Graham

10.1K posts

Graham banner
Graham

Graham

@Graham_117

Supporter of space settlement and energy abundance. Kardashev II anticipator.

Katılım Haziran 2023
715 Takip Edilen390 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Graham
Graham@Graham_117·
Yes, if you think "extraction of resources" is inherently bad, then you think life itself is bad. If you think resource extraction for personal gain is something that only happens under "capitalism" or "imperialism," then life itself is capitalist and imperialist.
Space Koala@SpaceKoala

Decrying "extractive imperialist context" when no people or even living organisms are at risk of being harmed is pure hypocrisy. They exist because of that same extraction of resources from other organisms and resources in their environment to survive.

English
9
77
617
7.7K
Graham
Graham@Graham_117·
@Ruukasu97 @AvantelWulf @HMBohemond And you just adapt. All buildings in California are built for earthquakes. Everyone in tornado country has a storm shelter.
English
0
0
1
17
Graham
Graham@Graham_117·
@Ruukasu97 @AvantelWulf @HMBohemond Because we have tornadoes in the Midwest, earthquakes in California, hurricanes in the South, blizzards in the Northeast and desert in the Southwest (also volcanoes in the Northwest but they don’t erupt very often). Almost all of North America is “an area that can kill you.”
English
1
0
1
35
Graham retweetledi
Chun
Chun@satofishi·
youtube.com/watch?v=LvRver… This is part of the reason why this mission is necessary. When this remains the mainstream opinion, we will never become a multiplanetary civilization. True. There are risks. Everything comes with risks. Instead of holding back, we are proactively looking for solutions to mitigate those risks. This is how progress is made. I feel a bit sad when people claim that a crewed flyby has little to no scientific value. They fail to understand that the science of human spaceflight is, in large part, medical science. Despite years of ISS operations, there are still many gaps in our understanding of the impact of spaceflight on the human body. Many of the studies we carried out on fram2 were medical studies. Even though the mission was short, I carefully chose them to help us better understand and prepare for future long-duration deep-space flights. We will do the same on our journey to Mars. A precursor mission before committing to a landing will deepen our knowledge and help answer long-standing questions that ground experiments like Mars-500 could never answer. Doraemon only exists in manga. The Anywhere Door does not belong to our physical world. A nuclear engine will not solve every problem. In the end, we still have to spend months, if not years, in deep space to reach another planet or asteroid. This is orbital mechanics. When you recognize that life is short, the universe is vast, and that making life multiplanetary is inevitable and urgent, the only meaningful answer is: Work. 💪
YouTube video
YouTube
English
36
25
239
16.7K
Graham retweetledi
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman
The near impossible is becoming possible. We are building toward a sustained human presence at the lunar South Pole. It begins with Phase 1: CLPS landers and LTV rovers testing the “science of survival” on the lunar surface before heavy HLS cargo landers deliver the mass and infrastructure needed for an enduring presence. We are building the Moon Base for all we will learn, the innovation that will improve life on Earth, the inspiration for the next generation of explorers, and to master the skills needed for where we will inevitably go next...Mars. The Golden Age of lunar exploration has begun.
English
192
689
4.5K
133.6K
Graham
Graham@Graham_117·
@LT0771 @Truthful_ast In those people's minds, Artemis 2 was "glorious NASA" dunking on "evil billionaires," so it'll create quite some cognitive dissonance for them when all later crewed Artemis missions involve giant vehicles from SpaceX and/or Blue Origin.
English
0
0
1
33
Truthful🛰️
Truthful🛰️@Truthful_ast·
The world isn’t ready for the Artemis era
Truthful🛰️ tweet media
English
13
27
561
6.8K
Graham
Graham@Graham_117·
@conspiracyslyr @ASHSPACEE Based on Ship 39's performance, SpaceX will almost certainly be putting Starships into LEO next year, so I think the only way they don't have an HLS for Artemis III is if they don't really try (I agree the silence is bizarre).
English
0
0
1
16
Graham retweetledi
Blue Origin
Blue Origin@blueorigin·
Lunar Permanence is only possible with recurring access to the Moon, and it starts this year. Proud to support @NASAMoonBase at the lunar South Pole with our Blue Moon MK1 vehicles delivering high-cadence, low-cost access—MK1-101 Endurance (Moon Base 1), followed by MK1-102 VIPER, and two additional MK1 missions supporting Lunar Terrain Vehicles (LTVs).
NASA@NASA

@NASAMoonBase @blueorigin @NASAAdmin @astrobotic “Congratulations @BlueOrigin and we are looking forward to this partnership to deliver the first lunar terrain vehicle (LTV) as part of @NASAMoonBase program.” Moon Base program executive Carlos García-Galán congratulates the recipient of the LTV delivery award.

English
44
187
1.4K
64.6K
Graham retweetledi
Starcloud
Starcloud@Starcloud_·
Starcloud is excited to announce that we will integrate 50 @SpaceX @Starlink Mini Laser terminals across 25+ satellites.  Each of the @Starcloud_ satellites will carry two Starlink Mini Laser terminals, and the first hardware is expected on orbit within one year. Starlink Mini Laser terminals, the same laser crosslink technology that SpaceX developed for its Starlink constellation, provide up to 25 Gbps of continuous intersatellite connectivity at distances up to 4,000 km and are capable of higher link speeds at shorter distances. The terminals enable direct optical links between Starcloud satellites and the Starlink constellation using laser light, eliminating the need for Starcloud to send data directly through bandwidth-constrained ground stations.
Starcloud tweet media
English
29
129
1.2K
261.6K
Graham retweetledi
Firefly Aerospace
Firefly Aerospace@FireflySpace·
The next era of Moon exploration has begun! We're proud to announce a $75 million subcontract from @NASAJPL to deliver four drones above the Moon's south pole with our Elytra orbiter. In support of @NASA's MoonFall mission and larger Moon Base initiative, these drones will help map safe landing spots and resources for future Artemis missions. Read more here: fireflyspace.com/news/firefly-a…
English
27
159
903
31.5K
Graham retweetledi
Toby Li
Toby Li@tobyliiiiiiiiii·
Just in - NASA selects Astrolab and Lunar Outpost as the companies to build the Artemis lunar terrain vehicles that astronauts will drive on the Moon's surface. The vehicles can carry up to 2 astronauts, travel up to 200km, 10km/hr, and have crewed & autonomous capabilities.
Toby Li tweet mediaToby Li tweet media
English
9
46
342
9.8K
Graham
Graham@Graham_117·
@rexthundercock A technological species would need *some* way to manipulate matter. It wouldn't have to look like our hands, but I'm not sure how you'd get advanced tech without some kind of tool-using ability. But fire is the really difficult thing to do without.
English
0
0
0
5
Rex Thundercock
Rex Thundercock@rexthundercock·
@Graham_117 Thinking in the order of thumbs or tools makes a lot of assumptions even, we are constrained heavily by our perspective as human beings to the point imagining something truly alien is difficult
English
1
0
0
16
Graham
Graham@Graham_117·
@rexthundercock I agree that intelligent life is likely extraordinarily rare, but also, intelligence by itself is not enough for the technology development needed to get to radio, let alone interstellar travel. You also probably need fire, opposable thumbs, tool use, etc.
English
2
0
1
35
Graham
Graham@Graham_117·
@Mr_BenPrime Travel to the nearest stars doesn't even need to take longer than a human lifespan (even assuming no life extension/hybernation, which IMO we will plausibly have by that time). Highly recommend this book to anyone curious about interstellar travel.
Graham tweet media
English
1
0
1
147
Benjamin Prime
Benjamin Prime@Mr_BenPrime·
"Interstellar travel is impossible." No. What you actually mean is it takes too long for a human lifespan. That's all. That has no bearing on the feasibility of getting assets/payload to another star system which imo is an entirely different conversation and entirely possible.
English
200
34
772
34.1K
Graham
Graham@Graham_117·
@chase_da_birdie @note61763 @Truthful_ast Fusion used to be perpetually 30 years away, now it's perpetually 5-10 years away. It's getting closer. Anyway, fusion is not the only interstellar propulsion method. I'd recommend this book if you haven't read it.
Graham tweet media
English
0
0
0
7
🇳🇱 Chase 🇪🇺
🇳🇱 Chase 🇪🇺@chase_da_birdie·
@note61763 @Graham_117 @Truthful_ast sure, in the works as equations on a whiteboard. not in our lifetimes, though i'd be happy to be proven wrong in this case i suppose, fusion is cool shit, both for enegery and propulsion, though its perpetually 10 years away lol
English
2
0
2
27
Truthful🛰️
Truthful🛰️@Truthful_ast·
How are people this incompetent? apparently to them it takes millions or years to reach Alpha Centauri???
Truthful🛰️ tweet media
English
46
9
426
17.4K
IshayuG
IshayuG@GIshayu·
@ZenkaiGoose What are these 4000 people playing? Whenever I search for an online match on Halo MCC I get nothing.
English
17
0
15
2K
Zenkai Goose
Zenkai Goose@ZenkaiGoose·
just bring back classic halo man
Zenkai Goose tweet media
English
74
73
2.1K
129.7K
Graham
Graham@Graham_117·
@rexthundercock Given that life on Earth started in the ocean, the galaxy could be full of ocean planets with intelligent life ("galaxy of dolphins") and we'd never know.
English
0
0
0
16