Marcello Gusberti🖤

14.9K posts

Marcello Gusberti🖤

Marcello Gusberti🖤

@Marcellogus

🇮🇹🖤

Novara Katılım Mayıs 2011
166 Takip Edilen153 Takipçiler
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
@MDolcinelli Nessuno ma proprio nessuno che abbia ipotizzato che ai giocatori italiani di un certo livello l'idea di andare in nazionale provochi quasi fastidio perché vista come secondaria rispetto ad altri impegni con il club?
Italiano
0
0
0
10
Marco Dolcinelli
Marco Dolcinelli@MDolcinelli·
In questi mesi, mi sono divertito a spulciare i commenti su Instagram per trovare il motivo della crisi della nostra nazionale Quella di seguito è una lista (in continuo aggiornamento) di tutti i motivi che ho trovato per cui non andiamo ai mondiali da un decennio
Italiano
6
23
356
47.6K
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
Avrà compiuto un "Hard Landing" da qualche parte dell'Iran o dell'Arabia Saudita come l'F-35 di qualche giorno fa. Non è neanche tanto importante a dirla tutta, danneggiato od abbattuto che esso sia comunque la pretesa Air Dominance che gli Statunitensi avevano qualche giorno fa frettolosamente proclamato, semplicemente o non si è proprio verificata o non ha comunque tenuto nel tempo (come pure non si è mai ottenuta da ormai quattro anni in Ucraina, ciò a dire che è un impossibilità pratica di fronte a nuove tattiche non dipendente da chi tenti di imporla).
Italiano
0
0
0
2
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
@mmjukic Marko, it's the same people that thing in its majority that a Stealth plane is REALLY invisible...
English
0
0
0
10
Marko Jukic
Marko Jukic@mmjukic·
At least 30% of the population believe the President of the United States is some kind of Superman-like demigod who can control all world events with his mind or a strongly-worded order to an omnipotent U.S. government that has access to alien technology and financial magic.
English
15
54
654
80.5K
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
@alebaccio @ZebraSbatta VERO. L'ultimo lotto di F-15E dell'USAF è stato consegnato nel 2000 (ed erano solo una manciata, aggiunti ad un ordine estero per ottimizzare la produttività).
Italiano
0
0
0
5
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
@ZebraSbatta Mentre i modernissimi F-35 sono degli incassatori formidabili: secondo il rapporto ufficiale effettuano "hard landings" nel bel mezzo del deserto arabico senza bisogno di una pista e nemmeno tirare fuori il carrello di atterraggio. Olè!
Italiano
0
0
1
5
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
@sadisticplatypi @ArmchairW Man, doesn't imitate their own ('Murican) chauvinism: A-10 is a great CAS plane and the same designers of Su-25 eagerly admitted this. Just it didn't fit their own military doctrine and tactical needs, so they stuck with their own and the American with their.
English
0
0
0
8
The Dim Palace 呆率宫
The Dim Palace 呆率宫@sadisticplatypi·
@ArmchairW the comparison is not really fair, the a-10 made bad trade offs for a gun that does not out perform the su25 without using DU rounds. the gun is Obsolete back in 1980 the a10 is terribly slow, hard to maintain, and cannot operate on dirt strips like the su25.
English
1
0
9
646
Armchair Warlord
Armchair Warlord@ArmchairW·
I actually tend to disagree on this, Su-25s have proven extremely useful aircraft in Ukraine... albeit generally in tactical situations in which a 30mm cannon would be dead weight. In modern war standoff means survivability and you get zero passes over the target.
Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️@cirnosad

Follow back @JucheAffirmer the boomeroids got them for mocking the A-10. I like the plane but hate the culture around it. Look, this thing is obsolete and is used to harass people who don’t have air defenses. In large numbers they were meant to be used to knock out tanks along the Fulda gap under the AirLand battle doctrine. The US didn’t build more, because they became obsolete in the world of A2AD. If these things were used anywhere near Iran they would be turned to scrap. Even though they’re sitting on runways Iran could target, they so far haven’t even wasted a Shahed drone to target them. They’re that low in priority. The A-10 is basically a flying boomer, struggling to stay alive and relevant, complete with the 80s VHS tapes and the synth and rock music backing it. Just get over this plane and grow up boomers.

English
31
30
458
40.7K
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
Man, you have demonstrated already your own abyssal ignorance on the argument with the affirmation of the Su-25 having not an internal cannon (yes, they could add gun pods also...). Please, don't keep drown yourself further. Toss bombing is a decades old method of dropping ordnances, being them bombs or rockets. And please, read something about aviation instead of just look on YouTube.
English
0
0
0
14
svgmzr
svgmzr@svgmzr·
@Marcellogus @ArmchairW There are multiple videos of toss firing rockets but very few videos of the results. It’s incredibly ineffective way to deliver explosives and not how Su-25 was designed to operate
English
1
0
0
11
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
@svgmzr @chickenhawkwork @ArmchairW MAN, are you just joking? The Su-25 cannon in a pod? And naturally they could use IR missiles like R-60 and R-73. Some versions could even carry an aerial radar in a pod (although it was never acquired by anyone).
English
0
0
0
16
svgmzr
svgmzr@svgmzr·
@chickenhawkwork @ArmchairW Su-25 doesn’t have a sight to engage aerial targets as far as I remember its gun is located in a pod, it’s an afterthought
English
2
0
0
29
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
MAN, sorry to delude you but this is EXACTLY the way that Su-25 have operated from day one of their entry in service: rockets (or to use the Sov/Russian denomination Unguided Missiles) were always their weapon of choice, cannon came second. The toss bombing is a further refinements of tactic due to the uses of the SVD-24 computerized aiming system.
English
1
0
0
18
svgmzr
svgmzr@svgmzr·
@ArmchairW All the videos of Su-25s from both sides is them firing rockets into the sky, they never engage targets as they were supposed to
English
2
0
0
257
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
Such planes (because there are things like Su-25 or AMX also in the same niche) could be extremely useful still now against drones because they are designed by default to stay low and slow for long periods. Remain to see if such a capacity ALONE would be enough to keep them in service.
English
0
0
0
8
John Lendabarker
John Lendabarker@JLendabarker·
@ArmchairW The A-10 isn't obsolete. Doctrine is. This could be an amazing long range drone killer. Especially if there is success at upgrading 70mm rockets into mini air to air weapons.
English
1
0
3
795
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
No, the same fact of compare one to the other directly has no sense. They occupy the same tactical niche (actually very narrow: there are them two, the Impala MkI and the AMX Ghibli) but they perform their own mission differently. And they are counter intuitive: they have to be capable to go slow and low to perform their own mission. Su-25 is not even pressurized, so it could not go over 6000 meters
English
0
0
0
18
Aegis Enjoyer
Aegis Enjoyer@Gundamator·
@ArmchairW The SU-25 has a good bit more speed which makes it a lot more viable in my opinion. The A-10 is just very slow and bogged down by the gun.
English
3
1
36
1.5K
Brandon Weichert
Brandon Weichert@WeTheBrandon·
FUN FACT: In 2006, the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) had a meeting with then-President George W. Bush and his top national security advisers in which they explained how insanely stupid it was to initiate a war against Iran. That was when there tens of thousands of combat troops sandwiching Iran in neighboring Afghanistan and Iraq. Today, we have no such footprint and the US military's logistical crisis is worst than it was 20 years ago.
English
12
117
703
29.7K
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
@iwelsh Still, the question remain: all those things would happen anyway even without this. Trump mandate would end 2028/9, so he will not have to pay for this mess.
English
0
0
0
20
Ian Welsh
Ian Welsh@iwelsh·
After the Iran war: 1) Global American Empire is over; 2) in ten years, missiles/drones will mean South American can resist America. 3) China and its allies will soon be the 1st world. 4) Europe/Anglos will slide into 2nd world status 5) European multi-century dominance over.
English
10
60
303
11.5K
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
@John_ForemanCBE And the worst thing its that all those thing would with all probabilities happen AFTER that Trump has left its own office...
English
0
0
0
6
John Foreman CBE
John Foreman CBE@John_ForemanCBE·
I agree and would add: 6. The US military is going to take years to recover from this daft war. The huge consumption of weapons, strain to the carrier and air force, overdue maintenance and disruption to force readiness will bite soon. 7. Trump is doing lasting damage to the Republic and its long established network of allies. Starting the war then pleading for support then calling them cowards won’t be easily forgotten abroad and will accelerate wider efforts to pivot away from a capricious friend. What a shitshow
Daniel DePetris@DanDePetris

Some fundamental things to remember as the Iran War hits Week 4: 1. Iran was not an “imminent” threat to the United States: its nuclear program was heavily degraded during the June strikes; it had no ICBM capability to speak of; and Iran’s medium to short-range ballistic missiles we’re only a threat if the U.S. attacked the country. This entire crisis is manufactured. 2. The Strait of Hormuz was always a leverage point for the Iranians. It was Tehran’s biggest card, and it turns out the regime was more than happy to play it if it believed its survival was at stake. Every war game known to man anticipated this, yet the Trump administration was apparently caught flat-footed to the point where it’s now allowing other countries to purchase Iranian oil to help calm the market. This policy change could net the regime another $14 billion, which means we’re now essentially funding the very adversary we’re currently fighting. Either Trump and his advisers don’t read or they’re laughably incompetent. Maybe both. 3. Congress has been pathetic throughout this entire ordeal. Not only has it failed to debate and authorize the war, but the congressional leadership has refused to even schedule open hearings to talk about it. And I’ll remind everybody that the war is almost one-month old. Mike Johnson, John Thune and the chairman of the various national security committees ought to be ashamed of themselves for turning a once-proud institution into a rubber stamp body of useless specimens that can’t even do the most basic thing imaginable: oversight. 4. Trump’s decision to wage war in Iran is now undermining other aspects of his foreign policy. Russia is taking advantage of higher oil prices to fund the war in Ukraine, which makes Trump’s desire to strike a settlement there virtually impossible. China is happy to see the U.S. military bottled up in the Middle East yet again—I’ve lost track of how many U.S. military assets have been re-deployed out of Asia. And because Middle East oil is not a sure thing anymore, China will probably buy more from Russia, further solidifying the relationship between two powers that Trump would like to pull apart (although we can debate whether this would even be possible). 5. Finally, the war exposes just how little we’ve learned as a country. People have short memories. The same public intellectuals and former officials who rooted for the war in Iraq are also rooting for the war in Iran. The same assumptions—the U.S. can will a new Middle East into existence—still hover over U.S. foreign policy like a bad cold.

English
25
87
608
83.7K
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
@BamaBonds Man , they would charge an admission fee for entering and exiting the Gulf (and only through their own water)...
English
0
0
0
2
Will Slaughter
Will Slaughter@BamaBonds·
If Iran is willing to let Japanese, Chinese, Indian, and possibly Korean vessels transit the SoH, the “closure” quickly becomes a non-issue with Saudi & Iraq able to divert 7-10 mmb/d via pipelines to the benefit of non-favored nations.
Bloomberg@business

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the nation is prepared to allow Japanese-related vessels to pass through the Strait of Hormuz after consultations between the countries’ officials, according to Kyodo News bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

English
75
125
916
194.1K
Phil
Phil@BO3673·
I’m not great military strategist but sometimes on this platform I feel like I’m looking at different maps to everyone else. The US has shown no appetite to even risk LCS let alone an ARG going through the strait.
Matt Bracken@Matt_Bracken48

Will somebody please explain to me how, with the Strait of Hormuz a no-go-zone for the U.S. Navy, and our warships driven out of the Persian Gulf, we can support a USMC amphibious landing on Kharg Island, 750 miles from the eastern tip of Oman?🧵 Is the Tripoli Amphibious Ready Group going to storm into the Persian Gulf, where our Burke-class destroyers won't go? Obviously not. This idea is insane. How about by helo and tilt-rotor? Out of range. What if they stage in Kuwait or Saudi Arabia for helo and Osprey lifts across the Gulf? Russia and China will tell Iran where to aim their drones and missiles while the force is assembling. Maybe a mass paradrop? Straight into an "Alamo" siege. Great idea. Not. What if the Marines just capture some of those "small" islands in the Strait of Hormuz? Qeshm is bigger than Okinawa. Larak is bigger than Iwo Jima. Any idea how many Marines and Soldiers it took to conquer just those 2 islands, at what cost in KIA and WIA? I keep reading absolute MORONS on X telling how some A-10s are "softening up" an area larger than South Vietnam, so that a few thousand Marines can attack and hold . . . what? It's as if space aliens studying only still images had no sense of scale of earth creatures, and thought a mouse could eat an elephant. It boggles my mind.

English
3
0
20
1.3K
Marcello Gusberti🖤
Marcello Gusberti🖤@Marcellogus·
NO, just not. Absolutely and totally not. It was not designed as an Aircraft Carrier at all. It was an heavily armed aircraft carrier cruiser like previous Doria and Vittorio Veneto class. Just with a full deck so to use also Harriers. A little more research, please.
English
0
0
0
25
Alex Luck
Alex Luck@AlexLuck9·
Even if you could conjure up a rationale for a maritime aviation support platform or "mothership", the problem remains that Garibaldi is a 40 year old aircraft carrier, designed to operate as an aircraft carrier. The acquisition really doesnt "add up". thediplomat.com/2026/03/why-in…
English
17
15
142
9.8K