Community First

1.6K posts

Community First banner
Community First

Community First

@CommFirst_LUNC

#LunaClassic Validator We encourage community engagement, accountability, and responsibility. We welcome and support #Binance, and other #LUNC industry leaders.

Cosmos शामिल हुए Nisan 2023
468 फ़ॉलोइंग4.6K फ़ॉलोवर्स
पिन किया गया ट्वीट
Community First
Community First@CommFirst_LUNC·
🚨Thank you @binance for your continued support of the the #LUNC Blockchain. Another 474m LUNC burnt from the supply🚨 The #Lunccommunity are forever grateful to @cz_binance and @_RichardTeng Keep building 🛠️
Community First tweet media
English
2
15
77
5K
Community First
Community First@CommFirst_LUNC·
It's an honor that @binance continues to invest in #LUNC by burning the LUNC supply every month. Thank you for this month's burn of more than 850 million Luna classic. 🙏
Community First tweet media
English
0
11
89
2.5K
Community First रीट्वीट किया
🛰️ Terra Classic
🛰️ Terra Classic@TerraClassic_·
Ohhh “dead chain”? Yeah… sure. Dead chain with validators. Dead chain with builders. Dead chain still upgrading. Dead chain still trending. Dead chain still burning supply. Right. Totally dead. ☠️ Meanwhile, the so-called “ghost” chain keeps shipping, keeps voting, keeps pushing governance, keeps reducing supply, and keeps one of the most loyal communities in crypto. Call it dead if that helps you cope. We call it $LUNC resilience. We call it Terra Classic persistence. We call it unfinished business. Every “dead” comment just fuels the revival narrative. Not financial advice. Just common sense. #LUNC #TerraClassic #Crypto #Rebuild #Revival
🛰️ Terra Classic tweet media
English
0
15
86
2.6K
Community First
Community First@CommFirst_LUNC·
We are genuinely so sorry to hear this, especially after everything @ColeStrathclyde has done for this chain and without compensation. A huge loss that will not be replaced easily. We wish you all the best and good health for you and your family❤️
StrathCole@ColeStrathclyde

It's time to say goodbye. While I had to be absent due to illness in recent weeks, I was able to take a look at #TerraClassic “from the outside and with some distance.” Or rather, at the behavior and interaction—and the lack thereof. None of the following would have made me give up if I had been in full health, but unfortunately, it is what it is. Perhaps there are a few thought-provoking ideas in the right direction, even without me. I find it both sad and frustrating that a lot of people have learned nothing from the past in four years. If things don't go their way, they resort to attacks, hostility, or discrediting others. The culture of discussion, if you can even call it that, is often, to put it bluntly, below par, at least in publicly visible areas; and in some cases, conspiracy theories and “false prophets” receive more support than sensible projects that could advance the chain. There is so often a lack of understanding for constructive and professional dissent that one might think Terra Classic was bathed in testosterone. When Jay (formerly @HappyCatKripto) returned from his recovery phase, he told me that I might need to take some time off to see things as they really are. I didn't believe him and told him he was being negative and overly critical. Well, he was right, and I was wrong. And it took a forced break to finally see more clearly what is publicly visible. To be clear, when I look at the entire Cosmos ecosystem, I see that Terra Classic is no worse off than other Cosmos chains. With a few exceptions, Cosmos is in a deep slumber in terms of user and community activity. It's so easy to say that Terra Classic has done everything wrong in recent years and that's why it is where it is. But the opposite is just as true. Terra Classic has done a lot of things right, which is why it is (still) where it is today. And the future? When I look at all the social media channels, X, public, semi-public, and private (conspiracy!) Telegram groups I'm in... There are ideas, plans, discussions. Constructive, collaborative, not necessarily always innovative. But on the whole, they get lost in the shuffle and may never reach the masses. Because what makes sense isn't necessarily fancy. What's necessary isn't necessarily pleasant. The best solution isn't necessarily the fairest. When we (yes, WE as chain via governance) decided to allocate liquidity for $LUNC/USDC to the DEXes, it was clear from the outset: it's either all or nothing. Was that the most sensible solution? Hell, no. The most sensible solution would have been to put everything into a DEX pool. But that would not have gone through governance. So the motto was: better a little than nothing. And this is where a structural problem with the decentralized nature of Terra Classic, or rather the expression of it, becomes apparent. For me, it's not a lack of leadership, a lack of a fixed roadmap, or anything like that. For me, it's more the “I can do that (better)” mentality that leads to fragmentation of users and capital. Don't get me wrong. I am a strong advocate of the “free for all” idea on this chain. Everyone is free to build what they want. However, I question the wisdom of this, or rather, whether “builders” are giving enough thought in advance to whether their projects make sense. Currently, Terra Classic has 4 (okay, 3.5) DEXes. TerraSwap, Terraport, Garuda DeFi, Astroport. WESO could also be included, but at least publicly, it's not yet clear where that's headed. Now let's take a simple example: LUNC/USTC pairs. 1. Astroport: $47,000 liquidity 2. Terraswap: $36,000 liquidity 3. Terraport (v3): $20,000 liquidity In a single pool, that would be over $100,000 in liquidity, even at current prices. The price impact on swaps would be significantly lower, or in other words: for 2% slippage, you could perhaps make $800 in a trade instead of just $350. The same applies to USDC. We have approximately $100,000 in liquidity spread across three DEXes because it's fair. But it's not the best for the chain. Because with this distribution, there is theoretically only one type of beneficiary: arbitrageurs. Theoretically. Because even they can only make profits when trading takes place, not when high slippage, etc., discourages people from trading. And fragmentation affects not only liquidity, but also users. Each of the existing DEXes has different pools, different UX/UI, a different history, different parts of the community that trust (or don't trust) it (thanks a lot, you various scammers, for making it even harder for projects to gain trust). And it doesn't end with the DEXes. Terra Classic now has three aggregators, countless metrics pages (which are of course good for visibility from a marketing perspective), etc. Terra Classic's strength is its weakness and will remain its weakness as long as builders do not coordinate or agree among themselves, and as long as we prioritize equal treatment over chain success. As harsh as that may sound. I am not in favor of a centralized chain, leadership, or something like a CEO. But it's finally time to put (hurt) egos aside. It's time for builders to get together and work together to bring out the best in their projects. Generally speaking, in this market situation (not just related to TC), any paid marketing is money down the drain. The same goes for external consultants and the like (why do you think most ice cream parlors are closed in winter?). The only ones who have the means and opportunity to put this chain in a reasonable position are those who build, validate, and invest here. Only then would the chain really benefit when the market finally moves in the “right” direction. For me personally, I have reached the point where health, strength (and, downstream, finances) are not enough to continue doing what I have been doing so far. I will fulfill my commitments, which are the development of MM2.0 and CMM at the L1 level, as well as support for the deployment of SDK 0.53. terra-classic.io will of course remain in place and functional as before, including GitHub management of the site. The @Galactic_Shift TCG will also go live when it is possible, but the validator will be sunset at March 31st. All this is not meant as a rant, but rather food for thought, my perspective after my first real break in four years. I would have made a similar statement if I had been able to continue. Not everything is negative; there are some bright spots, people who continue to fight to keep this chain alive. I think L1 is in good hands with @orbit__labs. And who knows, maybe everyone involved will eventually be mature and reasonable enough to work together in a way that creates more than just a fragile snapshot that will be torn apart by the next ego. Maybe at some point, the sum of all the parts will add up to a great picture instead of just a pile of puzzle pieces. I would wish that for everyone who has invested years of their life, energy, and commitment. Good luck and success. Cheers. #LUNCcommunity

English
1
6
21
580
Community First रीट्वीट किया
StrathCole
StrathCole@ColeStrathclyde·
It's time to say goodbye. While I had to be absent due to illness in recent weeks, I was able to take a look at #TerraClassic “from the outside and with some distance.” Or rather, at the behavior and interaction—and the lack thereof. None of the following would have made me give up if I had been in full health, but unfortunately, it is what it is. Perhaps there are a few thought-provoking ideas in the right direction, even without me. I find it both sad and frustrating that a lot of people have learned nothing from the past in four years. If things don't go their way, they resort to attacks, hostility, or discrediting others. The culture of discussion, if you can even call it that, is often, to put it bluntly, below par, at least in publicly visible areas; and in some cases, conspiracy theories and “false prophets” receive more support than sensible projects that could advance the chain. There is so often a lack of understanding for constructive and professional dissent that one might think Terra Classic was bathed in testosterone. When Jay (formerly @HappyCatKripto) returned from his recovery phase, he told me that I might need to take some time off to see things as they really are. I didn't believe him and told him he was being negative and overly critical. Well, he was right, and I was wrong. And it took a forced break to finally see more clearly what is publicly visible. To be clear, when I look at the entire Cosmos ecosystem, I see that Terra Classic is no worse off than other Cosmos chains. With a few exceptions, Cosmos is in a deep slumber in terms of user and community activity. It's so easy to say that Terra Classic has done everything wrong in recent years and that's why it is where it is. But the opposite is just as true. Terra Classic has done a lot of things right, which is why it is (still) where it is today. And the future? When I look at all the social media channels, X, public, semi-public, and private (conspiracy!) Telegram groups I'm in... There are ideas, plans, discussions. Constructive, collaborative, not necessarily always innovative. But on the whole, they get lost in the shuffle and may never reach the masses. Because what makes sense isn't necessarily fancy. What's necessary isn't necessarily pleasant. The best solution isn't necessarily the fairest. When we (yes, WE as chain via governance) decided to allocate liquidity for $LUNC/USDC to the DEXes, it was clear from the outset: it's either all or nothing. Was that the most sensible solution? Hell, no. The most sensible solution would have been to put everything into a DEX pool. But that would not have gone through governance. So the motto was: better a little than nothing. And this is where a structural problem with the decentralized nature of Terra Classic, or rather the expression of it, becomes apparent. For me, it's not a lack of leadership, a lack of a fixed roadmap, or anything like that. For me, it's more the “I can do that (better)” mentality that leads to fragmentation of users and capital. Don't get me wrong. I am a strong advocate of the “free for all” idea on this chain. Everyone is free to build what they want. However, I question the wisdom of this, or rather, whether “builders” are giving enough thought in advance to whether their projects make sense. Currently, Terra Classic has 4 (okay, 3.5) DEXes. TerraSwap, Terraport, Garuda DeFi, Astroport. WESO could also be included, but at least publicly, it's not yet clear where that's headed. Now let's take a simple example: LUNC/USTC pairs. 1. Astroport: $47,000 liquidity 2. Terraswap: $36,000 liquidity 3. Terraport (v3): $20,000 liquidity In a single pool, that would be over $100,000 in liquidity, even at current prices. The price impact on swaps would be significantly lower, or in other words: for 2% slippage, you could perhaps make $800 in a trade instead of just $350. The same applies to USDC. We have approximately $100,000 in liquidity spread across three DEXes because it's fair. But it's not the best for the chain. Because with this distribution, there is theoretically only one type of beneficiary: arbitrageurs. Theoretically. Because even they can only make profits when trading takes place, not when high slippage, etc., discourages people from trading. And fragmentation affects not only liquidity, but also users. Each of the existing DEXes has different pools, different UX/UI, a different history, different parts of the community that trust (or don't trust) it (thanks a lot, you various scammers, for making it even harder for projects to gain trust). And it doesn't end with the DEXes. Terra Classic now has three aggregators, countless metrics pages (which are of course good for visibility from a marketing perspective), etc. Terra Classic's strength is its weakness and will remain its weakness as long as builders do not coordinate or agree among themselves, and as long as we prioritize equal treatment over chain success. As harsh as that may sound. I am not in favor of a centralized chain, leadership, or something like a CEO. But it's finally time to put (hurt) egos aside. It's time for builders to get together and work together to bring out the best in their projects. Generally speaking, in this market situation (not just related to TC), any paid marketing is money down the drain. The same goes for external consultants and the like (why do you think most ice cream parlors are closed in winter?). The only ones who have the means and opportunity to put this chain in a reasonable position are those who build, validate, and invest here. Only then would the chain really benefit when the market finally moves in the “right” direction. For me personally, I have reached the point where health, strength (and, downstream, finances) are not enough to continue doing what I have been doing so far. I will fulfill my commitments, which are the development of MM2.0 and CMM at the L1 level, as well as support for the deployment of SDK 0.53. terra-classic.io will of course remain in place and functional as before, including GitHub management of the site. The @Galactic_Shift TCG will also go live when it is possible, but the validator will be sunset at March 31st. All this is not meant as a rant, but rather food for thought, my perspective after my first real break in four years. I would have made a similar statement if I had been able to continue. Not everything is negative; there are some bright spots, people who continue to fight to keep this chain alive. I think L1 is in good hands with @orbit__labs. And who knows, maybe everyone involved will eventually be mature and reasonable enough to work together in a way that creates more than just a fragile snapshot that will be torn apart by the next ego. Maybe at some point, the sum of all the parts will add up to a great picture instead of just a pile of puzzle pieces. I would wish that for everyone who has invested years of their life, energy, and commitment. Good luck and success. Cheers. #LUNCcommunity
English
86
66
242
23K
Community First रीट्वीट किया
Rummy | CF Validator
Rummy | CF Validator@The_Rum7·
@H0lyF0lly Cosmos unfortunately has a lot of dead chains now. Few will be there in the end. But projects like @cryptodungeonma and #LUNC that’s been bought back and without doubt has a future.
English
1
3
9
317
Community First रीट्वीट किया
BitcoinMusic
BitcoinMusic@ayewaken·
BREAKING 🚨: TFL Dissolution Extended to DEC 2026 1/21/26: A new court order just hit the docket for Terraform Labs. Here is the alpha you need: New Deadline: The court has officially extended the dissolution deadline for TFL and TLL through December 31, 2026. Estate Management: Plan Administrator Todd R. Snyder now has an additional year to manage the estates and oversee the winding-down process. Strategic Move: The court ruled this extension is in the "best interests" of the estates and creditors to ensure a proper resolution. More Time: This provides a significantly longer runway for the final stages of the Chapter 11 process than originally planned. The TFL chapter isn't closing just yet. 2026 is officially the new target year. Bullish 🛡️⚖️ Bookmark and share to spread awareness! #LUNC #USTC #TerraClassic
BitcoinMusic tweet media
English
20
23
106
30.4K
Community First रीट्वीट किया
Dungeon Games🐉
Dungeon Games🐉@cryptodungeonma·
🐉 Welcome to Dungeon Your all-in-one gateway to blockchain gaming, NFTs, and DeFi. Built to feel like a real game, not a complicated crypto tool. Play, collect, and own your adventure.
Dungeon Games🐉 tweet media
English
30
28
145
380.9K
Community First रीट्वीट किया
Robin | Community First Validator
Robin | Community First Validator@RobinTheFarmer·
This is 100% a hard “No With Veto” from me. The DEX proposal will empty what remains of the Community Pool and lead to nowhere near the burns the proposer is claiming. LUNC already has four other DEXs which the Community voted via governance to provide liquidity for, and it delivered virtually no benefits at all. It was a complete waste of money. The proposer has a very dubious past, and is a well know scammer.. There will be ZERO community pool funds left if this proposal passes.. zero funds left for development. We will end up with a chain that will not be able to afford even basic upgrades.. If you want to see LUNC at rock bottom then vote for this proposal.. Maybe the community then will finally realise that if they keep voting for nonsense spending proposals then they will have to learn to live with the results of their bad decision making.
English
2
3
4
289
Community First
Community First@CommFirst_LUNC·
Community First has voted No with Veto against prop #12212 for the reasons stated below. Additionally, we believe this prop may violate previously approved governance around pay. #lunc
Community First tweet media
English
3
8
35
1.3K
Community First
Community First@CommFirst_LUNC·
🚨#LUNC is getting ready for an important upgrade thank you to @orbit__labs for your work in this. We look forward to the full rollout and upgrade in due course🚨 Keep building 🛠️ #LUNC #BNB #USTC
Orbit Labs@orbit__labs

🚀 [Dev Update – Terra Classic SDK 53 Upgrade] The SDK 53 upgrade has been successfully executed on Rebel-2 testnet. ✅ The network is live on the new stack. We are now monitoring and testing before moving toward mainnet.

English
0
9
38
2.3K
Community First रीट्वीट किया
Orbit Labs
Orbit Labs@orbit__labs·
🚀 [Dev Update – Terra Classic SDK 53 Upgrade] The SDK 53 upgrade has been successfully executed on Rebel-2 testnet. ✅ The network is live on the new stack. We are now monitoring and testing before moving toward mainnet.
English
21
83
258
31.3K
Community First रीट्वीट किया
LUNC Artemis Protocol
LUNC Artemis Protocol@LUNCArtemis·
🚨 Announcement 🚨 We're pleased to announce the launch of the "Do Secret Bridge". The @LUNC_Cookies team have developed a bridge from Terra Classic Blockchain to the Secret Network. This will allow assets to be moved between the two networks and opens access to the unique security features on the Secret Network. Lunc will now also have access to the EVM which makes building on chain more simple as well as allow CW20 tokens to be brideged and and made into privacy snip-20 tokens. More information will be coming soon, but we are extremely please to have access to and work with the #SecretNetwork #DoSecretBridge #LunaClassic #USTC #Crosschain #SecretNetwork
English
9
17
37
2.3K