Derek Frangos

I memorized sunrise times and set alarms before I began to understand tensor notation. I trusted repeating patterns long before giving it to institutions. Nothing is perfectly even. Nature suggests the answers for you in a playful way, but there’s a problem. Discovery isn’t triumphant, it’s invasive. The same structures. Over and over again. Across scales. At a certain point, you surrender to the pattern. The universe doesn’t forget anything. The process that made you, and everything you love, will end precisely where it began. Rejoice.

@MinuteofZombie The recent engagement train of hatred toward Neil Tyson is more interesting than Neil Tyson.

What. A fuckin. Weirdo.

Steven Spielberg releases a film called “Disclosure Day”. Pete Hegseth releases UFO files from the Pentagon. You’d think people would pause and zoom out. Yet, very few are. This may be far more revealing than anything being disclosed. It interests me more than the film itself. I think that collective human psychology may have layers we still don’t fully understand.

@digijordan @wkpixley1 Why the ambiguity?

@wkpixley1 Obviously

The only ‘psyop’ part of Disclosure Day…was the complete omission of Nordics. And that’s exactly how the Nordics want it…

@skdh An infinity in physics indicates a boundary has been reached.

What happens when you divide an indivisible particle? Researchers from the University of Oslo in Norway have calculated what happens when a single photon is cut short by a shutter. A photon is a quantum of light, and as such indivisible qua mathematical definition. One might guess that blocking part of its wave packet leaves a superposition of two parts, one moving on, one not. The authors say the answer is much more difficult—and more interesting. According to their calculation, the result is a state with superpositions of 0, 1, 2, and in principle arbitrarily many photons. So it seems that cutting the photon creates infinitely many photons! The authors say that the reason is that cutting the photon itself requires energy, which creates photons, and theoretically infinite many of them. Paper: Rukan et al, PRL (2026), arXiv:2510.21636

@digijordan @planethunter56 Are you suggesting that these are real “aliens” featured in this image?

@planethunter56 Actually it’s a lot like this

They walk among us, but not like this UFO fam.

@topkekius Anisotropy in the CMB “axis of evil” suggests something more egg shaped🥚.

is the universe a sphere

@Enduristic1 @wkpixley1 I don’t mind spoilers, but I understand 👁️

@persistentflaw @wkpixley1 I’m not sure. 🥹 It touched my heart so profoundly. I would extrapolate, but I don’t want to drop any plot spoilers.

Yes, I just saw Disclosure Day.

@Enduristic1 @wkpixley1 Interesting. No explanation?

@wkpixley1 I cried like a baby! I have no explanation for it. 😅 The movie itself wasn’t really all that amazing. It was good, but, I still can’t count for my tears. There are a handful of us who apparently cried through the whole thing. 🥹😁

@4biddnKnowledge “Coherence” is probably the word people are looking for.

I have studied high frequency people for decades. The ones who seem to attract opportunity effortlessly. Who maintain clarity when everything around them is chaos. Who keep rising no matter what life throws at them. The biggest thing I noticed was not what they do. It was what they deliberately REFUSE TO DO. Here are 7 PATTERNS HIGH FREQUENCY PEOPLE AVOID at all costs:

@x_ptlc @The_Astral_ The interesting aspect of not seeing the film is seeing the reactions to the film. Ranked higher as a documentary than as a movie, huh? Abstinence is the best seat. 💺

@The_Astral_ Movie: 6/10 Documentary: 7.5/10 Predictive Programming: 9/10

Maybe my expectations were too high, but Disclosure Day didn’t land for me. 4/10.

I understand the frustration, but I disagree with this. Neil is mostly an entertainer and science communicator, and has never claimed to be a revolutionary physicist. I suspect what agitates people about him is his reluctance to engage in the excessive speculation others emotionally want from him.

I think Neil de Grasse Tyson just plain sucks. He has none of the depth of Carl Sagan, none of the humility Hawking, nor scientific accomplishments. He is a gotcha sound-byte narcissist, an absolute dead weight to society, he just fucking sucks

The @elonmusk discourse today is really fascinating because both extremes accidentally reveal something true precisely at the boundary. The fawning cult of personality around him is irrational. The seething hatred directed at him is often irrational too. Humans are ridiculously susceptible to visibility. Doom scrolling as a thing alone should alarm us. Exposure in itself allures us. We hopelessly mistake viral attention, immense wealth, acceleration of any sort, and brash confidence for wisdom. But the deeper issue isn’t Elon Musk specifically, as a man or as anything. It’s a systems issue. Human social media systems optimized for engagement will naturally elevate ultra polarizing figures with disproportionate reach and influence on the collective psyche. After which the public observably emotionally organizes itself around them as either our salvation or apocalypse. Meanwhile, I’m at the kitchen table wondering to myself. Are human beings as a whole family becoming more sovereign, thoughtful, healthy, capable, and free? The answer matters more to me than any individual trillionaire ever will.

@txrrxstrxxl Remarkable how often “disclosure” winds up tangled in Big Shiny Balls. I like the purple one.

Chipotle Orb zoomed. I think this belongs to people.

Who are SpaceX’s customers?

@ProofofMaro Only one timid conqueror here.

Alexander the Great conquered nations at nineteen and you’re too afraid to reverse a capacitors polarity

@bluewmist 👋🏻

People who're into: Writing Poetry Storytelling Literature Creative Expression Deep Conversations I want to CONNECT with you

@Shaun_Fosmark @LEC1224 Elon is an inevitability of a social system optimized for attention. Humans notoriously mistake the validation of visibility for actionable wisdom. Thats probably why he feels reflective, and why I avoid the frame.

I think its WAY more about unrealistic expectations. People hate Elon for less than the crazy stuff they themselves think. People have a strange idea about famous people. They dont want them to be individuals with their own ideas and perspective, they want them to be THEIR person with THEIR ideas. Its really about self validation.

I admire many aspects of Elon Musk, but to be unable to grasp why people would hate him, is either a rethorical hyperbole or a bizarre level of echo chambering.

@ProofofMaro I’ve never hovered over the unfollow button quite like this before.

⚠️WARNING⚠️ following this account may put you on a watchlist

@vxylily Not caring for others.

MEN: be brutally honest, what really makes a woman instantly UNATTRACTIVE

@koreckaa68447 @ASublminalAutst Gated.

@persistentflaw @ASublminalAutst They peddle what is not found in nature: everlasting youth, security purchased with coin, happiness on a monthly plan, love shrink-wrapped, a deity housed in a phone. You must have this. Without it, you are deficient. You are the ailment. Our product is the cure….

They are selling you things that are free Air.. water.. food.. good times.. Sit with that