AD

We continue to see a growing progressive judicial problem in the United States. Justice requires restraint. Activism requires applause. Judges are supposed to interpret the law, not celebrate who wins and loses. Because if the referee is cheering from the sidelines, the game was never fair.

The loudest lies, always chase the strongest voices.

We continue to see a growing progressive judicial problem in the United States. Justice requires restraint. Activism requires applause. Judges are supposed to interpret the law, not celebrate who wins and loses. Because if the referee is cheering from the sidelines, the game was never fair.

We continue to see a growing progressive judicial problem in the United States. Justice requires restraint. Activism requires applause. Judges are supposed to interpret the law, not celebrate who wins and loses. Because if the referee is cheering from the sidelines, the game was never fair.

We continue to see a growing progressive judicial problem in the United States. Justice requires restraint. Activism requires applause. Judges are supposed to interpret the law, not celebrate who wins and loses. Because if the referee is cheering from the sidelines, the game was never fair.

We continue to see a growing progressive judicial problem in the United States. Justice requires restraint. Activism requires applause. Judges are supposed to interpret the law, not celebrate who wins and loses. Because if the referee is cheering from the sidelines, the game was never fair.

Nick Shirley “Would you guys vote for Gavin Newsom in 2028?” California resident “I’d vote for him because he got me released, coming home from a life sentence — He signed off saying I’m fit for society” “What were you locked up for? “Murder, carjacking and robbery” Holy sh*t

We continue to see a growing progressive judicial problem in the United States. Justice requires restraint. Activism requires applause. Judges are supposed to interpret the law, not celebrate who wins and loses. Because if the referee is cheering from the sidelines, the game was never fair.

Spoiler alert Screaming “due process” for child r*pists while ignoring victims is beyond tone-deaf—it’s a betrayal. Stop coddling predators and start protecting people who don’t deserve to live in fear. Feelings aren’t facts, and this bleeding-heart nonsense is straight-up dangerous.

WATCH: Four weeks ago, a frustrated ICE agent in the sanctuary city of Boston contacted me, telling me a group of anti-ICE agitators had just blown their operation to arrest a Salvadoran fugitive who is wanted in his home country on an arrest warrant for child rape & had been living near a Boston elementary school. He told me while he & his team were in their vehicles surveilling the target's residence in East Boston & waiting for him to come out, the ICE team was quickly surrounded by activists who blew whistles, cursed at them, and said they were traumatizing children at the nearby school down the street. Their cover was blown, the whole neighborhood was alerted, and the child rapist wasn't arrested. The agent provided me several videos of the activists interfering that day (February 12th) as they unknowingly protected the child rapist from ICE arrest due to blind opposition to ICE. The agent asked me to sit on the videos until they were able to arrest the target. I’m told that fugitive target is now in ICE custody four weeks later (arrested March 10th). The agent says the target, a child rapist, was on the streets four weeks longer than he should have been because activists interfered without having any clue who they were protecting - and they dealing with this almost every day. I’m told his the target’s name is WALTER ROBERTO VIDES-ORTEZ, a Salvadoran national who crossed the Texas border illegally in 2016, the same year that El Salvador issued an arrest warrant for him for the offense of child rape.

Spoiler alert Screaming “due process” for child r*pists while ignoring victims is beyond tone-deaf—it’s a betrayal. Stop coddling predators and start protecting people who don’t deserve to live in fear. Feelings aren’t facts, and this bleeding-heart nonsense is straight-up dangerous.

WATCH: Four weeks ago, a frustrated ICE agent in the sanctuary city of Boston contacted me, telling me a group of anti-ICE agitators had just blown their operation to arrest a Salvadoran fugitive who is wanted in his home country on an arrest warrant for child rape & had been living near a Boston elementary school. He told me while he & his team were in their vehicles surveilling the target's residence in East Boston & waiting for him to come out, the ICE team was quickly surrounded by activists who blew whistles, cursed at them, and said they were traumatizing children at the nearby school down the street. Their cover was blown, the whole neighborhood was alerted, and the child rapist wasn't arrested. The agent provided me several videos of the activists interfering that day (February 12th) as they unknowingly protected the child rapist from ICE arrest due to blind opposition to ICE. The agent asked me to sit on the videos until they were able to arrest the target. I’m told that fugitive target is now in ICE custody four weeks later (arrested March 10th). The agent says the target, a child rapist, was on the streets four weeks longer than he should have been because activists interfered without having any clue who they were protecting - and they dealing with this almost every day. I’m told his the target’s name is WALTER ROBERTO VIDES-ORTEZ, a Salvadoran national who crossed the Texas border illegally in 2016, the same year that El Salvador issued an arrest warrant for him for the offense of child rape.

“There are No Republicans here to speak of …” Sound familiar Nashua❓Vermont is only our neighbor 🤷‍♀️ 57 elected seats … • Democrats: 53 = 93.0% • Republicans: 3 = 5.3% • Independents: 1 = 1.8% So, roughly 93% of Nashua’s political and administrative seats are held by one party … Democrats.

Karen Read gets it … Maggie Goodlander won Nashua with 53% of the vote. Imagine living in a city where 92% of elected officials belong to the same political party. That’s Nashua, New Hampshire. 67 seats. 62 from the same party. Tell me again how that creates accountability.

“There are No Republicans here to speak of …” Sound familiar Nashua❓Vermont is only our neighbor 🤷‍♀️ 57 elected seats … • Democrats: 53 = 93.0% • Republicans: 3 = 5.3% • Independents: 1 = 1.8% So, roughly 93% of Nashua’s political and administrative seats are held by one party … Democrats.

Karen Read gets it … Maggie Goodlander won Nashua with 53% of the vote. Imagine living in a city where 92% of elected officials belong to the same political party. That’s Nashua, New Hampshire. 67 seats. 62 from the same party. Tell me again how that creates accountability.

Karen Read gets it … Maggie Goodlander won Nashua with 53% of the vote. Imagine living in a city where 92% of elected officials belong to the same political party. That’s Nashua, New Hampshire. 67 seats. 62 from the same party. Tell me again how that creates accountability.

Karen Read gets it … Maggie Goodlander won Nashua with 53% of the vote. Imagine living in a city where 92% of elected officials belong to the same political party. That’s Nashua, New Hampshire. 67 seats. 62 from the same party. Tell me again how that creates accountability.

Karen Read gets it … Maggie Goodlander won Nashua with 53% of the vote. Imagine living in a city where 92% of elected officials belong to the same political party. That’s Nashua, New Hampshire. 67 seats. 62 from the same party. Tell me again how that creates accountability.

Karen Read gets it … Maggie Goodlander won Nashua with 53% of the vote. Imagine living in a city where 92% of elected officials belong to the same political party. That’s Nashua, New Hampshire. 67 seats. 62 from the same party. Tell me again how that creates accountability.