Post

GitHub
GitHub@github·
Better tools didn't improve Copilot code review. Rewriting their instructions did. 🧵
English
11
14
170
63.9K
GitHub
GitHub@github·
We swapped Copilot code review onto the same shared tools that power the Copilot CLI (grep, glob, view), expecting a clean upgrade. Instead, reviews did more work and caught fewer issues. 👀
GitHub tweet media
English
3
4
25
11.1K
Jason Fleagle
Jason Fleagle@jjfleagle·
@github This corrects the usual tooling story. Better instructions often beat another feature because they encode the team's review standard. The next step is versioning them like code and testing whether they reduce misses, noise, and reviewer rework.
English
0
0
0
133
Jegan Raj
Jegan Raj@i_am_jeganraj·
@github I agree that instructions should be improved and also the default setup should be smart enough to call better tools on its own
English
0
0
0
517
NITIN YADAV
NITIN YADAV@nitindotdev·
@github Skill issue... but not on the AI's side. 😭
English
0
0
0
378
牛大富
牛大富@USFist·
@github Turns out prompts are the real product.
English
0
0
1
506
牛大富
牛大富@USFist·
@github That's a prompt mismatch, not a tool failure.
English
0
0
0
315
comma
comma@comma_ai·
10% off for the 4th of July
English
0
2
20
45.7K
Paylaş