InvaderBug

@indivisividual @weimin_suozhi @PrinceVogel @bzogrammer Life existing and diversifying via chance and mutations, spread over massive amounts of time in an indifferent and harsh world isn't possible. The only way our world could arise though such a process is if there is a being that forms the life and keeps it on track as it develops.

@InvaderbugGames @weimin_suozhi @PrinceVogel @bzogrammer That’s why a bunch of them go extinct, when other creatures develop a favorable mutation and they don’t and the other can compete in their niche more effectively. And if it’s that tough for life to evolve and adapt how do you believe in a spontaneous creator

Can someone explain to the sort of selection gradient that starts an animal down the path to doing this? What does a proto-cocoon look like?

@weimin_suozhi @PrinceVogel @bzogrammer Survivorship bias can't account for there being any survivors at all. Earth's history is quite volatile, species wouldn't randomly mutate fast enough to acquire fit attributes to survive. Especially when it comes to complex and intricate mechanisms like metamorphosis (or cells).

@InvaderbugGames @PrinceVogel @bzogrammer

DISNEY HERCULES BUNDLE COSTS 4,000 V-BUCKS GET THEM HERE: fortnite.com/item-shop?crea… Use Code "Shiina" to support me, thank you!! ❤️ #EpicPartner

@UnclearRain @PrinceVogel @bzogrammer I've graduated as a bio major, and I've continued studying into both biological and theological fields. The materialistic worldview is insufficient to explain the world we live in and the diversity within.

@InvaderbugGames @PrinceVogel @bzogrammer no, you’re just uneducated in this regard

@weimin_suozhi @PrinceVogel @bzogrammer Random mutations won't suffice because of the nature of "survival of the fittest" as an inherently reductive process. Metamorphosis would require risky changes to survive through innumerable generations by chance. Evolution happening this way can only be theistic in nature.

@InvaderbugGames @PrinceVogel @bzogrammer Why would random mutation theory not suffice? All insects that undergo complete metamorphosis belong to a single clade, suggesting it happened exactly once. They proliferated bc drastic changes allowed them to occupy niche environments other species could not. Survivorship bias.

@PrinceVogel @bzogrammer Doesn't necessarily answer who is guiding it, but there is no way we could have such diverse life here without somebody designing or enabling the process and protecting life from a world that is not kind to it. Random chance can't account for an uphill battle lasting millennia.

@PrinceVogel @bzogrammer This question is a part of why I'm religious. If large scale evolution happened without guidance, then incredible systems like this would never happen. It has to occur via random mutation *and* the mutated species would have to survive and mutate more despite constant pressures.

what flower do u think represents me the most ..? tbh i feel like a mushroom most of the time... 🍄🌼

@JoeySlaton98149 @gatorgar Its a bunch of various politicians, CEOs, investors, and various other business people. Using a general population as a scape goat isn't sensible.

@gatorgar Who controls our media? Social media? Hollywood? Banking? Wall Street? Fed? It ain't the Muslims

People are like “I’m a pretty moderate average American. I think the Jews control the world, everything’s a psyop except the things I believe, we should get rid of everyone who isn’t white, and Hitler was right. Just your average run of the mill centrist really.”

@UmariTomoe Don't make jokes like that if you don't want to. Your model is pretty innocuous and you don't owe anyone inappropriate media just because they want it. Theres plenty of those out there.

Everyone's got a different environment/vibe, right? Though I'm often faced with criticism of, "Your model is really sexy so why are you uncomfortable talking about this stuff? That doesn't make any sense" so sometimes I worry maybe something is wrong with me somehow, I guess.

As a confession of sorts, the fact I'm unable to bring myself to make sexual jokes and such on stream is a bit embarrassing for me. It's just not in my personality to do so but I do feel bad when it seems like an expectation of EN VTubers. I promise I'm not trying to be seiso. 😭

Morning everyone. I normally don't do these kinds of posts as it's hard for me to form the words but it breaks my heart to see the divide that's been happening recently within the Christian space. Yes Jesus did call out sin, but it was those who were living hypocrisy, like the religious leaders, that He was harsh with. When the Pharisees and Saddresses were complaining that Jesus spent time with sinners and tax collectors, He rebuked them. Saying it was those who needed a savior. He even took Matthew, a tax collector, someone viewed as a traitor by his people, as one of His disciples. How is calling people slurs and other harsh things following Christ's example, especially when someone is boldly proclaiming their faith and what Jesus has done for them? Unless someone is clearly not following scripture and not the teachings of Jesus, when someone decides to share their testimony, regardless of their past, we should rejoice with them. As 2 Corinthians 5:17 says, "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new." Luke 15:10 "In the same way, I tell you, there is rejoicing in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner who repents.” I implore you, humble yourselves before God and examine the condition of your heart and let's be a united church, the body of Christ, Romans 15:5 "Now may the God of patience and comfort grant you to be like-minded toward one another, according to Christ Jesus,"

@Paulhar84214906 @JDunlap1974 These points fall into about 3 categories. 1. Incorrect 2, 6, 12 2. Unfounded Rumors/Bad Vibes 1, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13 3. Evidence that shouldn't be revealed yet. 3, 4, 5, 8 This is nothing more than fear mongering and irrational distrust stirred up by greedy influencers.

Every time I’ve witnessed this level of outrage over questioning the “official narrative,” it always means there’s more to the story: 1. Text messages are highly suspicious. 2. Claiming a .30-06 rifle is absurd. 3. TPUSA removed cameras and items within 5 minutes of Charlie Kirk’s assassination—blatant crime scene tampering. 4. The stage was dismantled 3 hours after his death, before ballistics investigators could analyze it. 5. Grass at the site was rototilled and covered with concrete pavers 5 days after the murder; skim-coated new stucco on the building ruins ballistics. 6. The hospital Charlie was taken to got a new CEO on August 26, 2025, was not the closest, and was ill-equipped for gunshot wounds. 7. How does someone conceal a rifle in skinny jeans? 8. Why release only footage of the suspect jumping off the roof, not shooting, when the camera captured that area? 9. Why refuse to plead guilty after turning himself in? Rumors suggest the “confession to a minister” was as staged as the texts. 10. Strange hand signals, including a 5-4-3-2-1 minute countdown, perfectly timed with the shooting. 11. Patsy distractions feel like textbook state-sponsored tactics. 12. The kid asking Charlie a question when he was shot was filmed practicing the exact same reaction he displayed during the shooting. 13. Not to mention all the interesting Google searches that occurred in August. You sound like 99% of America post-9/11.”how dare you question the official narrative…🤡

I feel compelled to share some insight on the shot/bullet that killed Charlie Kirk. I hate to wade into this conversation, but some sanity is necessary - seeing all the insane BS that’s out there. I’m a lifelong hunter and have shot at least 75+ deer with a 30-06, and countless more with other rounds, as well as bow and arrow. I guided hunting trips full-time for a decade. I have personally seen literally hundreds if not thousands of “kill shots” with high powered rifles. And in this line of work, I studied ballistics, bullet performance, etc. I guarantee I have more first-hand knowledge than pretty much every single “influencer” out there who is presenting themselves now as an expert in this. Two key points: - First, bullets do inexplicable things. Yes, they always obey the laws of physics (no “magic”) but there are just so many variables that an outcome in a dynamic situation is simply not predictable within the range of possibilities. - Second, yes it is quite possible that a 30-06 round (with a soft-point, lead-filled bullet, designed for expansion, as is the case here) would NOT make an exit wound. AND it is possible without a significant amount of external blood loss. I once shot a deer in the head at about 100 yards with a 30-06, and there was no exit. The skin on a deer’s head is thin compared to a human neck, and the cumulative bone-mass on the bullet’s trajectory much less than a human spine. I was baffled about this (must be magic!) until I figured it out. What happened is that (a slow-mo video would have revealed) the head instantly inflated like a balloon, and the insides turned to mush. That’s how it absorbed the bullet’s energy. It looked normal on the outside when I went to retrieve it, but on inspection it was obvious. And there was minimal blood loss (b’c the only hole was 3/10’s of an inch - ie, 30 caliber, as in 30-06 - and the skin closed around it as it sprang back after the shot). In the sickening video of Charlie’s assassination, there is a freeze-frame where his neck did the same thing — blew up (momentarily) like a balloon before springing back. That’s where the energy went. Not rocket science. Combined with a healthy spine (higher on the bone density scale, we are told), the thickness of skin and density of muscles in a human neck, the story we are being told is 100% plausible. I’m not saying I know what happened. Only that the folks saying this is not possible have no idea what they’re talking about, and by spewing this ignorant crap, they are only making things worse. If you are prone to be influenced by such ignorant conspiratorial information, please understand the context: fact is, “influencers” make their money by peddling their influence. Unethical ones do so to the highest bidder. Others have hidden agendas/biases that taint their content. Some are just batshit crazy. Some sow division on purpose, and fling out all kinds of crazy crap, just to stir the pot - to get clicks. Psyops from myriad powers shape our social media. Generating deepfake videos is easy as logging into Grok. It’s not rocket science to gin up a “following” and appear “credible” and “sincere.” The point is, you should not wholesale believe or even give a smidge of credibility to ANYONE you don’t personally know. And even then you have to be careful. The devil knows the more he tries to oppress revival from the outside, the more it breaks out. So the way to defeat it is to divide and conquer, through lies and deception that appear as truth. “The devil comes masquerading as an angel of light.” Be smarter.

@REYOX_WALK @snowwwalker There are extremists on both sides. If you spend time around enough real people you'll realize that the middle 90% of people on the political bell curve don't wish death on others. Conservatives (or liberals) aren't the boogeyman online media and forums make them out to be.

@InvaderbugGames @snowwwalker they can be when they don't share death treats to people that are different than them , which is like 99,9% of them

Made a mascot horror games devs ranking because i have free-speech

@snowwwalker @REYOX_WALK Surprisingly, conservatives are generally normal people that can be friendly with people they don't share ideologies with.

@REYOX_WALK well that already drags me away a bit that man likes trump? when he collectively has brought together like the gayest community ever???

@LostHistory9 As a non denominational, heck yeah, hunt those demons.

It is imperative for Christians to embrace and gatekeep fictional stories whose messages aligns with the teachings of the Christian faith. Too often, particularly in non-denominational and Evangelical circles, does the average person shun all kinds of stories because of the bullshit narrative that the stories are "demonic". This type of puritanical nonsense has been a blight on the faith for a long time, and it needs to stop. And yes, I have indeed heard retarded people call the works of Tolkien and Lewis "demonic".

@KarumaAnggora @DreddSnail Yeah, I think the hate on this guy is overblown. He's definitely been a hypocrite at times, but his work is decent and he's made some pretty funny skits. It would be great if he made up his mind, but there's worse things people have done for less infamy.

@DreddSnail Honestly I'm fine ProZD voices Doom, but yeah it is kinda contradicting his opinion towards authentic casting.

Didn't know they made Doom korean.

@Helldivers_NOW The h*ck did I do?

@falter_xv @Helldivers_NOW If you need a support weapon to do a mission then you shouldn't have one. Its a bonus for the funsies