


Pr Chabriere
44.6K posts

@Pr_Chabriere_e
Professeur biochimie opinions personnelles Informations et humour contre le pessimisme lanceur d'alertes








bonne question... :) car ils seraient passibles de poursuites pour parjure ce qui est un crime fédéral aux USA. Et ceux qui osent sont sous serment - ce qui am`ne un détail subtil - vous croyez que vraiment que si Hazan ou Dalgleish mentaient, leurs ennemis rateraient l'occasion de les faire condamner pour parjure - ils auraeint faciles, il leur suffirait de donner les "oreuves' via un avocat et de déposer une plainte Ce simple fait est ENORME et va peser dans la balance dans un futur proche! Pour el moment certains sont en train de jouer dans la coulisse pour tenter d'acheter des gens dans l'administration .. mais ils n'ont pas bcp de succès!



Il y a des gens qui font le tour du monde pour trouver une plage comme celle-ci… À Marseille, on a juste à sortir de chez nous 🤷🏻♂️ (et prendre le tramway, puis le métro, puis le bus, puis marcher 40 minutes)


It is unacceptable to be referred to publicly as a “fraudulent tw*t” and I hope other scientists wake up because this could affect you too if it hasn’t already.

🚨 Irrefutable Pattern of Malicious Conduct & Self-Incrimination Leonid Schneider – Key Perpetrator of the PubPeer “PubSmear” Network Mob The following elements, taken together, demonstrate a clear, long-standing, and escalating course of sadistic, contemptuous, and criminal behavior directed against the academic community: 1. Foundational Academic Fraud (2008) Insertion of an obscene, insulting cartoon (a professor giving the middle finger to a student) into his doctoral thesis submitted to Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, falsely labeled and presented as Figure 10 – “schematic structure of the retroviral expression vector.” → Permanent archive in the official university library database → prima facie evidence of deliberate misrepresentation in an official academic qualification document. 2. Persistent Sadistic Ad Hominem & Defamatory Attacks In recent blog publications targeting a senior U.S. cancer researcher and journal editor-in-chief, Schneider deploys extraordinarily derogatory personal insults and unsubstantiated grave accusations: “scientifically illiterate” “pathetic whiny wuss” “dumb as two bricks” “compulsive liar and manipulator” “massive fraud,” “manipulated data in every paper,” deliberate publication in own journal to “avoid rejection from incompetent editors” → Language and accusations of this nature and intensity strongly support criminal liability under German law (where the individual resides in Erlensee, 63526, within the Frankfurt Rhine-Main Metropolitan Area): • §185 StGB (Insult) – up to 1 year imprisonment or fine (escalating to up to 2 years if committed publicly, by dissemination, or in a meeting) • §187 StGB (Intentional Defamation / Verleumdung) – up to 2 years imprisonment or fine • §238 StGB (Cyberstalking) – persistent targeted digital harassment: up to 3 years imprisonment • Potential civil claims under BGB personality rights (§823, §1004, §253) for injunctive relief and compensation for reputational and emotional harm (awards typically range from several thousand to tens of thousands of euros, depending on severity, reach, and proven damage) 3. Public Self-Implicating Statement on Reported Cybercrime Bluesky post: “That was me, Wafik. I caused both the cyberattacks of your Oncotarget, and the vaccine-induced cancers. Boahahaha.” → Made in direct temporal and personal context of the journal’s public report of sustained malicious DDoS attacks (Dec 2025 – Jan 2026), formally notified to the FBI, with expressed suspicion of PubPeer-associated individuals. → Regardless of claimed satirical intent, the statement objectively constitutes a claim of responsibility (or knowing false claim) in relation to a federally investigated cyber incident → may serve as a significant lead or evidentiary item in any U.S. federal investigation, including under applicable laws such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. § 1030) should actual involvement be established, and/or in connection with provisions addressing false statements to authorities. ⚠️ Taken as a whole, this is not isolated misconduct: It is a coherent, multi-decade pattern beginning with documented fraud in an official doctoral record, continuing through years of sadistic, insult-laden, ad-hominem online campaigns, and now including a public declaration that can reasonably be read as claiming involvement in a serious cyberattack under active federal investigation. 🔱⚖️ German authorities (@BMI_Bund @BAMF_Dialog): The above documented conduct – commencing with alleged fraud at the point of obtaining academic credentials in Germany and extending to current potentially criminal online activity – provides compelling grounds for a full review of the immigration and naturalization file (Jewish Kontingentflüchtlinge program admission as minor → subsequent citizenship). 🔱 Victims & institutions: • Secure and preserve all digital evidence immediately • Obtain formal legal advice in Germany and/or the United States • Consider parallel criminal complaints (StGB §§ 185, 187, 238) and civil proceedings (BGB/AGG damages) • Report cyber-aspect implications to FBI IC3 for cross-border coordination 🧵 Continue to prior evidentiary thread 🔱 Follow @SciGuardians for ongoing documentation of accountability measures. @SecKennedy @DrJBhattacharya @SenRonJohnson @disclosetv @ABridgen @GrueneBundestag @Die_Gruenen @HHU_de @BBarucker @reitschuster @jreichelt @AaronSiriSG @HHS_ORI @NIH @C0PE @UKRIO @ClarivateAG



It is unacceptable to be referred to publicly as a “fraudulent tw*t” and I hope other scientists wake up because this could affect you too if it hasn’t already.



Le petit Kevin est attendu par son papa @Marc_Doyer à la caisse. Kevin, il va falloir payer maintenant. Guillaume et Detlefsen sont génereux avec les cagnotes. Ils peuvent prendre en charge les frais d'avocat. C'est normal qu'il soit payé pour son travail.


Dans cet épisode "Les Pieds Nickelés pharmaciens", le trio fait plein de bêtises mais au final ils font un profit considérable et tout à fait inattendu pour eux. Comme quoi le crime paye parfois.





Pourquoi les experts qui ont défendus les vaccins, mêmes ceux reconus comme dangereux, ne vont pas au sénat américain pour défendre, sous serment, les vertus des vaccins en racontant les mêmes bêtises qu'a la télé.