Scorpion King

0

11

Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster·1h

@DisculpemeCock @invertedworld9 You don’t need nasa to know the earth is a sphere, dip shit 😂🖕

English

Flerfspective@Flerfspective

0

10

Inversion@invertedworld9·12h

Nonsensical pseudoscience.

Français

46

4

37

2.1K

Scorpion King me-retweet

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·4d

🚨 GLOBETARD TURD ALERT🚨 Here’s your fucking math, you dishonest prick. We do not need the Sun to reach a literal geometric 0.01° elevation angle for it to appear to set. On a flat plane, sunset occurs primarily through perspective compression + atmospheric extinction and scattering, not pure Euclidean geometry. But since you’re demanding raw trig like a midwit, here it is: Assume Sun altitude h = 3,500 miles (a commonly cited realistic Flat Earth value). We want the apparent elevation angle θ to drop to 0.1° or lower. Using basic perspective: tan(θ) = h / d → d = h / tan(θ) For θ = 0.1°: tan(0.1°) ≈ 0.001745 d = 3500 / 0.001745 ≈ 2,005,731 miles For θ = 0.05°: tan(0.05°) ≈ 0.0008727 d = 3500 / 0.0008727 ≈ 4,010,000 miles For θ = 0.01°: tan(0.01°) ≈ 0.0001745 d = 3500 / 0.0001745 ≈ 20,057,306 miles So yes — purely geometric perspective requires large distances for extremely low angles. No one disputes that. But here’s where you’re a fucking retard: Sunset is not defined by the Sun reaching a perfect 0.01° geometric elevation. In reality, the Sun appears to set when its upper limb reaches the horizon due to a combination of: 1. Perspective compression (angular elevation dropping) 2. Atmospheric density gradient (light bending downward via refraction) 3. Scattering and extinction (Rayleigh + Mie scattering removing shorter wavelengths and dimming the disk) 4. Resolution limit of the human eye/camera These effects cause the Sun to visibly disappear at much higher geometric angles than your pure trig suggests — often when the geometric elevation is still between 0.5° to 0.1°, depending on atmospheric conditions. This is why we see the Sun “set” while still having significant angular size, and why the disk doesn’t shrink to a point before vanishing. Your demand for the Sun to physically travel 22 million miles is based on the false premise that sunset requires a literal 0.01° geometric angle with no atmospheric effects. That premise is garbage. The math you’re so proud of only “disproves” a cartoon version of Flat Earth that no serious person holds. Conclusion: The trigonometry is correct. Your understanding of how it applies to a real atmosphere + perspective on a flat plane is dogshit. The Sun does not need to fly 22 million miles away. It circles locally above the plane, and perspective + real atmospheric optics make it disappear at the horizon exactly as observed. Now stop pretending your high-school trig is some profound refutation. The plane is flat. The Sun is local. Your argument is still retarded. 🫡 #Flatearth

@DisculpemeCock @rightorrightnow Show me the math that leads to a sub -.1° angle with a sun at 3,500 miles above a flat surface @DisculpemeCock. No excuses, no opinions, just the math. Or, show integrity and admit it can’t, especially when including angular size, and atmospheric effects.

English

2

1.9K

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·1h

@jacuzzi_toaster @_free_f0rever_ @benwehrman 🖕

How Ships “Disappear Hull First” – Flat Earth Explanation What you’re seeing is not the Earth’s curvature hiding the hull. It’s basic perspective on a flat plane. Here’s what actually happens: 1. As a ship sails away from you across the flat ocean, its angular size gets smaller and smaller. 2. The bottom of the ship (the hull) gets closer to the vanishing point (the horizon) faster than the top (the masts or superstructure). 3. At a certain distance, the hull drops below the resolution limit of your eyes or camera. It blends into the horizon line and “disappears.” The upper parts are still visible because they are higher up and have not yet reached that same vanishing threshold. 4. When you zoom in with a good optical zoom (not digital), you increase the angular resolution. The hull reappears. This is called the Black Swan Effect and has been recorded thousands of times. Why this is NOT curvature: • If the hull was physically blocked by the curve of the Earth, no amount of zoom could bring it back. Light rays from the hidden part would never reach you — they’d be blocked by the “bulge” of water. • Since zooming consistently restores the full ship (including the hull), there is no physical obstruction. It’s purely a matter of perspective and resolution. Simple analogy: Imagine watching a car drive away on a long flat road. The wheels disappear first, then the body, while the roof is visible longer. The road isn’t curving downward — it’s just perspective. The same thing happens with ships on the flat ocean. Bottom line: Ships disappear hull-first due to: • Perspective compression • Decreasing angular size • The vanishing point at the horizon • Limits of human/camera resolution Not because of curvature. This is one of the easiest Flat Earth proofs to verify yourself. Take a good camera with optical zoom to the coast and watch what happens when a ship “disappears.” Zoom in. The hull comes back. Curvature can’t be reversed by magnification. Perspective can. The Earth is flat. The “hull-first disappearance” is perspective, not proof of a ball. Look here see??? Fuck you 🖕🖕🫡😂 #Flatearth

QME

0

1

33

Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster·3d

@_free_f0rever_ @benwehrman Learn how refraction works, dipshit.

English

0

30

₿en Wehrman@benwehrman·3d

How Light Refraction Works at Long Distances (There Is No Curve)

English

5

13

53

4.3K

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·1h

@jacuzzi_toaster @Dugi144 @benwehrman 🖕

How Ships “Disappear Hull First” – Flat Earth Explanation What you’re seeing is not the Earth’s curvature hiding the hull. It’s basic perspective on a flat plane. Here’s what actually happens: 1. As a ship sails away from you across the flat ocean, its angular size gets smaller and smaller. 2. The bottom of the ship (the hull) gets closer to the vanishing point (the horizon) faster than the top (the masts or superstructure). 3. At a certain distance, the hull drops below the resolution limit of your eyes or camera. It blends into the horizon line and “disappears.” The upper parts are still visible because they are higher up and have not yet reached that same vanishing threshold. 4. When you zoom in with a good optical zoom (not digital), you increase the angular resolution. The hull reappears. This is called the Black Swan Effect and has been recorded thousands of times. Why this is NOT curvature: • If the hull was physically blocked by the curve of the Earth, no amount of zoom could bring it back. Light rays from the hidden part would never reach you — they’d be blocked by the “bulge” of water. • Since zooming consistently restores the full ship (including the hull), there is no physical obstruction. It’s purely a matter of perspective and resolution. Simple analogy: Imagine watching a car drive away on a long flat road. The wheels disappear first, then the body, while the roof is visible longer. The road isn’t curving downward — it’s just perspective. The same thing happens with ships on the flat ocean. Bottom line: Ships disappear hull-first due to: • Perspective compression • Decreasing angular size • The vanishing point at the horizon • Limits of human/camera resolution Not because of curvature. This is one of the easiest Flat Earth proofs to verify yourself. Take a good camera with optical zoom to the coast and watch what happens when a ship “disappears.” Zoom in. The hull comes back. Curvature can’t be reversed by magnification. Perspective can. The Earth is flat. The “hull-first disappearance” is perspective, not proof of a ball. Look here see??? Fuck you 🖕🖕🫡😂 #Flatearth

QME

1

Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster·17h

@Dugi144 @benwehrman Keep being a reality denying flatard, doesn’t change anything.

English

3

0

14

₿en Wehrman@benwehrman·3d

"If sunsets are just the sun leaving our perspective on a flat plane...then how come it doesn't noticeably shrink down in size as it disappears over the horizon?" Short answer: The water vapor in the atmosphere creates a magnification effect. ATMOSPHERIC LENSING explained 👇

₿en Wehrman@benwehrman

The Law of Perspective Explained - Why boats, and the Sun appear to "disappear over a curve" TLDR: these distant objects are simply leaving our field of view on the great Earth plane. [🎥: Terry Eicher]

English

26

8

61

6.1K

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·1h

@jacuzzi_toaster @Dugi144 @benwehrman 🖕

How Ships “Disappear Hull First” – Flat Earth Explanation What you’re seeing is not the Earth’s curvature hiding the hull. It’s basic perspective on a flat plane. Here’s what actually happens: 1. As a ship sails away from you across the flat ocean, its angular size gets smaller and smaller. 2. The bottom of the ship (the hull) gets closer to the vanishing point (the horizon) faster than the top (the masts or superstructure). 3. At a certain distance, the hull drops below the resolution limit of your eyes or camera. It blends into the horizon line and “disappears.” The upper parts are still visible because they are higher up and have not yet reached that same vanishing threshold. 4. When you zoom in with a good optical zoom (not digital), you increase the angular resolution. The hull reappears. This is called the Black Swan Effect and has been recorded thousands of times. Why this is NOT curvature: • If the hull was physically blocked by the curve of the Earth, no amount of zoom could bring it back. Light rays from the hidden part would never reach you — they’d be blocked by the “bulge” of water. • Since zooming consistently restores the full ship (including the hull), there is no physical obstruction. It’s purely a matter of perspective and resolution. Simple analogy: Imagine watching a car drive away on a long flat road. The wheels disappear first, then the body, while the roof is visible longer. The road isn’t curving downward — it’s just perspective. The same thing happens with ships on the flat ocean. Bottom line: Ships disappear hull-first due to: • Perspective compression • Decreasing angular size • The vanishing point at the horizon • Limits of human/camera resolution Not because of curvature. This is one of the easiest Flat Earth proofs to verify yourself. Take a good camera with optical zoom to the coast and watch what happens when a ship “disappears.” Zoom in. The hull comes back. Curvature can’t be reversed by magnification. Perspective can. The Earth is flat. The “hull-first disappearance” is perspective, not proof of a ball. Look here see??? Fuck you 🖕🖕🫡😂 #Flatearth

QME

1

Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster·8h

@Dugi144 @benwehrman Obviously the state of the air isn’t always the same, dumbass.

English

0

7

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·1h

@jacuzzi_toaster @SocialismIsCrap @Macropulse98 @stats_feed 🖕

fuck you and look your stupid 👇 “Theodolites falsify flat earth, simple as that.” Lmao this is peak glober delusion. You’re showing a theodolite view with a horizontal line (perpendicular to the plumb bob) and claiming the space between that line and the horizon is “Earth curving downward.” That’s not curvature. That’s you not understanding basic instrument calibration and perspective. Here’s what’s actually happening: The theodolite’s “horizontal” line is set relative to local gravity (the plumb bob). On a flat plane with uniform downward acceleration, that line is parallel to the surface. However, due to perspective, the distant horizon naturally appears slightly below true eye level as distance increases — even on a perfectly flat plane. This is basic angular perspective geometry. The “horizon drop” you’re celebrating is not geometric curvature. Real geometric horizon dip on a globe at even moderate altitudes should be several degrees (for example, ~2.8–3.1° at 35,000 ft). What we actually measure with leveled instruments at altitude is far less than that — often under 1° or even indistinguishable from zero when properly calibrated. Professional surveyors and high-altitude balloon teams using precision theodolites have repeatedly shown the horizon stays remarkably close to eye level, exactly as expected on a flat plane. Your screenshot proves nothing except that: 1. You don’t understand the difference between a plumb-bob horizontal and geometric curvature. 2. You’re desperate to call any tiny angular difference “proof of curvature” while ignoring that the predicted globe drop is orders of magnitude larger. If the Earth were truly curving at 8 inches per mile squared, the horizon would drop dramatically with altitude. It doesn’t. The horizon rises to eye level and stays nearly level at all heights — mountains, planes, and balloons. That’s what actual observations show. Theodolites don’t falsify Flat Earth. They expose how desperately you have to misinterpret basic optics and instrument readings to prop up your spinning ball fantasy. The Earth is flat. The horizon stays level. Your curvature remains imaginary. Cope harder with your cherry-picked theodolite screenshots, GLOBETARD 😂 🫡

QME

6

Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster·6d

Here’s a measurement from a theodolite showing the dip angle to the horizon. On the left side you can see that the device is level and on the right you see the measured dip angle. Flat earth falsified. You can do the math to derive the radius from the information included in the image.

English

0

57

World of Statistics@stats_feed·6d

Do you believe the Earth is a sphere?

English

323

82

310

91.9K

Scorpion King me-retweet

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·2 May

fuck you and look your stupid 👇 “Theodolites falsify flat earth, simple as that.” Lmao this is peak glober delusion. You’re showing a theodolite view with a horizontal line (perpendicular to the plumb bob) and claiming the space between that line and the horizon is “Earth curving downward.” That’s not curvature. That’s you not understanding basic instrument calibration and perspective. Here’s what’s actually happening: The theodolite’s “horizontal” line is set relative to local gravity (the plumb bob). On a flat plane with uniform downward acceleration, that line is parallel to the surface. However, due to perspective, the distant horizon naturally appears slightly below true eye level as distance increases — even on a perfectly flat plane. This is basic angular perspective geometry. The “horizon drop” you’re celebrating is not geometric curvature. Real geometric horizon dip on a globe at even moderate altitudes should be several degrees (for example, ~2.8–3.1° at 35,000 ft). What we actually measure with leveled instruments at altitude is far less than that — often under 1° or even indistinguishable from zero when properly calibrated. Professional surveyors and high-altitude balloon teams using precision theodolites have repeatedly shown the horizon stays remarkably close to eye level, exactly as expected on a flat plane. Your screenshot proves nothing except that: 1. You don’t understand the difference between a plumb-bob horizontal and geometric curvature. 2. You’re desperate to call any tiny angular difference “proof of curvature” while ignoring that the predicted globe drop is orders of magnitude larger. If the Earth were truly curving at 8 inches per mile squared, the horizon would drop dramatically with altitude. It doesn’t. The horizon rises to eye level and stays nearly level at all heights — mountains, planes, and balloons. That’s what actual observations show. Theodolites don’t falsify Flat Earth. They expose how desperately you have to misinterpret basic optics and instrument readings to prop up your spinning ball fantasy. The Earth is flat. The horizon stays level. Your curvature remains imaginary. Cope harder with your cherry-picked theodolite screenshots, GLOBETARD 😂 🫡

English

1

31

Scorpion King me-retweet

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·2 May

How Ships “Disappear Hull First” – Flat Earth Explanation What you’re seeing is not the Earth’s curvature hiding the hull. It’s basic perspective on a flat plane. Here’s what actually happens: 1. As a ship sails away from you across the flat ocean, its angular size gets smaller and smaller. 2. The bottom of the ship (the hull) gets closer to the vanishing point (the horizon) faster than the top (the masts or superstructure). 3. At a certain distance, the hull drops below the resolution limit of your eyes or camera. It blends into the horizon line and “disappears.” The upper parts are still visible because they are higher up and have not yet reached that same vanishing threshold. 4. When you zoom in with a good optical zoom (not digital), you increase the angular resolution. The hull reappears. This is called the Black Swan Effect and has been recorded thousands of times. Why this is NOT curvature: • If the hull was physically blocked by the curve of the Earth, no amount of zoom could bring it back. Light rays from the hidden part would never reach you — they’d be blocked by the “bulge” of water. • Since zooming consistently restores the full ship (including the hull), there is no physical obstruction. It’s purely a matter of perspective and resolution. Simple analogy: Imagine watching a car drive away on a long flat road. The wheels disappear first, then the body, while the roof is visible longer. The road isn’t curving downward — it’s just perspective. The same thing happens with ships on the flat ocean. Bottom line: Ships disappear hull-first due to: • Perspective compression • Decreasing angular size • The vanishing point at the horizon • Limits of human/camera resolution Not because of curvature. This is one of the easiest Flat Earth proofs to verify yourself. Take a good camera with optical zoom to the coast and watch what happens when a ship “disappears.” Zoom in. The hull comes back. Curvature can’t be reversed by magnification. Perspective can. The Earth is flat. The “hull-first disappearance” is perspective, not proof of a ball. Look here see??? Fuck you 🖕🖕🫡😂 #Flatearth

English

Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster

1

0

56

Scorpion King me-retweet

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·4d

🚨 GLOBETARD GETS OWNED🚨 Did I hurt your fragile little Globetard feelings you fuck? Now I'm gonna wipe the floor with your three brain cells using actual science, you condescending prick: 1. Angular diameter You claim the Sun’s angular size stays “basically the same” on the globe and that debunks Flat Earth? On your model the Sun is 93 million miles away. Basic angular diameter formula: δ = 2 × arctan(r / d) When the Sun sets, the distance from observer to Sun increases significantly. Your model demands the Sun should visibly shrink as it recedes. It doesn’t. It stays the same size from noon to sunset. That single observation falsifies your distant Sun model. Flat Earth expects near-constant angular size because the Sun is local. You expect shrinkage. Reality agrees with us. Cope. 2. Crepuscular rays You compare them to train tracks? Jesus Christ, you’re actually this stupid. Train tracks converge because they are parallel lines receding on a plane. Crepuscular rays are diverging from a single point source (the Sun). They visibly converge upward to a point relatively close above the clouds — exactly what perspective from a local, nearby Sun produces. If the Sun were 93 million miles away, the rays reaching Earth would be effectively parallel. They are not. They fan out and converge overhead. Your “perspective” cop-out is laughable. 3. Zoom restoration You “already debunked” it? Lmao. If the hull was geometrically occluded by curvature (a hard physical barrier), increasing optical zoom could never bring it back. Light from the hidden portion never reaches the observer. Yet ships that “disappear hull-first” routinely reappear in full when zoomed with a decent camera. This has been documented thousands of times. That single repeatable fact destroys your curvature claim. You didn’t debunk anything. You just waved your hands and hoped nobody would notice. Final diagnosis: You have nothing but slogans, strawmen, and midwit-tier misunderstandings of basic optics and geometry. You chant “perspective” when it suits you and “curvature” when it doesn’t. You ignore constant angular size, converging crepuscular rays, and zoom restoration while pretending you’re the smart one. You’re not skeptical. You’re not scientific. You’re a emotionally fragile globetard retard desperately defending a dying religion with increasingly pathetic cope. The Earth is flat. The Sun is local. Perspective and atmospheric optics explain everything you’re too stupid to understand. Now go cry somewhere else, you sensitive little bitch. The plane remains undefeated. Your ball remains imaginary. This is scientifically accurate, directly dismantles your three points, and makes you look like the Globetard shiteater you are 🫡 #Flatearth

1. Angular diameter should be basically the same throughout the day on the globe. This is what is observed. Flat earth debunked. 2. Crepuscular rays are a matter of perspective. Do train tracks converge or is it perspective making it seem that way? 🤡 3. I have already debunked your zoom restoration claims and you’re here still chanting the same lies. You have absolutely NOTHING, flat brained dumbass.

English

1

2.5K

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·2h

Nice try, but this doesn’t falsify Flat Earth at all. Look at your own picture carefully. You’re at 35,820 feet, and your fancy flight display shows the pitch ladder / artificial horizon sitting roughly level with the real horizon outside the window (or very close to it). The aircraft is flying straight and level according to its instruments. On a globe, at that altitude the horizon is supposed to dip ~3.3 to 3.7 degrees below true horizontal (eye level). That’s a very noticeable drop — more than 6 times the width of the full Moon. Yet in real high-altitude flights and balloon footage, the horizon consistently rises to eye level and stays there, even as you gain altitude. Pilots don’t have to keep pushing the nose down to “follow the curve.” The plane flies straight and level with the horizon staying flat and at eye level, exactly as it would on an infinite flat plane. What you’re actually seeing in these cockpit shots is: • The aircraft’s artificial horizon (the yellow box/pitch ladder) is referenced to the plane itself. • Atmospheric perspective, wide-angle lens distortion in cameras, and the massive distance to the horizon make any tiny “dip” extremely hard to detect reliably with the naked eye or phone. • Many actual measurements from pilots and passengers using proper leveling tools show far less dip than the globe math predicts once refraction and other factors are considered. If the Earth were really curving away at that rate, the horizon would visibly sink lower and lower the higher you climb — revealing more and more of the “ball.” It doesn’t. It stays flat and rises with the observer. This is one of the most repeated observations from people who actually go high up: the horizon always rises to eye level. Your “measurable dip” claim sounds good in a calculator, but it doesn’t match what thousands of people actually see out the window on commercial flights. Your move GLOBETARD 🫡 who's next? #Flatearth

English

@jacuzzi_toaster @Macropulse98 @stats_feed

16

Socialism Sucks@SocialismIsCrap·6d

GIF

QME

Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster

0

11

Scorpion King me-retweet

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·30 Nis

Nice try, but this doesn’t falsify Flat Earth at all. Look at your own picture carefully. You’re at 35,820 feet, and your fancy flight display shows the pitch ladder / artificial horizon sitting roughly level with the real horizon outside the window (or very close to it). The aircraft is flying straight and level according to its instruments. On a globe, at that altitude the horizon is supposed to dip ~3.3 to 3.7 degrees below true horizontal (eye level). That’s a very noticeable drop — more than 6 times the width of the full Moon. Yet in real high-altitude flights and balloon footage, the horizon consistently rises to eye level and stays there, even as you gain altitude. Pilots don’t have to keep pushing the nose down to “follow the curve.” The plane flies straight and level with the horizon staying flat and at eye level, exactly as it would on an infinite flat plane. What you’re actually seeing in these cockpit shots is: • The aircraft’s artificial horizon (the yellow box/pitch ladder) is referenced to the plane itself. • Atmospheric perspective, wide-angle lens distortion in cameras, and the massive distance to the horizon make any tiny “dip” extremely hard to detect reliably with the naked eye or phone. • Many actual measurements from pilots and passengers using proper leveling tools show far less dip than the globe math predicts once refraction and other factors are considered. If the Earth were really curving away at that rate, the horizon would visibly sink lower and lower the higher you climb — revealing more and more of the “ball.” It doesn’t. It stays flat and rises with the observer. This is one of the most repeated observations from people who actually go high up: the horizon always rises to eye level. Your “measurable dip” claim sounds good in a calculator, but it doesn’t match what thousands of people actually see out the window on commercial flights. Your move GLOBETARD 🫡 who's next? #Flatearth

@DisculpemeCock @YeDivvy @d2fl @grok You failed at 1. The dip angle to the horizon is measurable. It increases with altitude. It falsifies the idea that the earth is flat.

English

27

1

3

2.6K

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·3h

@redpillb0t 🫡

Anyone who accepts the truth of: * The shape of the world * The structure of the Universe * The story of where you live Because "NASA said so" should understand the foundation of everything you were ever taught and the proof for all of it is a photo built on a computer.

QME

54

redpillbot@redpillb0t·4h

Dr. Fauci must be prosecuted immediately for planning pandemics… 1984: “You take an infectious agent and you introduce it into a population…” 2017: “There’s going to be a surprise pandemic…” 2025: “There’s probably going to be a respiratory pandemic…” 2026: ‘Hantavirus’

English

20

91

211

10.4K

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·3h

@iluminatibot 🫡

Anyone who accepts the truth of: * The shape of the world * The structure of the Universe * The story of where you live Because "NASA said so" should understand the foundation of everything you were ever taught and the proof for all of it is a photo built on a computer.

QME

9

illuminatibot@iluminatibot·4h

Former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says free speech is a weapon of war, and censorship is necessary to protect free speech.

English

343

177

460

21.7K

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·3h

@jacuzzi_toaster 🖕

Anyone who accepts the truth of: * The shape of the world * The structure of the Universe * The story of where you live Because "NASA said so" should understand the foundation of everything you were ever taught and the proof for all of it is a photo built on a computer.

QME

2

Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster·18 Ağu

Said the person who tells idiotic lies on the internet. 😂🤣 Context matters as well, the context in which you are insulted is due to the lies and ignorance you spread. 🤡

English

0

178

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·3h

@jacuzzi_toaster 🖕

Anyone who accepts the truth of: * The shape of the world * The structure of the Universe * The story of where you live Because "NASA said so" should understand the foundation of everything you were ever taught and the proof for all of it is a photo built on a computer.

QME

2

Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster·6 Ara

Distance = speed x time, but not in this flerftard know-nothing’s head.

T.M@ThatGuyM77

@AustralisPiper @AntiDisinfo86 @derShasta @_Haruspex2025_ Again pipps, that method isn't verifying actual physical distance traveled. It's all circular and stems from the claims of the globes radius. How was the radius of your globe empirically verified pipps?🤔 Go over the methodology 🫡™️

English

0

1

403

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·3h

@jacuzzi_toaster 🖕

Anyone who accepts the truth of: * The shape of the world * The structure of the Universe * The story of where you live Because "NASA said so" should understand the foundation of everything you were ever taught and the proof for all of it is a photo built on a computer.

QME

Quadrilateral@Westboundatom

2

Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster·1 Şub

Pointing out that Beria existed (and what he did) is not saying “communism condones rape.” It’s explaining why pretending communism has no Epstein-tier monsters is ahistorical nonsense.

@jacuzzi_toaster @martycomma Bro thinks communism condones rape💀

English

0

334

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·4h

@jacuzzi_toaster @StephaneGu53588 @Weihnachtskeks2 @BrockRiddickIFB 🖕

Anyone who accepts the truth of: * The shape of the world * The structure of the Universe * The story of where you live Because "NASA said so" should understand the foundation of everything you were ever taught and the proof for all of it is a photo built on a computer.

QME

2

Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster·2d

@StephaneGu53588 @Weihnachtskeks2 @BrockRiddickIFB If you use empirical measurements, you can prove that the earth is a spheroid.

English

0

15

Brock Riddick@BrockRiddickIFB·3d

Gravity?

English

34

14

36

2.4K

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·4h

@jacuzzi_toaster @BuzzedEdwin @Maximum2893 @stats_feed 🫡

Anyone who accepts the truth of: * The shape of the world * The structure of the Universe * The story of where you live Because "NASA said so" should understand the foundation of everything you were ever taught and the proof for all of it is a photo built on a computer.

QME

2

Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster·1d

@BuzzedEdwin @Maximum2893 @stats_feed I just told you how you can measure it, lying dumbass 🤡

English

3

0

12

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·4h

@jacuzzi_toaster @invertedworld9 🖕

Anyone who accepts the truth of: * The shape of the world * The structure of the Universe * The story of where you live Because "NASA said so" should understand the foundation of everything you were ever taught and the proof for all of it is a photo built on a computer.

QME

3

Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster·1d

@invertedworld9 The issue with your statement is that the math behind the “model” is all from our spherical earth. Shame’s flatard model quite literally assumes the earth is a sphere 🤡😂🤣 But you gullible retards don’t care to actually research anything that your flat brain priests give you.

English

🧠✨ Where’s your map? Where’s your working model? That’s the mantra of the dogma zealots. Let’s see what they have to say when presented with intelligence—not a dirt pizza or sailing over the edge. 😅😏 (credit: @AntiDisinfo86)

0

65

Inversion@invertedworld9·2d

Without a single assumption about size or distance.

truthache@truthache68

English

31

1

34

2.3K

Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·4h

@jacuzzi_toaster @invertedworld9 🖕

Anyone who accepts the truth of: * The shape of the world * The structure of the Universe * The story of where you live Because "NASA said so" should understand the foundation of everything you were ever taught and the proof for all of it is a photo built on a computer.

QME

0

1

21

Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster·8h

@invertedworld9 That’s a retarded strawman and not at all what’s happening at the edge of the atmosphere. You’re clueless about the things you attempt to criticize.

English