ProgrammingMadness

@msdavi01 @WKCosmo Where are the women engineers tho? Never got “Einstein is wrong” an email from a female engineer. Under represented.

#musings #autism #slowstart #methidolical #systematic #employmentviolations #schoolofhardknocks #embracingsuffering The expression (in the image post quoted) represents a real adaptation in nature to trigger (in non psychos or worse memln) the "don't fight too forcefully or punch this, it's cute/fragile--protect it: don't punch even if fighting over the most incredibly stupid nonsense, based on the nost incredibly stupid nonsense." Whereas in men who behaved in a similar way (as often seen), men around them would go gloves off. JB Peterson may be right that the nervous systems/cognition of women are likely, not adapted for themselves, for objective sensitivity--but for "the dyad" of self+infants. (And yes, as ASD guy, I know there are apparent exceptions.) I add, for relationships: with men (bigger, dangerous); for other women (clever--MORE dangerous). There must be mechanisms inbuilt to restrain men--and if some bitch reputation savages another woman, to find it humorous rather than provoking: An unmentionable reality is many of the supposed bigoted ills in men toward women, are in fact likely drivers of instincts to protect women, and to not punish them too readily or harshly (particularly when they often only get social information via the grapevine of, by, and through other women, who spread it for themselves, as women who've been savaged by gossips lament). The insanity: the "progress" surrounding the liberation of women has done tremendous damage to this sort of bio-emergent disposition in men and the possibility to express it in society as manly behavior: a man who doesn't take her too seriously "because she's a woman" will run to her rescue "because she's a woman; a man who does take you seriously who'll run to you is probably a weirdo masculine-auristic; a man who takes you seriously (who isn't that) is a liberal who likely won't run to save you unless LEO or paramedic. For the "but I'm 5'7" though"--I understand, not you! The gal I nearly married was a mathematician and medicinal chemist from one of the most prestigious universities. I get it! My best female friend is a PhD in Neuroscience. I get it! A modern problem is (a) we don't go gloves off with those "too stupid men", who understand nothing else so cannot think through consequences to motivate self control: only persistent terror upregulated their self control; (b) and courts dismiss charges when men are too stupid to restrain themselves for social purposes. This must increase relative misery and violence. Such stupid men (who are disorderly & immiserating), after all, engage in more domestic violence, chaosmaking, and foolishness that breeds violence and chaos. Stupidity of a sufficient degree (the kind of third world nonsense rising everywhere) is functionally equivalent to psychopathy: inability to think through consequences or understand "why those meanies are xyz to me" (like excluding a damn idiot from important family matters) results in indistinguishable behaviors and calamities for all around such persons. Relatedly, I'm a believer that without a sufficient, particular, supportive and mentoring environment, even high IQ autists should perhaps hold back, examine, think, & work on growth before diving into or trying to make decisions and participate in many things--on the above basis--since it's a blindness to many social things: they need time and experience (probably of being punched in the face, again and again--which is probably why some of my literally abusive, threatening, and aggressive bosses ever, were extremely confused that their behavior couldn't drive me away, as I understood the danger as accelerating personal development and need to pay accute attention at all times) to do "superstimuli"--to force the brain to pay attention (form capacity for perception, executive self control, empathizing and understanding many others)), to understand the dynamics that drive the fearful, inane, dysfunctions of "normies."

@Chriscrasscross @MartyBent Roll backs plural. Twice. en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Value_ove… blog.citp.princeton.edu/2015/07/28/ana…