DEFENSE_MATRIX

@Marcellogus Calling it 0.5 m^2 average doesn't make it true. That's not data, it's guesswork. Coatings on 4th gen don't rewrite the geometry of engine exposure & external stores. Stealth isn't just a paint job-it's design bro. F-35/J-20 simply aren't in the same detection regime as Su-30.

ALL BULLSHITs! Radical RCS reductions have been applied to ALL such planes, so that the frontal AVERAGE ones of a Flanker/Fullback is now 0,5 sqmts. and the AVERAGE one of planes like the F-35 and J-20 is almost in the same ballpark (forget the 0,000... ines : those are maximum values). Only real difference is in the all around- one with 5gen having it all around while others got it only in the frontal one.

🇮🇳 Fighter jets-estimated Radar Cross Section (RCS) RCS=/=size. It depends on shape, engine visibility & materials. Rafale ~0.3-1 m^2 Tejas ~0.5–2 m^2 Mirage 2000 ~1-3 m^2 Su-30MKI ~4-12 m^2 MiG-29 ~5-15 m^2 Jaguar ~5-10+ m^2 MiG-21 ~2-5 m^2 Lower RCS➡️harder detection, not .

🇮🇳Indian Air Force maximum payload comparison💠 Rafale: 9500kg Su-30MKI: 8000kg Jaguar: 4500kg MiG-29: 4000kg Tejas: 3500kg MiG-21: 1500kg Max payload=/=lethality: mission load, weapons mix, and range decide real strike power.

Tejas Mk2 is being designed with a much lower frontal radar signature than the Mk1a. Project officials claim up to a 75% reduction in RCS, achieved through improved shaping, composites and stealth-focused design.

From jetpacks to robotic scouts-the battlefield is evolving. 🇮🇳

🇮🇳India's next kamikaze drones may be built for the Himalayas. The IAF has launched an indigenous long-range OWA-UAS program, retaining the platform's IPR. The requirement to operate at up to 16,000 ft at a system tailored for high-altitude warfare and shaped by recent conflicts.

📍MILITARY INFRASTRUCTURE COMPARISON ✈️ AIR BASES 🇨🇳 80-90 | 🇮🇳 60-70 ⚓ NAVAL BASES 🇨🇳 12-20 | 🇮🇳 8-12 🪖 MILITARY INSTALLATIONS 🇨🇳 350-500+ | 🇮🇳 300-400+ China's larger geography, force size and dual-use infrastructure contribute to higher numbers.

@ghostyboi6969 RCS isn't just size. Su-30 reflects more due to exposed engine faces, pylons and complex shaping. MiG-29 is smaller but still has open inlets and twin fins. Jaguar is cleaner but still carries stores externally & also they are pretty old jets.

@PASU_MATRIX Why such big for su30 and mig29 I mean su30 is big But mig29? And Jaguar?

@RanaSb_V2 Operational utility helicopters |defined as frontline troop transport and battlefield logistics platforms, excluding dedicated attack, naval ASW, and training helicopters| China 500-650.

@PASU_MATRIX Around 600 of the 1500+ are gunships, rest are utility helicopters. That's over 1000+ utility choppers excluding gunships.

Utility helicopters are the backbone of battlefield mobility, moving troops, supplies and casualties where roads can't reach. 🇨🇳China: 500-650 (Z-20, Z-9, Z-8/Z-18, Mi-17) 🇮🇳India: 550-600 (Dhruv, Mi-17 family, Cheetah, Chetak, LUH) India relies on helicopters for logistics.

@RanaSb_V2 its only utility helicopters.

@PASU_MATRIX China has over 1500 helicopters my j33t routledge.com/The-Military-B…

@junshiguancha1 Mocking a pilot who lost his life in the line of duty? That's low, even for a troll. Show some respect bro.

@PASU_MATRIX jaihind🤣 x.com/junshiguancha1…

🇨🇳 Y-20 vs 🇺🇸 C-17 Globemaster III -Crew: 3 | 3 -Payload: 66t | 77.5t -Troops: 300 | 134 -Max Speed: 900 | 830 km\h -Service Ceiling: 43,000 | 45,000 ft -MTOW: 220t | 265t -Range: 4,500 | 4,400 km Y-20 often called as a copy of C-17 due to its structural similarities.

@junshiguancha1 you are using 3rd grade physics to explain why planes have wings. The thing is your argument is with no explanation and credible argument. and India 76 IQ Bro China had to steal C-17 blueprints because their 104 IQ couldn't design their own transport. lol 😸how dumb you are bro

@PASU_MATRIX Low-IQ morons naturally cannot grasp the logic of high-IQ individuals: wheels must be round, triangular structures offer the greatest stability, and a straight line is the shortest distance between two points. Physical laws dictate everything.😝

@junshiguancha1 Why he got engines for power, wings for lift, tail fins for stability control, and cargo holds for loading goods. Why can't be same 😁.you are just with no logic and no credible argument. Lollllllll 😆

@PASU_MATRIX Also, the picture you posted is of a C-5 Galaxy transport aircraft, not a C-17; there is a huge difference between the two, you low-IQ moron.

Steel above, courage below.

IAF MiG-27 Bahadurs lined up with the Indian Navy's Tu-142M in the background.

IAF Squadron Shortage -Fighters: 29-31 operational | 42 required | Gap: 11-13 squadrons -AWACS: 5 operational | 15-18 needed | Gap: 10-13 aircraft -Tankers; 6 operational | 12-18 needed | Gap: 6-12 aircraft Airpower is built through planning, not promises.

@junshiguancha1 the issue was whether the Y-20 is commonly perceived as resembling the C-17, not whether transport aircraft need engines to function. Next time, try addressing what was actually said instead of arguing with the version you invented in your head.

@PASU_MATRIX You Low-IQ idiot Their structures are similar because they are both transport aircraft, requiring engines for power, wings for lift, tail fins for stability control, and cargo holds for loading goods.🤣

@junshiguancha1 I said it's often called a copy due to structural similarities, and many Americans make that claim. If you can't distinguish between reporting a perception and endorsing it, don't lecture others about IQ.

@PASU_MATRIX You low-IQ idiots! The US isn't the only country with transport aircraft; China previously purchased Russian Il-76 transport aircraft, and we also borrowed some design elements from that platform. not C-17

If selected, the KC-390 could become the first foreign military transport aircraft manufactured in India. 🇧🇷 Brazil's Embraer says Indian engineers would train in Brazil while local production and MRO capabilities are built in India. Beyond aircraft, this is a transfer of tech.

China's military satellite network drives global ISR, navigation and command reach with continuous space coverage. 🇨🇳China: 100+ (Yaogan, Gaofen, Beidou, Tianlian) 🇮🇳India: 10–20 (Cartosat, RISAT, GSAT-7, NavIC) India stays focused on regional security, not global coverage.