Tweet épinglé
27🪞72
1.8K posts
27🪞72
@ratardedwizard
dev of ur favorite e-girl
#BleedGreen Inscrit le Ocak 2013
445 Abonnements318 Abonnés
Always gettin that shit right too
𝐒𝐌𝐎𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐖𝐈𝐙𝐀𝐑𝐃@swizardcore
me in the exam trying to remember something i never studied
English
Tone deaf
Insufferable
Completely oblivious to the reality of the space they operate.
You burn $300m + when the average trencher doesn't have one sol.
Unfortunately, all the idiots meant to say something about this are badged up and would glaze this stupidity.
Zero, lol.
Pump.fun@Pumpfun
The future of $PUMP We have burned ALL bought back $PUMP tokens, around $370M worth of purchases (~36% of circulating supply), to gain trust with our community. On top of that, we have initiated a programmatic buyback *and burn* scheme at 50% of revenue for the next year to instill trust, predictability, and sustainability for the underlying ecosystem - and to remove as much of the supply from circulation as possible. $PUMP is changing; for the better of token holders, the team and the ecosystem. Learn more about why we’ve made these decisions and where we’re headed next 👇
English
Roundtripping 40k? True retard chads roundtrip 6figs w a few k in their bank account and dont blink. Its not bout the destination its the journey
Coinfessions@coinfessions
Pumpfun ruined my life. I round tripped a 40k bag and am now 20k in debt. I’m totally lost.
English
"we were gonna do an airdrop but it would be such a pain so we decided to literally burn the money"
?????
Pump.fun@Pumpfun
The future of $PUMP We have burned ALL bought back $PUMP tokens, around $370M worth of purchases (~36% of circulating supply), to gain trust with our community. On top of that, we have initiated a programmatic buyback *and burn* scheme at 50% of revenue for the next year to instill trust, predictability, and sustainability for the underlying ecosystem - and to remove as much of the supply from circulation as possible. $PUMP is changing; for the better of token holders, the team and the ecosystem. Learn more about why we’ve made these decisions and where we’re headed next 👇
English
I've been thinking about why Pumpfun never went through with the airdrop and I have a theory.
What if the reason isn't that they don't want to, but that they actually can't right now without making a bigger legal mess?
They raised $1.3B at the ICO last July, promising the airdrop "coming soon".
Same week the lawsuit against them got expanded to $5.5B with RICO claims, Alon went on a livestream and said the airdrop wasn't happening anytime soon.
Then in November he disappeared from X for around 2 months and returned two days after the second amended complaint deadline.
In March, the SEC published new guidance on airdrops.
What they basically said: airdrops are NOT securities, unless users were told certain activity would qualify them, and they took that action expecting to receive one.
Pumpfun has been telling users since 2024 that platform activity would qualify.
Every trader on the platform was farming with that exact expectation.
That single line in the SEC framework puts their specific airdrop on the wrong side.
Now here's an even bigger problem.
If the airdrop ever happens and gets ruled a securities offering, every single person who claimed it can potentially become a part of the lawsuit.
So what do they do instead?
$370M of $PUMP buybacks, 36% of circulating supply removed.
And today they just announced they're burning all of it.
Burns return value to holders without distributing anything.
No recipients, no eligibility, no expectations.
It's the safest possible substitute for an airdrop if this theory is correct.
Now this is just a theory and my personal opinion, but the timeline makes too much sense to ignore.
Curious to hear what you guys think.
English
@AllenTheDetails @collinsanity @NFLNumbersGuy You quite literally said take out tush push tds, break up yards into rushing and passing.
Then you claimed you never said take anything away.
This dude either sub 70 iq or is trolling
English
English
@AllenTheDetails @NaughtonButDebt @NFLNumbersGuy you would count the superbowl TD if dotson wasnt ruled down on the 1, but since immediately after we runs a historically unstoppable play, a feat named so BECAUSE of his skillset, it dosnt count?
You just dont like how it looks.
Dosnt change facts
English
@NaughtonButDebt @NFLNumbersGuy Is a 45 yard TD pass worth more than a 1 yd rush TD?
On the scoreboard no, but in terms of player value … I would say absolutely.
English
@AllenTheDetails @collinsanity @NFLNumbersGuy “Im not saying take anything away”
Original tweet
“Take out the tush push TDs”
English
@collinsanity @NFLNumbersGuy We are talking about QBs … I’m not saying take anything away …. I’m saying break out the stats …. It adds context.
Do you report an RBs Rush and Reception yards as just Total yards?
English
English
Did she leak this before the deal was signed with Carolina so the Patriots could swoop in and offer more money??😭😭😭
English
Does anybody else just not care about the White House Correspondent’s Dinner shooting like at all
English
