Nested 456

6.6K posts

Nested 456

Nested 456

@Nested42937

शामिल हुए Ocak 2025
299 फ़ॉलोइंग81 फ़ॉलोवर्स
Bohn Jurns
Bohn Jurns@BJurns48955·
@katrosenfield The whole issue with dating now is that young men are lower status than the average young woman. It's baffling to me that young women can simultaneously think "these guys don't even earn as much as me" and "everything is stacked against me". What kind of mental ju jitsu is this?
English
4
0
21
642
Kat Rosenfield
Kat Rosenfield@katrosenfield·
Shocking-not-surprising statistic here that young women disproportionately believe “things are stacked against me, no matter how hard I try,” and while I know some people will find this deeply ironic (it sort of is) it’s also both understandable and really sad
The New Statesman@NewStatesman

ANGRY YOUNG WOMEN by @emilylawford and @Scarlett__Mag It was a Wednesday night and seven members of the University of Leeds’ feminist society had invited me to join their book swap. I asked how they felt about the young men they knew. “I don’t care for them,” said a girl called Ruby imperiously. “They’re not bad people, but they refuse to call out their friends who make other girls uncomfortable. They’ll laugh at jokes that are sexist, racist, homophobic, they don’t care about political issues… I don’t think they like women a lot.” If a man is attracted to you, she said, he might talk about things like toxic misogyny. If he doesn’t fancy you, he won’t bother. “I feel like a lot of it is quite sexually motivated with men.” I asked if they’d consider dating a man with different political views. They all immediately said no. “I don’t think I’d even be friends with one,” said one girl. “They don’t see you as human.” Only one woman, Evelyn, admitted to having male friends (though she was worried this made her a “pick me”, trying too hard for male attention). Evelyn was concerned about what the men she knew were watching online. “The stuff that’s being said about women is crazy,” she said. “They’re getting all these reels, talking about, like, bad stuff about women. And I get reels of women saying bad stuff about men. I try to think, not all men are like this, but…” On the internet, women and men have never been more alienated from each other. While the toxic, often hard-right politics of the manosphere have been exhaustively documented, the new generation of female influencers are nearly as extreme – just on the other side of the political spectrum. The “femosphere” spans a range of tones: there are misandrist dating coaches who urge women to reject men altogether, and more explicitly progressive content creators who cover global and domestic politics. Exclusive polling by Merlin Strategy for the New Statesman reveals that young women, aged between 18 and 30, are by far the most progressive demographic in the UK. Young women are 26 percentage points less likely to feel positively about capitalism than young men, and much less likely to feel the economy works in their favour. Gen Z women are more likely to support causes such as feminism, environmentalism and anti-racism than young men. They also feel much more negatively towards young men than young men feel about them. I spent the last few months in search of the new left-wing young women. It wasn’t difficult – they were everywhere. But it all felt impossibly bleak. They weren’t excited about their futures. They didn’t like the men they knew, or the idea of those they didn’t. Men were just a threat who had the potential to harm or trap them. This will almost certainly make relationships harder: fewer than half of young women feel men understand them. Young women are much less likely than men to date people who disagree with their politics. People will get lonelier, and angrier. Young women are twice as likely to not want children as young men. And it’s getting worse. Women under 25 are most likely to believe things are “stacked against me, no matter how hard I try”. A significant majority of young women feel isolated from the rest of the country. The two main political parties aren’t reaching out to them specifically. Many women told me they feared a Reform government pressuring them to have babies. Many say they will vote for the Greens in the upcoming local elections, but few seem to believe that will make a difference. They don’t feel represented by mainstream politics, and they don’t think anyone cares. Cover art by Carl Godfrey

English
63
11
246
38.5K
Nested 456
Nested 456@Nested42937·
@peterrhague You do wonder why stories of Eve and Pandora were told
English
0
0
11
174
Peter Hague
Peter Hague@peterrhague·
These young women have been radicalised into basically wanting to tear down civilisation. This is far worse than a handful of pathetic manosphere influencers.
The New Statesman@NewStatesman

ANGRY YOUNG WOMEN by @emilylawford and @Scarlett__Mag It was a Wednesday night and seven members of the University of Leeds’ feminist society had invited me to join their book swap. I asked how they felt about the young men they knew. “I don’t care for them,” said a girl called Ruby imperiously. “They’re not bad people, but they refuse to call out their friends who make other girls uncomfortable. They’ll laugh at jokes that are sexist, racist, homophobic, they don’t care about political issues… I don’t think they like women a lot.” If a man is attracted to you, she said, he might talk about things like toxic misogyny. If he doesn’t fancy you, he won’t bother. “I feel like a lot of it is quite sexually motivated with men.” I asked if they’d consider dating a man with different political views. They all immediately said no. “I don’t think I’d even be friends with one,” said one girl. “They don’t see you as human.” Only one woman, Evelyn, admitted to having male friends (though she was worried this made her a “pick me”, trying too hard for male attention). Evelyn was concerned about what the men she knew were watching online. “The stuff that’s being said about women is crazy,” she said. “They’re getting all these reels, talking about, like, bad stuff about women. And I get reels of women saying bad stuff about men. I try to think, not all men are like this, but…” On the internet, women and men have never been more alienated from each other. While the toxic, often hard-right politics of the manosphere have been exhaustively documented, the new generation of female influencers are nearly as extreme – just on the other side of the political spectrum. The “femosphere” spans a range of tones: there are misandrist dating coaches who urge women to reject men altogether, and more explicitly progressive content creators who cover global and domestic politics. Exclusive polling by Merlin Strategy for the New Statesman reveals that young women, aged between 18 and 30, are by far the most progressive demographic in the UK. Young women are 26 percentage points less likely to feel positively about capitalism than young men, and much less likely to feel the economy works in their favour. Gen Z women are more likely to support causes such as feminism, environmentalism and anti-racism than young men. They also feel much more negatively towards young men than young men feel about them. I spent the last few months in search of the new left-wing young women. It wasn’t difficult – they were everywhere. But it all felt impossibly bleak. They weren’t excited about their futures. They didn’t like the men they knew, or the idea of those they didn’t. Men were just a threat who had the potential to harm or trap them. This will almost certainly make relationships harder: fewer than half of young women feel men understand them. Young women are much less likely than men to date people who disagree with their politics. People will get lonelier, and angrier. Young women are twice as likely to not want children as young men. And it’s getting worse. Women under 25 are most likely to believe things are “stacked against me, no matter how hard I try”. A significant majority of young women feel isolated from the rest of the country. The two main political parties aren’t reaching out to them specifically. Many women told me they feared a Reform government pressuring them to have babies. Many say they will vote for the Greens in the upcoming local elections, but few seem to believe that will make a difference. They don’t feel represented by mainstream politics, and they don’t think anyone cares. Cover art by Carl Godfrey

English
25
40
517
11.3K
Nested 456 रीट्वीट किया
Daughter of Wolves
Daughter of Wolves@Alicia_Bittle_·
My daughters caught my husband and I making out in our hallway last night. They had gotten out of bed and surprised us. At first I was mortified and embarrassed. But then I thought about it... If my kids catch me kissing their father instead of fighting him. If they see us holding hands instead of holding grudges. If they believe we genuinely like each other… that we love each other not out of duty, but due to deep affection… That’s exactly what I want for them. Thats the security I want them to feel. That’s the kind of love I want them to find.
English
91
140
4.5K
244.6K
Close the Dip
Close the Dip@dose_of_Close·
@PaulaWright It just shows the eventuality of female nature. In the end, women just want to be naked. That's their end goal. And we are going to get there very soon and they're going to panic, because then what?
English
1
3
39
2.2K
Nested 456
Nested 456@Nested42937·
@WarMonitor3 Does nothing but finance and that reached its limit in 2008
English
0
0
0
13
Leslie Dixon Reform Councillor
Leslie Dixon Reform Councillor@LeslieDixon1952·
Desmond, my love, you are mistaken. I was born around the same time, I set my alarm clock every day, worked hard. Paid my dues for 40 years as a hairdresser. All I'm getting back is what me and millions others paid in. Now I'm a Reform council candidate, I will fight hard for the triple lock. I want to want it a quadruple lock
English
20
1
20
1.8K
rt hon Sir Desmond Swayne TD MP
If, like me, you were born in 1956, you’ll receive almost £300,000 more in benefits than you’ll pay in taxes in your lifetime State Pensions make up a huge chunk of that Long term, we simply can’t afford to sustain the Triple Lock’s generosity Blog: desmondswaynemp.com/ds-blog/1956/?…
rt hon Sir Desmond Swayne TD MP tweet media
English
906
238
2.1K
254.9K
BWWM
BWWM@swirl_bwwm·
Ry and Claudrice👸🏾🤴🏼We met online. Advice: communicate openly and frequently. Embrace and celebrate each other’s backgrounds, educate yourself on your partner’s experiences, support each other against external pressures, and stay true to yourselves. #interracial #swirl #love
BWWM tweet mediaBWWM tweet mediaBWWM tweet mediaBWWM tweet media
English
4
5
60
3.2K
Nested 456
Nested 456@Nested42937·
@Graham_117 It's currently a transition where children aren't in factories or in the farms, the cost is on parents - and no country pays enough to raise them. They're a net loss unless they become child stars. Hopefully once we move to robots doing everything we'll have nowt to do but breed
English
0
0
1
6
Graham
Graham@Graham_117·
I think the birthrate will rebound once humanity adapts to this unprecedented selection event we're currently going through (the ability to *not* have children at mass scale). The people of future centuries will be descended from those who actively chose to reproduce. /2
English
1
0
2
35
Graham
Graham@Graham_117·
This is indeed a concern. Can't populate the stars if you don't have a population. Two reasons why I don't think it'll be a showstopper: AI/robots will greatly reduce the number of people needed for industry/economic growth. And... /1
Chris Green@heuristics

@Graham_117 With what population?

English
2
0
5
366
Kamil Pabis
Kamil Pabis@Aging_Scientist·
@Noahpinion Maybe I was naive when I imagined that people mean it when they say they don't like working. I hope society will not reject the promise of eternal freedom and abundance in favor of kleptocratic serfdom like we have now.
English
1
0
0
92
Noah Smith 🐇🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼
Agreed. But people need to understand, the idea of making human workers obsolete has been the explicit, stated *goal* of top AI labs -- and many AI researchers -- for many many years. It's not just marketing.
John Loeber 🎢@johnloeber

Lazy and Dangerous AI Marketing For the last few years, the main communications strategy from major AI labs has been shock and awe: it's not enough to say that the technology will be transformative, but it's going to eviscerate broad categories of labor, and it's dangerous enough that "in the wrong hands" the results could be apocalyptic. This strategy is understandable: for investors betting on disruption, this pitch promises the greatest possible disruption, and the suggestion of AI holding world-ending power induces regulatory capture: get the regulators worried, and it pulls up the ladder behind the labs that lead by a small edge right now. But this is a short-sighted and self-defeating strategy. Preaching doom may be a great strategy for raising capital, but the general public is getting radicalized against AI (by itself and as part of a broader anti-capitalist wave). Gunshots fired in opposition to mere AI *derivatives* (data centers) make this clear. If you tell people that they're at best going to be part of a permanent underclass, and at worst, holocausted by a paperclip maximizer, then they will kill you. The regulatory capture angle is also mistaken: doomsaying is not how you maintain your autonomy as a firm. This is how you get nationalized, the entire industry gets run from a bunker under Cheyenne Mountain, and the great AI researchers of our day end up reporting to Professional Managerial Class government lawyers. It is noteworthy that Silicon Valley people, as a rule, have never been good at politics, and have often underestimated their adversaries in this arena. The most dangerous time is when you think you're being very clever in a field you don't understand well. The reasons why I call this communications strategy Dangerous are clear. But it's also Lazy: there's a much more optimistic story one could tell, one that doesn't risk the pitfalls above. In and of itself, the AI story should be one of tremendous hope and inspiration. Can you imagine never having to work again? It should be a slam dunk! Almost everyone's been fantasizing about this forever! There are lots of AI optimists, many of them even insiders from the big labs, who believe in bountiful visions of the future, and -- importantly -- who have the academic tooling to actually substantiate those beliefs. They understand that AI is self-commodifying, that aggregate demand can be adjusted at will, and that this industry will run on razor-thin margins that cede virtually all the value as consumer surplus. (The worst part of the AI pessimists' doomsaying is that it is often straightforwardly wrong.) But the optimists appear not to be in charge of marketing. Maybe optimism doesn't get eyeballs as well as Skynet-adjacent messaging. But it's a hell of a lot less likely to get you killed, which should count for something. Over the long term, this seems important, and dare I say there could be a compounding advantage to a lab that consistently keeps their communications positive and focused on abundance. AI applications are the most popular, fastest-growing consumer products of all time. Getting the messaging right such that the public doesn't want you dead should be easy. It is shocking that the discourse is where it is.

English
14
23
246
19.2K
Max Ellison
Max Ellison@MaxEllison2048·
@Noahpinion You missed the key part of his argument: "In and of itself, the AI story should be one of tremendous hope and inspiration. Can you imagine never having to work again? It should be a slam dunk! Almost everyone's been fantasizing about this forever!"
English
1
0
1
210
Nested 456
Nested 456@Nested42937·
@pmddomingos Anyone can find them it's public source (or decompilable binary). But why *didn't* humans find these particular bugs?
English
0
0
0
64
Pedro Domingos
Pedro Domingos@pmddomingos·
No evidence so far that AI can find exploits a human couldn’t, or even do it at lower cost.
English
60
15
269
15.6K
Dr Singularity
Dr Singularity@Dr_Singularity·
A Type II civilization extracting resources from a planet
English
23
20
234
12.2K
Nested 456
Nested 456@Nested42937·
@GWHayduke97 BS jobs. We'll compete on an AI version of the bachelor to impress an AI girlfriend
English
0
0
0
14
Hayduke ⏹️
Hayduke ⏹️@GWHayduke97·
Serious question for AI optimists who believe AI will automate all work: In a society where there are no sources of income other than UBI, and thus everyone has the same income, how would positional goods be allocated?
English
92
3
131
13.2K
jo.sh
jo.sh@rudejudas·
@ZelenskyyUa So you're pretty much doubling down on War forever and have no intention of any peace whatsoever?
English
82
0
44
15.9K
Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський
The future is already on the front line – and Ukraine is building it. These are our ground robotic systems. For the first time in the history of this war, an enemy position was taken exclusively by unmanned platforms – ground systems and drones. The occupiers surrendered, and the operation was carried out without infantry and without losses on our side. Ratel, TerMIT, Ardal, Rys, Zmiy, Protector, Volia, and our other ground robotic systems have already carried out more than 22,000 missions on the front in just three months. In other words, lives were saved more than 22,000 times when a robot went into the most dangerous areas instead of a warrior. This is about high technology protecting the highest value – human life. From the congratulatory address to the workers of Ukraine’s defense-industrial complex (2/3).
Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський tweet mediaVolodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський tweet media
English
684
5.2K
27.3K
1.1M
Nested 456
Nested 456@Nested42937·
@tthomson @ananayarora Russia and China will pay. The bizarre "hacking is illegal" cope ignores it's not illegal if you're in Russian intelligence!
English
0
0
2
71
Travis
Travis@tthomson·
@ananayarora I think his mistake is looking at this through the lens of a pen tester. “Who’s going to foot the bill?” Probably hostile governments with deep pockets and massive incentives to break into our systems. Now they can point LLMs at our systems and say “Don’t rest till you get in”
English
5
0
31
3.3K
Ananay
Ananay@ananayarora·
Marcus Hutchins, the guy famous for stopping the WannaCry Ransomware, probably has the best take on Mythos doing vulnerability research
English
106
546
4.3K
489.7K
Nested 456 रीट्वीट किया
Owen Lewis
Owen Lewis@is_OwenLewis·
The ultimate goal of space exploration is new homes for humanity. Settlements need human families: men, women, and children. Ultimately, the way we conquer the final frontier is with families.
Owen Lewis tweet mediaOwen Lewis tweet mediaOwen Lewis tweet mediaOwen Lewis tweet media
Robotbeat🗽 ➐@Robotbeat

NASA should stop tiptoing around space settlement as a goal. Unlike pseudomilitary Apollo, Artemis has the explicit goal of sending the first woman to the Moon. Human settlement as a goal naturally calls for sending representatives of our full biology, no need to appeal to DEI.

English
7
27
224
5.5K
Nested 456
Nested 456@Nested42937·
@farzyness Moravecs Paradox is unfortunate. In an ideal world road sweepers find new jobs before PhD biologists. Making the more high status jobs obsolete first is inevitably going to cause resentment
English
0
0
0
25
Farzad 🇺🇸 🇮🇷
I'm telling you guys right now - the only way to "fix" the AI perception in the general public is very simple. You have to start with the fact that the core Abundance thesis - disease resolved, near-free energy, endlessly abundant robotic labor (digital and physical) doing things on your behalf is AT MINIMUM 5 years away. More likely 10 years away at any meaningful scale. As we march towards that future, the companies that are building it will begin accruing a significant % of the wealth, which a lot of it will come from disrupted legacy businesses that don't adapt quickly enough. For example, once a company solves the cure for cancer, what happens to all the companies who make a ton of money administering care for cancer? They go bye bye. All those people working for those companies? Jobless. Where does a lot of the money that would've gone to them go instead? To the company that cured cancer. Extrapolate this to basically every industry - digital first, then physical. As companies try to adapt, they will become hyper-efficient. Hyper-efficiency means extreme usage of AI. Extreme usage of AI means minimum number of humans in the loop. Minimum number of humans in the loop means mass layoffs for companies that have to shift from humans to AI. Will there also be a huge growth of new jobs/business because of AI? Absolutely. Is that number greater or equal to the number of layoffs? Absolutely not. Why? Because building your own thing is hard AF, is painful, and it requires a certain demeanor/life circumstance that allows you to take the risk to build the thing. The friction to do that is FAR GREATER than the friction for a business to layoff people in order to compete in an AI-native world. The flip side is that we're going to get MASSIVE deflation as businesses HAVE to adopt AI. There will be next-level competition on costs to deliver high quality products/services for the lowest possible cost. This is going to be incredible... for the people that have money to spend. For the people that DON'T have money to spend, or for the people who ARE NOT CONFIDENT that they can build a life in the AI age, or for the people who simply DO NOT want to build a life in the AI age because they don't want change, the coming time feels extremely scary and uncertain. This is most people. Most people are not risk takers. Most people want to live a life of comfort, happiness, and predictability. Most people don't want sudden change. This is not a good or bad thing. It's reality. People are afraid for good reason. So what's the easiest way to remove that fear? To give people a safety cushion - in the form of money - that tells them that they will not go hungry, lose their home, or end up worse off because of AI while we transition to abundance. There's literally no other way. You can sell people the hopes and dreams of AI all you want - which are 100% accurate and WILL HAPPEN. But people aren't dumb. They know the downside risk, and they know the transition can easily be bungled. Anyone who has interfaced with AI semi-seriously can already tell that it is a SUPERHUMAN tool. It is very easy to make the jump that says "if it's superhuman, then it can do the job that I can as well. And if that's the case, then what do I do?" There's no PR campaign that exists that will cause people to set aside their very RATIONAL fears and instead tell themselves that potentially losing their livelihood will be good for them long term. It very well may be, but try telling that to a country with 60%+ of the people living paycheck to paycheck. It doesn't work. So either deliver the abundance thesis ASAP - which is wholly dependent on businesses achieving their goals FASTER... or give people money to survive the inevitable chaotic transition. My 2 cents. Hope I'm wrong.
Kiri@Kyrannio

I'm stressed, friends. The more I'm touching grass outside of our bubble lately, the more I'm realizing we really have an issue with how people perceive AI. Something urgently needs to be done, more IRL events and outreach are essential.

English
55
21
306
51.1K
H
H@hamdikadriu·
@XFreeze The most adventurous journey of humanity: going to a dead planet with no air, no water, and no magnetosphere, just to build a city that will cost trillions of dollars. Meanwhile, on Earth we still have people who don’t have clean drinking water.
English
1
0
1
52
X Freeze
X Freeze@XFreeze·
Humanity’s most adventurous ride is yet to come: The Mars Mission It is the most ambitious goal humanity has ever set Starship is what will finally take us there to build a self-sustaining civilization on Mars This is the largest, most powerful launch vehicle ever built. Fully reusable and capable of carrying 100+ tons to orbit, Starship is the only machine designed to make us a true multi-planetary species
X Freeze tweet media
English
84
62
317
8.4K
Nested 456
Nested 456@Nested42937·
@is_OwenLewis @ErikWernquist @SpaceX My dream is robots do everything, build the O'Neil cylinders, then we kind of forget tech exists and live in paradise making love all day
English
1
0
2
52
kache
kache@yacineMTB·
i love random reward
English
6
2
52
4.5K