Wex
805 posts















Hey Bittensor, We set out to build something we believed didn’t exist yet and would be an essential product in the future. And right now, we’re at real risk of deregistration. And it hurts more than we expected it to. When we came to @opentensor, it wasn’t for the economics. It was because we believed this was a network that could support work that’s early, technically demanding, and worth building. @Loosh_ai was never meant to be easy to explain in one sentence. Part of the challenge has been explaining something that spans multiple disciplines, without losing clarity along the way. We’re working on memory, reasoning, and emotional understanding in machines - not as features, but as foundations. For machines that can remember what happened yesterday, weigh difficult decisions, and behave appropriately in real-world environments without being told exactly what to do in every situation. It sounds ambitious because it is. But it’s also ambitious because the world it’s built for is only just starting to emerge. We’re moving from systems that respond, to systems that act. The robotics market may not be fully here yet. But the underlying problem is, and we’re already seeing how it’s beginning to play out. Systems that follow instructions too literally, systems that drift outside their intended scope, systems that behave correctly in isolation, but incorrectly - sometimes even dangerously - in context: these aren’t edge cases, they’re structural. Which means they won’t go away on their own. Right now, almost all approaches try to solve this by adding more rules, more constraints, more output checks. We think that’s not enough. In some cases, it may even be the wrong direction. There's a version of this that ends well. Robots enter homes, hospitals, and hospitality at scale. The question of trust - whether they can remember, reason, and act ethically - is a central question in AI. And someone will need to have built the foundations for that. We wanted that someone to have been us. Here. In this network. We understand how incentive mechanisms work. We understand why holders move toward what’s measurable today. That’s rational. But it does raise a question about what Bittensor is for. At its best, it’s a frontier, a place where difficult, important, demanding problems can be worked on before they’re obvious. We're not asking for blind support. We're asking for a little more time and the chance to prove this direction in a way that’s visible. In the short term, we’re focused on improving miner response quality on a hard timeline. And later this week, we’ll release a whitepaper outlining a new framework for how to define and enforce the boundaries of agentic systems. We don’t think this problem is solved yet. And we don’t think it’s optional. That’s why we’re still here, and still building. If you believe in what we’re trying to do, now is the moment to back us. And we’re grateful to everyone who’s been with us along the way.



@IamRamenPanda 谁的空军,海军没了?谁被长期制裁了?你个大傻逼你没看到这些大的方向吗。

tao链开始火起来了 如何玩转tao链?搞了一个教程 1⃣准备钱包Talisman 🔗chromewebstore.google.com/detail/talisma… 2⃣币安或者bg买tao代币,直接充值Bittensor链 3⃣把Talisman钱包里面tao跨链到okx钱包上 🔗tao.app/bridge tao链目前几个比较火的 1⃣第一个meme(目前价格0.0000007u) 电报群中午发的已经50个点 brain.fun/token/0xb24495… 2⃣第一个nft punk(当前价格0.19tao) taopunks.com/marketplace






















