Lilia Rissman

324 posts

Lilia Rissman banner
Lilia Rissman

Lilia Rissman

@wugtask

Cognitive scientist at @UWMadison. Bribing children with stickers to get them to do language tasks since 2004. event cognition, cross-ling diversity, learning.

Madison, WI Inscrit le Eylül 2009
434 Abonnements492 Abonnés
Tweet épinglé
Lilia Rissman
Lilia Rissman@wugtask·
Thrilled that this paper is finally out – we compared child homesigners against speakers of English, Spanish, and Chinese and found common patterns across all groups in how they described pictures of events. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09…
English
0
7
39
4K
Lilia Rissman
Lilia Rissman@wugtask·
@bdzinszer That's an interesting result – challenges the idea that typicality is dependent on naming (i.e. what is a typical instance of a word in one language may be an atypical instance of a different word in a different language). Where did you give this poster?
English
1
0
1
28
Benjamin Zinszer
Benjamin Zinszer@bdzinszer·
@wugtask Neat, thanks for following up! I'm to see what you find! I've been wishing for new ratings like that for a while. The typicality ratings we elicit are much more consistent than the labels and suggest to me that we're missing interesting latent structure. conelab.net/pubs/Gaby_CogS…
English
2
0
0
33
Lilia Rissman
Lilia Rissman@wugtask·
Hey CogPsych folks - what’s a reference for a categorization study w/o labels, eg: given three pictures belonging to a category (chair, desk, table) does a fourth picture (lamp) also belong to the category? Or, do two pictures (chair, desk) belong to the same category?
English
6
3
7
3.6K
Lilia Rissman
Lilia Rissman@wugtask·
@bdzinszer I was suggesting how the Malt paper that you referenced could be modified to address the question that we are interested in
English
1
0
0
36
Benjamin Zinszer
Benjamin Zinszer@bdzinszer·
@wugtask I'm not sure if by "Malt task" you mean the usual (naming) or the task unique to this paper, which was the non-linguistic similiarity evaluation (put these objects together in groups). But this paper differs in including the latter. (If you already knew that, sorry!)
English
1
0
0
35
Lilia Rissman
Lilia Rissman@wugtask·
@bdzinszer thanks – we are basically looking for a version of the Malt task where they collected similarity judgments while also labeling the objects (e.g., bottle, jar, etc.)
English
1
0
0
78
Benjamin Zinszer
Benjamin Zinszer@bdzinszer·
@wugtask Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., Gennari, S., Shi, M., & Wang, Y. (1999). Knowing versus naming: Similarity and the linguistic categorization of artifacts. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(2), 230–262. doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1…
English
1
0
2
127
Lilia Rissman
Lilia Rissman@wugtask·
@m_zettersten W&G is right on the money but they don't test adults (although even four-year-olds don't seem to need to hear the superordinate labels, so that is relevant)
English
0
0
1
48
Lilia Rissman
Lilia Rissman@wugtask·
@m_zettersten (we are ultimately interested in superordinate labels like animal, but basic level labels like dog and cat are relevant too)
English
1
0
1
54
Lilia Rissman
Lilia Rissman@wugtask·
@TraversEoin A triad task with and without labels would be relevant for our purposes also! (Eg chair, desk, computer; with and without the label ‘furniture’)
English
0
0
0
121
Lilia Rissman
Lilia Rissman@wugtask·
@glupyan and I are especially interested in studies that do this type of task and without labels (eg furniture). Koemeda-Lutz (1987, Brain & Language) did this but only w brain-damaged ppl.
English
0
0
0
306
Lilia Rissman retweeté
Rikker Dockum /ɹɪkɹ̩/
Light verbs implies the existence of the more sinister dark verbs, which drain the words around them of any semantic content
English
7
22
130
0
Lilia Rissman retweeté
ArrateIsasi
ArrateIsasi@ArrateIsasmendi·
Only a week left for our @JCoLE2022 workshop on Event role biases in language and cognition! With the fantastic line up of talks including @wugtask, @AlonHafri, @Denis_Tatone and @ebru_ger, join us online next Monday (Sept 5th)🤩 More info👇
English
1
7
16
0
Lilia Rissman
Lilia Rissman@wugtask·
@garicgymro In my work I have referred to this as “agent-backgrounding” - not that catchy for the public though
English
0
0
5
0
Gareth Roberts
Gareth Roberts@garicgymro·
So what term should linguists be encouraging non-linguists to use instead of "passive voice" for sentences that—by a variety of grammatical means—obscure agency?
Philadelphia, PA 🇺🇸 English
14
10
79
0