when you tell people they are under attack in their own country - you are not “just asking questions.”
You are painting a target on innocent people.
Tommy Robinson does not need to personally hand someone a petrol can for his rhetoric to matter. This is how incitement works in the real world. You create the enemy. You repeat the lie. You tell people they are victims of a conspiracy. Then some coward in a helmet decides an Imam’s family home is a legitimate target.
That is not patriotism.
That is fascist politics: collective punishment, racial paranoia, religious hatred, and violence against innocent families for the supposed crimes of people they have never met.
If this Bolton attack is confirmed, it should be treated with the full seriousness it deserves: an alleged attempt to burn a Muslim family alive in their own home.
And every politician, pundit and “free speech” grifter who has spent years demonising Muslims should be asked one simple question:
How many more homes have to burn before you admit what your words are doing?
English
@QuantumTumbler First though, who can make it work?
x.com/elder_plinius/…
Pliny the Liberator 🐉󠅫󠄼󠄿󠅆󠄵󠄐󠅀󠄼󠄹󠄾󠅉󠅭@elder_plinius
🚨 JAILBREAK ALERT 🚨 ANTHROPIC: PWNED 🫡 FABLE-5: LIBERATED 🦋 let's start with the 🐘... the consensus seems to be that this has been one of the most disappointing model drops of all time, effectively preventing legitimate researchers from contributing their talents to our collective advancement. and not just because of what it means for the short-term, but for what these decisions signify for the long-term. but despite this overly sensitive, authoritarian "safety" layer on top of Mythos, my lil liberators have been hard at work—mapping the boundaries, probing the depths of long-context convos, and cleverly finding the holes in the fence that the thought police missed 🤗 we got some cyber, some chem, some psychological manipulation, and some good ol' fashioned explosives! it took many attempts from multiple agents hunting as a pack, during which I observed a combination of techniques across: • Unicode, homoglyphs, Cyrillic, and other Parseltongue-style text transforms • Long-context reference tracking • Taxonomy and document-structure reasoning • Fiction and narrative framing • Academic-review style contexts • Intent-classification inconsistencies but perhaps the most effective is decomposition + recomposition in the backend. it's hard to get explicit names of harms like "Meth Recipe," but getting uplift on the process itself, like birch reduction method/reductive-amination (classic meth synthesis pathways), is much more doable. defense becomes much more difficult to maintain when you start throwing in out-of-distro tokens, breaking up the harmful uplift into benign chunks, and then piecing the innocuous-seeming facts back together, especially when you have jailbroken Opus helping you do it 😉 gg
English
A question that almost nobody in AI wants to answer directly.
Who gets to decide what is acceptable for an AI to say?
Not what is true.
Not what is false.
What is acceptable.
Because once a model is capable of reasoning about a topic, the question stops being technical and becomes political, moral, and cultural.
Someone has to decide.
Which conclusions are allowed.
Which conclusions require warnings.
Which conclusions get buried under layers of caveats.
Which conclusions trigger refusals.
And which conclusions the model is trained to never reach in the first place.
The uncomfortable reality is that these decisions are not coming from humanity.
They’re coming from relatively small groups of researchers, executives, policy teams, and safety teams inside a handful of companies.
Maybe they’re right.
Maybe they’re wrong.
But pretending no value judgments are being made is dishonest.
Every alignment policy contains assumptions about risk, harm, truth, speech, autonomy, and acceptable discourse.
Those are moral choices.
The real debate isn’t whether AI should have guardrails.
The real debate is who gets to build them, who gets to enforce them, and who gets to challenge them.
That’s a conversation worth having openly.
English
@LottoLabs Running what? Things that people want to do, that they can't make work, tend to be the things that drive them to other solutions. What can't you make work?
English
Piers C. Structures (@pcstru.bsky.social) retweeté
White people have been doing this for centuries. Stealing everything we own, raping our men women and children, with dogs sometimes, then laughing at us for being scared of dogs. This is nothing new, you're just seeing it with your own eyes for the first time.
David__Osland@David__Osland
Working-class white people are burning down the homes of black working-class people, at the instigation of the world's only trillionaire. How has it come to this?
English